Newhotness Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 So, Greenland Republic asked for help and you activated your MADP with PC (who attacked TPF) to attack TPF AND SSSW18? Wow. That's convoluted even for Planet Bob.Funny, I always thought that the MADP was only effective against, you know, the alliance your treaty partner is hitting, which would be TPF in this instance. Always interesting the leaps some alliances will take to get involved in a war. o/bogus CBs Bogus CBs are what CN is all about. Get over it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flyin Hawaiian Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 So, Greenland Republic asked for help and you activated your MADP with PC (who attacked TPF) to attack TPF AND SSSW18? Wow. That's convoluted even for Planet Bob.Funny, I always thought that the MADP was only effective against, you know, the alliance your treaty partner is hitting, which would be TPF in this instance. Always interesting the leaps some alliances will take to get involved in a war. o/bogus CBs Don't get mad get glad. If you ask nicely, I'll try my patented psychological warfare on you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riddermark Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 lmao on aiunurs response Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbrownso Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Don't get mad get glad. If you ask nicely, I'll try my patented psychological warfare on you. I'm not mad. I'm just amazed at the hypocrisy of Karma. As for those fine upstanding folks at RAD: Bogus CBs are part of what this war is about. Maybe you need to look at what your side is spouting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flyin Hawaiian Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 I'm not mad. I'm just amazed at the hypocrisy of Karma. As for those fine upstanding folks at RAD: Bogus CBs are part of what this war is about. Maybe you need to look at what your side is spouting. The game is called Cyber "Hypocrisy" Nations for a reason you know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tamerlane Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Ride forth on the wings of war and leave none standing! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JWConner Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 (edited) Definitely a pathetic DoW. Going after an alliance who's not even going in with TPF, but instead is activating a treaty with NPO. Truly sad how some people will make up a CB to enter a war. Truly sad. Poor show DT. Edited April 23, 2009 by JWConner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flyin Hawaiian Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Definitely a pathetic DoW. Going after an alliance who's not even going in with TPF, but instead is activating a treaty with NPO.Truly sad how some people will make up a CB to enter a war. Truly sad. Poor show DT. If you ask nicely, I'll try my patented psychological warfare on you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JWConner Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 If you ask nicely, I'll try my patented psychological warfare on you. Well your pretend powers are about as valid as your pretend CB...so sure, try it out on me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rabonnobar Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Bogus CBs are what CN is all about. Get over it Oh really? That totally goes against your coalition's philosophy. Seriously guys... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Medraut Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 o/ Dark Templar You guys are awesome and you can always count on LSR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattski133 Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 I have intense bloating on my nation could you relieve the pressure. good luck guys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbrownso Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 If you ask nicely, I'll try my patented psychological warfare on you. Dude, I managed to get a guy to first strike nuke me because I drove him insane. Don't mock the psychological warfare. You'll end up with a mailbox full of things that will make you want to tear your hair and eyes out. Kinda like how I feel when I try to understand DT's CB against SSSW18. The lack of logic is such, that my head hurts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maksim Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Get 'er done, DT. o/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AuiNur Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 FYI, DT has a MDoAP with GR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Icheliebebrad Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 THIS JUST IN! DT and PC have a MADP. Stop complaining. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grahamkeatley Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Wait... Didnt PC use YOUR treaty to attack TPF? So if you werent fighting already, how did PC declare with a valid reason? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baden-Württemberg Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Well your pretend powers are about as valid as your pretend CB...so sure, try it out on me. The FS war has shown they are beast. So don't be worried. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earogema Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 So, Greenland Republic asked for help and you activated your MADP with PC (who attacked TPF) to attack TPF AND SSSW18? Wow. That's convoluted even for Planet Bob.Funny, I always thought that the MADP was only effective against, you know, the alliance your treaty partner is hitting, which would be TPF in this instance. Always interesting the leaps some alliances will take to get involved in a war. o/bogus CBs PC can request mutual aggression on another party. That's how ALL MADPs work. Seriously people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fant0m Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 GR asked DT to activate their MDoAP. DT then asked PC to activate our MDAP. I'm not seeing any problems here guys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricardo Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 hmm dissapointing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JWConner Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 PC can request mutual aggression on another party. That's how ALL MADPs work.Seriously people. Did staying up til (OOC)update(/OOC) fry some of your brains or something? True, PC has an MADP with GR. But how does that come to SSSW18? SSSW18 DoW'd on MOON from their treaty with NPO. SSSW18 isn't activating any treaty with TPF. They just happen to be allies. Like it has been said, it's pathetic how people will manufacture reasons for war. Just pathetic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbrownso Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 PC can request mutual aggression on another party. That's how ALL MADPs work.Seriously people. Like TPF. That's the other party it applies to. So PC attacks TPF. The "A" means that DT can join in PC's aggressive war, which is against TPF. Conversely, if TPF attacked PC, then DT could attack the attacker in a defensive war. I've never seen an example of someone using a MADP to attack a completely uninvolved party. If there is a example of your stance, please feel free to bring it to my attention MegaArgos. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earogema Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 (edited) Did staying up til (OOC)update(/OOC) fry some of your brains or something? True, PC has an MADP with GR. But how does that come to SSSW18?SSSW18 DoW'd on MOON from their treaty with NPO. SSSW18 isn't activating any treaty with TPF. They just happen to be allies. Like it has been said, it's pathetic how people will manufacture reasons for war. Just pathetic. Because PC can request aggression on whoever they want. Besides, you didn't yell about preemptive strikes in the last war. What is even more pathetic is how people are trying to make out different conflicts. No. There are two obvious sides. We all know it. To complain at this point is foolishness. Hell, I KNOW for a fact that SSSW18 was coordinating battle plans with TPF. There you go. Bam. Easy CB. Edited April 23, 2009 by MegaAros Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earogema Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Like TPF. That's the other party it applies to. So PC attacks TPF. The "A" means that DT can join in PC's aggressive war, which is against TPF. Conversely, if TPF attacked PC, then DT could attack the attacker in a defensive war. I've never seen an example of someone using a MADP to attack a completely uninvolved party. If there is a example of your stance, please feel free to bring it to my attention MegaArgos. Rok vs. OcUK. Done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.