Jump to content
  • Announcements

    • Sentinel

      Cyber Nations Forum Rules   07/03/2016

        Cyber Nations Forum Rules  
      In the process of registering on this forum, all players--including you--agreed to accept these terms and conditions and the terms and conditions of Invision Power Board. In doing so you essentially signed an electronic contract pledging to have read the rules and TOS and agreeing to follow the rules and TOS as written. It is your continued responsibility to read, follow, and keep up-to-date with the CN rules.
      The following are basic guidelines for use of the Cyber Nations community forum. Anyone caught disobeying these guidelines will be issued a warning. The forum staff works on a five warn limit policy unless the situation calls for more appropriate action ranging from a verbal warning to a double warn and suspension to an immediate ban, etc.   Just because something is not listed specifically here as illegal does not mean it's allowed. All players are expected to use common sense and are personally responsible for reading the pinned threads found in the Moderation forum. Questions regarding appropriateness or other concerns can be sent via PM to an appropriate moderator.   A permanent ban on the forums results in a game ban, and vice versa. Please note that the in-game warn system works on a "three strikes you're out" policy and that in-game actions (including warnings and deletions) may not be appealed. For more information regarding in-game rules please read the Cyber Nations Game Rules.   1.) First Warning
      2.) Second Warning
      3.) Third Warning (48 hour suspension at the forum)
      4.) Fourth Warning (120 hour suspension at the forum)
      5.) Permanent Ban   Game Bans and Forum Bans
      If you receive a 100% warn level on the forums, you will be subject to removal from the forums AND have your nation deleted and banned from the game at moderator(s) discretion.   If you are banned in the game, then you will be banned from the forums.   Process of Appeals
      Players may not appeal any in-game actions. This includes cheat flags, canceled trades, content removals, warn level increases, nation deletion, and bans from the game.   Players may appeal individual forum warnings. You may only appeal a warning if you can show with evidence that it was unwarranted or unduly harsh. If a reasonable amount of time has passed (no less than one month and preferably longer) in which you have demonstrated reformed behavior than you may request a warning level reduction. Wasting staff time with inappropriately filed reports and/or unfounded appeals will result in a warn level raise. Repeat incidences will result in a ban from the forum.   Bans are permanent. Banned players may appeal to the Senior Staff if they believe grounds exist (very, very rare) in which they state their case with evidence and why explain why they believe they deserve to be allowed back into Cyber Nations. This process is not quick and the investigation into cases may last three minutes or three weeks or more depending on the individual situation.   The only place where discussion of moderator action is acceptable is in the appropriate Moderation forum. Posting commentary on or disagreement with moderator action elsewhere will result in a warn level raise.   Posting
      All posts must be in English. Common phrases in other languages will be allowed so long as they are translated upon request. Foreign languages are permitted in signatures and avatars, however.   Certain areas of the forum require you to have a nation in either standard CN or CN:TE. If you have...   A SE and a TE nation: You get one forum account. Your forum account name must match your SE nation or ruler name. You are allowed to post in either SE or TE areas of the forum. You must have your CN:TE nation name listed in your profile to post in the CN:TE section of the forum.
      Just an SE nation: You get one forum account. Your forum account name must match your SE nation or ruler name. You are not allowed to post in any TE areas of the forum.
      Just a TE nation: You get one forum account. Your forum account name must match your TE nation name or ruler name. Your must have your CN:TE nation name listed correctly in your profile. You are not allowed to post in any of the SE areas. You are allowed to post in the water cooler, question center and the moderation forums. Other than that, all your posts need to stay in the TE area.   Flame/Flamebait/Trolling
      Flaming is expressing anger or lobbing insults at a person/player rather than a character, post, idea, etc. Flamebait are posts that are made with the aim of targeting/harassing/provoking another user into rule-breaking. Trolling is submitting posts with the aim of targeting/harassing/provoking a specific group into rule-breaking. Forum users should not be participating in any of these, and doing so will result in a warning.   Topic Hijacking
      Hijacking is forcing the current thread discussion off of the original topic and usually results in spam or flame from either side. Forum users found hijacking threads will be given a warning.   Repeat Topics
      One topic is enough. Repeat topics will be locked, removed, and the author given a warning. Users found creating repeat topics after others were locked by staff will receive a warn raise.   Joke Topics
      Topics created as a joke are prohibited. Joke topics will be locked and the author warned. This includes topics in which the author is making an announcement “for” another in-game alliance. Humorous threads are permitted; it is up to the discretion of the moderation staff to determine what is merely satire and what is actually a joke topic.   Spam
      Spam is defined as creating posts or topics containing only contentless material of any kind. Users found spamming will receive a warning. Examples include (but are in no way limited to) posts containing nothing but smilies, "+1", "QFT", "this" any other one/few-word contentless combination, joke threads, or posts containing quotes and anything that counts as spam by itself. Adding words to a post with the express intent of avoiding a spam warn will result in a warning. These posts and other similar contributions have no substance and hence are considered spam. Posts of "Ave", "Hail" or any other one word congratulatory type are acceptable as one word posts. Emoticon type posts such as "o/" without accompanying text is still not allowed. Posts containing only images are considered spam, unless the image is being used in the Alliance Politics sub-forum and then the actual text of the image be placed into spoiler tags.   Posting in All Caps
      Posting large amounts of text in capital letters is not permitted. Use discretion when using your caps lock key.   No Discussion Forums
      There are forums that are not for discussion and are used strictly for game and forum staff to address certain issues, bugs, etc. The following forums are not open to discussion: Report Game Abuse, Report Forum Abuse, and Warn/Ban Appeals. Only moderators and the original poster may post in a thread, period, with absolutely no exceptions. Users found disobeying this guideline will receive an automatic warning for each offense.   Moderation Forums
      All Moderation forums also maintain pinned threads clearly marked as required reading before posting. Failure to read and follow required reading and procedure in a Moderation forum will result in a warning. Examples include posting requests in the wrong forum, failure to include all required information in posts, etc. The standard of conduct and enforcement of rules in Moderation forums is strictly enforced and the repercussions for disregarding rules or disrespecting staff are harsh. Read the pinned threads before posting and you will be fine.   Namecalling
      Excessive or unqualified namecalling is not allowed in IC forums; namecalling should also never make up the bulk of a post. Namecalling is prohibited entirely in all OOC forums.   Filtered Words
      Any attempts to evade the word filter will result in a warning. The terms we have filtered are filtered for a reason and no excuse for evasion will be accepted. Filter evasion includes censoring or deliberately misspelling part of a filtered word.   If you link to a website, image, video, etc., containing profanity, please post a disclaimer before the link. The moderation staff may still remove links if the content is deemed too obscene.   Harassment
      Forum users should not be stalking/harassing others on the forums. Anyone found stalking players from topic to topic, etc., will be subject to a warning.   Gravedigging
      Gravedigging is not allowed anywhere on the forums. Gravedigging is "bumping" old topics which haven't been active for quite some time (four to seven days is standard depending on the nature of the thread and how many pages back it had been pushed before bump). Your warn level will be raised if you are caught doing this.   The Suggestion Box and Black Market forums are partial exceptions to this rule. Suggestions/ideas in that forum may be posted in regardless of age PROVIDING that the reviving post contains constructive, on-topic input to the original topic or discussion. Black Market threads may be bumped by the author if there is new information about the offered exchange (i.e open aid slots). In the Player Created Alliances forum it will not be considered gravedigging to bump a topic up to a year old, so long as the alliance in question still exists and it is not a duplicate thread.   Signatures
      Those who fail to read and abide by these rules will have their signatures removed and receive a warning.   You may have only one image per signature which may not exceed the maximum size of 450 pixels wide by 150 pixels tall. You may have no more than 8 lines of text and text size cannot exceed size 4. Each quote-tag, image and empty line count as a line.   Inappropriate Images and Other Disallowed Images
      Images that are sexual in nature or have sexual overtones are prohibited. It is up to the discretion of the moderation staff to determine what constitutes sexual overtones. Depictions of kissing are permissible provided there are no sexual implications. Images depicting female nipples are prohibited outright.   Making “ASCII art” is prohibited regardless of the image depicted.   Using photos or likenesses of another Cyber Nations player is also prohibited.   Drug References
      Images and posts promoting illegal drug use are prohibited. References to drugs are acceptable only if the moderation staff deems that it is not promoting the use thereof.   Obscene Content and/or "Account Suicide"
      Anyone caught posting vulgar material (including but in no way limited to pornography, "gross," "tubgirl," "lemonparty," photos depicting RL illegal acts such as violence towards humans or animals, child pornography, death photos, and any other obscene or offensive material in either text form or picture form) will have their account(s) permanently banned, and their ISP contacted along with any other applicable internet and RL authorities.   OOC Threats / Revealing Personal Information
      An OOC threat of any nature will equate to an automatic ban from the game and forums. Likewise, the publishing of personal information of any other player without their explicit permission is grounds for warning and/or a ban from the game depending on the severity of the offense.   Death Threats / Death Wishes
      A death threat or a death wish of any nature (including but not limited to telling another player to commit suicide) will result in at very least a 40% warn level increase and 2 day suspension from the forums, with harsher punishments, including a complete ban from the forums and game, up to the discretion of the moderation staff.   Quoting Rulebreaking Posts
      Do not quote any post with obscene content or any other content that has to be removed by the moderation staff. Doing so makes it more difficult for the moderation staff to find and remove all such content and will result in a warn level increase. Putting rulebreaking posts of any kind in your signature is prohibited.   Forum Names
      With the exception of moderator accounts, all forum accounts must match up exactly with the ruler name or nation name of your in-game country. Those found not matching up will be warned and banned immediately. Forum account names may not be profane or offensive.   Multiple Forum Accounts
      With the exception of moderators, if you are caught with multiple forum accounts, the multiple account(s) will be banned, warn level raised, and your identity will be announced by a moderator to the CN community so rule-abiding players can take IC action against you. Multiple forum account offenders will receive a varying percentage warn level raise and/or a permanent ban on a case-by-case basis.   Posting For Other Players
      Posting for banned or suspended players is prohibited, as is posting for any person without a nation. This includes making warn and ban appeals on their behalf.   Imitation &. Impersonation
      Imitation in terms of this forum is mimicking the posting, avatar, or signature styles of another user in an attempt to be satirical or generally humorous. Impersonation in terms of this forum is copying the posting, avatar, or signature styles of another user in order to present the illusion that the person is in fact that user. Imitation is fine and can be quite funny. Impersonation is disruptive and is warnable. Please pay attention to the subtle difference between these two concepts.   A player may not impersonate another player by emulating the characteristics of someone else's past or present account in an attempt to harass, stalk, or flamebait. Creating a new forum account in an attempt to impersonate a standing account will result in deletion and banning without notice.   Any attempt at imitation and/or impersonation of moderators and game staff is strictly prohibited and will be met with harsh repercussions.   Avatars
      Size for avatars is limited by the forum mechanics, therefore there is no size issue for a user to worry about. Avatars must be in good taste, and any avatar containing a picture that is too violent, disgusting, sexually explicit, insulting to another player or staff member, etc. will be removed. Avatars that are potentially seizure inducing will not be permitted. Players may not "borrow" the avatars of any moderator past or present without permission.   Swastikas and Nazi Imagery
      The swastika may not be used in signatures or avatars. Pictures of swastika's are acceptable for use in the In Character (IC) sections of the roleplay forums, so long as its context is In Character, and not Out Of Character. Pictures of Hitler, mentioning of the Holocaust, etc... have no place in the roleplay forums, since these people and events existed in real life, and have no bearing or place in the Cyberverse. Other Nazi or SS imagery is forbidden in all forums.   Moderation Staff
      The revealing of the private identities of any Cyber Nations staffers past or present is strictly prohibited, and thus no speculation/accusation of identity is allowed. Doing so is grounds for moderator action against your account appropriate to the offense, including a full forum/game ban.   Claims of moderator bias should be directed to the highest level of authority--the Head Game & Forum Mod/Admin, Keelah. Claims of moderator bias without supporting evidence is grounds for a warning.   Blatant disrespect of the moderator staff is strictly prohibited. This includes but is not limited to spoofing moderator accounts in any way, sig/avatar references, baiting, flaming, rude demands, mocking, attitude, and unsubstantiated claims of bias. They are volunteers hired to enforce the rules. If you have a problem with the way a moderator is enforcing the rules or the rules themselves please contact Keelah.   Attempting to use the moderation staff as a weapon by abusing the report system in an attempt to get another player warned or banned is strictly prohibited.   Do not ask about becoming or campaign to become a moderator. The moderators are drawn from CN membership but moderation positions are by invitation only. Asking to become one will substantially decrease your chances of ever being asked.   Aiding Rule Violators
      Any user found to know of a serious rule violation without reporting it to a game moderator (eg. knowledge of a user with multiple nations) will be given a warning or, in more serious cases, have their nation deleted.   Aiding Banned Players
      Any user found to be harboring, aiding or otherwise knowingly helping a banned user will be deleted. This includes knowing of their existence within the game without reporting it to the game-moderation staff.   Questionable Actions and Content
      The forum rules are not designed to cover every scenario. Any action that is seen to be counter-productive or harmful to the forum community may be met with moderator action against your account. The Cyber Nations Moderation Staff reserves the right to take action against your account without warning for any reason at any time.   Private Transactions
      Nation selling and other private transactions via such auction sites like eBay is against the Cyber Nations terms and conditions. While our moderators cannot control what people do outside of the game you are not allowed to promote such private exchanges on our forums without expressed permission from admin only. Anyone found to be engaging in such activity without permission will be banned from the game.   Advertising
      Advertising other browser games and forums is prohibited. Soliciting donations towards commercial causes is also prohibited. If you wish to ask for donations towards a charitable cause, please contact a moderator before doing so.   Extorting Donations
      Donations are excluded from any kind of IC payment. Anyone found extorting others for OOC payments will be warned in-game and/or banned.   Third Party Software
      Third party software is not allowed to be advertised on these forums by any means (post, signature, PM, etc). These programs can easily be used to put malware on the user's computer, and as such can cause huge security issues. Anybody who is caught spreading links to these will at the very least have their warning level increased.   Other Forum Terms & Rules   Please take a moment to review these rules detailed below. If you agree with them and wish to proceed with the registration, simply click the "Register" button below. To cancel this registration, simply hit the 'back' button on your browser.   Please remember that we are not responsible for any messages posted. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. USE THE WEB SITE AT YOUR OWN RISK. We will not be liable for any damages for any reason. THIS WEB SITE IS PROVIDED TO YOU "AS IS," WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.   The messages express the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of this bulletin board. Any user who feels that a posted message is objectionable is encouraged to contact us immediately by email. We have the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.   You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this bulletin board to post any material which is knowingly false and/or defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise violative of any law.   You agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or by this bulletin board.
Sign in to follow this  
HiredGun

We come in pieces

Recommended Posts

52 minutes ago, wasso said:

Congrats, thats like a fair play. GG to you and to all your hidden ghosts out there. 

 

Lmao what? Do you know what a "ghost" is? It's someone who you don't know, who sits on pending on your AA. Temps do not = ghosts. 

 

Second, are you claiming D1 has no temps off AA? I know for a fact you guys do. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Das Blitzkrieger said:

Ah, so if UN had a higher score earlier in the round, other alliances would have recruited nations to boost their score? That's the very tactic we executed last round—the one which is still being heavily criticized.

 

Thank you for your honesty, KingBilly.

Please don't try and misquote me. Had those nations been at UN all round then the rest of us could have focused on recruiting all round. Not recruit in the last week.

 

Your tactic was to bring in a lot of nations (too many to be real) TE hasn't seen recruitment like that for many years. I think you recruited more in 24 hours than all of CN has recruited this past year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, KingBilly1 said:

Please don't try and misquote me. Had those nations been at UN all round then the rest of us could have focused on recruiting all round. Not recruit in the last week.

 

Your tactic was to bring in a lot of nations (too many to be real) TE hasn't seen recruitment like that for many years. I think you recruited more in 24 hours than all of CN has recruited this past year.

I didn't misquote you. What's the difference between recruiting nations (for the sake of score) one week out, two weeks out, or a month out? In each case, an alliance is manipulating the score of their alliance. The problem, then, seems to be the number of nations we pulled in last round. I find it highly incredulous that D1 members, if they were *really* motivated, couldn't ask family and friends to create nations and join D1 at a similar rate as we did last round. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Bajoran Federation said:

 

That's a matter of interpretation. They had no autonomy at all. I do not, and never have, considered them seperate, whether or not they were in a different AA; just as I never considered The Raiders or LoG to be a seperate alliance. This was merely a strategy enacted so we were able to build them up adequately instead of bringing them on AA right away, which would've meant they'd be hit by IRS ops, nukes, etc. How can you seriously sit there and blame us for not being able to keep all of our members on AA without them being bullied and their round ruined? We did what we had to do, and what we had to do has literally nothing to do casualties, nor AA score.

 

Can everyone stop jumping to conclusions and let the round conclude? D1 will inevitably win strongest AA and the wolves will inevitably win most soldiers killed. 

 

 

We weren't trying to keep our stats low. I'm unsure what the point of keeping stats low would even be? The plan was for them to get back at D1, yes. That's obviously part of our feud and doesn't concern you. They were never here to boost stats, nor do we need them to. I don't think you realize how many temps we have off AA; we could easily call them all onto AA and set a score that no one can beat, but have we, or will we? Nope, because since day 7 of this round we haven't been trying to win a single award. 

 

 

They wont? Instead of making assumptions and jumping to conclusions, let the round conclude. There's still plenty of time left. 

 

 

You just contradicted yourself. How was rerolling to spite D1 in terms of casualties when the ones who rerolled where the ones who topped the casualty count? If they hadn't deleted, the UN would probably be winning the race for most soldiers killed. 

 

 

Lol, this was supposed to be a secret, but Bdrocks is one of the Dawners. You know him quite well by now, yeah?

 

He's been with us for rounds now, he's an economic officer and one of our low-gov (most likely will work his way up to gov shortly.) He's in this very thread. So, tell me, is he not a legitimate member? Should he be condemned to stay off AA just to satisfy you? 

 

And another thing, WD are currently allowed access to our Discord server. They know exactly who the Dawners are. They've been coordinating with every single one of them. So, before you make a bunch of idiotic assumptions, you should really vet the situation fully. It's impossible to lie about who they are when they're coordinating with a foreign AA in our server. 

 

 

Such bs. You've said several times all round you're going to continue your vandetta indefinitely. But you're most certainly right, we do have a grudge. Did you expect to nuke us on day 7, hit us with IRS ops, blockades, hit and blockade unbuilt nations then build up to 4k+ Infra, and send threatening messages to our rerolled nations who you were able to idenetify, and we would just shake hands and go seperate ways? 

 

What does reality look like to you?

 

 

A very terrible analogy. None of our members left for a new alliance. They were told to stay off AA while they beelined WRCs; in no way is that "leaving for another alliance." 

 

If you don't like our strategy of keeping members in a temporary, non-legitimate AA, then try to actually let our players have a chance to build without your psychotic leader hunting them down. 

 

Wow just so many lies right here.

 

First, if they hadn't re-rolled D1 would be leading the race for most kills. After our first 2 wars the UN had just over 1.5 mill kills while D1 had just over 5 mill. Lol

 

Now provide proof that I said I'd continue this vendetta indefinitely then provide proof that I had sent these threatening messages to your re-rolls. I never spoke to your re-rolls once. This is your desperation kicking in again. 

 

No one here is complaining about Bdrocks, he has been on the UN since the start so he is not a good example to use. 

 

If you're not chasing any flags then why did you have the Dawners merge? Why are your flag runners spending their cash very conservatively? 

 

Nothing you say adds up because none of it is true. 

Edited by HiredGun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, HiredGun said:

First, if they hadn't re-rolled D1 would be leading the race for most kills. After our first 2 wars the UN had just over 1.5 mill kills while D1 had just over 5 mill. Lol

 

Are you forgetting that we fought one more war than you have?

 

53 minutes ago, HiredGun said:

Now provide proof that I said I'd continue this vendetta indefinitely

 

Go read your own messages in the TE server. 

 

54 minutes ago, HiredGun said:

provide proof that I had sent these threatening messages to your re-rolls. I never spoke to your re-rolls once. This is your desperation kicking in again. 

 

I never claimed you personally messaged anyone. However, cowboy has messaged our rerolls with threatening messages. Would you like a screenshot? (you've already seen the screenshot, btw). 

 

55 minutes ago, HiredGun said:

No one here is complaining about Bdrocks, he has been on the UN since the start so he is not a good example to use. 

 

No he hasn't, you idiot. That's my entire point; Bd was one of the Dawners. 

 

56 minutes ago, HiredGun said:

If you're not chasing any flags then why did you have the Dawners merge? Why are your flag runners spending their cash very conservatively? 

 

Why wouldn't we? They're fully built, have WRCs and got declared on by D1. The only reason we had them off AA in the first place was to prepare for this war. And who's talking about individual flags? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Bajoran Federation said:

 

Are you forgetting that we fought one more war than you have?

 

 

Go read your own messages in the TE server. 

 

 

I never claimed you personally messaged anyone. However, cowboy has messaged our rerolls with threatening messages. Would you like a screenshot? (you've already seen the screenshot, btw). 

 

 

No he hasn't, you idiot. That's my entire point; Bd was one of the Dawners. 

 

 

Why wouldn't we? They're fully built, have WRCs and got declared on by D1. The only reason we had them off AA in the first place was to prepare for this war. And who's talking about individual flags? 

Fighting in one more war doesn't mean anything when you only earned just over 1.5 mill kills in your first two wars. If most of your alliance at the time didn't delete then you'd be sitting on about 11 mill kills while we'd be sitting on about 15 mill right now.

 

Show me using discord where I said I wanted war indefinitely? You needed a very harsh lesson for what you did last round, D1 and WotN were the only alliances to step up and fight to protect our community rules, there were no excuses, we knew what was at stake and punished your underhanded tactics in the hopes you wouldn't do it again, clearly this didn't work though and the main reason for that is because not everyone wanted to risk UN/rogue retaliation. I don't understand that though when you have two of the most active and experienced alliances that'd make any retaliation very difficult for the UN.

 

Cowboy gave one or two of your rerolls the opportunity to leave the UN and start a fresh, I'd call that mercy. Why all of a sudden does the UN want to mass train newbies when in previous rounds, your numbers were consistently between 18 and 20. You knew a severe community response was coming so the only reason you'd bring in a lot of newbies this round is as meat shields and to justify the stat padding. I called it early that rather than bring all these new nations in at the end, you'd simply create them throughout the round and bring them into the alliance when you need to increase your score, if anyone opposed it you'd say they've always been members.

 

Bdrocks was a member of the UN then he re-rolled changing his name to North Korea and he rejoined the UN, not The Dawners. The truth is he has recruited almost all of these very suspicious nations that no one knows or has heard of. Are they genuine people from other gaming realms, we can only hope so and how did you convince 5 newbies to re-roll just to suicide into D1? You claim you have more temp traders outside the UN  and I bet another 100 on standby right. It's to the point where it's extremely unlikely that you're recruiting real people especially when we saw over around 35 get recruited in a single day last round.

 

There have been many shady patterns that I have never seen before in the 7 years I've been playing even when TE was much larger around when I started, alliances struggled to recruit the numbers you've been pulling in these last 2 rounds.

 

And you never needed The Dawners to be off your alliance to prepare for this war, they could've prepared in any alliance including the UN, it was risky for them to be off the UN alliance because if we hadn't declared on them were they going to jump us? That'd have ended badly for them and worst for you so all in all, this is all a very poor excuse.

 

10 hours ago, Das Blitzkrieger said:

I didn't misquote you. What's the difference between recruiting nations (for the sake of score) one week out, two weeks out, or a month out? In each case, an alliance is manipulating the score of their alliance. The problem, then, seems to be the number of nations we pulled in last round. I find it highly incredulous that D1 members, if they were *really* motivated, couldn't ask family and friends to create nations and join D1 at a similar rate as we did last round. 

But why the mass recruitment these past 2 rounds? If you could've done it legally, you would've done it a long time ago. Everything you're doing looks suspicious, if it's too good to be true it probably is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, HiredGun said:

Fighting in one more war doesn't mean anything when you only earned just over 1.5 mill kills in your first two wars. If most of your alliance at the time didn't delete then you'd be sitting on about 11 mill kills while we'd be sitting on about 15 mill right now.

 

So next time, don't nuke newbies on day 7 and they won't have to reroll. And please stop lying for once, you lost about 2m kills from the rerolls, no more. 

 

48 minutes ago, HiredGun said:

Show me using discord where I said I wanted war indefinitely?

 

My bad, you never said indefinitely, you actually gave a time frame lmao: https://imgur.com/k0a7TNC

 

There are many other examples too, but I don't feel like digging through 1000s of messages of you crying. 

 

48 minutes ago, HiredGun said:

Cowboy gave one or two of your rerolls the opportunity to leave the UN and start a fresh, I'd call that mercy

 

He tried to force one of our new players to join RE, and then when our newbie didn't comply, cowboy messaged him threatening him. Is that mercy? 

 

48 minutes ago, HiredGun said:

Bdrocks was a member of the UN then he re-rolled changing his name to North Korea and he rejoined the UN, not The Dawners

 

Lol, look at you trying to tell me who my members are. North Korea is not Bdrocks, it's NikolaP. Anyone in the Wolves' server knows this. You're clueless, HG; Bdrocks was one of the Dawners. 

 

48 minutes ago, HiredGun said:

as meat shields and to justify the stat padding

 

One of those "meatshields" has the most destructive war with you, and he's winning. 

 

And if stat padding is considered allowing members who have been with you all round and have fought with you all round, one of whom is low-gov, to join the AA, then I guess that's what we're doing. 

 

It's quite clear you're continuing to attempt to manipulate the other AAs into forming a coalition, and it's both transparent and idiotic. 

 

48 minutes ago, HiredGun said:

And you never needed The Dawners to be off your alliance to prepare for this war

 

Keeping them off AA allowed for a few things: it allowed them to build in peace instead of being at constant war, it allowed them to not be hit with IRS ops by some psychotic dude named HiredGun, and it allowed us to be flexible in when they were deployed into war. 

 

But I'm done debating something so foolish. The simple fact is this: the Dawners are UN members. They've been here all round, and one of them is low-gov and has been with us for rounds now. They fought in both of our wars against D1 earlier this round, and are now fighting in our current war with D1.

 

Furthermore, they'll be back with the UN next round, and will continue to fight with their alliance. 

 

If anyone has a problem with us deciding to allow our members to  come to their AA, I simply couldn't care less; that demonstrates a level of idiocy that far surpasses logic or reason, and one could only hope that this colossal idiocy is reserved for only HG. 

Edited by Bajoran Federation

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Bajoran Federation said:

 

Quote

So next time, don't nuke newbies on day 7 and they won't have to reroll. And please stop lying for once, you lost about 2m kills from the rerolls, no more. 

Then don't use these underhanded tactics of mass reciting new nations to pad stats and deny the alliances that are far more deserving of this award. We had about 5.5 mill kills after our two wars, then after the mass deletions we were left with about 1.5 mill kills, I was keeping tab, clearly you were not. :)

 

Quote

 

My bad, you never said indefinitely, you actually gave a time frame lmao: https://imgur.com/k0a7TNC


 

I think you need to learn the difference between indefinitely and conventional TE warfare. Also that was in response to similar provocations.

 

Quote

There are many other examples too, but I don't feel like digging through 1000s of messages of you crying. 

We could both do that but I am the same, I also don't want to dig through 1000's of messages of you crying but we both know you would seeing as you've done it before. lol

 

Quote

 

He tried to force one of our new players to join RE, and then when our newbie didn't comply, cowboy messaged him threatening him. Is that mercy? 


 

Where is the message? If anyone knows Cowboy, his intent is not malicious but he likes to stir the pot but only in good fun, anyone that knows him, knows that and there are a lot of people here who know him.

 

Quote

Lol, look at you trying to tell me who my members are. North Korea is not Bdrocks, it's NikolaP. Anyone in the Wolves' server knows this. You're clueless, HG; Bdrocks was one of the Dawners. 

  4oah35X.png

 w6vzeX0.png

Given the rank # is there and the figures matched North Korea, how does this make me clueless? If this was not BD then I was mislead.

 

3 minutes ago, Bajoran Federation said:

 

Quote

 

One of those "meatshields" has the most destructive war with you, and he's winning. 


 

Tbh, that's not saying much.

Quote

 

And if stat padding is considered allowing members who have been with you all round and have fought with you all round, one of whom is low-gov, to join the AA, then I guess that's what we're doing. 


 

I'm sure we'll see more of the same soon.

 

Quote

 

It's quite clear you're continuing to attempt to manipulate the other AAs into forming a coalition, and it's both transparent and idiotic. 


 

This is what you want everyone else to believe so no one else takes part. This problem will only end when at least majority of the community take a stand militarily, we saw that the diplomatic appraoch had no effect, it fell on admins deaf ears so imo the only solution is with a good ole fashion beat down.  "Step out of line again and prepare to get rolled again!" This method has been proven time again to be the most effective and usually the only method that works.

 

3 minutes ago, Bajoran Federation said:
Quote

Keeping them off AA allowed for a few things: it allowed them to build in peace instead of being at constant war, it allowed them to not be hit with IRS ops by some psychotic dude named HiredGun, and it allowed us to be flexible in when they were deployed into war. 


But they would never have been at constant war in the UN for the simple fact that you never were, you knew we weren't going to stagger, I said we were done and moving forward unless you used the same underhanded tactics again and you have, you're going to be defending these tactics and in turn fighting for them for as long as you use them, that I can assure you of. As for the name calling, you sound more psychotic than I do, it's very obvious how much hatred you have for me. :)

Quote

 

But I'm done debating something so foolish. The simple fact is this: the Dawners are UN members. They've been here all round, and one of them is low-gov and has been with us for rounds now. They fought in both of our wars against D1 earlier this round, and are now fighting in our current war with D1.

 

Furthermore, they'll be back with the UN next round, and will continue to fight with their alliance. 

 

If anyone has a problem with us deciding to allow our members to  come to their AA, I simply couldn't care less; that demonstrates a level of idiocy that far surpasses logic or reason, and one could only hope that this colossal idiocy is reserved for only HG. 

 

It's not just the Dawners though,  you've bought in on averaged an extra member every week for discreteness and not to bring too much attention at once. But keep trying to weasel your way out of this.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is up with your post? Did you mess up the simple task that is quoting lol? 

 

I've said all I needed to say. 

 

And yes, you were mislead. Go cry about it, I guess? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Bajoran Federation said:

What is up with your post? Did you mess up the simple task that is quoting lol? 

 

I've said all I needed to say. 

 

And yes, you were mislead. Go cry about it, I guess? 

It sounds more like Bd has more than one nation and you didn't know that was all said on discord. lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, HiredGun said:

It sounds more like Bd has more than one nation and you didn't know that was all said on discord. lol

No Bajor know's exactly what you are talking about. You were intentionally mislead. I am UN low gov and was in The Dawners as a reroll. Wolves know who Trump(NorthKorea) is, it's Nikola. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is out of topic now but Bdrocks is Lebronjames. 

 

Anyway, that's not the case.. 

Edited by wasso
keyboard

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

×