Jump to content

Mogar

Members
  • Posts

    14,555
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Mogar

  1. 🤪 I don't like Oysters but RV is free to eat what he wants, as long as it is not right next to me.
  2. While I know you have your line you have to stick to, I don't think you understand how little Caustic influences NG decision making for a fairly lengthy time now. I can say for sure you would be hard pressed to have such a collection of personalities held together elsewhere but to compare NG's government to a traditional government is kind of silly too, the alliances on the "hegemony" side have a whole lot less government and general membership discussion/interaction than NG would ever tolerate. The only kool-aid NG is drinking is likely mixed with several types of alcohol on a movie night, you should join an alliance with more than a half dozen active people, it's pretty nice.
  3. That has existed a few times at this point, a Polar and Pacifica treaty comes to mind.
  4. The econ minister in me is both laughing and crying uncontrollably, tossing away tens of billions(or more if we are looking at the macro of the scenario) because your FA strategy had no next step beyond "ally everything with an upper tier".
  5. If only there were a way to control which tiers suffers the most damaging conflicts based off your nation makeup, most haven't had years and years of free technology and have to buy their own.
  6. Welcome back my brother, it is good to see the boys back in action.
  7. I would support you coming back to Maroon so long as you stand for our beliefs. From my interactions with you all I know you would so I am not worried about offering my seat.
  8. Are you sure? I would take a step back and reevaluate that position.
  9. I don't think I have been this proud of MHA in years, I am glad to see XX is not simply a Polar extension.
  10. This sounds like a political issue, perhaps your side should choose allies more wisely beyond having a strong upper tier?
  11. Polar seems to support DBDC's aggression is the truly sad thing. IRON being on the bigger side is par for the course really.
  12. Got any evidence of this before you canceled the treaty? Or were we supposed to sign EJ's "everyone has to be nice or get PZI'D" accords?
  13. So I other words no, you will not defend them against DBDC, since you did not do so the last time Polar and XX got raided.
  14. I would say talk to your leaders but they would lie about it. Feel free to hit me up on discord.
  15. When DBDC hits you guys and XX again, will your good friends in NPO defend you like they did last time?
  16. Typically cancelling on an ally and then directly attacking them when you were part of the war planning is a !@#$%* action.
  17. Thought about it, but effort doesn't seem to be in high demand in this world beyond collecting the bad statistics, not casualties. I can't speak to our allies CB, merely defending them from the agressive actions of DBDC over and over again. It is unfortunate that NPO has to be on the same side as them, there is not much point to growing that upper tier unless they plan on hitting DBDC one day. I for one can't wait for them to do so, it's really useful they are getting us to weaken DBDC and friends upper tier in the first place ironically enough.
  18. Defending our allies from DBDC oppression, may the world one day be rid of bullies.
  19. You can't risk losing your pixels on a spreadsheet game that is about old enough to vote at this point.
  20. Casualties and hitting NPO, what could possibly be better in CN?
×
×
  • Create New...