Jump to content

Baden-Württemberg

Banned
  • Posts

    1,887
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Baden-Württemberg

  • Birthday 08/10/1982

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://tsohq.net
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Interests
    YOU.
  • Location
    D
  • Gender
    Male

Previous Fields

  • Nation Name
    Baden-Württemberg
  • Alliance Name
    The Sweet Oblivion
  • Resource 1
    Lumber
  • Resource 2
    Pigs

Baden-Württemberg's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  1. [quote name='pd73bassman' timestamp='1286397279' post='2477382'] Oh that's right, it didn't happen to have anything to do with Dilber promising you a place in 1v so you guys could plot your vendetta against Polar, nah that's not how it was [/quote] Yeah, sure thing. As if "our vendetta" weren't possible without 1V. [quote name='New Frontier' timestamp='1286401712' post='2477443'] The other difference being that MK was the lead alliance in CnG, whereas MCXA was always a horrible alliance and even the rest of BLEU knew it. Additionally, MK didn't leave CnG because NPO was offering them a prime-fellating position. [/quote] Yes, as because we were such a horrible alliance and everyone knew it, Polar was so upset about our departure. Grow up Cheyenne.
  2. [quote name='The MVP' timestamp='1286377833' post='2477170'] This is actually parodyig the moments of BLEU when MCXA left. When Sponge said BLEU was just find and as strong as ever, such a statement was made. Now that MK left CnG, I just wanted to use it too. [/quote] When MCXA left BLEU, it collapsed not because MCXA left it, but because the lapdog alliances finally decided forever and till the end lick whatever came out of Sponge. It's not they didn't have the choice. Spongebob knew that he would get the bills for his actions, but instead of admitting it, he again tried to weasel his way out lying. I think the situation is different here.
  3. [quote name='Kalasin' timestamp='1286357087' post='2477033'] An excellent point. It's so evil and hegemonic, it's almost NPO-like. [/quote] From all people involved an ODNer is speaking up...hilarious. Why wasn't ODN invited into the bloc? I thought you are so amazingly awesome super fantastic lapdogs???
  4. Reading Umbrellas posts in the thread I hardly believe MK will stay "treatyless" for a long time. The "we can be friends without treaties" argumentation might be valid, but then again, there is hardly a reason to cancel all treaties with your "friends" (and keep them as friends without any disadvantages in the relationship) unless your sole intention is to create worthless e-paper on these boards. In the end, if what Umbrella suggests is true, MK will have old friends 2nd class, and new friends first class. Congrats ODN You again pulled the loser card.
  5. [quote name='Il Impero Romano' timestamp='1284532789' post='2454581'] No, I'm talking as a person right now, not the member of an alliance. My comment has zero political undertones relating to this game. I deal with fact patterns where it is necessary to determine if an offense took place literally every single day, and here the victims story does not add up. The harassing act he claims is only harmful if read by others. Therefore, if someone were to do such an act using a tool like an anonymous proxy that enables them to remain free of consequence, they would [i]not [/i]do it in a forum that is unused. It goes against the nature of the act hes claiming took place. Furthermore, false victims almost always assert that the action in question took place in a venue which only they are privy, as it gives them full control over the story at hand. When you consider that only he knows whether or not someone has actually been trying to do this combined with the fact that it defies the nature of the act to attempt this type of harassment in an area with almost zero population, common sense leads one to believe that his story has no merit. As for a motive of frustration, there are far easier and less risky ways to frustrate someone without pushing the bounds of legality. It's counter intuitive, verging on ridiculous even, to think someone would go through all the trouble of getting his [i]arrest records[/i] only to post them where they would only be seen by him to whom they belong, simply so they can make him a little pissy. [/quote] In my opinion, it [i]does [/i]add up. While the story itself is, and I agree with that, unlikely, I know that in many cases of juvenile crime, (in which the crime is planned, included computer crime) the delinquency of teenagers knows borders. Especially out of frustration it is easy to proclaim "the crime", more difficult to prepare "the crime" but most difficult to actually do it. I think it is a realistic possibility that in this case the person wanted to actually announce it on a public forum, but then got afraid of the consequences, and searched for a middle way, which would be increasing pressure on M by only showing it to him. And then again, you don't know how difficult it was to get the information. You claimed it must be hard to gain these information. Usually, I'd agree. It is hard to get such information, but if this happened, I am sure, for the person who posted them, it was rather easy. I am not sure about the U.S. but in Germany it is logged when someone searches for the crime records of persons. So, if I were you, I'd go to the police, and hope that the U.S. police doesn't use systems from 30 years ago. That said, for searching these information at least your RL name needs to be known. So, unless someone hacked your computer, it must be a person who you trusted. (if it happened) I wouldn't automatically call him a lier, just because the story doesn't add up for you. That's too easy.
  6. [quote name='lionheart' timestamp='1284239032' post='2450139'] Guys Ihave seen the future. October first will be the Casper vs. UPN war. Though really good on you guys. It will be easier to run a gov for an alliance with only a few people. [/quote] A guy a few posts above made the same joke. Way to be creative, copycat. And before arguing I'd actually try to figure out how many caspers UPN "owns"?
  7. [quote name='Hogosha' timestamp='1283864734' post='2445217'] [i]You're so vain, you probably think this song is about you...[/i] Amazingly enough, this thread is about marking a landmark. Your entertaining "contest" just gives a nice backdrop. I'm glad you guys are around to provide the CN community with your cunning commentary and sharp data analysis skills. [img]http://cnnato.org/hogosha/nodate.png[/img] [/quote] Sorry MK, but their propaganda is better than your propaganda.
  8. [quote name='Rayvon' timestamp='1282730667' post='2430651'] You of all people should know me better than than to use a 'your clan' definition .. Of [i]any[/i] Viridian - as much as I used to refer to even Impero as one of my best friends (past tense) - (you) have known/understood/supported/refuted/etc anything we've ever talked about on a personal level of the course of the Entente. Except within these threads. And if that's a quote to somehow involve Symphony. Then you best PM me quick - because I have a few choice words I won't hold back any longer. Not if you backstabbing !@#$%*es in VE want to continue slandering me even while I've made every attempt to diverse myself from you. Personal politics have no play here - and I'll gladly put any AA aside if you want to make it as such. You're selling the entire Entente short over the actions of the current 'Good Ol Boys Club' ... While I agree with it to the current persuasion, it's not the full case. [/quote] I know Rayvon even longer than Egore. And listening to his posts makes me believing RV. Keep it going^^
  9. [quote name='Valtamdraugr' timestamp='1281993810' post='2418259'] No one is untouchable. If we fail to act, out of fear, we have lost ourselves. [/quote] That's what you [i]want[/i] to believe. And at the same time far from the truth.
  10. [quote name='Xerxer' timestamp='1281965441' post='2417867'] At this point, the treaty is canceled, the cancellation period is over with, the bonds that existed between NPO and GATO are cut. What could the NPO [i]possibly[/i] gain from sending a [b]former Emperor into #gato to try to slander Omni?[/b] Most people in the room were more concerned with Moo's poor form than whatever Omni said in that brief snippet of logs. [/quote] Moo isn't really slandering him. He'd slander him, if the logs were faked, or if he added something insulting to it. But he is simply copy-/pasting a statement. Every reader can draw own conclusions...that these conclusions might be something like "GATO sucks", isn't Moo's fault but Omni's.
  11. [quote name='TypoNinja' timestamp='1281899334' post='2416854'] I donnuo I'm gov in an alliance that actually gets incoming members peace before picking them up and getting into wars, I think that alone puts me above your current home. So no, not a self evident statement. My alliance solves problems before they blow up into something to get us attacked, your alliance provokes run of the mill FA disputes into issues that get them rolled, who's the bloody moron in this case? I know you might be a wee bit bitter, but the bias is showing. [/quote] For escalating a conflict you always need two. Because if the fellow were accepted by a "untouchable" alliance, ROK would have tried harder.
  12. It's not that they are hostages. They can found a new IRC channel and call it cn-facepunch, or even #wehateupnforhavingourircchannelname, and even make a PR-joke out of it. Whatever, let's not quarrel over an IRC name, that's kinda pathetic...
  13. RV for Superhero. Also, I am starting to like this....
  14. [quote name='Grumpdogg' date='10 May 2010 - 09:23 AM' timestamp='1273476212' post='2293395'] To be fair, at least we peaced out with \m/. [/quote] As Minister of Peace you should re-read Polar's propaganda line...
  15. Honestly Matthew, where is the problem with simply telling them the terms? What's the reason behind the unconditional surrender?
×
×
  • Create New...