Tank4ever

Well I had a little fun in the 2-3 days of battle against the 1 person I was able to fight.

2 week bump

New Year bump!

lolbump for above post.

Bump to celebrate my re-election.

Zen bump.

A do the bumpty bump.

[center][img]http://i.imgur.com/x6hIl.png[/img] [color=#a9a9a9][size=5][b]Shangri-La[/b][/size][/color] [color=#0000ff][size=3][b]Peace, Strength, Prosperity[/b][/size][/color][/center] [center][size=2][b]Forum:[/b] [url="http://cn-shangrila.net"]Link[/url] | [b]IRC Channel:[/b] #Shangri-La (Coldfront)[/size][/center] Greetings Comrade! If you are looking for an alliance to help your nation achieve economic superiority, military strength and the camaraderie which comes with being a part of the greatest community on Planet Bob, then look no further! Shangri-La is one of the fastest and growing alliances on CyberNations (Otherwise known as DigiTerra), founded on [url="http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=113520"]October 12th, 2012[/url]. [size=3][b]Protection[/b][/size] We take pride in our theme of being a paradise for all who call Shangri-La home. Shangri-La guarantees it's members protection and rapid response in the case of wrongdoings by outside forces. If an outside entity attacks a member of Shangri-La, the government will do its best to secure a peaceful resolution and any reparations warranted by the assault. [size=3][b]Foreign Aid and Economic Growth[/b][/size] Shangri-La puts emphasis on helping its new members grow and become prosperous. You will have the ability to participate in tech deals to benefit your nation no matter whether you are buying or selling the tech. [size=3][b]Politics[/b][/size] The government of Shangri-La is democratic. All government positions are elected. This allows for eager members to advance themselves and campaign for positions in hopes that they win and can better the alliance. If your campaign is unsuccessful, we also employ the use of Deputies. Each Steward appoints their own deputies to help advance specific goals that they are aiming to achieve during their term. [size=3][b]War[/b][/size] We do our best to maintain peaceful relations with other alliances, but there are times in which war is necessary. We fight with honor. We pride ourselves as being a tight knit community which doesn't leave other members out to dry. We will always stand up for another when wronged, and we will always be there for our allies. In a day and age where alliances will scramble to cancel a treaty with (or sometimes completely ignore said treaty) and ally to avoid a war, we will not. [size=3][b]Ascending to Paradise[/b][/size] You are still here? Hopefully this it means you are interested in applying. If so, please go ahead and switch your alliance affiliation to "Shangri-La Applicant" and head over to our forums[color=#000000] [/color][url="http://cn-shangrila.net"][color=#000000]HERE[/color][/url]

Welp this took long enough. o/ SL

[quote name='OsRavan' timestamp='1348252572' post='3032799'] Why wouldnt we want to roll nor? I can only speak for myself here no one else. 1) Nor hasnt done anything to me. 2) Nor is tied to a number of my allies allies. 3) Theres no reason to. I will point out the conversation of this thread has now moved from "CnG had secret plans to roll NoR" to "Why wouldn't CnG agree to roll NoR?" [/quote] No. thanx to Rush we know there was some plan/promise/discussion to attack NoR via INT eventually. Now I'm asking, why couldn't that be done in a way to help LSF (your friend's oldest friend) if either way you're gonna lose.

So Rush said numerous times, next war when INT would most likely get to hit NoR would be a losing war. And Ogaden's SS shows Os saying going in for LSF wouldnt result in a winning war. Well since the outcome seems of both to be leading to the same place, a losing war, why wouldn't CnG want INT to do the latter & save some PR by helping their oldest friend who got in over their head?

[quote name='Yankees Empire' timestamp='1348159226' post='3032303'] Now that a) currently out of government and b) LSF and Int are no longer allied, I feel like I can freely say I am glad Int and LSF are no longer allied. LSF, you are a horrible alliance. You've displayed a level of incompetence not seen around these parts since Peggy Sue ran UPN, or when GGA grew fat on Pacifica's teat. I am truly disappointed that NoR did not disband you out of pity. You have brought all of this down upon yourself. You have seen your own alliance sacked, savaged and burned to the ground. Not only that, you have allowed your (now former) ally to suffer public condemnation while you, and you alone, are to blame. Your pride, your stupidity and your arrogance are what caused this. Int are not at fault for you immolating yourselves. Take some responsibility for your actions. [/quote] "I will disregard everything said here in favor of my bias beliefs"

[quote name='Tick1' timestamp='1340327666' post='2992312'] Why are you linking posts made in the apology thread? Did they ask on IRC? Did they ask in a direct message via forums or game? Yes, that is also their fault for not contacting government members from IRON to inform them the time needed to come to a conclusion through their government process. [/quote] Keep up. I already conceded that to you. I was referring to your statement that the apology was "alliance approved".

[quote name='Dom Zak' timestamp='1340325177' post='2992296'] Once again I say this, it was not IRON's job to read LSF's charter and see how long they needed for a vote to occur. IRON gave them a deadline, and they could have then stated that their charter didn't allow for that, which in turn would force IRON to give them more time. Not hard... nonetheless they still ignored the time limit given and spat in our face with [b]an alliance approved apology[/b] which was minutes late and not just coincidental. They made it late to prove a point that they don't care, which again was a F U. [/quote] http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=111638&view=findpost&p=2989305 http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=111638&view=findpost&p=2989350 http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=111638&view=findpost&p=2990246 http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=111638&view=findpost&p=2990492 You were saying?? Thats 3 LSF members. Now put that with the statement earlier that the number of votes could have been counted on 1 hand with fingers to spare. And it doesnt look like anyone voted for this. Assumption yes, but the point is you cant honestly say this was the LSF's choice this with only ~5 of 40+ votes. [b]But you are right, its their fault for not requesting more time.[/b]

[quote name='Penlugue Solaris' timestamp='1340319684' post='2992200'] i. The minimum time period before a quorum can be enacted on a vote [b]to amend the Charter or Constitution of the Libertarian Socialist Federation[/b] is 12 hours. Thanks for playing~ Also, I don't think my alliance has followed our constitution in a while if ever to the letter. Everything can be expedited or moved up based on the situation. [/quote] Idk what quorum is, but the part that keeps catching my attention is bolded. When did this become them needing time to amend their charter? Again Idk what quorum is. I might better understand in context, but it clearly states that it is for changing their charter, not making alliance decisions