Jump to content

Superhero08

Members
  • Posts

    20
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Previous Fields

  • Nation Name
    Apple Crumble
  • Alliance Name
    Dark Templar
  • Resource 1
    Aluminum
  • Resource 2
    Cattle

Superhero08's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  1. I think TSK is a more generally accepted acronym for The Seven Kingdoms, as opposed to 7K. Heck, even HB is more common than 7K.
  2. Needz moar posts Anyone know what's up? ...I should probably read the last page of posts. Probably some relevant info there idk
  3. this ranking is looking at AVERAGE and CURRENT* level of development where development is based mostly on tech amount. ranking low on this index does not mean your AA lacks an upper tier. it would mean your alliance is not only or mostly upper tier. it also would not mean your AA does not develop its nations. it would mean your AA has not yet developed its nations -- on average -- to the level of the AAs ahead of yours. this essentially does not reflect the rate at which an AA is currently developing (see below). *CURRENT meaning it is static. some AAs ranking low here may be developing their younger, newer, or war-ravaged nations very efficiently -- in some cases, no doubt, more efficiently than some AAs ranking much higher. this index simply shows that they have not yet imported as much tech on average. to rank the development of AAs (again, defined here as tech acquired) over a period of time, one could take this same formula in a week or month or year and see the extent to which AAs' development has either progressed or regressed (ofc tracking actual development of an AA's nations requires taking an AA's nation gains and losses into consideration over the time period). the formula is a bit arbitrary, but it is interesting nonetheless. it must be somewhat accurate because it places DBDC at the top. anyway, there's no reason to feel offended by nor get one's panties in a wad about this index. people should post more indexes. if you feel your AA is slighted, see how you can display information differently.
  4. The Riotous Raid (Part I) Let's be honest, this was little more than the raid.
  5. @Unknown Smurf: Franz's insinuation would be crystal clear had the ex-RS member in question joined DT. At this point, I would reference you or any others to my original comment on the topic, which essentially said not every application to join DT is approved.
  6. Sure, I'm in hippie. I don't have any military improvements and my soldiers cannot defend at the right time if u catch my drift. Still hoping u enlighten us. I'm curious to know why u would feel compelled to congratulate ur deserter on his new home in DT when in fact he does not have a home in DT. It does not compute. Are u trying to shame the deserter? He prolly doesn't use the forum, and shame doesn't usually register with deserters. So what's ur grand purpose?
×
×
  • Create New...