Jump to content
  • Announcements

    • Sentinel

      Cyber Nations Forum Rules   07/03/2016

        Cyber Nations Forum Rules  
      In the process of registering on this forum, all players--including you--agreed to accept these terms and conditions and the terms and conditions of Invision Power Board. In doing so you essentially signed an electronic contract pledging to have read the rules and TOS and agreeing to follow the rules and TOS as written. It is your continued responsibility to read, follow, and keep up-to-date with the CN rules.
      The following are basic guidelines for use of the Cyber Nations community forum. Anyone caught disobeying these guidelines will be issued a warning. The forum staff works on a five warn limit policy unless the situation calls for more appropriate action ranging from a verbal warning to a double warn and suspension to an immediate ban, etc.   Just because something is not listed specifically here as illegal does not mean it's allowed. All players are expected to use common sense and are personally responsible for reading the pinned threads found in the Moderation forum. Questions regarding appropriateness or other concerns can be sent via PM to an appropriate moderator.   A permanent ban on the forums results in a game ban, and vice versa. Please note that the in-game warn system works on a "three strikes you're out" policy and that in-game actions (including warnings and deletions) may not be appealed. For more information regarding in-game rules please read the Cyber Nations Game Rules.   1.) First Warning
      2.) Second Warning
      3.) Third Warning (48 hour suspension at the forum)
      4.) Fourth Warning (120 hour suspension at the forum)
      5.) Permanent Ban   Game Bans and Forum Bans
      If you receive a 100% warn level on the forums, you will be subject to removal from the forums AND have your nation deleted and banned from the game at moderator(s) discretion.   If you are banned in the game, then you will be banned from the forums.   Process of Appeals
      Players may not appeal any in-game actions. This includes cheat flags, canceled trades, content removals, warn level increases, nation deletion, and bans from the game.   Players may appeal individual forum warnings. You may only appeal a warning if you can show with evidence that it was unwarranted or unduly harsh. If a reasonable amount of time has passed (no less than one month and preferably longer) in which you have demonstrated reformed behavior than you may request a warning level reduction. Wasting staff time with inappropriately filed reports and/or unfounded appeals will result in a warn level raise. Repeat incidences will result in a ban from the forum.   Bans are permanent. Banned players may appeal to the Senior Staff if they believe grounds exist (very, very rare) in which they state their case with evidence and why explain why they believe they deserve to be allowed back into Cyber Nations. This process is not quick and the investigation into cases may last three minutes or three weeks or more depending on the individual situation.   The only place where discussion of moderator action is acceptable is in the appropriate Moderation forum. Posting commentary on or disagreement with moderator action elsewhere will result in a warn level raise.   Posting
      All posts must be in English. Common phrases in other languages will be allowed so long as they are translated upon request. Foreign languages are permitted in signatures and avatars, however.   Certain areas of the forum require you to have a nation in either standard CN or CN:TE. If you have...   A SE and a TE nation: You get one forum account. Your forum account name must match your SE nation or ruler name. You are allowed to post in either SE or TE areas of the forum. You must have your CN:TE nation name listed in your profile to post in the CN:TE section of the forum.
      Just an SE nation: You get one forum account. Your forum account name must match your SE nation or ruler name. You are not allowed to post in any TE areas of the forum.
      Just a TE nation: You get one forum account. Your forum account name must match your TE nation name or ruler name. Your must have your CN:TE nation name listed correctly in your profile. You are not allowed to post in any of the SE areas. You are allowed to post in the water cooler, question center and the moderation forums. Other than that, all your posts need to stay in the TE area.   Flame/Flamebait/Trolling
      Flaming is expressing anger or lobbing insults at a person/player rather than a character, post, idea, etc. Flamebait are posts that are made with the aim of targeting/harassing/provoking another user into rule-breaking. Trolling is submitting posts with the aim of targeting/harassing/provoking a specific group into rule-breaking. Forum users should not be participating in any of these, and doing so will result in a warning.   Topic Hijacking
      Hijacking is forcing the current thread discussion off of the original topic and usually results in spam or flame from either side. Forum users found hijacking threads will be given a warning.   Repeat Topics
      One topic is enough. Repeat topics will be locked, removed, and the author given a warning. Users found creating repeat topics after others were locked by staff will receive a warn raise.   Joke Topics
      Topics created as a joke are prohibited. Joke topics will be locked and the author warned. This includes topics in which the author is making an announcement “for” another in-game alliance. Humorous threads are permitted; it is up to the discretion of the moderation staff to determine what is merely satire and what is actually a joke topic.   Spam
      Spam is defined as creating posts or topics containing only contentless material of any kind. Users found spamming will receive a warning. Examples include (but are in no way limited to) posts containing nothing but smilies, "+1", "QFT", "this" any other one/few-word contentless combination, joke threads, or posts containing quotes and anything that counts as spam by itself. Adding words to a post with the express intent of avoiding a spam warn will result in a warning. These posts and other similar contributions have no substance and hence are considered spam. Posts of "Ave", "Hail" or any other one word congratulatory type are acceptable as one word posts. Emoticon type posts such as "o/" without accompanying text is still not allowed. Posts containing only images are considered spam, unless the image is being used in the Alliance Politics sub-forum and then the actual text of the image be placed into spoiler tags.   Posting in All Caps
      Posting large amounts of text in capital letters is not permitted. Use discretion when using your caps lock key.   No Discussion Forums
      There are forums that are not for discussion and are used strictly for game and forum staff to address certain issues, bugs, etc. The following forums are not open to discussion: Report Game Abuse, Report Forum Abuse, and Warn/Ban Appeals. Only moderators and the original poster may post in a thread, period, with absolutely no exceptions. Users found disobeying this guideline will receive an automatic warning for each offense.   Moderation Forums
      All Moderation forums also maintain pinned threads clearly marked as required reading before posting. Failure to read and follow required reading and procedure in a Moderation forum will result in a warning. Examples include posting requests in the wrong forum, failure to include all required information in posts, etc. The standard of conduct and enforcement of rules in Moderation forums is strictly enforced and the repercussions for disregarding rules or disrespecting staff are harsh. Read the pinned threads before posting and you will be fine.   Namecalling
      Excessive or unqualified namecalling is not allowed in IC forums; namecalling should also never make up the bulk of a post. Namecalling is prohibited entirely in all OOC forums.   Filtered Words
      Any attempts to evade the word filter will result in a warning. The terms we have filtered are filtered for a reason and no excuse for evasion will be accepted. Filter evasion includes censoring or deliberately misspelling part of a filtered word.   If you link to a website, image, video, etc., containing profanity, please post a disclaimer before the link. The moderation staff may still remove links if the content is deemed too obscene.   Harassment
      Forum users should not be stalking/harassing others on the forums. Anyone found stalking players from topic to topic, etc., will be subject to a warning.   Gravedigging
      Gravedigging is not allowed anywhere on the forums. Gravedigging is "bumping" old topics which haven't been active for quite some time (four to seven days is standard depending on the nature of the thread and how many pages back it had been pushed before bump). Your warn level will be raised if you are caught doing this.   The Suggestion Box and Black Market forums are partial exceptions to this rule. Suggestions/ideas in that forum may be posted in regardless of age PROVIDING that the reviving post contains constructive, on-topic input to the original topic or discussion. Black Market threads may be bumped by the author if there is new information about the offered exchange (i.e open aid slots). In the Player Created Alliances forum it will not be considered gravedigging to bump a topic up to a year old, so long as the alliance in question still exists and it is not a duplicate thread.   Signatures
      Those who fail to read and abide by these rules will have their signatures removed and receive a warning.   You may have only one image per signature which may not exceed the maximum size of 450 pixels wide by 150 pixels tall. You may have no more than 8 lines of text and text size cannot exceed size 4. Each quote-tag, image and empty line count as a line.   Inappropriate Images and Other Disallowed Images
      Images that are sexual in nature or have sexual overtones are prohibited. It is up to the discretion of the moderation staff to determine what constitutes sexual overtones. Depictions of kissing are permissible provided there are no sexual implications. Images depicting female nipples are prohibited outright.   Making “ASCII art” is prohibited regardless of the image depicted.   Using photos or likenesses of another Cyber Nations player is also prohibited.   Drug References
      Images and posts promoting illegal drug use are prohibited. References to drugs are acceptable only if the moderation staff deems that it is not promoting the use thereof.   Obscene Content and/or "Account Suicide"
      Anyone caught posting vulgar material (including but in no way limited to pornography, "gross," "tubgirl," "lemonparty," photos depicting RL illegal acts such as violence towards humans or animals, child pornography, death photos, and any other obscene or offensive material in either text form or picture form) will have their account(s) permanently banned, and their ISP contacted along with any other applicable internet and RL authorities.   OOC Threats / Revealing Personal Information
      An OOC threat of any nature will equate to an automatic ban from the game and forums. Likewise, the publishing of personal information of any other player without their explicit permission is grounds for warning and/or a ban from the game depending on the severity of the offense.   Death Threats / Death Wishes
      A death threat or a death wish of any nature (including but not limited to telling another player to commit suicide) will result in at very least a 40% warn level increase and 2 day suspension from the forums, with harsher punishments, including a complete ban from the forums and game, up to the discretion of the moderation staff.   Quoting Rulebreaking Posts
      Do not quote any post with obscene content or any other content that has to be removed by the moderation staff. Doing so makes it more difficult for the moderation staff to find and remove all such content and will result in a warn level increase. Putting rulebreaking posts of any kind in your signature is prohibited.   Forum Names
      With the exception of moderator accounts, all forum accounts must match up exactly with the ruler name or nation name of your in-game country. Those found not matching up will be warned and banned immediately. Forum account names may not be profane or offensive.   Multiple Forum Accounts
      With the exception of moderators, if you are caught with multiple forum accounts, the multiple account(s) will be banned, warn level raised, and your identity will be announced by a moderator to the CN community so rule-abiding players can take IC action against you. Multiple forum account offenders will receive a varying percentage warn level raise and/or a permanent ban on a case-by-case basis.   Posting For Other Players
      Posting for banned or suspended players is prohibited, as is posting for any person without a nation. This includes making warn and ban appeals on their behalf.   Imitation &. Impersonation
      Imitation in terms of this forum is mimicking the posting, avatar, or signature styles of another user in an attempt to be satirical or generally humorous. Impersonation in terms of this forum is copying the posting, avatar, or signature styles of another user in order to present the illusion that the person is in fact that user. Imitation is fine and can be quite funny. Impersonation is disruptive and is warnable. Please pay attention to the subtle difference between these two concepts.   A player may not impersonate another player by emulating the characteristics of someone else's past or present account in an attempt to harass, stalk, or flamebait. Creating a new forum account in an attempt to impersonate a standing account will result in deletion and banning without notice.   Any attempt at imitation and/or impersonation of moderators and game staff is strictly prohibited and will be met with harsh repercussions.   Avatars
      Size for avatars is limited by the forum mechanics, therefore there is no size issue for a user to worry about. Avatars must be in good taste, and any avatar containing a picture that is too violent, disgusting, sexually explicit, insulting to another player or staff member, etc. will be removed. Avatars that are potentially seizure inducing will not be permitted. Players may not "borrow" the avatars of any moderator past or present without permission.   Swastikas and Nazi Imagery
      The swastika may not be used in signatures or avatars. Pictures of swastika's are acceptable for use in the In Character (IC) sections of the roleplay forums, so long as its context is In Character, and not Out Of Character. Pictures of Hitler, mentioning of the Holocaust, etc... have no place in the roleplay forums, since these people and events existed in real life, and have no bearing or place in the Cyberverse. Other Nazi or SS imagery is forbidden in all forums.   Moderation Staff
      The revealing of the private identities of any Cyber Nations staffers past or present is strictly prohibited, and thus no speculation/accusation of identity is allowed. Doing so is grounds for moderator action against your account appropriate to the offense, including a full forum/game ban.   Claims of moderator bias should be directed to the highest level of authority--the Head Game & Forum Mod/Admin, Keelah. Claims of moderator bias without supporting evidence is grounds for a warning.   Blatant disrespect of the moderator staff is strictly prohibited. This includes but is not limited to spoofing moderator accounts in any way, sig/avatar references, baiting, flaming, rude demands, mocking, attitude, and unsubstantiated claims of bias. They are volunteers hired to enforce the rules. If you have a problem with the way a moderator is enforcing the rules or the rules themselves please contact Keelah.   Attempting to use the moderation staff as a weapon by abusing the report system in an attempt to get another player warned or banned is strictly prohibited.   Do not ask about becoming or campaign to become a moderator. The moderators are drawn from CN membership but moderation positions are by invitation only. Asking to become one will substantially decrease your chances of ever being asked.   Aiding Rule Violators
      Any user found to know of a serious rule violation without reporting it to a game moderator (eg. knowledge of a user with multiple nations) will be given a warning or, in more serious cases, have their nation deleted.   Aiding Banned Players
      Any user found to be harboring, aiding or otherwise knowingly helping a banned user will be deleted. This includes knowing of their existence within the game without reporting it to the game-moderation staff.   Questionable Actions and Content
      The forum rules are not designed to cover every scenario. Any action that is seen to be counter-productive or harmful to the forum community may be met with moderator action against your account. The Cyber Nations Moderation Staff reserves the right to take action against your account without warning for any reason at any time.   Private Transactions
      Nation selling and other private transactions via such auction sites like eBay is against the Cyber Nations terms and conditions. While our moderators cannot control what people do outside of the game you are not allowed to promote such private exchanges on our forums without expressed permission from admin only. Anyone found to be engaging in such activity without permission will be banned from the game.   Advertising
      Advertising other browser games and forums is prohibited. Soliciting donations towards commercial causes is also prohibited. If you wish to ask for donations towards a charitable cause, please contact a moderator before doing so.   Extorting Donations
      Donations are excluded from any kind of IC payment. Anyone found extorting others for OOC payments will be warned in-game and/or banned.   Third Party Software
      Third party software is not allowed to be advertised on these forums by any means (post, signature, PM, etc). These programs can easily be used to put malware on the user's computer, and as such can cause huge security issues. Anybody who is caught spreading links to these will at the very least have their warning level increased.   Other Forum Terms & Rules   Please take a moment to review these rules detailed below. If you agree with them and wish to proceed with the registration, simply click the "Register" button below. To cancel this registration, simply hit the 'back' button on your browser.   Please remember that we are not responsible for any messages posted. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. USE THE WEB SITE AT YOUR OWN RISK. We will not be liable for any damages for any reason. THIS WEB SITE IS PROVIDED TO YOU "AS IS," WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.   The messages express the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of this bulletin board. Any user who feels that a posted message is objectionable is encouraged to contact us immediately by email. We have the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.   You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this bulletin board to post any material which is knowingly false and/or defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise violative of any law.   You agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or by this bulletin board.

Recommended Posts

The United Nations declares war on the Wolves of the North, New League of Nations and Roman Empire.
 
We are aware of RE's "declaration" on IRON, but we planned on this war before, and, since we understand this as a practical joke, we're going to carry forward hitting WoTN, and the top tiers of RE and NLoN.
 
Good luck and have fun!
Edited by Bajoran Federation
Oops

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shall we counter?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Brewersalliance said:

You say NLoN in the title and IRON in the body. Who are you hitting?

 

Typo lmao. WotN, RE and NLoN

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Bajoran Federation said:
The United Nations declares war on the Wolves of the North, New League of Nations and Roman Empire.
 
We are aware of RE's "declaration" on IRON, but we planned on this war before, and, since we understand this as a practical joke, we're going to carry forward hitting WoTN, and the top tiers of RE and NLoN.
 
Good luck and have fun!

 

 

That's a pretty BS move, it was not a 'practical joke', we had full intentions for a one-round casualty pad as or war chests allow us to pop back up.

 

Regardless of what you planned prior, doesn't still make it 'okay' given the circumstances. Targeting our top teir after we declared war is a rediculous.

 

Remember this Bajoran, because we won't forget.

Edited by Lord Hitchcock

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, Lord Hitchcock said:

That's a pretty BS move, it was not a 'practical joke', we had full intentions for a one-round casualty pad as or war chests allow us to pop back up.

 

Regardless of what you planned prior, doesn't still make it 'okay' given the circumstances. Targeting our top teir after we declared war is a rediculous.

 

Remember this Bajoran, because we won't forget.

 

Why did you declare at 8:11pm? A very odd time, no? 

 

8:11pm happens to be 7 minutes after I posted the war announcement in-game. 

 

Coincidence? 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not fair to anyone to add NLoN with anyone when everyone knows they don't coordinate with the other alliances. Why do you think we never added them in our war against NDO, OP and WD. This war should've been the long anticipated IRON vs UN but your greed for most kills was of highest priority here.

 

1 hour ago, Bajoran Federation said:

 

Why did you declare at 8:11pm? A very odd time, no? 

 

8:11pm happens to be 7 minutes after I posted the war announcement in-game. 

 

Coincidence?

Alliances declare a little earlier all the time in case anyone else had plans so you've hit an alliance already at war.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, HiredGun said:

 

It's not fair to anyone to add NLoN with anyone when everyone knows they don't coordinate with the other alliances. Why do you think we never added them in our war against NDO, OP and WD. This war should've been the long anticipated IRON vs UN but your greed for most kills was of highest priority here

 

 

41 minutes ago, HiredGun said:

Alliances declare a little earlier all the time in case anyone else had plans so you've hit an alliance already at war.

 

giphy.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Bajoran Federation said:

 

Why did you declare at 8:11pm? A very odd time, no? 

 

8:11pm happens to be 7 minutes after I posted the war announcement in-game. 

 

Coincidence? 

 

 

 

Yes.

 

Your in-game war announcement was posted 12hrs after our approved war on RON.

 

Coincidence?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now you want peace after attacking us unprovoked because you got hit...funk that reap what you sowed...:lol1:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Stonewall14 said:

Now you want peace after attacking us unprovoked because you got hit...funk that reap what you sowed...:lol1:

 

I don't think you're up to date...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Bajoran Federation said:

 

I don't think you're up to date...

I'm very much up to date and you guys blitz us then say my bad we got hit by IRON peace us out...:P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Stonewall14 said:

I'm very much up to date and you guys blitz us then say my bad we got hit by IRON peace us out...:P

 

Yeah... Definitely not up to date lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesn't matter Bajoran, I'd prefer it this way anyway. Down the road we will get you back 10 times worse than your piddle-paddle attempt to cherry pick our top teir. This sort of thing has happened many times before and we're still here, and our enemies are not.

 

Edited by Lord Hitchcock

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 20/10/2017 at 1:02 AM, Lord Hitchcock said:

 

 

That's a pretty BS move, it was not a 'practical joke', we had full intentions for a one-round casualty pad as or war chests allow us to pop back up.

 

Regardless of what you planned prior, doesn't still make it 'okay' given the circumstances. Targeting our top teir after we declared war is a rediculous.

 

Remember this Bajoran, because we won't forget.

 

1 round causality pad? gtfo with your insignificant petty mean nothing wars.

what war chest? u are lucky to have 50 mil.

 

had we done what everyone wanted and hit IRON 1v1 I can see it now. "UN and RE down declare on IRON"

 

1 nation rouging 4 IRON nations with the inability to do f all. we've already seen the rouge actions from RE so far this round.

 

You are puny. And I am definitely still here kicking your ass.  do you remember raiding citadel/skaulin and going dirty rather than xp huntingonly? because I never forget.

 

or perhaps you can humor me in telling me which of your enemies have deserted b3cauae of your greatness?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 20/10/2017 at 3:08 AM, HiredGun said:

It's not fair to anyone to add NLoN with anyone when everyone knows they don't coordinate with the other alliances. Why do you think we never added them in our war against NDO, OP and WD. This war should've been the long anticipated IRON vs UN but your greed for most kills was of highest priority here.

 

Alliances declare a little earlier all the time in case anyone else had plans so you've hit an alliance already at war.

NLON have been coordinating with IRON so I hear. it's not like RE have been coordinating with us either. guess they are the meat in the sandwich 😀

 

IRON alone could not match us. especially if we wanted to hurt them as das has so eloquently pointed out in another thread.

 

greed would have seen us either declare on all. or continue to fight all and not peace wolves. they then wouldn't be able to give u this next war.

 

we definitely had it in us too. regardless of your nonsensical assumptions.

 

As to hitting AAs already at war. well that shoe fits more than us. but your hypocrisy is blinding you.

 

on another note. why is it that you are happy to wage war after war without being that successful? is it because you can rebuild and keep going again in pursuit of soldiers killed? 

we know it is. and AAs fighting strategically for AA honours should be applauded not condemned.

 

I salute you for giving it a go. now we just need to get IRON and wolves playing the same game.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, StevieG said:

NLON have been coordinating with IRON so I hear. it's not like RE have been coordinating with us either. guess they are the meat in the sandwich 😀

 

IRON alone could not match us. especially if we wanted to hurt them as das has so eloquently pointed out in another thread.

 

greed would have seen us either declare on all. or continue to fight all and not peace wolves. they then wouldn't be able to give u this next war.

 

we definitely had it in us too. regardless of your nonsensical assumptions.

 

As to hitting AAs already at war. well that shoe fits more than us. but your hypocrisy is blinding you.

 

on another note. why is it that you are happy to wage war after war without being that successful? is it because you can rebuild and keep going again in pursuit of soldiers killed? 

we know it is. and AAs fighting strategically for AA honours should be applauded not condemned.

 

I salute you for giving it a go. now we just need to get IRON and wolves playing the same game.

 

 

I don't classify a win a win if the opponent goes all out and they struggle to bounce back to pre-war levels cos the loser prioritized their post war rebuild yet had more cash than the winner to win it if they also wanted to go all out, this is basic strategy used in many sports. TE has never been a sprint race, it's always been a marathon race that most will never win on merit and we've always considered the "Most Alliance Kills' the pinnacle flag that everyone should strive to win so we've never condemned it, only pointed out and criticized those who'll pretend they're not maneuvering to win it.

 

When was the last time we hit an alliance at war and when was the last time the UN did? Then explain the reasons for both wars.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/25/2017 at 2:03 AM, StevieG said:

 

1 round causality pad? gtfo with your insignificant petty mean nothing wars.

what war chest? u are lucky to have 50 mil.

 

had we done what everyone wanted and hit IRON 1v1 I can see it now. "UN and RE down declare on IRON"

 

1 nation rouging 4 IRON nations with the inability to do f all. we've already seen the rouge actions from RE so far this round.

 

You are puny. And I am definitely still here kicking your ass.  do you remember raiding citadel/skaulin and going dirty rather than xp huntingonly? because I never forget.

 

or perhaps you can humor me in telling me which of your enemies have deserted b3cauae of your greatness?

 

 

oh good gawd... you cannot sit here and tell the world how you take a 24 karat gold piss every morning (real gold) when you wrap yourself in a bubble for the first 2 months while everyone else is fighting.

 

You are not a warrior of greatness, you are a sniffling math geek who goes into a war bullet proof because of your lack first round contribution. Any moron can  sit in a large alliance with a different name every round and buy up level one plays the first 60 days.

 

buckstopsherefrontsmall.jpg

 

and me...

 

giphy.gif

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/25/2017 at 11:44 PM, HiredGun said:

I don't classify a win a win if the opponent goes all out and they struggle to bounce back to pre-war levels cos the loser prioritized their post war rebuild yet had more cash than the winner to win it if they also wanted to go all out, this is basic strategy used in many sports. TE has never been a sprint race, it's always been a marathon race that most will never win on merit and we've always considered the "Most Alliance Kills' the pinnacle flag that everyone should strive to win so we've never condemned it, only pointed out and criticized those who'll pretend they're not maneuvering to win it.

 

When was the last time we hit an alliance at war and when was the last time the UN did? Then explain the reasons for both wars.

 

You dont classify a win, a win. And what I said was "without being that successful" then you go on to explain why you werent that successful, just as I said you had no problem simply rebuilding to high enough anyways.

 

Nobody is pretending nothing. You come out with funny accusations and we are saying whats wrong? You are also going for it as should all other aspiring AAs.

 

I do not care to dig into the past, but you obviously missed the point that IRON hit UN after engagement. Whereas RE engaged IRON in 4 wars, and we did not even hit any single nation at war I believe, as we didnt hit that rouge. Never mind this silly accusation of hitting AAs at war when it is within an hour os so of declare, and everyone seemed to be wanting us to what? hit IRON, which also would have been hitting an AA at war.

 

Stop being so petty. These are irrelevant issues to even be wasting my time replying to.

 

The real issues are changing up the awards, far more regularly and not including stupid ones.

 

On 10/27/2017 at 2:53 AM, Lord Hitchcock said:

 

 

oh good gawd... you cannot sit here and tell the world how you take a 24 karat gold piss every morning (real gold) when you wrap yourself in a bubble for the first 2 months while everyone else is fighting.

 

You are not a warrior of greatness, you are a sniffling math geek who goes into a war bullet proof because of your lack first round contribution. Any moron can  sit in a large alliance with a different name every round and buy up level one plays the first 60 days.

 

It is all about balance. Naturally a long back collect decreases the rate at which you can militarize your nation, so you can get off to a slow start sometimes. It is definitely not 2 months before some serious fighting can happen as you seem to think though. And I have had my fair share of early action thanks. Spent plenty of rounds in small AAs too, so yo dont know what you are talking about.

 

You clearly want to forget my day 15 MP though.

 

What is it with this planes thing? Like do you want to also criticize those who dont buy planes at all?

Or are you just criticizing me for not buying tech back up to 500 after each nuke and buying max air in some early wars?

 

Are you serious?

 

Here let me use none other than the man who gets to day 81 with no MP. How much does that take away from your AA soldiers killed total? He does have some words of advice for you though.



TE has never been a sprint race, it's always been a marathon race

prioritized their post war rebuild yet had more cash

to win it if they also wanted to go all out, this is basic strategy used in many sports

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, StevieG said:

 

You dont classify a win, a win. And what I said was "without being that successful" then you go on to explain why you werent that successful, just as I said you had no problem simply rebuilding to high enough anyways.

 

Nobody is pretending nothing. You come out with funny accusations and we are saying whats wrong? You are also going for it as should all other aspiring AAs.

 

I do not care to dig into the past, but you obviously missed the point that IRON hit UN after engagement. Whereas RE engaged IRON in 4 wars, and we did not even hit any single nation at war I believe, as we didnt hit that rouge. Never mind this silly accusation of hitting AAs at war when it is within an hour os so of declare, and everyone seemed to be wanting us to what? hit IRON, which also would have been hitting an AA at war.

 

Stop being so petty. These are irrelevant issues to even be wasting my time replying to.

 

The real issues are changing up the awards, far more regularly and not including stupid ones.

 

It is all about balance. Naturally a long back collect decreases the rate at which you can militarize your nation, so you can get off to a slow start sometimes. It is definitely not 2 months before some serious fighting can happen as you seem to think though. And I have had my fair share of early action thanks. Spent plenty of rounds in small AAs too, so yo dont know what you are talking about.

 

You clearly want to forget my day 15 MP though.

 

What is it with this planes thing? Like do you want to also criticize those who dont buy planes at all?

Or are you just criticizing me for not buying tech back up to 500 after each nuke and buying max air in some early wars?

 

Are you serious?

 

Here let me use none other than the man who gets to day 81 with no MP. How much does that take away from your AA soldiers killed total? He does have some words of advice for you though.

 

 

 

You are such a sniffling weasel. That 24k gold you pretend to piss is nothing more than not drinking enough water. No one cares about you; as you spend your early rounds as a god forsaken mute or at worse your early rounds kicking-and-screaming.

 

Now run along, your grandmother relevancy as been noted and your impact resembles that of a single pube hair on a camel.

 

Your chest beating sickens the likes of the greats in this realm, like my beloved cowboy, wile coyote and our lord and savior Ningkeptune, hell, even hiredgun has a healthy non-parasitic contribution to the growth of our world.

 

Edited by Lord Hitchcock

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, StevieG said:

 

You dont classify a win, a win. And what I said was "without being that successful" then you go on to explain why you werent that successful, just as I said you had no problem simply rebuilding to high enough anyways.

 

Nobody is pretending nothing. You come out with funny accusations and we are saying whats wrong? You are also going for it as should all other aspiring AAs.

 

I do not care to dig into the past, but you obviously missed the point that IRON hit UN after engagement. Whereas RE engaged IRON in 4 wars, and we did not even hit any single nation at war I believe, as we didnt hit that rouge. Never mind this silly accusation of hitting AAs at war when it is within an hour os so of declare, and everyone seemed to be wanting us to what? hit IRON, which also would have been hitting an AA at war.

 

Stop being so petty. These are irrelevant issues to even be wasting my time replying to.

 

The real issues are changing up the awards, far more regularly and not including stupid ones.

 

It is all about balance. Naturally a long back collect decreases the rate at which you can militarize your nation, so you can get off to a slow start sometimes. It is definitely not 2 months before some serious fighting can happen as you seem to think though. And I have had my fair share of early action thanks. Spent plenty of rounds in small AAs too, so yo dont know what you are talking about.

 

You clearly want to forget my day 15 MP though.

 

What is it with this planes thing? Like do you want to also criticize those who dont buy planes at all?

Or are you just criticizing me for not buying tech back up to 500 after each nuke and buying max air in some early wars?

 

Are you serious?

 

Here let me use none other than the man who gets to day 81 with no MP. How much does that take away from your AA soldiers killed total? He does have some words of advice for you though.

Accusing D1 of attacking an alliance while at war to take the spotlight off the very thing you've just committed is pathetic and desperate. IRON's response to your crime was not only justified but also supported by many.

 

Mittens is correct that historically you go quiet on the owf, focus heavily on econ and hide early in new rounds while last round I bought the MP on day 6, the round before day 15, the round before that day 11 if my memory serves me right but collectively, D1 militarizes and goes to war early. Just cos you bought the MP early for once doesn't mean anything, the reason you militarized early is cos we've put the spotlight on you, your minions and you want to show everyone we're wrong.

 

You're fooling no one here.

 

As for "losing" wars, it doesn't bother us as we know it's your petty attempt to be condescending. Just know, D1 is going nowhere anytime soon so we'll see who's alliance is still standing in the end.

Edited by HiredGun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Lord Hitchcock said:

 

You are such a sniffling weasel. That 24k gold you pretend to piss is nothing more than not drinking enough water. No one cares about you; as you spend your early rounds as a god forsaken mute or at worse your early rounds kicking-and-screaming.

 

Now run along, your grandmother relevancy as been noted and your impact resembles that of a single pube hair on a camel.

 

Your chest beating sickens the likes of the greats in this realm, like my beloved cowboy, wile coyote and our lord and savior Ningkeptune, hell, even hiredgun has a healthy non-parasitic contribution to the growth of our world.

 

Again you have no substance, merely insults. Like water off a ducks back.

 

No disrespect as I respect some of those you mention, but if that is your "greats" line up you are in trouble.

 

And finished off with a suck up, how charming :)

5 hours ago, HiredGun said:

Accusing D1 of attacking an alliance while at war to take the spotlight off the very thing you've just committed is pathetic and desperate. IRON's response to your crime was not only justified but also supported by many.

 

Mittens is correct that historically you go quiet on the owf, focus heavily on econ and hide early in new rounds while last round I bought the MP on day 6, the round before day 15, the round before that day 11 if my memory serves me right but collectively, D1 militarizes and goes to war early. Just cos you bought the MP early for once doesn't mean anything, the reason you militarized early is cos we've put the spotlight on you, your minions and you want to show everyone we're wrong.

 

You're fooling no one here.

 

As for "losing" wars, it doesn't bother us as we know it's your petty attempt to be condescending. Just know, D1 is going nowhere anytime soon so we'll see who's alliance is still standing in the end.

When I made mention of more than us can wear that shoe it was in reference to THIS ROUND. Stop reading so much into it.

 

We had no qualm with IRON being our "judge and jury" to this "crime"? you speak of haha.

 

Do you not think we evaluated whether IRON would hit us and played out that scenario? In fact some members wanted to continue to fight everyone including IRON.(this would have potentially locked you out of war partners) but we went ahead with peace as we are confident in our ability. Even "letting you" have the war with Wolves. No need to thank us.

 

You havent even been around long enough to talk history, and no I didnt get MP very early this round either.

Ive played plenty of rounds where you havent even known my nation? So you have nothing but how many rounds? to base it off.

The fact is there is barely any competition left due to the game dying.

But we can still have our blood fued to keep things interesting.

 

 

We dont need to fool anyone. You bring the spotlight to yourselves.

 

Your strategy is actually a sound one. It would have been an unwise assumption to assume that we wouldnt keep up with your war mongering however. :) 

I am not among those being condescending about losing wars, merely calling it as I see it. In this thread I used the phrase "without being that successful" And from your explanation you only agreed with what I said, so whats the issue? I agree you could have got WRCs and tech as you had monies, but you prioritized your post war rebuild as you said. Similar situation for us too perhaps.

 

This isnt quite as close, exciting and intense as our run off a few rounds ago, but it is decent competition. Something we want from more AAs.

 

Think of it this way. If we werent here, who would be pushing you to be better? :P 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎10‎/‎19‎/‎2017 at 6:24 PM, Lord Hitchcock said:

we're still here, and our enemies are not.

8 hours ago, HiredGun said:

Just know, D1 is going nowhere anytime soon so we'll see who's alliance is still standing in the end.

 

Translation: I'm willing to settle for mediocrity and a fallacious sense of eventual and subsequent prosperity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

×