Jump to content

The Trail

Members
  • Posts

    220
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by The Trail

  1. When can I expect the TGE drama to come back again? well aside from the small drama above
  2. I don't know where you are pulling that out of (ass perhaps?). I was just regular member for a month and now got into gov and I can't say that much goes behind closed doors the GA has any need or interest to know. Of course there are certain matters that must be handled in private as anyone with half a brain understands though.A regular member that was a leader in INT a while ago. Thats the difference between someone who joined CN a month ago compared to you who has been in CN for uh well I assume years?I hardly see what that has to do with the openness of ODN governance though. I didn't have any special access to the gov sections in ODN boards before getting elected even if I am an ancient member of CN community.True enough that I might have easier time grasping matters than a new player but that doesn't mean the new player doesn't have the equal chance to put things together in his head as I did. It doesnt but where you have credentials new players have none. Since you have proven yourself to be a better canidate then someone who just recently joined you have more chance. As would anyone else who posts here. Hell if schattenman joined ODN he would have more chance. Its about experience and recognition versus none and a nobody
  3. [quote name='NOMNOMNOM' timestamp='1304297481' post='2703555'] He sent a mass ingame pm saying that he would declare war on them if they did not stop tech dealing. NOMNOMNOM reporting in for $#@!poster of the ODN [/quote] He didn't, he warned the leader of TFE that tech dealing is a valid CB. There is a difference. Also you should seriously stop posting. Your alliances reputation, credibility and whatnot would improve if you did. [quote name='ChairmanHal' timestamp='1304300183' post='2703596'] The ODN you feel sorry for doesn't exist anymore. "No more mister nice guy." The funny part is that they think that they are something better. In some ways they correct...in others quite the opposite. [/quote] Indeed There was a time I liked ODN. That love stopped a few months after the maccers incident and when they backstabbed IRON in one war. (or left to dry I should stay) [quote name='Louis Balfour' timestamp='1304302356' post='2703640'] When you tell our protectorate 'We consider tech dealing with the ODN and act of war', the implicit [i]threat[/i] is that 'if you don't stop tech dealing with the ODN, we will attack you'. When you threaten our protectorate, explicitly or implicitly, there are consequences. End of story. [/quote] The way I see it he only warned them. He barely threatened them For educational purposes: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/warning http://www.thefreedictionary.com/threat In the end I guess its up to interpertation of the individual but schatt was pretty simplistic when he mentioned it. Its not like it was a gunpoint warning
  4. I don't know where you are pulling that out of (ass perhaps?). I was just regular member for a month and now got into gov and I can't say that much goes behind closed doors the GA has any need or interest to know. Of course there are certain matters that must be handled in private as anyone with half a brain understands though. A regular member that was a leader in INT a while ago. Thats the difference between someone who joined CN a month ago compared to you who has been in CN for uh well I assume years?
  5. [quote]we are loyal friends with a good community who are not interested in torturing our enemies or anything other than honorable wars.[/quote] the first one made me laugh. Im pretty sure there are a few alliances who disagree. the second point also made me laugh. (it relates to the first point) [quote name='OsRavan' timestamp='1304285618' post='2703381'] And RV (or whoever), can you imagine the storm Schatt would have kicked up if anyone in DH had dared to act as he has done? Can you imagine if say, MK had mass messaged applicant AAs to get them to switch sides, infiltrated spies, threatened protectorates (yes he did do that), attempted to influence elections, pass themselves off as gov of another alliance? I honestly think we would have seen him rending his clothes and pulling clumps of his hair from scalp as he crawled across the OWF ranting about a New Hegemony. [/quote] havent seen any of the sort you describe in the post above other then saying to the TFE that tech trading during war can be seen as an agressive act (and it certainly is a valid CB) [quote name='Sardonic' timestamp='1304286050' post='2703385'] This is boring, do this week in GOONS already. [/quote] Agreed [quote name='supercoolyellow' timestamp='1304286301' post='2703388'] Now [i]that [/i]I would pay to see. 50 tech to whoever can make a legit IRON-ODN defense treaty happen. [/quote] As an Ex IRON member I doubt this wil ever happen.
  6. [quote name='Mathias' timestamp='1304081227' post='2701895'] Why do people keep making alliances with xR1? He has a terrible track record. What's worse is that people keep protecting them. [/quote] Perhaps you should look at the alliance that is protecting him. They dont have a great track record either
  7. [quote]we do have a good relationship with IRON and they've expressed their support in helping us rebuild.[/quote] I dont remember any hinting towards that when I was in IRON (and in the diplo corps no less) just this fact alone makes me thing the OP reaks of lies (and not being upper gov or a member who knows whats going on)
  8. [quote name='Cataduanes' timestamp='1303759832' post='2699358'] Good to finally be alongside you UCR Nah man, Communsit better reflects our lazy approach to CN and life in general. [/quote] But republicans are evil!
  9. Switzerland is actually majority German (that figure is only going up)
  10. [quote name='deathman1212' timestamp='1303500128' post='2696877'] Yep. I was rather disappointed in this swift change of tune. [/quote] There is no-one stopping you from still getting at the people in thriller (past and current)
  11. [quote name='Schattenmann' timestamp='1303479313' post='2696506'] Take that, hotshots. Patently tacky, Gotham, tacky. [/quote] Not to mention the fact that the declaration came 2 hours later.
  12. [quote name='nutkase' timestamp='1303343779' post='2694973'] You say to let people play the game they want to play? Wouldn't that mean letting us play it the way we want too aswell? Or wanting us to play it the way you want too? [/quote] See janax. Not only that Your CB: Attack them because their warchest, spy count are low and because they have no forums. Their way to play: Without what you attacked them for Your CB: Non existant [quote name='Ying Yang Mafia' timestamp='1303346058' post='2695013'] Nutkase really beat me to the punch here, but what happened to letting us do things how we want to do them. [/quote] See above and below [quote name='janax' timestamp='1303346282' post='2695017'] The minute you attack another alliance who doesn't want to do things your way. [/quote]
  13. [quote name='Ying Yang Mafia' timestamp='1303338262' post='2694906'] So they'll listen of course. Then again, I regretfully had to fire a nuke today in retaliation for an unwarranted nuclear attack on my nation. Such a shame really. [/quote] I somehow doubt it that you even remotely tried to contact them and suggest them the idea's (spies, warchest) before all of this. let people play the game they want to play it.
  14. [quote name='Exige' timestamp='1303307448' post='2694602'] WTF???????????????????? joke treaty? prather, JD you guys are !@#$@#$ republicans and now you're signing with team Obama. .... [/quote] Wait Obama is socialist? This is news to me I wasnt even aware he was on the left side of the spectrum let alone close to the center
  15. [quote name='Yates' timestamp='1303267863' post='2694209'] Yes, you appear to be quite the war hero... [URL=http://img691.imageshack.us/i/methrage2.png/][IMG]http://img691.imageshack.us/img691/3607/methrage2.th.png[/IMG][/URL] [URL=http://img19.imageshack.us/i/methrage1.png/][IMG]http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/7889/methrage1.th.png[/IMG][/URL] [URL=http://img856.imageshack.us/i/kilerc.png/][IMG]http://img856.imageshack.us/img856/3329/kilerc.th.png[/IMG][/URL] [URL=http://img251.imageshack.us/i/insula.png/][IMG]http://img251.imageshack.us/img251/8761/insula.th.png[/IMG][/URL] [URL=http://img263.imageshack.us/i/12thman.png/][IMG]http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/1776/12thman.th.png[/IMG][/URL] It is my hope to be fighting 19 day old nations when I reach your age as well. [/quote] You know ODN did declare war on him not the otherway around right?
  16. [quote name='Ying Yang Mafia' timestamp='1303272695' post='2694269'] Read the posted terms. We are doing these poor souls a service. [/quote] Why present it to them at the end of a gun? [quote name='Duncan King' timestamp='1303311430' post='2694633'] Wow, you guys really are full of yourselves. Not only did you attack them for no reason, now you're violating their sovereignty even further by telling them how to run their nations and alliance and you're reserving the right of any member of Thriller, no matter where they are, to commit acts of war (spy attacks) against ActI nations for months after the war actually wins. I personally think ActI should deny these terms because they're really just a viceroyship without the mandatory hand over of forums. [/quote] Almost correct. They have no forums and if you read the surrender term accepting the forum clause basically makes it a viceroyship (because if anyone of thrillers side made it then they would have root admin and thus viceroyship.)
  17. Its sad to see alliances dissapear of the Globe. Atleast you are going to a good home. Good luck to Quantum members in their new home(s)
  18. [quote name='Systemfailure' timestamp='1303306173' post='2694582'] Nope, we have a CB, but why make a big deal about it since there are plenty of wars already doing it and the agruemnets for and against have already been given i have nothing new to say on the subject.[/quote] Still havent seen said CB (unless you refer to the NoCB is a CB now) [quote]umm what?[/quote] [quote]If you didn't say it in the past you sure as hell just did then[/quote] was a reference to your contradiction [quote]yeah im sorry i didnt clarify what i ment, i mean given that the past 2 major wars have been built on a fake CB(please dont bother telling me about whos right or wrong in the past PBvNpO war i dont care) or none at all (thumbs up MK and Doomhouse stay classy). oh and for the record my own personal reason for this war is 1. I can. 2. Why not. 3. I resent anyone failing more then me at any given time. [/quote] I dont really care who is right or wrong either. The PB-NpO war CB was solid. And even the DH-NPO war had a pointed out CB that basically implied that DH was pre-empting NPO to prevent them from interferring in the other war. The CB for this war I havent seen from either side or even a neutral party yet. Anyway good luck in your Raid fest hope you have fun
  19. [quote]I didnt say we have No CB[/quote] I see [quote name='Systemfailure' timestamp='1303305241' post='2694571'] but frankly are you really going to make a big deal about that [/quote] Contradiction? If you didn't say it in the past you sure as hell just did then Given the recent events yes I am still going to make an issue out of it. If teddy or the other dude are at fault here you should have attacked them not the others in the alliance. Maybe it is too hard for you to grasp this but im sure there are people in that alliance that are in there that are innocent and just want to build their nations? Having no warchest or having no spies or having no forum to communicate with is not a valid CB to declare war on an alliance for. And if you have trouble with the leaders then you target them. Especially when this alliance as you have shown has no representation on any sort of forum (meaning the members have no idea whats going on) I am not sure what the recent turn of events are (just that you split of from your alliances and made an AA with the sole purpose of attacking an alliance you dont like)
  20. [quote name='Systemfailure' timestamp='1303270459' post='2694240'] they are so fail if we didnt roll them their membership would have....oh wait not with those warchests they wouldnt [/quote] So you have no cassus belli? classy. I had no idea cyber bullying is back. The last time that happened was 2007-2008 I think during the WuT era
×
×
  • Create New...