Jump to content
  • Announcements

    • Sentinel

      Cyber Nations Forum Rules   07/03/2016

        Cyber Nations Forum Rules  
      In the process of registering on this forum, all players--including you--agreed to accept these terms and conditions and the terms and conditions of Invision Power Board. In doing so you essentially signed an electronic contract pledging to have read the rules and TOS and agreeing to follow the rules and TOS as written. It is your continued responsibility to read, follow, and keep up-to-date with the CN rules.
      The following are basic guidelines for use of the Cyber Nations community forum. Anyone caught disobeying these guidelines will be issued a warning. The forum staff works on a five warn limit policy unless the situation calls for more appropriate action ranging from a verbal warning to a double warn and suspension to an immediate ban, etc.   Just because something is not listed specifically here as illegal does not mean it's allowed. All players are expected to use common sense and are personally responsible for reading the pinned threads found in the Moderation forum. Questions regarding appropriateness or other concerns can be sent via PM to an appropriate moderator.   A permanent ban on the forums results in a game ban, and vice versa. Please note that the in-game warn system works on a "three strikes you're out" policy and that in-game actions (including warnings and deletions) may not be appealed. For more information regarding in-game rules please read the Cyber Nations Game Rules.   1.) First Warning
      2.) Second Warning
      3.) Third Warning (48 hour suspension at the forum)
      4.) Fourth Warning (120 hour suspension at the forum)
      5.) Permanent Ban   Game Bans and Forum Bans
      If you receive a 100% warn level on the forums, you will be subject to removal from the forums AND have your nation deleted and banned from the game at moderator(s) discretion.   If you are banned in the game, then you will be banned from the forums.   Process of Appeals
      Players may not appeal any in-game actions. This includes cheat flags, canceled trades, content removals, warn level increases, nation deletion, and bans from the game.   Players may appeal individual forum warnings. You may only appeal a warning if you can show with evidence that it was unwarranted or unduly harsh. If a reasonable amount of time has passed (no less than one month and preferably longer) in which you have demonstrated reformed behavior than you may request a warning level reduction. Wasting staff time with inappropriately filed reports and/or unfounded appeals will result in a warn level raise. Repeat incidences will result in a ban from the forum.   Bans are permanent. Banned players may appeal to the Senior Staff if they believe grounds exist (very, very rare) in which they state their case with evidence and why explain why they believe they deserve to be allowed back into Cyber Nations. This process is not quick and the investigation into cases may last three minutes or three weeks or more depending on the individual situation.   The only place where discussion of moderator action is acceptable is in the appropriate Moderation forum. Posting commentary on or disagreement with moderator action elsewhere will result in a warn level raise.   Posting
      All posts must be in English. Common phrases in other languages will be allowed so long as they are translated upon request. Foreign languages are permitted in signatures and avatars, however.   Certain areas of the forum require you to have a nation in either standard CN or CN:TE. If you have...   A SE and a TE nation: You get one forum account. Your forum account name must match your SE nation or ruler name. You are allowed to post in either SE or TE areas of the forum. You must have your CN:TE nation name listed in your profile to post in the CN:TE section of the forum.
      Just an SE nation: You get one forum account. Your forum account name must match your SE nation or ruler name. You are not allowed to post in any TE areas of the forum.
      Just a TE nation: You get one forum account. Your forum account name must match your TE nation name or ruler name. Your must have your CN:TE nation name listed correctly in your profile. You are not allowed to post in any of the SE areas. You are allowed to post in the water cooler, question center and the moderation forums. Other than that, all your posts need to stay in the TE area.   Flame/Flamebait/Trolling
      Flaming is expressing anger or lobbing insults at a person/player rather than a character, post, idea, etc. Flamebait are posts that are made with the aim of targeting/harassing/provoking another user into rule-breaking. Trolling is submitting posts with the aim of targeting/harassing/provoking a specific group into rule-breaking. Forum users should not be participating in any of these, and doing so will result in a warning.   Topic Hijacking
      Hijacking is forcing the current thread discussion off of the original topic and usually results in spam or flame from either side. Forum users found hijacking threads will be given a warning.   Repeat Topics
      One topic is enough. Repeat topics will be locked, removed, and the author given a warning. Users found creating repeat topics after others were locked by staff will receive a warn raise.   Joke Topics
      Topics created as a joke are prohibited. Joke topics will be locked and the author warned. This includes topics in which the author is making an announcement “for” another in-game alliance. Humorous threads are permitted; it is up to the discretion of the moderation staff to determine what is merely satire and what is actually a joke topic.   Spam
      Spam is defined as creating posts or topics containing only contentless material of any kind. Users found spamming will receive a warning. Examples include (but are in no way limited to) posts containing nothing but smilies, "+1", "QFT", "this" any other one/few-word contentless combination, joke threads, or posts containing quotes and anything that counts as spam by itself. Adding words to a post with the express intent of avoiding a spam warn will result in a warning. These posts and other similar contributions have no substance and hence are considered spam. Posts of "Ave", "Hail" or any other one word congratulatory type are acceptable as one word posts. Emoticon type posts such as "o/" without accompanying text is still not allowed. Posts containing only images are considered spam, unless the image is being used in the Alliance Politics sub-forum and then the actual text of the image be placed into spoiler tags.   Posting in All Caps
      Posting large amounts of text in capital letters is not permitted. Use discretion when using your caps lock key.   No Discussion Forums
      There are forums that are not for discussion and are used strictly for game and forum staff to address certain issues, bugs, etc. The following forums are not open to discussion: Report Game Abuse, Report Forum Abuse, and Warn/Ban Appeals. Only moderators and the original poster may post in a thread, period, with absolutely no exceptions. Users found disobeying this guideline will receive an automatic warning for each offense.   Moderation Forums
      All Moderation forums also maintain pinned threads clearly marked as required reading before posting. Failure to read and follow required reading and procedure in a Moderation forum will result in a warning. Examples include posting requests in the wrong forum, failure to include all required information in posts, etc. The standard of conduct and enforcement of rules in Moderation forums is strictly enforced and the repercussions for disregarding rules or disrespecting staff are harsh. Read the pinned threads before posting and you will be fine.   Namecalling
      Excessive or unqualified namecalling is not allowed in IC forums; namecalling should also never make up the bulk of a post. Namecalling is prohibited entirely in all OOC forums.   Filtered Words
      Any attempts to evade the word filter will result in a warning. The terms we have filtered are filtered for a reason and no excuse for evasion will be accepted. Filter evasion includes censoring or deliberately misspelling part of a filtered word.   If you link to a website, image, video, etc., containing profanity, please post a disclaimer before the link. The moderation staff may still remove links if the content is deemed too obscene.   Harassment
      Forum users should not be stalking/harassing others on the forums. Anyone found stalking players from topic to topic, etc., will be subject to a warning.   Gravedigging
      Gravedigging is not allowed anywhere on the forums. Gravedigging is "bumping" old topics which haven't been active for quite some time (four to seven days is standard depending on the nature of the thread and how many pages back it had been pushed before bump). Your warn level will be raised if you are caught doing this.   The Suggestion Box and Black Market forums are partial exceptions to this rule. Suggestions/ideas in that forum may be posted in regardless of age PROVIDING that the reviving post contains constructive, on-topic input to the original topic or discussion. Black Market threads may be bumped by the author if there is new information about the offered exchange (i.e open aid slots). In the Player Created Alliances forum it will not be considered gravedigging to bump a topic up to a year old, so long as the alliance in question still exists and it is not a duplicate thread.   Signatures
      Those who fail to read and abide by these rules will have their signatures removed and receive a warning.   You may have only one image per signature which may not exceed the maximum size of 450 pixels wide by 150 pixels tall. You may have no more than 8 lines of text and text size cannot exceed size 4. Each quote-tag, image and empty line count as a line.   Inappropriate Images and Other Disallowed Images
      Images that are sexual in nature or have sexual overtones are prohibited. It is up to the discretion of the moderation staff to determine what constitutes sexual overtones. Depictions of kissing are permissible provided there are no sexual implications. Images depicting female nipples are prohibited outright.   Making “ASCII art” is prohibited regardless of the image depicted.   Using photos or likenesses of another Cyber Nations player is also prohibited.   Drug References
      Images and posts promoting illegal drug use are prohibited. References to drugs are acceptable only if the moderation staff deems that it is not promoting the use thereof.   Obscene Content and/or "Account Suicide"
      Anyone caught posting vulgar material (including but in no way limited to pornography, "gross," "tubgirl," "lemonparty," photos depicting RL illegal acts such as violence towards humans or animals, child pornography, death photos, and any other obscene or offensive material in either text form or picture form) will have their account(s) permanently banned, and their ISP contacted along with any other applicable internet and RL authorities.   OOC Threats / Revealing Personal Information
      An OOC threat of any nature will equate to an automatic ban from the game and forums. Likewise, the publishing of personal information of any other player without their explicit permission is grounds for warning and/or a ban from the game depending on the severity of the offense.   Death Threats / Death Wishes
      A death threat or a death wish of any nature (including but not limited to telling another player to commit suicide) will result in at very least a 40% warn level increase and 2 day suspension from the forums, with harsher punishments, including a complete ban from the forums and game, up to the discretion of the moderation staff.   Quoting Rulebreaking Posts
      Do not quote any post with obscene content or any other content that has to be removed by the moderation staff. Doing so makes it more difficult for the moderation staff to find and remove all such content and will result in a warn level increase. Putting rulebreaking posts of any kind in your signature is prohibited.   Forum Names
      With the exception of moderator accounts, all forum accounts must match up exactly with the ruler name or nation name of your in-game country. Those found not matching up will be warned and banned immediately. Forum account names may not be profane or offensive.   Multiple Forum Accounts
      With the exception of moderators, if you are caught with multiple forum accounts, the multiple account(s) will be banned, warn level raised, and your identity will be announced by a moderator to the CN community so rule-abiding players can take IC action against you. Multiple forum account offenders will receive a varying percentage warn level raise and/or a permanent ban on a case-by-case basis.   Posting For Other Players
      Posting for banned or suspended players is prohibited, as is posting for any person without a nation. This includes making warn and ban appeals on their behalf.   Imitation &. Impersonation
      Imitation in terms of this forum is mimicking the posting, avatar, or signature styles of another user in an attempt to be satirical or generally humorous. Impersonation in terms of this forum is copying the posting, avatar, or signature styles of another user in order to present the illusion that the person is in fact that user. Imitation is fine and can be quite funny. Impersonation is disruptive and is warnable. Please pay attention to the subtle difference between these two concepts.   A player may not impersonate another player by emulating the characteristics of someone else's past or present account in an attempt to harass, stalk, or flamebait. Creating a new forum account in an attempt to impersonate a standing account will result in deletion and banning without notice.   Any attempt at imitation and/or impersonation of moderators and game staff is strictly prohibited and will be met with harsh repercussions.   Avatars
      Size for avatars is limited by the forum mechanics, therefore there is no size issue for a user to worry about. Avatars must be in good taste, and any avatar containing a picture that is too violent, disgusting, sexually explicit, insulting to another player or staff member, etc. will be removed. Avatars that are potentially seizure inducing will not be permitted. Players may not "borrow" the avatars of any moderator past or present without permission.   Swastikas and Nazi Imagery
      The swastika may not be used in signatures or avatars. Pictures of swastika's are acceptable for use in the In Character (IC) sections of the roleplay forums, so long as its context is In Character, and not Out Of Character. Pictures of Hitler, mentioning of the Holocaust, etc... have no place in the roleplay forums, since these people and events existed in real life, and have no bearing or place in the Cyberverse. Other Nazi or SS imagery is forbidden in all forums.   Moderation Staff
      The revealing of the private identities of any Cyber Nations staffers past or present is strictly prohibited, and thus no speculation/accusation of identity is allowed. Doing so is grounds for moderator action against your account appropriate to the offense, including a full forum/game ban.   Claims of moderator bias should be directed to the highest level of authority--the Head Game & Forum Mod/Admin, Keelah. Claims of moderator bias without supporting evidence is grounds for a warning.   Blatant disrespect of the moderator staff is strictly prohibited. This includes but is not limited to spoofing moderator accounts in any way, sig/avatar references, baiting, flaming, rude demands, mocking, attitude, and unsubstantiated claims of bias. They are volunteers hired to enforce the rules. If you have a problem with the way a moderator is enforcing the rules or the rules themselves please contact Keelah.   Attempting to use the moderation staff as a weapon by abusing the report system in an attempt to get another player warned or banned is strictly prohibited.   Do not ask about becoming or campaign to become a moderator. The moderators are drawn from CN membership but moderation positions are by invitation only. Asking to become one will substantially decrease your chances of ever being asked.   Aiding Rule Violators
      Any user found to know of a serious rule violation without reporting it to a game moderator (eg. knowledge of a user with multiple nations) will be given a warning or, in more serious cases, have their nation deleted.   Aiding Banned Players
      Any user found to be harboring, aiding or otherwise knowingly helping a banned user will be deleted. This includes knowing of their existence within the game without reporting it to the game-moderation staff.   Questionable Actions and Content
      The forum rules are not designed to cover every scenario. Any action that is seen to be counter-productive or harmful to the forum community may be met with moderator action against your account. The Cyber Nations Moderation Staff reserves the right to take action against your account without warning for any reason at any time.   Private Transactions
      Nation selling and other private transactions via such auction sites like eBay is against the Cyber Nations terms and conditions. While our moderators cannot control what people do outside of the game you are not allowed to promote such private exchanges on our forums without expressed permission from admin only. Anyone found to be engaging in such activity without permission will be banned from the game.   Advertising
      Advertising other browser games and forums is prohibited. Soliciting donations towards commercial causes is also prohibited. If you wish to ask for donations towards a charitable cause, please contact a moderator before doing so.   Extorting Donations
      Donations are excluded from any kind of IC payment. Anyone found extorting others for OOC payments will be warned in-game and/or banned.   Third Party Software
      Third party software is not allowed to be advertised on these forums by any means (post, signature, PM, etc). These programs can easily be used to put malware on the user's computer, and as such can cause huge security issues. Anybody who is caught spreading links to these will at the very least have their warning level increased.   Other Forum Terms & Rules   Please take a moment to review these rules detailed below. If you agree with them and wish to proceed with the registration, simply click the "Register" button below. To cancel this registration, simply hit the 'back' button on your browser.   Please remember that we are not responsible for any messages posted. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. USE THE WEB SITE AT YOUR OWN RISK. We will not be liable for any damages for any reason. THIS WEB SITE IS PROVIDED TO YOU "AS IS," WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.   The messages express the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of this bulletin board. Any user who feels that a posted message is objectionable is encouraged to contact us immediately by email. We have the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.   You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this bulletin board to post any material which is knowingly false and/or defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise violative of any law.   You agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or by this bulletin board.
Cenk Uygur

Recognition of Hostilities

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, white majik said:

 

Like who thought letting NPO and Umbrella end up on the same side was a good idea?

 

Don't forget that we have to turn on each other at some point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Jesse End said:

 

Don't forget that we have to turn on each other at some point.

Didn't go so well for either of you last time that happened.  :ph34r:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Caladin   
On 8/12/2017 at 5:42 AM, AlmightyGrub said:

If my "term" was unclear to you in the first place then perhaps you should have clarified with me personally before you began beating your drum.  

 

You know now deep down in your little e-lawyer heart what I meant by vacate.  You chose to return to power on the basis of you being the strong leader who could address evil Polar.  It requires no huge jump in logic to see the path required to accomplish your election promises.  

 

When coupled with other information received it is clear that the NADC had once again found itself led by someone who had their ability and ambition confused.  

 

I am intrigued that "dissolve " is in your vocabulary but if you insist I,for one, would not try to dissuade you.   I doubt this matter is that extreme but I do note that you are prone to hyperbole in all your statements.   

 

Good luck.  You know where I am if you want to debate the validity of the word vacate.  

 

And yet you choose not to specify that you meant 'remain off forever'. I can only speculate why that was the case, but the fact is that you did not, and as such it is clear to all that while NADC might have considered to plan to violate your intent of the treaty, they did not consider to plan to violate the treaty, as you chose to write you.

 

On 8/12/2017 at 11:10 AM, AlmightyGrub said:

Berkanstel may well have committed some acts of treason against NADC, but you screwed yourselves when you decided that orange wasn't good enough for you.  Blue is the natural home of the NpO therefore not the NADC.  Seriously, if you were in doubt, playing semantics wasn't the way forward.  You accepted the term in full knowledge of what it meant, right or wrong in your mind is of no consequence to me.

 

Ah, so we get to the truth. This has nothing to do with the violation of terms or anything like this, but instead Polaris' insistence that Blue is theres and no-one else's. 

 

Thank you for the clarification.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
EaTeMuP   
20 minutes ago, Caladin said:

 

And yet you choose not to specify that you meant 'remain off forever'. I can only speculate why that was the case, but the fact is that you did not, and as such it is clear to all that while NADC might have considered to plan to violate your intent of the treaty, they did not consider to plan to violate the treaty, as you chose to write you.

 

 

Ah, so we get to the truth. This has nothing to do with the violation of terms or anything like this, but instead Polaris' insistence that Blue is theres and no-one else's. 

 

Thank you for the clarification.

 

Yeah, it was forever for NADC.  There are many nations on Blue not Polaris, and don't have any issues.  If there was any confusion before, I think it is pretty clear now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Caladin said:

 

And yet you choose not to specify that you meant 'remain off forever'. I can only speculate why that was the case, but the fact is that you did not, and as such it is clear to all that while NADC might have considered to plan to violate your intent of the treaty, they did not consider to plan to violate the treaty, as you chose to write you.

 

 

Ah, so we get to the truth. This has nothing to do with the violation of terms or anything like this, but instead Polaris' insistence that Blue is theres and no-one else's. 

 

Thank you for the clarification.

 

Hello Caladin.  I see you are still unhappy.  It pains me to see a comrade working so hard to create something when he is not at all in full possession of the facts. I reject your interpretation of the statements made and I point you to the fact that there are many alliances on Blue, two of whom have Senators elected every cycle.  Your assertions are nonsense and inflammatory.  How about you accept the protocols of the Order along with the protections they offer your bloated pixel hugging nation?

 

Still not happy?  Join NADC and put your convictions to work at the end of a nuke.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgive me, gentlemen (and gentlewomen, if there are any). It's been a busy weekend. I'll respond to posts that raise new issues as I can.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I can see, most of it is more of the same. With respect, I am not going to waste time responding to those.

 

On ‎12‎/‎08‎/‎2017 at 8:12 PM, Morphine said:

Without releasing anything too sensitive,

 

I'll quote Aurelius from the NADC forums

"To clarify it is not OPSEC, but if seen by polars people it has the potential to be problematic. My concern is they will react negatively to this when we are not ready"

 

So back to my original statement "YOU (NADC Govt) knew it would be a problem. YOU (NADC Govt) continued on with the plan regardless of the fact that you knew it would cause problems. Now your pissed because Polar did indeed react negatively to this? Or are you pissed simply because you "weren't ready"? 

 

If you're going to quote, please don't cherry pick. Quote the next part too.

 
Aurelius said:

The more general point is that I think internal discussions should remain internal (again, a return to the Blue Team objective is not official policy yet and is merely the expressed intention of one candidate). That is the attitude I have always taken, both in the past and going into the future. While it is not required by law, it does seem to me to be a natural courtesy.

 
Without a doubt, I made a mistake. But not the mistake you think. I made the mistake of thinking Bernkastel would be a gracious candidate in defeat. I did not know the true nature of his character.
 
What I did know was that even the merest hint that I wished for us to return to the Blue Team was a pretext to declare war on us, regardless of the fact that: (a) it was not yet official policy; (b) it was not in breach of the agreement; and (c) even if I had adopted the most conciliatory means, they would assume hostile action was the only way we sought to achieve that end and pounce upon us. This, in fact, turned out to be prescient.
 
To avoid this end, what I had hoped to do was to lay the ground work to negotiate. First, I had to determine if my people even wanted to return to Blue. As leader, I don't force my views on others but I do have the responsibility for starting the conversation. If my alliance had said it was not worth investing our time, I would have moved onto other things (in fact, other things had been prioritised - trade circles, tech clubs, etc.) If they had said yes, I knew that I had to negotiate with the right people in Polaris. I knew there had to be reasonable, decent people in Polaris - it's just the few prominent bad apples that give you all a bad name.
 
In short, I'm not pissed. I knew Polaris would use any excuse to beat us up was a possibility - if it hadn't been this, it would have been something else. Polaris simply confirmed what I suspected. What I hope is others, both those inside Oculus and outside of it, see the situation for what it is - that Polaris has broken our peace agreement in its haste to find any excuse at all to hit us - and the kind of threat Oculus represents to all - by giving Polaris the military backing and carte blanche it needs to recklessly pursue its objectives, irrespective of what is fact, right or even acceptable behaviour - and indeed, to the continuing vibrancy of Planet Bob.
Edited by Cenk Uygur
Formatting and verbosity editing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dude, your entire campaign was based on returning to blue team and getting even with Polar. You can't win an election on a platform and then say you have to find out if people support the platform.

Edited by Immortan Junka

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Immortan Junka said:

Dude, your entire campaign was based on returning to blue team and getting even with Polar. You can't win an election on a platform and then say you have to find out if people support the platform.

Incorrect. In fact, less than 30% of the content in the campaign thread was related to moving to blue. To characterize the entire platform was based on that shows that not only have you not read the things you do have access to, but you choose to ignore the idea that there is more content that you don't know about. Also, the statement that we planned to "[get] even with Polar" is nonsense. Nowhere was it stated that the plan was to get even. I would be hard pressed to state that we do not have bad feeling towards Polar considering our history, but even without Oculus' backing (which they did not directly have 2 months ago when this campaign occurred), it would be a fool's errand to attempt an aggressive action against them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Chunky Monkey said:

Incorrect. In fact, less than 30% of the content in the campaign thread was related to moving to blue. To characterize the entire platform was based on that shows that not only have you not read the things you do have access to, but you choose to ignore the idea that there is more content that you don't know about. Also, the statement that we planned to "[get] even with Polar" is nonsense. Nowhere was it stated that the plan was to get even. I would be hard pressed to state that we do not have bad feeling towards Polar considering our history, but even without Oculus' backing (which they did not directly have 2 months ago when this campaign occurred), it would be a fool's errand to attempt an aggressive action against them.

 

There were a large number of people two months ago who openly thought isolating and hitting Polar/NG was feasible, and that Oculus was about to split. Gh0s7 of TTK schemed against Oculus with a network of collaborators, and very aggressive treaties were being signed by that sector of the treaty web. The only reason I have a dog in the fight is that some of those same people were trying to roll ISX, so we had to abandon our earlier isolationism and pick a side (Polar).

 

I highly doubt NADC's leadership was ignorant of the (apparently) shifting political situation, and I'd wager they wanted to capitalize on it with a victorious return to the blue team. Unfortunately for them, they analyzed the situation completely incorrectly. I didn't. ;)

Edited by Immortan Junka

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, Immortan Junka said:

 

There were a large number of people two months ago who openly thought isolating and hitting Polar/NG was feasible, and that Oculus was about to split. Gh0s7 of TTK schemed against Oculus with a network of collaborators, and very aggressive treaties were being signed by that sector of the treaty web. The only reason I have a dog in the fight is that some of those same people were trying to roll ISX, so we had to abandon our earlier isolationism and pick a side (Polar).

 

I highly doubt NADC's leadership was ignorant of the (apparently) shifting political situation, and I'd wager they wanted to capitalize on it with a victorious return to the blue team. Unfortunately for them, they analyzed the situation completely incorrectly. I didn't. ;)

 

It is almost like NADC think we are stupid.  The screenshots provided so far represent  only a fraction of the intel to hand.  

 

In and and of themselves they create sufficient evidence but be clear there was further investigation leading to the damning conclusion.

 

Aurelius is rambling about the welfare of the planet when really he should be concerned directly with his immediate resignation to save his alliance.  

 

I mock your assertions Aurelius especially where they concern "bad" Polar elements and empowerment via Oculus.  If you think there is anyone sympathetic to you within Polar, you have overreached.  If you think we needed the Oculus treaty to conduct our affairs you would also be grossly mistaken.  

 

Dear NADC members,  your leader is blatantly incompetent.  You are being destroyed because his ego fuels an ambition your alliance can not support.  You allies are unable to do anything useful.  It is time for you to consider your future and that of your alliance.  Please do not listen to his self serving revision of the facts at hand, please don't be blinded to reality

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Neo Uruk   

"Less than 30%" isn't really reassuring that something is anything other than the bulk of a campaign

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Jesse End said:

 

Don't forget that we have to turn on each other at some point.

 

Thats after the neutrals are rolled

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, Neo Uruk said:

"Less than 30%" isn't really reassuring that something is anything other than the bulk of a campaign

 

If in fact that hastily configured percentage is in fact true.  I seems to me that the point of difference in the campaign was indeed this restoration of NADC to the Blue team and the addressing of the wrongs committed upon NADC by the evil Polar.

 

I also note the extreme arrogance of Aurelius continues, his dismissive attitude towards answering the complaints against him is typical of someone who believes their situation to be much better than it is.  The general membership of the NADC would be well within their rights to be asking questions of the Sec-Gen about now, how could a stable situation with Polar be allowed to deteriorate so fast and so far when their previous Sec-Gen had things so completely under control.

 

Chunky Monkey is a great guy in my experience but his efforts in this thread have been deplorable.  It is time for a new age of NADC leaders to rise up and overthrow the stagnant bitter and twisted individuals hogging the prime locations.  A simple amount of diplomacy would have prevented your current destruction, but like the NADC of old you chose to arrogantly plot and plan in secret, aided by others whose time will come shortly, once again confusing your reality with your fantasy.

 

If the NADC lacks the courage to do so, the will to find new leadership, perhaps I will have to help you.  Far better for fate to be in your own hands though.  Be positive, take some action now before everything you have lies in ruin...again.  It is lucky that those old nations who never do anything but occupy positions of authority got caught in full economic prosperity mode isn't it.  For once they will experience what the common man has felt many times.

 

Godspeed NADC, your future is in your hands, not that of your flaccid leadership, if you so desire it to be.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
EaTeMuP   
3 hours ago, Williambonney said:

Vote grub for viceroy!  :D

 

4112575.jpg

 

 

I'm not sure if there will be anything left to Viceroy over.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, EaTeMuP said:

 

 

I'm not sure if there will be anything left to Viceroy over.

 

Of course there will be a few bitter and twisted nations, who despite logic and truth confronting them, will choose to remain in the crumbling chrysalis whilst the rest of their alliance departs to be beautiful blue butterflies.  I can imagine some of them will fly into the fluro to be eaten by the geckos, but some will survive the journey.

 

I will gladly help anyone who wants to be free to truly be free.  It is in my nature to care for all Bob's creatures up to and including the ones that are better going off to the ''farm''.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Auctor   

AlmightyGrub can save you. The hour is not yet too late.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Auctor said:

AlmightyGrub can save you. The hour is not yet too late.

 

Glory Glory Glory.  Grub Saves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
EaTeMuP   
20 minutes ago, AlmightyGrub said:

 

Glory Glory Glory.  Grub Saves.

 

 

We just saved one misled NADC member.  We welcome others.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, EaTeMuP said:

 

 

We just saved one misled NADC member.  We welcome others.

 

There is plenty of room at the fountain.  Just raise your hand and start walking towards the light. 

 

I have decided, to follow Grubby, no turning back, no turning back.

Edited by AlmightyGrub

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/11/2017 at 2:59 PM, Lord Hitchcock said:

Can we please quit calling it a 'curb stomp'... that word meaning is the outdated and grossly overused.

 

Let's call it a learning curve or positive reinforcement or constructive conditioning. 

 

 

 

Better term Aggressive negotiations

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, EaTeMuP said:

 

 

We just saved one misled NADC member.  We welcome others.

Thank you for rooting out our disloyal members. It's good to shed the dead weight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Chunky Monkey said:

Thank you for rooting out our disloyal members. It's good to shed the dead weight.

 

We also appear to be shedding some dead weight infrastructure for you.  Some hideously bloated builds are now far more balanced 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, AlmightyGrub said:

 

We also appear to be shedding some dead weight infrastructure for you.  Some hideously bloated builds are now far more balanced 

Infrastructure is the chains that bind pixel huggers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×