Auctor Posted May 19, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 19, 2014 You don,t feel like you did enough damage to us in the police action so you use this to setup a curb stomp to end our round i think.It's the other way around. Yall wanted to continue this, but didn't want your flag runners to actually take damage doing it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King James XVIII Posted May 19, 2014 Report Share Posted May 19, 2014 something is wrong then because it appears that you are harboring people that send rogues. No. As mentioned on irc, your gov has announced they accepted someone that your gov believed either was at war with us (Zul), or was sending rogues to us (E). In addition, you had a member while a member admit to sending a rogue at us. Maybe you picked a terrible day to be away, but you also picked terrible gov with the ability to accept members. A peaceful solution was given to all. Stevie G accepted it while under TPC's banner. If it doesn't play out that way, its a shame and one not on us. No. Seems to me that bomb broke the agreement. Care to back up your claims with facts? Stop. So, to review: For Stevie G he will accept peace means he will reject peace offers, hold the war slots and run attacks For TPC, we don't harbor rogues means we will accept people we will admit to know to be leading them Good show. No. In TE, alliances are commonly responsible for the acts of their members. There is no "oh, he's not government so it doesn't count!" defense. Not one that holds any weight at any rate. Even if we were to take what you are saying at face value, and honestly, this situation has really left me with more questions than assurances, TPC is still responsible for what Therm did. The problem with that narrative, however, is that last night, yall seemed to know exactly what was going on - the part yall found confusing was that we responded to it as a breach of the peace. This. I might have been out of town, but as I said through PM, had the situation been reversed I'd probably do the same thing TEPD did. No, we don't harbor rogues, but when one was taken under our flag we're responsible for that regardless of the circumstances. The buck stops with me, period. It shouldn't have happened, but actions have consequences. No one should be upset about this at all. As far as I can see the situation has been resolved. Time to move on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted May 19, 2014 Report Share Posted May 19, 2014 (edited) No. No. Stop. No. This. I might have been out of town, but as I said through PM, had the situation been reversed I'd probably do the same thing TEPD did. No, we don't harbor rogues, but when one was taken under our flag we're responsible for that regardless of the circumstances. The buck stops with me, period. It shouldn't have happened, but actions have consequences. No one should be upset about this at all. As far as I can see the situation has been resolved. Time to move on. Respect for this gentleman, don't think anything else is really needed here. Edited May 19, 2014 by Bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBRaiders Posted May 19, 2014 Report Share Posted May 19, 2014 No one should be upset about this at all. As far as I can see the situation has been resolved. Time to move on. We still have members being nuked by a rogue who was sent at us from someone who was a member of your AA. When those wars are peaced or expire, maybe then we can talk about moving on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dogbite Posted May 19, 2014 Report Share Posted May 19, 2014 Stevie G must be enjoying this. I banned him from our forum long time ago and now somehow we sent him to hit you as a member of TPC . Well your logic seems sound. Im sure all of TE will agree your right to hit us again with 4 to 1 odds to keep TE safe from the bullies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King James XVIII Posted May 19, 2014 Report Share Posted May 19, 2014 All conversations about this are private and between gov now. This will be settled one way or another. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The R00STER Posted May 19, 2014 Report Share Posted May 19, 2014 All conversations about this are private and between gov now. This will be settled one way or another. But I just made popcorn... why y'all gotta be so inconsiderate with this private nonsense. :/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canik Posted May 20, 2014 Report Share Posted May 20, 2014 All conversations about this are private and between gov now. This will be settled one way or another. I take it negotiations didn't go well. Good. I needed more defending casualties. :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caliph Posted May 20, 2014 Report Share Posted May 20, 2014 Something about due process and wanting a laywer present during interro...I mean interviews. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamthey Posted May 20, 2014 Report Share Posted May 20, 2014 I am justice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.