Jump to content

Mayzie

Members
  • Posts

    1,821
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Mayzie

  1. I'm not 100% sure how inactivity works. Is it not just the same as paying your bills normally? As in if you delete your Infrastructure does that 1.5bn infra bill come down to virtually nothing? Without that & the improvements, you're less than a round of aid away from being able to pay bills.
  2. I think there must have been quite a few deletions because I've just noticed I'm at #49 and I've not even broke the 15m mark yet. Number of Soldiers Lost: 4,120,524 Attacking + 10,770,065 Defending = 14,890,589 Casualties Casualty Rank: Ranked #49 of 4,346 Nations (Top 1.13%)
  3. To be fair, I shouldn't have read this on my phone in tiny font as obviously he was biting to those baiting him. Either way, these "no-one is filling my defensive slots, my defensive wars haven't even been by GLOF, no-one even fights back, half of their members in my range are in peacemode" posts get a bit irritating. No-one is filling your defensive slots, because no-one cares. Plus with limited numbers in certain ranges, you don't unnecessarily throw three people onto a nuclear nation & put them out of action (into anarchy). SUN found themself at war with a bunch of our allies (& other coalition members) for interrupting our wars with TTK. Obviously all of our offensive wars aren't going to be against SUN & your defensive slots wont be filled by us. Like any other alliance, not all of our members are active every single day. Sorry you've not been satisfied with your engagement so far. Yes, half of our members in your range during that time were in peacemode. Half of your alliance are in peacemode now, what's your point?
  4. I'm hardly active, don't know what goes off within Oculus or amongst any of our allies but I'm pretty certain that SUN doesn't even register on anyone's list of priorities for this war. The only reason I hit you and not someone from TTK was because you're a gob-!@#$e and you were running your mouth on here. I figured it might shut you up for a bit and it did, but now you're not in range and back talking crap.
  5. I never said they were a day old. Either way, feel free to highlight all of the words since they all ring true. Younger, less advanced, less developed & less prepared. Generally, hitting nations at an NS level where the people running them haven't been bothered to do anything other than maybe sell tech will give you a high damage ratio. Well done you. I guess that's what you were looking for?
  6. Yeah, I'd stop too. All you're doing is reinforcing my point that you're fighting a bunch of nations that are less developed & less equipped for war than your own, so it's hardly suprising that you're outdamaging them. Unless I'm missing something and you've got some God-like button clicking skills that are boast worthy.
  7. Please do tell us more about how your seven year old, 5k NS nation with twenty-three wonders is outdamaging those younger, less advanced nations. I'm not sure going rogue en masse is "the honourable way out" either but I guess that's a matter of opinion.
  8. That's great logic. With such a convoluted treaty web, if no-one went to war with alliances that are two treaties away from another ally of theirs then things would be even less interesting around here.
  9. I got drunk, read every comment in the Queen's English & found the thread hilarious. Give it a try.
  10. I guess everyone treats their allies differently. Normally alliances respect the difficult decisions made when it comes to which side you're going to fall and the reasons behind it - it's usually a case of "We've got X amount of allies on this side of the war, I can't justify ignoring X treaties to defend you when you jump in to defend your other allies". It seems to me that you expect opsec to be broken, rage incessantly all over the OWF about how shit your allies are and demand the impossible - to fight every war unopposed because you're tied to most of the treaty web in one way or another and you expect every ally you have to stick their neck out to prevent any semblance of a counter on you above the needs of their coalition & their other allies. If that's how much you value your allies then I'm thankful we don't hold a treaty.
  11. Over seven months & not a single post. Similar to our forums. :v:
  12. Have fun you lot. Hopefully someone blocks about fifteen straight nukes of Phil's.
  13. Your cap on warchests is to basically write off the best part of two years of me hoarding cash & buying tech when I might as well just have been going rogue every other month, isn't it?
  14. I'm not sure I can cope with waiting to see if the next batch gets delivered on time.
  15. We get it, you don't like NSF. How about you just don't have anything to do with them instead of being such a drama queen?
  16. All we need now is that guy who posts boat pictures & this topic will be complete.
  17. This means I can't sell everything & destroy Phil, Auctor & Petro doesn't it?
  18. Have fun chaps. I'm not envious of your generals at all. <_<
  19. I wouldn't offer them lenient peace terms either, in fact I'd just keep them at war forever. That's no less than a tiny alliance that doesn't know any better deserves. Fuck em all I say. Or you could stop coming across as such a pretentious prick and just peace out. Pounding on their nations while attempting to teach them the ways of the world & after the aggrieved party in all of this have given them white peace makes no sense. Does anyone really give enough of a crap about this to moderate discussions between a tiny alliance no-one has ever heard of before and another tiny alliance that just decided to stomp on them for no good reason?
  20. There's a name I've not seen in a while. Best of luck with this MadMax, hope it works out for you.
×
×
  • Create New...