GeniusInc Posted October 9, 2015 Report Share Posted October 9, 2015 (edited) Oct 9Oculus declares on MI6Oculus declares on TPF Oct 11MInc declares on NPO (et al. Oculus) Oct 14STA declares on NPO in defence of TPF Edited October 17, 2015 by GeniusInc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hartfw Posted October 9, 2015 Report Share Posted October 9, 2015 Pedro's war for Argent Affection. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeniusInc Posted October 9, 2015 Author Report Share Posted October 9, 2015 (edited) Like the last few wars, I'll be keeping a war chart and timeline of the war in the OP. Edit: dang you are fast hartfw :P Edited October 9, 2015 by GeniusInc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted October 9, 2015 Report Share Posted October 9, 2015 The War After Rey Got Peace from Argent is my favorite submission so far. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hartfw Posted October 9, 2015 Report Share Posted October 9, 2015 The War After Rey Got Peace from Argent (with Sengoku's help) is my favorite submission so far. Lets not slight our role. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auctor Posted October 9, 2015 Report Share Posted October 9, 2015 There are some metrics that this war chart hasn't caught onto. Such as Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franz Ferdinand Posted October 9, 2015 Report Share Posted October 9, 2015 Remove Oculus, add Dark Templar, Aurora Borealis and Grand Lodge of Freemasons Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isolatar Posted October 9, 2015 Report Share Posted October 9, 2015 GLOF is already on there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
white majik Posted October 9, 2015 Report Share Posted October 9, 2015 Occulus Rift Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeniusInc Posted October 9, 2015 Author Report Share Posted October 9, 2015 Remove Oculus, add Dark Templar, Aurora Borealis and Grand Lodge of Freemasons Technically I can't until they show up on the war screen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perez Posted October 10, 2015 Report Share Posted October 10, 2015 Mi6 massacre Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hornguard Posted October 10, 2015 Report Share Posted October 10, 2015 "Die Another Day War" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eejack Posted October 10, 2015 Report Share Posted October 10, 2015 Only seven alliances versus one? Smart holding back a couple of alliances - you never know with the 10+ to 1 advantage when you will require that backup. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kayser Posted October 10, 2015 Report Share Posted October 10, 2015 Only seven alliances versus one? Smart holding back a couple of alliances - you never know with the 10+ to 1 advantage when you will require that backup. This is the best post the owf has seen in a long time. Wished I thought of it fist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keeology Posted October 10, 2015 Report Share Posted October 10, 2015 Only seven alliances versus one? Smart holding back a couple of alliances - you never know with the 10+ to 1 advantage when you will require that backup. Never know these guys might need the back up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shahenshah Posted October 10, 2015 Report Share Posted October 10, 2015 (edited) Only seven alliances versus one? Smart holding back a couple of alliances - you never know with the 10+ to 1 advantage when you will require that backup.You spread the damage out the thinnest, independent of the arithmetic of this war. Its a good policy to have for any grouping or sides, you tend to aim for maximum advantage. Despite all the hupla hoo of one sided wars etc, everyone shouting that or vice versa have always aimed for maximum advantage in the past at coalition levels. Winners and losers change, but coalitions always aim for maximum advantage, not equality. This was true in the past, it is true now and it will remain as such, everyone has shouted the war isn't equal argument, those attacking have done it, those getting attacked have done it too, so, in the end, it is what it is. The argument was stupid before, it is stupid now. Its merely an emotional outlet to satisfy your inner self that the big bad guy is on to you, and you're fighting the good under dog fight, and that if the big guy had the balls/honor/moral/whatever he'd come on to you in an equal fight, so you are fighting injustice and evil. Its just that, a silly line that is always associated mostly with smaller side, regardless of actors in the smaller side. Same actors have pressed for maximum advantage when they were in position of strength and actors in strength have shouted the equal war argument in the past too when they were in smaller sides. Edited October 10, 2015 by shahenshah Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avakael Posted October 10, 2015 Report Share Posted October 10, 2015 I like Whispers War but I know it won't stick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kayser Posted October 10, 2015 Report Share Posted October 10, 2015 You spread the damage out the thinnest, independent of the arithmetic of this war. Its a good policy to have for any grouping or sides, you tend to aim for maximum advantage. Despite all the hupla hoo of one sided wars etc, everyone shouting that or vice versa have always aimed for maximum advantage in the past at coalition levels. Winners and losers change, but coalitions always aim for maximum advantage, not equality. This was true in the past, it is true now and it will remain as such, everyone has shouted the war isn't equal argument, those attacking have done it, those getting attacked have done it too, so, in the end, it is what it is. The argument was stupid before, it is stupid now. Its merely an emotional outlet to satisfy your inner self that the big bad guy is on to you, and you're fighting the good under dog fight, and that if the big guy had the balls/honor/moral/whatever he'd come on to you in an equal fight, so you are fighting injustice and evil. Its just that, a silly line that is always associated mostly with smaller side, regardless of actors in the smaller side. Same actors have pressed for maximum advantage when they were in position of strength and actors in strength have shouted the equal war argument in the past too when they were in smaller sides. I think we can safely infer from this post that another 5 allainces will be declaring on Mi6 shortly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schad Posted October 10, 2015 Report Share Posted October 10, 2015 The War of Schad's CMs is still available. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucius Optimus Posted October 10, 2015 Report Share Posted October 10, 2015 The Oculus Rift war Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dochartaigh Posted October 10, 2015 Report Share Posted October 10, 2015 You spread the damage out the thinnest, independent of the arithmetic of this war. Its a good policy to have for any grouping or sides, you tend to aim for maximum advantage. Despite all the hupla hoo of one sided wars etc, everyone shouting that or vice versa have always aimed for maximum advantage in the past at coalition levels. Winners and losers change, but coalitions always aim for maximum advantage, not equality. This was true in the past, it is true now and it will remain as such, everyone has shouted the war isn't equal argument, those attacking have done it, those getting attacked have done it too, so, in the end, it is what it is. The argument was stupid before, it is stupid now. Its merely an emotional outlet to satisfy your inner self that the big bad guy is on to you, and you're fighting the good under dog fight, and that if the big guy had the balls/honor/moral/whatever he'd come on to you in an equal fight, so you are fighting injustice and evil. Its just that, a silly line that is always associated mostly with smaller side, regardless of actors in the smaller side. Same actors have pressed for maximum advantage when they were in position of strength and actors in strength have shouted the equal war argument in the past too when they were in smaller sides. While this may be true, it has been a long time since we seen 7+ alliances against a single alliance. Not since the last time NPO led a bloc actually. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeCoHo Posted October 10, 2015 Report Share Posted October 10, 2015 What makes you think we're leading this bloc? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keeology Posted October 10, 2015 Report Share Posted October 10, 2015 What makes you think we're leading this bloc? NPO leading anything would shock me. Last war you guys were the alliance that took orders. All that NS that tech, aid slot % and just slaves to others Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucius Optimus Posted October 10, 2015 Report Share Posted October 10, 2015 Oculustober Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MitchellBade Posted October 10, 2015 Report Share Posted October 10, 2015 What makes you think we're leading this bloc? Well that would explain the amateur hour going on... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.