Jump to content
  • Announcements

    • Sentinel

      Cyber Nations Forum Rules   07/03/2016

        Cyber Nations Forum Rules  
      In the process of registering on this forum, all players--including you--agreed to accept these terms and conditions and the terms and conditions of Invision Power Board. In doing so you essentially signed an electronic contract pledging to have read the rules and TOS and agreeing to follow the rules and TOS as written. It is your continued responsibility to read, follow, and keep up-to-date with the CN rules.
      The following are basic guidelines for use of the Cyber Nations community forum. Anyone caught disobeying these guidelines will be issued a warning. The forum staff works on a five warn limit policy unless the situation calls for more appropriate action ranging from a verbal warning to a double warn and suspension to an immediate ban, etc.   Just because something is not listed specifically here as illegal does not mean it's allowed. All players are expected to use common sense and are personally responsible for reading the pinned threads found in the Moderation forum. Questions regarding appropriateness or other concerns can be sent via PM to an appropriate moderator.   A permanent ban on the forums results in a game ban, and vice versa. Please note that the in-game warn system works on a "three strikes you're out" policy and that in-game actions (including warnings and deletions) may not be appealed. For more information regarding in-game rules please read the Cyber Nations Game Rules.   1.) First Warning
      2.) Second Warning
      3.) Third Warning (48 hour suspension at the forum)
      4.) Fourth Warning (120 hour suspension at the forum)
      5.) Permanent Ban   Game Bans and Forum Bans
      If you receive a 100% warn level on the forums, you will be subject to removal from the forums AND have your nation deleted and banned from the game at moderator(s) discretion.   If you are banned in the game, then you will be banned from the forums.   Process of Appeals
      Players may not appeal any in-game actions. This includes cheat flags, canceled trades, content removals, warn level increases, nation deletion, and bans from the game.   Players may appeal individual forum warnings. You may only appeal a warning if you can show with evidence that it was unwarranted or unduly harsh. If a reasonable amount of time has passed (no less than one month and preferably longer) in which you have demonstrated reformed behavior than you may request a warning level reduction. Wasting staff time with inappropriately filed reports and/or unfounded appeals will result in a warn level raise. Repeat incidences will result in a ban from the forum.   Bans are permanent. Banned players may appeal to the Senior Staff if they believe grounds exist (very, very rare) in which they state their case with evidence and why explain why they believe they deserve to be allowed back into Cyber Nations. This process is not quick and the investigation into cases may last three minutes or three weeks or more depending on the individual situation.   The only place where discussion of moderator action is acceptable is in the appropriate Moderation forum. Posting commentary on or disagreement with moderator action elsewhere will result in a warn level raise.   Posting
      All posts must be in English. Common phrases in other languages will be allowed so long as they are translated upon request. Foreign languages are permitted in signatures and avatars, however.   Certain areas of the forum require you to have a nation in either standard CN or CN:TE. If you have...   A SE and a TE nation: You get one forum account. Your forum account name must match your SE nation or ruler name. You are allowed to post in either SE or TE areas of the forum. You must have your CN:TE nation name listed in your profile to post in the CN:TE section of the forum.
      Just an SE nation: You get one forum account. Your forum account name must match your SE nation or ruler name. You are not allowed to post in any TE areas of the forum.
      Just a TE nation: You get one forum account. Your forum account name must match your TE nation name or ruler name. Your must have your CN:TE nation name listed correctly in your profile. You are not allowed to post in any of the SE areas. You are allowed to post in the water cooler, question center and the moderation forums. Other than that, all your posts need to stay in the TE area.   Flame/Flamebait/Trolling
      Flaming is expressing anger or lobbing insults at a person/player rather than a character, post, idea, etc. Flamebait are posts that are made with the aim of targeting/harassing/provoking another user into rule-breaking. Trolling is submitting posts with the aim of targeting/harassing/provoking a specific group into rule-breaking. Forum users should not be participating in any of these, and doing so will result in a warning.   Topic Hijacking
      Hijacking is forcing the current thread discussion off of the original topic and usually results in spam or flame from either side. Forum users found hijacking threads will be given a warning.   Repeat Topics
      One topic is enough. Repeat topics will be locked, removed, and the author given a warning. Users found creating repeat topics after others were locked by staff will receive a warn raise.   Joke Topics
      Topics created as a joke are prohibited. Joke topics will be locked and the author warned. This includes topics in which the author is making an announcement “for” another in-game alliance. Humorous threads are permitted; it is up to the discretion of the moderation staff to determine what is merely satire and what is actually a joke topic.   Spam
      Spam is defined as creating posts or topics containing only contentless material of any kind. Users found spamming will receive a warning. Examples include (but are in no way limited to) posts containing nothing but smilies, "+1", "QFT", "this" any other one/few-word contentless combination, joke threads, or posts containing quotes and anything that counts as spam by itself. Adding words to a post with the express intent of avoiding a spam warn will result in a warning. These posts and other similar contributions have no substance and hence are considered spam. Posts of "Ave", "Hail" or any other one word congratulatory type are acceptable as one word posts. Emoticon type posts such as "o/" without accompanying text is still not allowed. Posts containing only images are considered spam, unless the image is being used in the Alliance Politics sub-forum and then the actual text of the image be placed into spoiler tags.   Posting in All Caps
      Posting large amounts of text in capital letters is not permitted. Use discretion when using your caps lock key.   No Discussion Forums
      There are forums that are not for discussion and are used strictly for game and forum staff to address certain issues, bugs, etc. The following forums are not open to discussion: Report Game Abuse, Report Forum Abuse, and Warn/Ban Appeals. Only moderators and the original poster may post in a thread, period, with absolutely no exceptions. Users found disobeying this guideline will receive an automatic warning for each offense.   Moderation Forums
      All Moderation forums also maintain pinned threads clearly marked as required reading before posting. Failure to read and follow required reading and procedure in a Moderation forum will result in a warning. Examples include posting requests in the wrong forum, failure to include all required information in posts, etc. The standard of conduct and enforcement of rules in Moderation forums is strictly enforced and the repercussions for disregarding rules or disrespecting staff are harsh. Read the pinned threads before posting and you will be fine.   Namecalling
      Excessive or unqualified namecalling is not allowed in IC forums; namecalling should also never make up the bulk of a post. Namecalling is prohibited entirely in all OOC forums.   Filtered Words
      Any attempts to evade the word filter will result in a warning. The terms we have filtered are filtered for a reason and no excuse for evasion will be accepted. Filter evasion includes censoring or deliberately misspelling part of a filtered word.   If you link to a website, image, video, etc., containing profanity, please post a disclaimer before the link. The moderation staff may still remove links if the content is deemed too obscene.   Harassment
      Forum users should not be stalking/harassing others on the forums. Anyone found stalking players from topic to topic, etc., will be subject to a warning.   Gravedigging
      Gravedigging is not allowed anywhere on the forums. Gravedigging is "bumping" old topics which haven't been active for quite some time (four to seven days is standard depending on the nature of the thread and how many pages back it had been pushed before bump). Your warn level will be raised if you are caught doing this.   The Suggestion Box and Black Market forums are partial exceptions to this rule. Suggestions/ideas in that forum may be posted in regardless of age PROVIDING that the reviving post contains constructive, on-topic input to the original topic or discussion. Black Market threads may be bumped by the author if there is new information about the offered exchange (i.e open aid slots). In the Player Created Alliances forum it will not be considered gravedigging to bump a topic up to a year old, so long as the alliance in question still exists and it is not a duplicate thread.   Signatures
      Those who fail to read and abide by these rules will have their signatures removed and receive a warning.   You may have only one image per signature which may not exceed the maximum size of 450 pixels wide by 150 pixels tall. You may have no more than 8 lines of text and text size cannot exceed size 4. Each quote-tag, image and empty line count as a line.   Inappropriate Images and Other Disallowed Images
      Images that are sexual in nature or have sexual overtones are prohibited. It is up to the discretion of the moderation staff to determine what constitutes sexual overtones. Depictions of kissing are permissible provided there are no sexual implications. Images depicting female nipples are prohibited outright.   Making “ASCII art” is prohibited regardless of the image depicted.   Using photos or likenesses of another Cyber Nations player is also prohibited.   Drug References
      Images and posts promoting illegal drug use are prohibited. References to drugs are acceptable only if the moderation staff deems that it is not promoting the use thereof.   Obscene Content and/or "Account Suicide"
      Anyone caught posting vulgar material (including but in no way limited to pornography, "gross," "tubgirl," "lemonparty," photos depicting RL illegal acts such as violence towards humans or animals, child pornography, death photos, and any other obscene or offensive material in either text form or picture form) will have their account(s) permanently banned, and their ISP contacted along with any other applicable internet and RL authorities.   OOC Threats / Revealing Personal Information
      An OOC threat of any nature will equate to an automatic ban from the game and forums. Likewise, the publishing of personal information of any other player without their explicit permission is grounds for warning and/or a ban from the game depending on the severity of the offense.   Death Threats / Death Wishes
      A death threat or a death wish of any nature (including but not limited to telling another player to commit suicide) will result in at very least a 40% warn level increase and 2 day suspension from the forums, with harsher punishments, including a complete ban from the forums and game, up to the discretion of the moderation staff.   Quoting Rulebreaking Posts
      Do not quote any post with obscene content or any other content that has to be removed by the moderation staff. Doing so makes it more difficult for the moderation staff to find and remove all such content and will result in a warn level increase. Putting rulebreaking posts of any kind in your signature is prohibited.   Forum Names
      With the exception of moderator accounts, all forum accounts must match up exactly with the ruler name or nation name of your in-game country. Those found not matching up will be warned and banned immediately. Forum account names may not be profane or offensive.   Multiple Forum Accounts
      With the exception of moderators, if you are caught with multiple forum accounts, the multiple account(s) will be banned, warn level raised, and your identity will be announced by a moderator to the CN community so rule-abiding players can take IC action against you. Multiple forum account offenders will receive a varying percentage warn level raise and/or a permanent ban on a case-by-case basis.   Posting For Other Players
      Posting for banned or suspended players is prohibited, as is posting for any person without a nation. This includes making warn and ban appeals on their behalf.   Imitation &. Impersonation
      Imitation in terms of this forum is mimicking the posting, avatar, or signature styles of another user in an attempt to be satirical or generally humorous. Impersonation in terms of this forum is copying the posting, avatar, or signature styles of another user in order to present the illusion that the person is in fact that user. Imitation is fine and can be quite funny. Impersonation is disruptive and is warnable. Please pay attention to the subtle difference between these two concepts.   A player may not impersonate another player by emulating the characteristics of someone else's past or present account in an attempt to harass, stalk, or flamebait. Creating a new forum account in an attempt to impersonate a standing account will result in deletion and banning without notice.   Any attempt at imitation and/or impersonation of moderators and game staff is strictly prohibited and will be met with harsh repercussions.   Avatars
      Size for avatars is limited by the forum mechanics, therefore there is no size issue for a user to worry about. Avatars must be in good taste, and any avatar containing a picture that is too violent, disgusting, sexually explicit, insulting to another player or staff member, etc. will be removed. Avatars that are potentially seizure inducing will not be permitted. Players may not "borrow" the avatars of any moderator past or present without permission.   Swastikas and Nazi Imagery
      The swastika may not be used in signatures or avatars. Pictures of swastika's are acceptable for use in the In Character (IC) sections of the roleplay forums, so long as its context is In Character, and not Out Of Character. Pictures of Hitler, mentioning of the Holocaust, etc... have no place in the roleplay forums, since these people and events existed in real life, and have no bearing or place in the Cyberverse. Other Nazi or SS imagery is forbidden in all forums.   Moderation Staff
      The revealing of the private identities of any Cyber Nations staffers past or present is strictly prohibited, and thus no speculation/accusation of identity is allowed. Doing so is grounds for moderator action against your account appropriate to the offense, including a full forum/game ban.   Claims of moderator bias should be directed to the highest level of authority--the Head Game & Forum Mod/Admin, Keelah. Claims of moderator bias without supporting evidence is grounds for a warning.   Blatant disrespect of the moderator staff is strictly prohibited. This includes but is not limited to spoofing moderator accounts in any way, sig/avatar references, baiting, flaming, rude demands, mocking, attitude, and unsubstantiated claims of bias. They are volunteers hired to enforce the rules. If you have a problem with the way a moderator is enforcing the rules or the rules themselves please contact Keelah.   Attempting to use the moderation staff as a weapon by abusing the report system in an attempt to get another player warned or banned is strictly prohibited.   Do not ask about becoming or campaign to become a moderator. The moderators are drawn from CN membership but moderation positions are by invitation only. Asking to become one will substantially decrease your chances of ever being asked.   Aiding Rule Violators
      Any user found to know of a serious rule violation without reporting it to a game moderator (eg. knowledge of a user with multiple nations) will be given a warning or, in more serious cases, have their nation deleted.   Aiding Banned Players
      Any user found to be harboring, aiding or otherwise knowingly helping a banned user will be deleted. This includes knowing of their existence within the game without reporting it to the game-moderation staff.   Questionable Actions and Content
      The forum rules are not designed to cover every scenario. Any action that is seen to be counter-productive or harmful to the forum community may be met with moderator action against your account. The Cyber Nations Moderation Staff reserves the right to take action against your account without warning for any reason at any time.   Private Transactions
      Nation selling and other private transactions via such auction sites like eBay is against the Cyber Nations terms and conditions. While our moderators cannot control what people do outside of the game you are not allowed to promote such private exchanges on our forums without expressed permission from admin only. Anyone found to be engaging in such activity without permission will be banned from the game.   Advertising
      Advertising other browser games and forums is prohibited. Soliciting donations towards commercial causes is also prohibited. If you wish to ask for donations towards a charitable cause, please contact a moderator before doing so.   Extorting Donations
      Donations are excluded from any kind of IC payment. Anyone found extorting others for OOC payments will be warned in-game and/or banned.   Third Party Software
      Third party software is not allowed to be advertised on these forums by any means (post, signature, PM, etc). These programs can easily be used to put malware on the user's computer, and as such can cause huge security issues. Anybody who is caught spreading links to these will at the very least have their warning level increased.   Other Forum Terms & Rules   Please take a moment to review these rules detailed below. If you agree with them and wish to proceed with the registration, simply click the "Register" button below. To cancel this registration, simply hit the 'back' button on your browser.   Please remember that we are not responsible for any messages posted. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. USE THE WEB SITE AT YOUR OWN RISK. We will not be liable for any damages for any reason. THIS WEB SITE IS PROVIDED TO YOU "AS IS," WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.   The messages express the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of this bulletin board. Any user who feels that a posted message is objectionable is encouraged to contact us immediately by email. We have the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.   You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this bulletin board to post any material which is knowingly false and/or defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise violative of any law.   You agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or by this bulletin board.
Cenk Uygur

Recognition of Hostilities

Recommended Posts

Can I say something serious? This war is giving me a tingly feeling down below. Do whatever you like with that information.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Justinian the Mighty said:

Can I say something serious? This war is giving me a tingly feeling down below. Do whatever you like with that information.

 

At least you acknowledged with honestly, rather than trying to deny it.

 

Edited by Lord Hitchcock

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, magicninja said:

Well I'm officially tired of defending Oculus....

 

AlmightyGrub is a giant piece of !@#$. Anyone backing him or any of his petty !@#$%^&* is guilty by association.

 

Period.

 

You are like a random person off the street wandering into a room and yelling something  nonsensical then wandering back out.  I remember a time when you at  least made sense.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Justinian the Mighty said:

Can I say something serious? This war is giving me a tingly feeling down below. Do whatever you like with that information.

 

You should be running NADC.  Do whatever you like with that information.  (hint coup)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What I find intriguing is that no one has yet to man up as to how the screen shots got into polars hands. :psyduck:

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Devialance said:


Then WHY did you use returning to blue as part of your campaign to regain power?, I personally do not understand it, if i felt that NpO was going to roll my alliance if we went to blue and i was running to be the leader the last thing i would do is base my whole job on moving back to blue, before you say thats not all it was, every leader wants to setup trades, tech deals and so on, but to make a point of returning to blue KNOWING what could happen is just foolish in truth.

 

It's curious to me that one would blame the victim rather than the perpetrator of unwarranted violence. Nevertheless, as I said, Polaris would use any excuse to beat us up, it was only a matter of time. I'm sure if it had not been this, something else would have been "manufactured" to ensure war.

 

Please bear in mind also that my posts were made as a candidate running for leadership in a democratic alliance. I am obligated to inform the members of my alliance what my objectives and guiding principles are. It is true that there is always a risk that someone will leak internal discussions but the NADC has been of late quite disciplined in this regard - that is until quite recently.

 

In regards to why I felt returning to the Blue Team was important, I note that our alliance has been for the vast majority of its existence a Blue Team alliance. The NADC has a strong community that is proud of its history and heritage. I felt that a negotiated return to the Blue Team would help restore part of our heritage, which was lost when we were forced off the Blue Team. Bear in mind that, again, this was not official policy and was yet to be discussed by our alliance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Cenk Uygur said:

 

It's curious to me that one would blame the victim rather than the perpetrator of unwarranted violence. Nevertheless, as I said, Polaris would use any excuse to beat us up, it was only a matter of time. I'm sure if it had not been this, something else would have been "manufactured" to ensure war.

 

Please bear in mind also that my posts were made as a candidate running for leadership in a democratic alliance. I am obligated to inform the members of my alliance what my objectives and guiding principles are. It is true that there is always a risk that someone will leak internal discussions but the NADC has been of late quite disciplined in this regard - that is until quite recently.

 

In regards to why I felt returning to the Blue Team was important, I note that our alliance has been for the vast majority of its existence a Blue Team alliance. The NADC has a strong community that is proud of its history and heritage. I felt that a negotiated return to the Blue Team would help restore part of our heritage, which was lost when we were forced off the Blue Team. Bear in mind that, again, this was not official policy and was yet to be discussed by our alliance.

 

You are a victim now huh?  I'm not sure how the victim card will help you regain your honour.

 

You ran as a candidate of leadership, and won on a platform that could potentially put my alliance in peril.  I am obligated to defend my members, and if that means we cut off the head off of the snake before you can strike, that is what I do.  Those are my guiding principles.

 

While I am pleased that you have a strong community, you are no longer a Blue team alliance.  You signed a peace agreement confirming this point.  I suggest you tear down those Blue monuments, and retire your social justice viewpoint.  

 

There is a common word in all of your posts.  "YET".  It doesn't matter to me if it is your public policy or not.  If it is your personal policy, it will eventually become your public policy.  A good leader would see his vision realized.

 

As a good leader, it is my job to make sure your vision is not realized.  Fortunately, I don't need votes to make the decision.

 

Regards,

-Eatem

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Williambonney said:

What I find intriguing is that no one has yet to man up as to how the screen shots got into polars hands. :psyduck:

 

 

Why don't you ask Polar. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, Cenk Uygur said:

 

It's curious to me that one would blame the victim rather than the perpetrator of unwarranted violence. Nevertheless, as I said, Polaris would use any excuse to beat us up, it was only a matter of time. I'm sure if it had not been this, something else would have been "manufactured" to ensure war.

 

Please bear in mind also that my posts were made as a candidate running for leadership in a democratic alliance. I am obligated to inform the members of my alliance what my objectives and guiding principles are. It is true that there is always a risk that someone will leak internal discussions but the NADC has been of late quite disciplined in this regard - that is until quite recently.

 

In regards to why I felt returning to the Blue Team was important, I note that our alliance has been for the vast majority of its existence a Blue Team alliance. The NADC has a strong community that is proud of its history and heritage. I felt that a negotiated return to the Blue Team would help restore part of our heritage, which was lost when we were forced off the Blue Team. Bear in mind that, again, this was not official policy and was yet to be discussed by our alliance.

Then your campaign promises should have read "If elected I promise to open dialogue with Polaris for our possible return to blue". 

 

You are wrong. Admit it and you might find eatem and grub to be reasonable. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Morphine said:

Why don't you ask Polar. 

 

I can confirm that at least three different people (quite possibly more: I've been on holiday for the last couple of weeks, and don't have much to do with this stuff anyway, so I may well have missed some) sent us those screenshots, and that Bern wasn't one of those three. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Morphine said:

Then your campaign promises should have read "If elected I promise to open dialogue with Polaris for our possible return to blue". 

 

You are wrong. Admit it and you might find eatem and grub to be reasonable. 

 

I am always reasonable.  Here is the issue I have right now though.  Aurelius sprouts pure lies and fabrications when he says Polar was going to manufacture any excuse to attack the NADC.  This is patently false, I have not held the NADC in my sights nor has EaTeM, the matter was closed, sealed and completely done with once the NADC moved themselves off Blue.  To suggest we wanted to flog a dead horse is ridiculous.  During the last conflict the NADC avoided attacking us and likewise we didn't involve ourselves at all in their theater of war.  This was not because we lacked the opportunity to do what ever we pleased but rather we lacked any motivations to do so.  Honestly Bern had made contact with our alliance and from all the reports I had received was making genuine conciliatory overtures towards us.  We were extremely happy to see that the NADC had moved on, as had we.

 

Whilst I understand and concede that the move off Blue was indeed humiliating for the NADC, it was a term they accepted without hesitation at the time the peace was brokered.  I can not penetrate the NADC mindset but it seemed to reflect the fact that the NADC had accepted its fate and decided to move away from a collision course with Polar in the future.  I understood the acceptance of the term as a desire to remove all obstacles to a peaceful existence.  Polar leadership was happy with that position.  So far from needing to manufacture an excuse to destroy the NADC, Polar was happy to receive diplomatic overtures to prevent any further conflict.

 

Imagine our disgust when we read the screenshots of the campaign of the new Sec-Gen.  A man so bitter and twisted by his own fragile ego that he insisted on undoing all the work done by his predecessors to fuel a populist agenda.  Imagine a man so full of himself that he publicly declared he was the man with the vision to defeat Polar, ''rally around me chaps'' he cried, ''our blood is blue and we will spill it to defeat the imposter Polar''.  Beating his drum and chanting his mantra he misled his alliance, like so many before him.  Today his ego remains intact, his posts are evidence of a man unprepared to accept responsibility for the carnage at his doorstep.

 

Imagine a man, who arrogantly declares ''I am not an e-lawyer, I am a lawyer"  whilst whipping his e-peenie out to impress the masses (only to find that it only looked like an e-peenie but smaller), a man for whom the detail of language and the law are a daily grind, making such fundamental mistakes in his vocabulary.  It is almost unbelievable that someone could hope to convince anyone including himself of the alternate  meaning of his stated campaign without being high on the smell of his own flatulence.

 

Aurelius, the time to be truthful is here.  You are either lying in an attempt to deflect blame from yourself or you are so woefully incompetent both as a leader and as a lawyer that you consider immediately resigning both positions and looking for work in your nation in a fast food outlet flipping burgers.

 

So which is it mate, liar or moron, because there is no other possibility.

Edited by AlmightyGrub
commas add meaning

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, blue sam3 said:

 

I can confirm that at least three different people (quite possibly more: I've been on holiday for the last couple of weeks, and don't have much to do with this stuff anyway, so I may well have missed some) sent us those screenshots, and that Bern wasn't one of those three. 

I know one of them. Possibly 2. Agreed, Bern was not one. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We'll never get to know if NADC would have been hit with a manufactured reason because NADC didn't present that as an opportunity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Vote Grub for prez, 2020

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Vote Lord Hitchcock, Leader of NADC.

 

Yes, yes.... I known it's a long shot, but they wouldn't be hard to turn around.

 

My first order of buisness would be to take responsibility for our actions, admit we were wrong and apologize, make amends and then thereafter be welcomed back into the community with open arms.

 

I will certainly not restrict healthy activity, but NADC members need to understand that actions have consequences, hearsay has consequences... some times the juice is worth the squeeze and other times it's best to move on.

 

My platform would be honestly and integrity, and a firm realization of our place in the world. 

 

I would not grand stand in an election campaign to "take on Polar" without considering all of my members well-being, and the actual realization of NADCs potential.

 

The key to great leadership is not limitations, but expectations. And a genuine smile in foreign affairs rather than a blunt middle finger that only consequences into more kicking-and-screaming.

 

Planet Bob has given so much to me and now it's my civic duty to give back to Planet Bob. I will try to save NADC. 

 

I will be blunt NADC, I may not be able to save you, but as your leader I would genuinely try- and it would certainly be a better effort than Aurelius's actions of which only comfort his ego instead of his members well-being.

 

I throw my hat in the ring, Lord Hitchcock, NADC leader 2017 everybody, please endorse me. 

 

Campaign Slogan:

 

"Following the little Green Ball, results in love for us all!"

 

 

(...I will be making buttons and t-shirts shortly)

Edited by Lord Hitchcock

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, EaTeMuP said:

 

That's the thing... we weren't planning on rolling them.  We have left them alone for over a year, and were improving relations via Bern, as stated in this or the other thread.  

We didn't decide to roll them until after we found out about this plan/platform.

Not saying you was or was not planning on rolling them, just to me seems dumb that he felt that way and gave you a legit CB, just do not add up lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Cenk Uygur said:

 

It's curious to me that one would blame the victim rather than the perpetrator of unwarranted violence. Nevertheless, as I said, Polaris would use any excuse to beat us up, it was only a matter of time. I'm sure if it had not been this, something else would have been "manufactured" to ensure war.

 

Please bear in mind also that my posts were made as a candidate running for leadership in a democratic alliance. I am obligated to inform the members of my alliance what my objectives and guiding principles are. It is true that there is always a risk that someone will leak internal discussions but the NADC has been of late quite disciplined in this regard - that is until quite recently.

 

In regards to why I felt returning to the Blue Team was important, I note that our alliance has been for the vast majority of its existence a Blue Team alliance. The NADC has a strong community that is proud of its history and heritage. I felt that a negotiated return to the Blue Team would help restore part of our heritage, which was lost when we were forced off the Blue Team. Bear in mind that, again, this was not official policy and was yet to be discussed by our alliance.


When i was in school I was a lot bigger than most kids, At the age of 13 i was playing over over 18 rugby players as i was simply to big for my age group they was worried i would hurt someone, however that did not stop people in school trying to pick a fight with me and then they would claim to be the victim when they lost.

You say it is unwanted violence, however you stated before yuo felt for a while that NpO would do anything to roll NDAC, so what do you do, tell your alliance you will go back to blue therefore forcing the bigger strong alliance to attack you and then claim your a victim. Kids in my school used to do that to me but in the end it never worked out for them as when they throw the first punch victim or not they would get their ass beat, you had throw the first punch on polar when telling those who voted for you that you will return to blue. now you !@#$%* and moan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Devialance said:

you had throw the first punch on polar when telling those who voted for you that you will return to blue. now you !@#$%* and moan

 

It's funny how fast NADCs "white knight" turned into NADCs biggest liability.

 

Edited by Lord Hitchcock

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, EaTeMuP said:

could potentially put my alliance in peril. 

 

There's no way you felt threatened even the slightest bit for your alliance (part of the largest bloc by percentage of global NS there has ever been) when an alliance half your size who's allies are all smaller than itself had someone campaign on an undefined plan to move to your color. It's so far from the realm of the believable that it's difficult to quantify.

 

6 hours ago, Lord Hitchcock said:

Vote Lord Hitchcock, Leader of NADC.

 

Yes, yes.... I known it's a long shot, but they wouldn't be hard to turn around.

 

My first order of buisness would be to take responsibility for our actions, admit we were wrong and apologize, make amends and then thereafter be welcomed back into the community with open arms.

 

I will certainly not restrict healthy activity, but NADC members need to understand that actions have consequences, hearsay has consequences... some times the juice is worth the squeeze and other times it's best to move on.

 

My platform would be honestly and integrity, and a firm realization of our place in the world. 

 

I would not grand stand in an election campaign to "take on Polar" without considering all of my members well-being, and the actual realization of NADCs potential.

 

The key to great leadership is not limitations, but expectations. And a genuine smile in foreign affairs rather than a blunt middle finger that only consequences into more kicking-and-screaming.

 

Planet Bob has given so much to me and now it's my civic duty to give back to Planet Bob. I will try to save NADC. 

 

I will be blunt NADC, I may not be able to save you, but as your leader I would genuinely try- and it would certainly be a better effort than Aurelius's actions of which only comfort his ego instead of his members well-being.

 

I throw my hat in the ring, Lord Hitchcock, NADC leader 2017 everybody, please endorse me. 

 

Campaign Slogan:

 

"Following the little Green Ball, results in love for us all!"

 

 

(...I will be making buttons and t-shirts shortly)

You're not a member, and thus cannot run for office (which you would know, if you actually read our Charter).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In fairness, it's become hard to determine which things NADC says that "count" and which things they say that don't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Chunky Monkey said:

 

There's no way you felt threatened even the slightest bit for your alliance (part of the largest bloc by percentage of global NS there has ever been) when an alliance half your size who's allies are all smaller than itself had someone campaign on an undefined plan to move to your color. It's so far from the realm of the believable that it's difficult to quantify.

 

You're not a member, and thus cannot run for office (which you would know, if you actually read our Charter).

 

I am sure he would be happy to join.  As for the rest, I think it is easy to see now that your alliance has renamed itself No Apparent Defense Combine, but we have to take you at face value.  Your largest nations were larger than ours, you had allies in a channel planning a coalition, and you had people like ghos7 running around plotting and scheming.  It seems more than coincidental when you loom at the bigger picture.  You don't need to be able to win to be a threat to us.  We are a peaceful alliance and any attack on us causes us damage.  We are unprepared to see such damages as acceptable.  We have responded in a timely fashion.

 

Whether you are convinced or not is not the issue here, we are convinced.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

reminder that nadc has argued that quotes from screenshots didn't count because they might not be real since the screenshots weren't dumped (yet)

 

they have been disingenuous at every point

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Neo Uruk said:

reminder that nadc has argued that quotes from screenshots didn't count because they might not be real since the screenshots weren't dumped (yet)

 

they have been disingenuous at every point

 

I am beginning to wonder wether it is in fact disingenuous, I am now leaning a little towards dead set oblivious or something even more troubling.  It would be extremely unlikely that someone could be so naive by this stage of the debate as to ignore the evidence written in their own hand.  It is more likely that Aurelius and Chunky are either sociapaths, so blinded by their own arrogance in the pursuit of fame and glory, that they continue to prattle lies and try to convince people they are true OR complete morons who can not see the hand in front of their face punching it repeatedly. I am leaning towards the moronic, but we mus not discount mental disorder either.  More posts of denial will show a clearer trend, so I welcome Chunk and Aurelius to provide further evidence for the diagnosis.

 

I am not sure how I would feel if I was a No Apparent Defender to see my leadership, so obviously in the wrong, embarrassing themselves over and over.  In all possible scenarios it seems that Aurelius has ruled himself unfit to continue as the man in charge.  The level of failure is becoming damning at every denial.

 

Then again they could just be the worst liars Bob has ever seen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, Lord Hitchcock said:

 

You defended them?... When? Why?

 

If you're going to act like a hard ass, then at least explain your relevance to the peanut gallery. 

 

 

I defended being tied to them to half our membership that no longer wanted anything to do with them. Not any more though. The hell with them. Their !@#$%^&* has steadily gotten worse to the point I don't feel like pretending they are just misunderstood mischievous children anymore.  They're just anuses. The whole lot. Some of them I could tolerate and even like because they were funny while doing it. It's why I could be pals with a lot of NG. Pacifica at least pretends to be civilized but then turns a blind eye to this kind of nonsense. Polar has always been a crap show that is just using up everyone else's power to be a bunch of !@#$%bags. I don't see how the better alliances in Oculus don;t cut them off like the infection they are. 

 

Whatever. I'm not anyone any more if I ever was. Just tell me who to nuke when the time comes. I'm gonna go take a nap.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ah yes the hilarity of "pretending" to be a racist yes the NG charm is sure strong

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×