Disman Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 Even though CNTE is supposed to be the agressive version of CN, I find that there are still too many people who care too much about their 'precious infrastructure' and instead of going wild with war they merely sit there saving and complaining when they get attacked. Because of this I feel that CNTE is still fairly tame. Sure there are a lot more alliance vs. alliance wars and a lot more agression in general, but I still feel like things could be much more interesting. My suggestion is that each round of the tournament have a specific theme. This could include anything such as: - No requirements what-so-ever for nukes other than the 100k to buy them (or even cheaper?). - No alliances allowed, forcing everyone to be in "none". This would mean no organised protection and more chaos. - Different amounts of cash for nations to start with, or even randomised amounts for each nation. - Being allowed to decom tanks and soldiers at any time. Lols would be had. - Reducing the cost of soldiers and tanks to zero - Raising the cap for all losses and spoils of war - Allowing every nation to choose one wonder for free in their first day of the round. - Allow nations to purchase an improvement every 100 people instead of every 1000 people. - No limit on how many offensive and/or defensive wars you can have at one time - Only allowing someone to have one nation per round. People would be less agressive, but I'd have a lot of fun knocking people out If each round were to have one or even two of these themes implemented, then things would be more interesting and more enjoyable in my opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Believland Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 This sounds so fun Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lehran Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 - Allowing every nation to choose one wonder for free in their first day of the round. Well I like this bit... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strykewolf Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 My suggestion is that each round of the tournament have a specific theme. This could include anything such as:- No requirements what-so-ever for nukes other than the 100k to buy them (or even cheaper?). Naaaaa...who needs nukes? - No alliances allowed, forcing everyone to be in "none". This would mean no organised protection and more chaos. Wouldn't work, folks would just coordinate via pm and while there would be more chaos...organised protection would continue. - Different amounts of cash for nations to start with, or even randomised amounts for each nation. interesting idea, but...no more than a 250k fluctuation either way - Being allowed to decom tanks and soldiers at any time. Lols would be had. hmmm...maybe, though having 3 days wars versus 7 would help more, methinks - Reducing the cost of soldiers and tanks to zero. and triple upkeep - Raising the cap for all losses and spoils of war. Naaaa, makes sense at this time as it is - Allowing every nation to choose one wonder for free in their first day of the round. that would be interesting - Allow nations to purchase an improvement every 100 people instead of every 1000 people. too low, maybe around 500 would work - No limit on how many offensive and/or defensive wars you can have at one time. While it would be worth the bragging rights of "I took on 100 all at once!" Not very practical - Only allowing someone to have one nation per round. People would be less agressive, but I'd have a lot of fun knocking people out interesting, though I think a lot of folks won't reroll. Yeah, I did last round 3 times. But, was a pain in the butt getting everything set up trade-wise again. Thus I don't plan to this time, or in the future. If each round were to have one or even two of these themes implemented, then things would be more interesting and more enjoyable in my opinion. Hmmmm... Heh. -Mongol Hordes. 100 or so nations with aggressive ai pop up and attack everybody Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Salovsky Posted December 15, 2008 Report Share Posted December 15, 2008 Even though CNTE is supposed to be the agressive version of CN, I find that there are still too many people who care too much about their 'precious infrastructure' and instead of going wild with war they merely sit there saving and complaining when they get attacked. Because of this I feel that CNTE is still fairly tame. Sure there are a lot more alliance vs. alliance wars and a lot more agression in general, but I still feel like things could be much more interesting.My suggestion is that each round of the tournament have a specific theme. This could include anything such as: - No requirements what-so-ever for nukes other than the 100k to buy them (or even cheaper?). - No alliances allowed, forcing everyone to be in "none". This would mean no organised protection and more chaos. - Different amounts of cash for nations to start with, or even randomised amounts for each nation. - Being allowed to decom tanks and soldiers at any time. Lols would be had. - Reducing the cost of soldiers and tanks to zero - Raising the cap for all losses and spoils of war - Allowing every nation to choose one wonder for free in their first day of the round. - Allow nations to purchase an improvement every 100 people instead of every 1000 people. - No limit on how many offensive and/or defensive wars you can have at one time - Only allowing someone to have one nation per round. People would be less agressive, but I'd have a lot of fun knocking people out If each round were to have one or even two of these themes implemented, then things would be more interesting and more enjoyable in my opinion. other than the bold, I think this idea rocks... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Salovsky Posted December 15, 2008 Report Share Posted December 15, 2008 Hmmmm... Heh.-Mongol Hordes. 100 or so nations with aggressive ai pop up and attack everybody i disagree about the alliance thing... his idea makes it better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bomberboy Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 Even though CNTE is supposed to be the agressive version of CN, I find that there are still too many people who care too much about their 'precious infrastructure' and instead of going wild with war they merely sit there saving and complaining when they get attacked. Because of this I feel that CNTE is still fairly tame. Sure there are a lot more alliance vs. alliance wars and a lot more agression in general, but I still feel like things could be much more interesting.My suggestion is that each round of the tournament have a specific theme. This could include anything such as: - No requirements what-so-ever for nukes other than the 100k to buy them (or even cheaper?).I agree Nukes are very expensive and there are too many requirements for them - No alliances allowed, forcing everyone to be in "none". This would mean no organised protection and more chaos. No. Alliances take ages to set up to then say you can't have one is bad for those who set them up and run them. - Different amounts of cash for nations to start with, or even randomised amounts for each nation. I think it shouldn't be any less than 1mil like it is now. - Being allowed to decom tanks and soldiers at any time. Lols would be had. Could work - Reducing the cost of soldiers and tanks to zero. What about the upkeep to zero 'cause they just add more to your bills! - Raising the cap for all losses and spoils of war? - Allowing every nation to choose one wonder for free in their first day of the round. Best Idea! - Allow nations to purchase an improvement every 100 people instead of every 1000 people. Another Great Idea! - No limit on how many offensive and/or defensive wars you can have at one time But if your in anarchy you just get pounded even harder! - Only allowing someone to have one nation per round. People would be less agressive, but I'd have a lot of fun knocking people out Not really because if your destroyed completely you can't start over. If each round were to have one or even two of these themes implemented, then things would be more interesting and more enjoyable in my opinion. My responses are in bold Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disman Posted December 24, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 24, 2008 It would appear that many of you arent thinking about these ideas enough. - No requirements what-so-ever for nukes other than the 100k to buy them (or even cheaper?). Naaaaa...who needs nukes? If this were to happen, there would be hundreds of nukes flying around by day 3. The best part about this idea is that it would make it very difficult just to get to the #1 spot. People could no longer just collect taxes and never fight in a war to be one of the top nations. - No alliances allowed, forcing everyone to be in "none". This would mean no organised protection and more chaos. Wouldn't work, folks would just coordinate via pm and while there would be more chaos...organised protection would continue. Yes, people could stil communicate through forums, but no one would be able to hide behind an alliance to avoid war. Normally, most people would avoid attacking a nation in a large alliance, but with this idea, nations would actuallybe given the freedom to attack whoever they want withouot the fear that a whole alliance will jump on them. It would be near impossible for an alliance to defend all its nations if people wern't scared of attacking each other. - No alliances allowed, forcing everyone to be in "none". This would mean no organised protection and more chaos. No. Alliances take ages to set up to then say you can't have one is bad for those who set them up and run them. Firstly, IT WOULD ONLY BE FOR 1 ROUND. I'm sure if someone is annoyed that they can't start an alliance that they will get over it. The only people who would be annoyed are the people who don't like not being able to avoid war and just pile on infra, in which case they deserve it because getting owned and owning others is what CN TE is about. - Different amounts of cash for nations to start with, or even randomised amounts for each nation. interesting idea, but...no more than a 250k fluctuation either way Actually, I was thinking along the lines of 500k - 2MIL. 1MIL - 1.5MIL could have an 80% chance, while 500k - 1MIL and 1.5MIL - 2MIL could each have a 10% chance. - Reducing the cost of soldiers and tanks to zero. What about the upkeep to zero 'cause they just add more to your bills! - Reducing the cost of soldiers and tanks to zero. and triple upkeep Both are also good ideas, but would be better if they were doubled up with another theme. - Raising the cap for all losses and spoils of war. Naaaa, makes sense at this time as it is I'm not suggesting this one because I think it's not already good as it is, but because it would be fun to be able to destroy more infra and gain more spoils for a round. - No limit on how many offensive and/or defensive wars you can have at one time. While it would be worth the bragging rights of "I took on 100 all at once!" Not very practical smile.gif - No limit on how many offensive and/or defensive wars you can have at one time But if your in anarchy you just get pounded even harder! Ok well after thinking about this one I decided it may not have been a great idea. BUT it could be with a few adjustments. - No limit to how many offencive wars you can have at one time AND no limit to how many deployments you can make in a day (or maybe make it 3 deployments in a day) - Only allowing someone to have one nation per round. People would be less agressive, but I'd have a lot of fun knocking people out tongue.gif interesting, though I think a lot of folks won't reroll. Yeah, I did last round 3 times. But, was a pain in the butt getting everything set up trade-wise again. Thus I don't plan to this time, or in the future.- Only allowing someone to have one nation per round. People would be less agressive, but I'd have a lot of fun knocking people out tongue.gif Not really because if your destroyed completely you can't start over. I reckon this is actually a good idea. And yes, the whole point is that you wouldn't be able to restart after getting completly destroyed! A lot of people just re-roll if their nation falls below 300 infra, due to the fact that you can easily get it back. This idea would make it interesting knocking people out of the game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chocolate Cookies Posted December 28, 2008 Report Share Posted December 28, 2008 Personally, I don't have much of a problem with these. They are only for 1 round, and seeing what would happen with 1 or 2 of these implemented during a round would be Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewPoseidon Posted January 5, 2009 Report Share Posted January 5, 2009 (edited) - No requirements what-so-ever for nukes other than the 100k to buy them (or even cheaper?). Maybe - No alliances allowed, forcing everyone to be in "none". This would mean no organised protection and more chaos. No way. How does one tell which alliance is winning a war if there's no way to analyze their numbers and strength? - Different amounts of cash for nations to start with, or even randomised amounts for each nation. Super dumb idea. Why should some start out with an advantage? Besides being unfair, loser would always say, "they must've started out w/more cash than me" - Being allowed to decom tanks and soldiers at any time. Lols would be had. Maybe 1 day delay instead of 2 - Reducing the cost of soldiers and tanks to zero Umm, no. - Raising the cap for all losses and spoils of war Maybe - Allowing every nation to choose one wonder for free in their first day of the round. That actually sounds like an awesome idea. Kinda a noob trap though, LOL! - Allow nations to purchase an improvement every 100 people instead of every 1000 people. a bit too much, maybe every 500 people. - No limit on how many offensive and/or defensive wars you can have at one time No limit? How would you like to fight 100 multis? 3 and 3 is good for me - Only allowing someone to have one nation per round. People would be less agressive, but I'd have a lot of fun knocking people out tongue.gif It's definitely a problem that the second ur nation goes below 1000 NS or so you can just delete and start over. Maybe a one week delay to restart would be less draconian than a full-round ban. Edited January 5, 2009 by NewPoseidon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seth Muscarella Posted January 5, 2009 Report Share Posted January 5, 2009 i think structure is something that keeps CN fun though. some of the ideas are good, but with a few of them, it would turn the game into a huge warzone that people would probably get frustrated with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.