James Spanier Posted August 11, 2017 Report Share Posted August 11, 2017 1 hour ago, Auctor said: Operation Argent Relevancy is a go. Wasn't that when MI6 was destroyed the first time? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auctor Posted August 11, 2017 Report Share Posted August 11, 2017 It's not OPSEC, but if Polaris's people saw it, it has the potential to be problematic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeathAdder Posted August 11, 2017 Report Share Posted August 11, 2017 1 minute ago, James Spanier said: Wasn't that when MI6 was destroyed the first time? I told Chim it was a bad idea to be going around and plotting to whomever would listen both before their first and second rolling, so... Smh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlmightyGrub Posted August 11, 2017 Report Share Posted August 11, 2017 They will react negatively when we are not ready. People get ready. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted August 11, 2017 Report Share Posted August 11, 2017 these are some neat quotes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord of Darkness Posted August 11, 2017 Report Share Posted August 11, 2017 (edited) 1 minute ago, Neo Uruk said: these are some neat quotes While it is not required by law, it does seem to me to be a natural courtesy. Edited August 11, 2017 by Lord of Darkness Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chunky Monkey Posted August 11, 2017 Report Share Posted August 11, 2017 14 minutes ago, EaTeMuP said: Ok, I'll give you a HINT You'll have to get the rest from Aurelius. I hear he welcomes all questions about his candidacy. A public campaign promise is hardly a surreptitious plan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlmightyGrub Posted August 11, 2017 Report Share Posted August 11, 2017 3 minutes ago, Chunky Monkey said: A public campaign promise is hardly a surreptitious plan. The 9th hears you and disagrees. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EaTeMuP Posted August 11, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 11, 2017 Just now, Chunky Monkey said: A public campaign promise is hardly a surreptitious plan. But the 9th Circuit Court of Bob found differently, and I said I would just give you a hint. You are welcome to express your disquiet, but I suggest you raise a formal complaint with the Chief. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noctis Lucis Caelum Posted August 11, 2017 Report Share Posted August 11, 2017 Voting Grub for Blue Senate is always the best choice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chunky Monkey Posted August 11, 2017 Report Share Posted August 11, 2017 4 minutes ago, EaTeMuP said: But the 9th Circuit Court of Bob found differently, and I said I would just give you a hint. You are welcome to express your disquiet, but I suggest you raise a formal complaint with the Chief. What does this even mean? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mandystalin Posted August 11, 2017 Report Share Posted August 11, 2017 37 minutes ago, Chunky Monkey said: Feel free to post your proof that this was a real thing anytime now. We're all anxious to see it. I warn you, there will be 15 pages of gunk to wade through before you finally get to an implicit admission that actually they just did it because they could, rather than because there was any real issue there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlmightyGrub Posted August 11, 2017 Report Share Posted August 11, 2017 2 minutes ago, Chunky Monkey said: What does this even mean? It means you are living in a crater for the foreseeable future. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlmightyGrub Posted August 11, 2017 Report Share Posted August 11, 2017 2 minutes ago, Mandystalin said: I warn you, there will be 15 pages of gunk to wade through before you finally get to an implicit admission that actually they just did it because they could, rather than because there was any real issue there. Poor Chunky has been given all the help he needs, he knows exactly what we are talking about and if he doesn't he is a moron. Evidence demands a verdict and the verdict is in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EaTeMuP Posted August 11, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 11, 2017 3 minutes ago, Chunky Monkey said: What does this even mean? It means you get "Fire and Fury". Gotta watch out for that Deep State. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chunky Monkey Posted August 11, 2017 Report Share Posted August 11, 2017 3 minutes ago, AlmightyGrub said: It means you are living in a crater for the foreseeable future. I don't have to do anything other than obey the laws of physics. 2 minutes ago, AlmightyGrub said: Poor Chunky has been given all the help he needs, he knows exactly what we are talking about and if he doesn't he is a moron. Evidence demands a verdict and the verdict is in. Except I haven't. All you've pointed me to is a screenshot taken by a disgruntled former member that everyone has known about for a month now. Beyond that, there is nothing else, unless you have something that neither I nor anyone I've talked to has any knowledge of. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EaTeMuP Posted August 11, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 11, 2017 Just now, Chunky Monkey said: I don't have to do anything other than obey the laws of physics. Except I haven't. All you've pointed me to is a screenshot taken by a disgruntled former member that everyone has known about for a month now. Beyond that, there is nothing else, unless you have something that neither I nor anyone I've talked to has any knowledge of. Correct. It wasn't OPSEC. We've established intent, but the rest is classified, and part of an ongoing investigation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auctor Posted August 11, 2017 Report Share Posted August 11, 2017 (edited) "It wasn't a secret plan, it was a totally nonsecret plan we voted in favor of as an alliance" is definitely one of the more interesting denials we've seen around here lately. Kudos for providing some variety. Edited August 11, 2017 by Auctor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted August 11, 2017 Report Share Posted August 11, 2017 Imagine in 2017 inflating Bern's ego. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caustic Posted August 11, 2017 Report Share Posted August 11, 2017 Oh don't worry, I'll go dig up porksaber to come out of retirement and immediately deflate it again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Zigur Posted August 11, 2017 Report Share Posted August 11, 2017 Why even move back to blue? Doesn't seem very wise if you ask me, even without the terms. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EaTeMuP Posted August 11, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 11, 2017 2 minutes ago, Immortan Junka said: Why even move back to blue? Doesn't seem very wise if you ask me, even without the terms. Yeah, didn't seem too smart to me either, but who am I to question it. The alliance voted for it. Apparently, it would be achieving the goal of redressing the wrongs done to them by Polaris, and restore their honour. He has dedicated his efforts in leading the alliance to it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Williambonney Posted August 11, 2017 Report Share Posted August 11, 2017 Well now that is interesting. Seems like someone just won't get the hint. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackatron Posted August 11, 2017 Report Share Posted August 11, 2017 54 minutes ago, EaTeMuP said: The alliance voted for it. This would be very compelling if it were actually true. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EaTeMuP Posted August 11, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 11, 2017 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Blackatron said: This would be very compelling if it were actually true. I don't see how it could possibly be false. They even made a post HERE with the government announcement. Are you saying that he didn't run on a 'move back to blue and restore our honour' platform? He got elected, so the alliance clearly agreed with his platform. Additionally, they hinted at it HERE What proof do you have that it is false? Edited August 11, 2017 by EaTeMuP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.