Jump to content
  • Announcements

    • Sentinel

      Cyber Nations Forum Rules   07/03/2016

        Cyber Nations Forum Rules  
      In the process of registering on this forum, all players--including you--agreed to accept these terms and conditions and the terms and conditions of Invision Power Board. In doing so you essentially signed an electronic contract pledging to have read the rules and TOS and agreeing to follow the rules and TOS as written. It is your continued responsibility to read, follow, and keep up-to-date with the CN rules.
      The following are basic guidelines for use of the Cyber Nations community forum. Anyone caught disobeying these guidelines will be issued a warning. The forum staff works on a five warn limit policy unless the situation calls for more appropriate action ranging from a verbal warning to a double warn and suspension to an immediate ban, etc.   Just because something is not listed specifically here as illegal does not mean it's allowed. All players are expected to use common sense and are personally responsible for reading the pinned threads found in the Moderation forum. Questions regarding appropriateness or other concerns can be sent via PM to an appropriate moderator.   A permanent ban on the forums results in a game ban, and vice versa. Please note that the in-game warn system works on a "three strikes you're out" policy and that in-game actions (including warnings and deletions) may not be appealed. For more information regarding in-game rules please read the Cyber Nations Game Rules.   1.) First Warning
      2.) Second Warning
      3.) Third Warning (48 hour suspension at the forum)
      4.) Fourth Warning (120 hour suspension at the forum)
      5.) Permanent Ban   Game Bans and Forum Bans
      If you receive a 100% warn level on the forums, you will be subject to removal from the forums AND have your nation deleted and banned from the game at moderator(s) discretion.   If you are banned in the game, then you will be banned from the forums.   Process of Appeals
      Players may not appeal any in-game actions. This includes cheat flags, canceled trades, content removals, warn level increases, nation deletion, and bans from the game.   Players may appeal individual forum warnings. You may only appeal a warning if you can show with evidence that it was unwarranted or unduly harsh. If a reasonable amount of time has passed (no less than one month and preferably longer) in which you have demonstrated reformed behavior than you may request a warning level reduction. Wasting staff time with inappropriately filed reports and/or unfounded appeals will result in a warn level raise. Repeat incidences will result in a ban from the forum.   Bans are permanent. Banned players may appeal to the Senior Staff if they believe grounds exist (very, very rare) in which they state their case with evidence and why explain why they believe they deserve to be allowed back into Cyber Nations. This process is not quick and the investigation into cases may last three minutes or three weeks or more depending on the individual situation.   The only place where discussion of moderator action is acceptable is in the appropriate Moderation forum. Posting commentary on or disagreement with moderator action elsewhere will result in a warn level raise.   Posting
      All posts must be in English. Common phrases in other languages will be allowed so long as they are translated upon request. Foreign languages are permitted in signatures and avatars, however.   Certain areas of the forum require you to have a nation in either standard CN or CN:TE. If you have...   A SE and a TE nation: You get one forum account. Your forum account name must match your SE nation or ruler name. You are allowed to post in either SE or TE areas of the forum. You must have your CN:TE nation name listed in your profile to post in the CN:TE section of the forum.
      Just an SE nation: You get one forum account. Your forum account name must match your SE nation or ruler name. You are not allowed to post in any TE areas of the forum.
      Just a TE nation: You get one forum account. Your forum account name must match your TE nation name or ruler name. Your must have your CN:TE nation name listed correctly in your profile. You are not allowed to post in any of the SE areas. You are allowed to post in the water cooler, question center and the moderation forums. Other than that, all your posts need to stay in the TE area.   Flame/Flamebait/Trolling
      Flaming is expressing anger or lobbing insults at a person/player rather than a character, post, idea, etc. Flamebait are posts that are made with the aim of targeting/harassing/provoking another user into rule-breaking. Trolling is submitting posts with the aim of targeting/harassing/provoking a specific group into rule-breaking. Forum users should not be participating in any of these, and doing so will result in a warning.   Topic Hijacking
      Hijacking is forcing the current thread discussion off of the original topic and usually results in spam or flame from either side. Forum users found hijacking threads will be given a warning.   Repeat Topics
      One topic is enough. Repeat topics will be locked, removed, and the author given a warning. Users found creating repeat topics after others were locked by staff will receive a warn raise.   Joke Topics
      Topics created as a joke are prohibited. Joke topics will be locked and the author warned. This includes topics in which the author is making an announcement “for” another in-game alliance. Humorous threads are permitted; it is up to the discretion of the moderation staff to determine what is merely satire and what is actually a joke topic.   Spam
      Spam is defined as creating posts or topics containing only contentless material of any kind. Users found spamming will receive a warning. Examples include (but are in no way limited to) posts containing nothing but smilies, "+1", "QFT", "this" any other one/few-word contentless combination, joke threads, or posts containing quotes and anything that counts as spam by itself. Adding words to a post with the express intent of avoiding a spam warn will result in a warning. These posts and other similar contributions have no substance and hence are considered spam. Posts of "Ave", "Hail" or any other one word congratulatory type are acceptable as one word posts. Emoticon type posts such as "o/" without accompanying text is still not allowed. Posts containing only images are considered spam, unless the image is being used in the Alliance Politics sub-forum and then the actual text of the image be placed into spoiler tags.   Posting in All Caps
      Posting large amounts of text in capital letters is not permitted. Use discretion when using your caps lock key.   No Discussion Forums
      There are forums that are not for discussion and are used strictly for game and forum staff to address certain issues, bugs, etc. The following forums are not open to discussion: Report Game Abuse, Report Forum Abuse, and Warn/Ban Appeals. Only moderators and the original poster may post in a thread, period, with absolutely no exceptions. Users found disobeying this guideline will receive an automatic warning for each offense.   Moderation Forums
      All Moderation forums also maintain pinned threads clearly marked as required reading before posting. Failure to read and follow required reading and procedure in a Moderation forum will result in a warning. Examples include posting requests in the wrong forum, failure to include all required information in posts, etc. The standard of conduct and enforcement of rules in Moderation forums is strictly enforced and the repercussions for disregarding rules or disrespecting staff are harsh. Read the pinned threads before posting and you will be fine.   Namecalling
      Excessive or unqualified namecalling is not allowed in IC forums; namecalling should also never make up the bulk of a post. Namecalling is prohibited entirely in all OOC forums.   Filtered Words
      Any attempts to evade the word filter will result in a warning. The terms we have filtered are filtered for a reason and no excuse for evasion will be accepted. Filter evasion includes censoring or deliberately misspelling part of a filtered word.   If you link to a website, image, video, etc., containing profanity, please post a disclaimer before the link. The moderation staff may still remove links if the content is deemed too obscene.   Harassment
      Forum users should not be stalking/harassing others on the forums. Anyone found stalking players from topic to topic, etc., will be subject to a warning.   Gravedigging
      Gravedigging is not allowed anywhere on the forums. Gravedigging is "bumping" old topics which haven't been active for quite some time (four to seven days is standard depending on the nature of the thread and how many pages back it had been pushed before bump). Your warn level will be raised if you are caught doing this.   The Suggestion Box and Black Market forums are partial exceptions to this rule. Suggestions/ideas in that forum may be posted in regardless of age PROVIDING that the reviving post contains constructive, on-topic input to the original topic or discussion. Black Market threads may be bumped by the author if there is new information about the offered exchange (i.e open aid slots). In the Player Created Alliances forum it will not be considered gravedigging to bump a topic up to a year old, so long as the alliance in question still exists and it is not a duplicate thread.   Signatures
      Those who fail to read and abide by these rules will have their signatures removed and receive a warning.   You may have only one image per signature which may not exceed the maximum size of 450 pixels wide by 150 pixels tall. You may have no more than 8 lines of text and text size cannot exceed size 4. Each quote-tag, image and empty line count as a line.   Inappropriate Images and Other Disallowed Images
      Images that are sexual in nature or have sexual overtones are prohibited. It is up to the discretion of the moderation staff to determine what constitutes sexual overtones. Depictions of kissing are permissible provided there are no sexual implications. Images depicting female nipples are prohibited outright.   Making “ASCII art” is prohibited regardless of the image depicted.   Using photos or likenesses of another Cyber Nations player is also prohibited.   Drug References
      Images and posts promoting illegal drug use are prohibited. References to drugs are acceptable only if the moderation staff deems that it is not promoting the use thereof.   Obscene Content and/or "Account Suicide"
      Anyone caught posting vulgar material (including but in no way limited to pornography, "gross," "tubgirl," "lemonparty," photos depicting RL illegal acts such as violence towards humans or animals, child pornography, death photos, and any other obscene or offensive material in either text form or picture form) will have their account(s) permanently banned, and their ISP contacted along with any other applicable internet and RL authorities.   OOC Threats / Revealing Personal Information
      An OOC threat of any nature will equate to an automatic ban from the game and forums. Likewise, the publishing of personal information of any other player without their explicit permission is grounds for warning and/or a ban from the game depending on the severity of the offense.   Death Threats / Death Wishes
      A death threat or a death wish of any nature (including but not limited to telling another player to commit suicide) will result in at very least a 40% warn level increase and 2 day suspension from the forums, with harsher punishments, including a complete ban from the forums and game, up to the discretion of the moderation staff.   Quoting Rulebreaking Posts
      Do not quote any post with obscene content or any other content that has to be removed by the moderation staff. Doing so makes it more difficult for the moderation staff to find and remove all such content and will result in a warn level increase. Putting rulebreaking posts of any kind in your signature is prohibited.   Forum Names
      With the exception of moderator accounts, all forum accounts must match up exactly with the ruler name or nation name of your in-game country. Those found not matching up will be warned and banned immediately. Forum account names may not be profane or offensive.   Multiple Forum Accounts
      With the exception of moderators, if you are caught with multiple forum accounts, the multiple account(s) will be banned, warn level raised, and your identity will be announced by a moderator to the CN community so rule-abiding players can take IC action against you. Multiple forum account offenders will receive a varying percentage warn level raise and/or a permanent ban on a case-by-case basis.   Posting For Other Players
      Posting for banned or suspended players is prohibited, as is posting for any person without a nation. This includes making warn and ban appeals on their behalf.   Imitation &. Impersonation
      Imitation in terms of this forum is mimicking the posting, avatar, or signature styles of another user in an attempt to be satirical or generally humorous. Impersonation in terms of this forum is copying the posting, avatar, or signature styles of another user in order to present the illusion that the person is in fact that user. Imitation is fine and can be quite funny. Impersonation is disruptive and is warnable. Please pay attention to the subtle difference between these two concepts.   A player may not impersonate another player by emulating the characteristics of someone else's past or present account in an attempt to harass, stalk, or flamebait. Creating a new forum account in an attempt to impersonate a standing account will result in deletion and banning without notice.   Any attempt at imitation and/or impersonation of moderators and game staff is strictly prohibited and will be met with harsh repercussions.   Avatars
      Size for avatars is limited by the forum mechanics, therefore there is no size issue for a user to worry about. Avatars must be in good taste, and any avatar containing a picture that is too violent, disgusting, sexually explicit, insulting to another player or staff member, etc. will be removed. Avatars that are potentially seizure inducing will not be permitted. Players may not "borrow" the avatars of any moderator past or present without permission.   Swastikas and Nazi Imagery
      The swastika may not be used in signatures or avatars. Pictures of swastika's are acceptable for use in the In Character (IC) sections of the roleplay forums, so long as its context is In Character, and not Out Of Character. Pictures of Hitler, mentioning of the Holocaust, etc... have no place in the roleplay forums, since these people and events existed in real life, and have no bearing or place in the Cyberverse. Other Nazi or SS imagery is forbidden in all forums.   Moderation Staff
      The revealing of the private identities of any Cyber Nations staffers past or present is strictly prohibited, and thus no speculation/accusation of identity is allowed. Doing so is grounds for moderator action against your account appropriate to the offense, including a full forum/game ban.   Claims of moderator bias should be directed to the highest level of authority--the Head Game & Forum Mod/Admin, Keelah. Claims of moderator bias without supporting evidence is grounds for a warning.   Blatant disrespect of the moderator staff is strictly prohibited. This includes but is not limited to spoofing moderator accounts in any way, sig/avatar references, baiting, flaming, rude demands, mocking, attitude, and unsubstantiated claims of bias. They are volunteers hired to enforce the rules. If you have a problem with the way a moderator is enforcing the rules or the rules themselves please contact Keelah.   Attempting to use the moderation staff as a weapon by abusing the report system in an attempt to get another player warned or banned is strictly prohibited.   Do not ask about becoming or campaign to become a moderator. The moderators are drawn from CN membership but moderation positions are by invitation only. Asking to become one will substantially decrease your chances of ever being asked.   Aiding Rule Violators
      Any user found to know of a serious rule violation without reporting it to a game moderator (eg. knowledge of a user with multiple nations) will be given a warning or, in more serious cases, have their nation deleted.   Aiding Banned Players
      Any user found to be harboring, aiding or otherwise knowingly helping a banned user will be deleted. This includes knowing of their existence within the game without reporting it to the game-moderation staff.   Questionable Actions and Content
      The forum rules are not designed to cover every scenario. Any action that is seen to be counter-productive or harmful to the forum community may be met with moderator action against your account. The Cyber Nations Moderation Staff reserves the right to take action against your account without warning for any reason at any time.   Private Transactions
      Nation selling and other private transactions via such auction sites like eBay is against the Cyber Nations terms and conditions. While our moderators cannot control what people do outside of the game you are not allowed to promote such private exchanges on our forums without expressed permission from admin only. Anyone found to be engaging in such activity without permission will be banned from the game.   Advertising
      Advertising other browser games and forums is prohibited. Soliciting donations towards commercial causes is also prohibited. If you wish to ask for donations towards a charitable cause, please contact a moderator before doing so.   Extorting Donations
      Donations are excluded from any kind of IC payment. Anyone found extorting others for OOC payments will be warned in-game and/or banned.   Third Party Software
      Third party software is not allowed to be advertised on these forums by any means (post, signature, PM, etc). These programs can easily be used to put malware on the user's computer, and as such can cause huge security issues. Anybody who is caught spreading links to these will at the very least have their warning level increased.   Other Forum Terms & Rules   Please take a moment to review these rules detailed below. If you agree with them and wish to proceed with the registration, simply click the "Register" button below. To cancel this registration, simply hit the 'back' button on your browser.   Please remember that we are not responsible for any messages posted. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. USE THE WEB SITE AT YOUR OWN RISK. We will not be liable for any damages for any reason. THIS WEB SITE IS PROVIDED TO YOU "AS IS," WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.   The messages express the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of this bulletin board. Any user who feels that a posted message is objectionable is encouraged to contact us immediately by email. We have the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.   You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this bulletin board to post any material which is knowingly false and/or defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise violative of any law.   You agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or by this bulletin board.
AL Bundy

TE Suggestion: Limit on Members in an Alliance

Recommended Posts

TE Suggestion,

Create a limit on alliance memberships.

My suggestion is 12 nations per alliance to be the max. This is enough for two trade circles and is about the average in the game currently. This will make it easier to find better wars between alliances. Also it make awards based on the strongest alliance more fair than just have a couple more members than another. This might force some members to recruit more members to the game to max out their alliance.

What does everyone think?

Thanks for the time!

Also two other suggestions/edits:

  1. Alliance flag: be able to choose one at 10 members.

  2. Just an edit on the Weapons Research Complex description it states that once purchased you can buy 2 nukes a day, but you already can do that.

Thanks again,

Al Bundy -a dang good women’s shoe salesman!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure about the number, but something like this might actually be very good, would promote a form of equality between alliances not seen before, also stops the same 2-3 AAs being top every round, every decently run alliance with max members would have a decent chance.

 

WRC description on improvements page is also wrong about size of multiplier.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"

Create a limit on alliance memberships.

My suggestion is 12 nations per alliance to be the max. This is enough for two trade circles and is about the average in the game currently. This will make it easier to find better wars between alliances. Also it make awards based on the strongest alliance more fair than just have a couple more members than another. This might force some members to recruit more members to the game to max out their alliance. "

 

I think that would be an outstanding idea... I have been saying the same thing for a long time.

 

this second part I would most likely get little support  but I will throw it out there.

 look at the number of nations we have this round that have a strength level of 3 (nearly  15%  ) that's because they are not playing they are just trade partners they do not grow or do anything but collect about every 15 days to stay alive for their trade partners.. I would take your proposal a step farther and require people to only trade with members of your AA.  This would force people to play or they would be penalty to their AA 's ability to win a round..  and it would limit rouges, because they could not get trade partners without belonging to an AA and if they go rouge it would make their whole AA subject to attack.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Wayne World said:

"

Create a limit on alliance memberships.

My suggestion is 12 nations per alliance to be the max. This is enough for two trade circles and is about the average in the game currently. This will make it easier to find better wars between alliances. Also it make awards based on the strongest alliance more fair than just have a couple more members than another. This might force some members to recruit more members to the game to max out their alliance. "

 

I think that would be an outstanding idea... I have been saying the same thing for a long time.

 

this second part I would most likely get little support  but I will throw it out there.

 look at the number of nations we have this round that have a strength level of 3 (nearly  15%  ) that's because they are not playing they are just trade partners they do not grow or do anything but collect about every 15 days to stay alive for their trade partners.. I would take your proposal a step farther and require people to only trade with members of your AA.  This would force people to play or they would be penalty to their AA 's ability to win a round..  and it would limit rouges, because they could not get trade partners without belonging to an AA and if they go rouge it would make their whole AA subject to attack.

 

Thanks man!

 

The second part I find to be hard to create, but what do I know haha.....Maybe just kick nations faster if they don't do anything.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Won't do anything. For various reasons I've run TE AA's with more than one AA before; if this was implemented, it would just add another reason to do that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎8‎/‎24‎/‎2016 at 11:10 PM, Caladin said:

Won't do anything. For various reasons I've run TE AA's with more than one AA before; if this was implemented, it would just add another reason to do that.

If you can run two successful alliances in TE then id say go for it, love to see it.

 

Still this concept would keep the rounds from having 2 major alliances run the show, and give a chance to those alliances that cant get 20-30 people to join. All alliances would have a max of around 12 nations, better fights, and an even opportunity to get awards for their alliance.

 

Then for those that feel the need to run multi AA's other alliances with dog pile them like they do now when they feel cheated.

 

Al

Edited by AL Bundy
Because I can :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, AL Bundy said:

If you can run two successful alliances in TE then id say go for it, love to see it.

 

Still this concept would keep the rounds from having 2 major alliances run the show, and give a chance to those alliances that cant get 20-30 people to join. All alliances would have a max of around 12 nations, better fights, and an even opportunity to get awards for their alliance.

 

Then for those that feel the need to run multi AA's other alliances with dog pile them like they do now when they feel cheated.

 

Al

 

I'm not running two. I'm running three or four, but in reality I'm just running one, and that is what the larger alliances will do; it's easy enough to create spare alliances, put an officer in charge of them, and run it as if it was one large alliance with only a slight increase in administrative workload.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Caladin said:

 

I'm not running two. I'm running three or four, but in reality I'm just running one, and that is what the larger alliances will do; it's easy enough to create spare alliances, put an officer in charge of them, and run it as if it was one large alliance with only a slight increase in administrative workload.

Well I wouldnt consider that running? Thats more like the hug circle I was talking about in a different post.....We all know some alliances wont attack certain ones......but i think have more smaller alliances, will bring more leaders, and better wars

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, AL Bundy said:

Well I wouldnt consider that running? Thats more like the hug circle I was talking about in a different post.....We all know some alliances wont attack certain ones......but i think have more smaller alliances, will bring more leaders, and better wars

 

Not really. It's more as if your battalion, squad, however your SE alliance organizes its military units had it's own AA; there is no structural difference.

 

The thing is, there is nothing that will stop someone doing that; creating multiple AA's to host their entire AA on - the only difference is that it will be slightly annoying to those who weren't already doing it for other reasons.

 

In general, I see no point to this idea, simply because it won't actually change anything.

Edited by Caladin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, AL Bundy said:

Well I wouldnt consider that running? Thats more like the hug circle I was talking about in a different post.....We all know some alliances wont attack certain ones......but i think have more smaller alliances, will bring more leaders, and better wars

Different times demanded different actions so for the past dozen or so rounds we've had our hands forced to unite and again forced to compete against a common foe and naturally those ties are still strong today but the good news is, TE may be moving back to post Avengers era where the environment allowed more war and less stagnation cos more teams had balance. The circle you refer to want nothing more than an even playing field and the opportunity to fight everyone, most of all friends.

 

Another problem with a limited membership is it'll encourage newbies to be excluded from the more skilled alliances cos they're less desirable than veterans and i believe they're very important for the survival of the game as they help balance out those who leave.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎8‎/‎27‎/‎2016 at 5:51 AM, HiredGun said:

Another problem with a limited membership is it'll encourage newbies to be excluded from the more skilled alliances cos they're less desirable than veterans and i believe they're very important for the survival of the game as they help balance out those who leave.

Good point. I still believe they would create their own new alliances.....it could end up 8 veteran alliances and 10 newbie alliances. More experience for them... would be nice to see some newbie alliances fighting each other.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

" it could end up 8 veteran alliances and 10 newbie alliances. "

 

I think you would have vets trying their hand at running an alliances 

 

 

    Nations in TE

Started by Overlord Wes, October 9, 2011

 

It shows that we are a dying game if we do not find some thing to make it interesting again 

we are done

 

 

 

Edited by Wayne World
had a brain fart

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Wayne World said:

" it could end up 8 veteran alliances and 10 newbie alliances. "

 

I think you would have vets trying their hand at running an alliances 

 

 

    Nations in TE

Started by Overlord Wes, October 9, 2011

 

It shows that we are a dying game if we do not find some thing to make it interesting again 

we are done

 

 

 

Its the consistent player base who are keeping this game a float and I'd say we're a little over 100 strong. The rest will come and go but its important we hang onto those who show interest to balance out the core players who drop off and every round we lose more so look at opportunities to bring newbies through your academic programs/ranks and keep them interested in the game, the more they know the more they'll enjoy TE.

 

But not everyone is in a position to teach or guide the new comers, so there are other ways to support the game such as donating, disabling your ad blocker, inviting friends and family to have a go, more seasoned vets need to step up and contribute more cos at the end of the day, its your lost if you find one day that TE has been cancelled.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also I'd still like to see admin trial a 12 membership limit, I've played a couple of other turn based war sims years ago that had membership limits and they were fun. A month or 2 at the most trial would be interesting, at this point whats there to lose.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With the amount of participation steadily declining..  as well as the increasing  popularity of temp trading... I think some creative changes to trades/rings could be of benefit...  The success of both individual nations/ alliances (old or new) depend on having good and active trades...   I think taking some of the frustration out of it would benefit the game as a whole.. What exactly those changes should be I don’t know...  I just know it’s not working in the same capacity it used to.. 

Edited by rexius

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread has diversified a bit so I don't feel too bad going off topic on some of this.

 

In response to the actual OP and Caladin, I don't think the possibility of having multiple AAs under one alliance is too much of a problem, very simply because the AAs will necessarily compete with one another in terms of stats and will have different internal communication, also the rules against intra alliance wars will not apply. So it's no different to having multiple AAs usually fighting together now, except unlike having everyone under one AA this creates the potential for conflicts involving only one part, or conflicts between the two at some point.

 

I think a few things could be done to make it a bit more appealing. One thing I would like to see is more efficient ways to launch attacks, like if you are trying to nuke someone with an SDI make it so that you can launch multiple times from the same screen, just like how you can launch multiple naval attacks without returning to the wars and battle screen, the same thing could be done with CMs as well. Additionally it would be very nice if attacks you have already run the maximum amount of could be crossed out/in red or whatever, just so if you are attacking your opponents in an irregular order you don't have to click through 7 screens to see who hasn't been GA'd or CM'd yet.

 

I doubt it would increase the player base but it would be nicer for those that continue to play I think.

 

Best way to get more people involved would be to advertise additional benefits in SE from doing well in TE; not just for a handful of people but for people in the top 40-50% in casualties or something like that (with greater rewards the higher up you are). Donations are decent bonuses but there's other stuff that could be cool, maybe if you could select an event to be applied to your SE nation or a senate proposal to be applied just to you (imagine the numbers if you had a chance to get an extra aid slot for 30 days once every 100 days!).

 

Other than that I agree that veterans have to bring more people on board and get them into the game, I assume Al does that with SE AW and I'm trying to do that with TTK this round, seems like a lot of alliances don't bother with that though, which is very sad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Blackatron said:

Best way to get more people involved would be to advertise additional benefits in SE from doing well in TE; not just for a handful of people but for people in the top 40-50% in casualties or something like that (with greater rewards the higher up you are). Donations are decent bonuses but there's other stuff that could be cool, maybe if you could select an event to be applied to your SE nation or a senate proposal to be applied just to you (imagine the numbers if you had a chance to get an extra aid slot for 30 days once every 100 days!).

I like the idea of additional or even alternative bonuses. The senate proposal especially. I think that can get some activity back into the game.

 

Maybe have the events broken down in tiered fashion and lower the percentage down to 5-10% of whatever the flavor is for that round. It can even be the top 5 of something like casualties, most destructive wars, etc. Only 1 event can be applied per color per round.

 

A few questions about it though...Would that stats be the end of the round or at everyone's peak? Would the event be an extra one applied to the color, replace one, or become an option for when the next set of events come around?

 

This suggestion should have it's own topic in my opinion. If you write it up, I'll back it.

 

E - i see that there was a thread with something close to this, but on a completely different scale,  crooked even. I think this idea is a more balanced approach, and shouldn't be that hard to implement. I would also say that there should be negative events as well. Maybe something like - $2 income for blue sphere and +$2 for red sphere due to some natural disaster. EMPs over a color sphere reducing tech shipments to be halved (50t). :D This would also mean that the events picked would be mandatory and not up to the senators. Maybe allow it so you can send a personalized message with the event as well.

Edited by rileyaddaff

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, rileyaddaff said:

I like the idea of additional or even alternative bonuses. The senate proposal especially. I think that can get some activity back into the game.

 

Maybe have the events broken down in tiered fashion and lower the percentage down to 5-10% of whatever the flavor is for that round. It can even be the top 5 of something like casualties, most destructive wars, etc. Only 1 event can be applied per color per round.

 

A few questions about it though...Would that stats be the end of the round or at everyone's peak? Would the event be an extra one applied to the color, replace one, or become an option for when the next set of events come around?

 

This suggestion should have it's own topic in my opinion. If you write it up, I'll back it.

 

Yeah, I'll write it up when I get around to it. The idea would be to rewards casualties (possibly just attacking casualties?) as they correlate to activity the best, and I suppose it would be measured at the end of the round.

 

My idea with the senate proposal part was not that it would be applied to the whole colour, but rather that you would chose one that applies only to your nation, but I don't know how that would be listed other than under events, but it would be interesting if players could chose a specific proposal to be generated that would affect the whole team, senators would still have to vote on it in that case.

 

I think top 30% is minimum needed, you want to ensure that people who are active every day and grow their nations properly reap the rewards. I agree it would help boost activity as currently all that is needed for maximum growth in SE is to log in a couple of times a week to maintain tech deals. If you want to see a small economic boost to your nation that applies 3/10ths of the time you have to work for it every day in TE else fall behind. Would only be +$2 citizen income or something along those lines for people in the top 30%, but enough to make a bit of a difference, and would obviously allow for better events if you're in the top 20/10/5%.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I understood were you coming from, i just tried to amplify it 10 fold is all. To be honest, i don't think admin would want to put extra work into, so it would have to be something he already has the structure for. So we would need to break down individual events into tiers.

 

If we are trying to draw more people from SE into TE, then going bigger, and doing color sphere events is the way to go in my opinion. I personally think the ability to give a color a negative event would add some much needed drama to the corpse of a world called SE.

Edited by rileyaddaff

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My 2cents about growth.  Recruit recruit recruit, simple and solid magic for the game!  Here's a spin start a stat sheet for recruits and longevity by nation and alliance give us goals thru stats (ingame).    It is a game which has ingulfed our lives because we enjoy the challenge.  Ok, guys challenge is on us everyone recruit 2.  Need to make it fun bringing guys up and on as the editions become more strategised.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/08/2016 at 6:46 AM, Blackatron said:

Not sure about the number, but something like this might actually be very good, would promote a form of equality between alliances not seen before, also stops the same 2-3 AAs being top every round, every decently run alliance with max members would have a decent chance.

 

WRC description on improvements page is also wrong about size of multiplier.

I'm not sure it'd promote a form of equality, I think what may happen is those who can, would consolidate their most active, coordinated and best builders/fighters. I know we probably would and I'm pretty confident this group of 12 would be more effective during wars than when we had 30 members this round, in terms of overall stats we would suffer but coordination, overall activity and the average skill level would considerably improve. Its difficult to tell though but that'd be my forecast.

 

As for changing the game mechanics or adding more incentives for more SE players to participate, I think admin has been doing this for years now with little success. As CB is basically saying, its mostly up to us and our efforts. I think overall the game mechanics and incentives are good but definitely support changing it up from time to time to help keep it interesting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Hoosier said:

My 2cents about growth.  Recruit recruit recruit, simple and solid magic for the game!  Here's a spin start a stat sheet for recruits and longevity by nation and alliance give us goals thru stats (ingame).    It is a game which has ingulfed our lives because we enjoy the challenge.  Ok, guys challenge is on us everyone recruit 2.  Need to make it fun bringing guys up and on as the editions become more strategised.

This is the key....

TE is a great place for my newbies in standard to learn about wonders, improvements, fighting, nukes and there is a lot more action to keep them active.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing is, we are running out of these so called newbies..What we need is incentive to bring people from SE to TE. I've been around a long time and only played TE a few times to help with trades. This last round is the first time I've played a complete round. There is no incentive to do so from my point of view. So in my opinion, some sort of SE perk would be enough to get a handful of players to hop over. Make color sphere perks and i believe we can get even more

Edited by rileyaddaff

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, rileyaddaff said:

The thing is, we are running out of these so called newbies..What we need is incentive to bring people from SE to TE. I've been around a long time and only played TE a few times to help with trades. This last round is the first time I've played a complete round. There is no incentive to do so from my point of view. So in my opinion, some sort of SE perk would be enough to get a handful of players to hop over. Make color sphere perks and i believe we can get even more

Create a dedicated thread for your SE perk suggestion to be added to the game, if its a good idea then I'll support it. Also the incentives i was referring to are the awards that if won have the option of a $30 donation to be added to yours or friends nation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, rileyaddaff said:

The thing is, we are running out of these so called newbies..What we need is incentive to bring people from SE to TE. I've been around a long time and only played TE a few times to help with trades. 

 

This is why something needs to change with trades... newbies are usually always at a disadvantage because rings are usually already set up for returning veteran players.. I love the challenge and creativity trades once supplied...  however with declining participation...  it’s now more of a pain in the neck than anything..  And I think that’s one reason that the newbies we do manage to get...  ultimately get discouraged and quit. So it’s not just getting them here... it’s also finding better ways to keep the ones that we do get..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×