Jump to content

bwc153

Members
  • Posts

    23
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About bwc153

  • Birthday August 6

Profile Information

  • Location
    My nation name says it all...
  • Gender
    Male

Previous Fields

  • Nation Name
    Kansas City
  • Alliance Name
    Death Before Dishonor
  • Resource 1
    Oil
  • Resource 2
    Silver

bwc153's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  1. Good fight to UCoN. Of all the nations I've foughten in the war, those from UCoN gave the toughest fight. o/ DB4D o/ NEW o/ UCoN
  2. Hope you have fun with MC and UCoN, I know I am! o/ NEW
  3. I need more wars, all the INT guys I fought are way below my range now.

  4. Good to see this finally official, I'll say when I first read the draft of this treaty I found it quite hilarious - it's great to see other alliances with a sense of humor, and it is an honor that one of them can be counted on in the battlefield. o7 DB4D o7 Invicta
  5. [quote name='wasso' timestamp='1345437958' post='3023642'] [b]Alliances Statistics :[/b] [b] [u] Hellas [/u] ( Before the War Hellas had 2 Nations in Anarchy ) Total Nations : 32 Strength : 180,656 [u] Death Before Dishonor [/u] Total Nations : 38 Strength : 159,128[/b] [/quote] [quote name='Alexandros o Megas' timestamp='1347422695' post='3029302'] It seems to forget a few minor points: 1. You started the war nr. 6th alliance while our Alliance was nr. 8th. It seems to me opposite now. 2. 90% of our nations can not fight you anymore, first because your nations' NS is less than 1st or 2nd day created nations even though the round goes to the end, while about a week or more ago I have advised my nations here publicly to ignore you anymore, not starting new wars against, as your nations were so flat from our bombs likea tennis court. 3. You have anarchied 2-3 inactive micros of us while all the other anarchies are from the parallel wars we have with the majoirty of the game flag runners during our wars with TPC and CoS with nations 6, 7 or even 8 times bigger size than your biggest nation. 4. Consider yourselves happy for the training you have received during this round from Hellas. There is more to come! [/quote] 1. How is this the case when the declaration post (which has NOT been edited) shows us with 21,000 points less than you? 2. Your inability to fight our nations is not our problem. 3. I count 6 nations that were anarchied by DB4D and are STILL anarchied (in all likelyhood some have been anarchied and since most of the wars have ended, many have likely recovered - same with our nations), only of which was inactive at the time of our nations declaring war on them. Let's be fair and also see how many DB4D nations currently in anarchy who are not inactive? 3, one of which was sent into anarchy by a person who is not part of Hellas but is apparently fighting on your behalf. The other 6 have been inactive and either did not take action in the war at all, or never changed out of Anarchy back into a stable form of government at least 5 days after the war ended. Also, where are all these newbies and rerolls you speak of us having? I see only one newbie.
  6. You claim to have won the war yet the war has yet to end. Remember, our name is Death Before Dishonor; All loyal members would fight to the last soldier, the last citizen. Thus far, you seem to be having difficulty causing such a damage to our people. If you take a note at the stats screens you'll notice 12 of your 26 nations (46%) in comparison to 9 of our 31 nations (29%) are in anarchy. You'll note that 14 (55%) of our nations are listed as active in comparison to 21 (81%) of yours. We outnumber you nation wise and almost half of our nations are not actively playing - yet more of your nations are in anarchy than ours, clearly something [i]is[/i] wrong here with your assumption. You claim to be winning the war. But are you?
  7. Wait, we got declared on 20 days ago? I wasn't aware of this until I was told about it, in fact I wasn't even paying attention to the affairs of my nation... Where's all the notifications that my nation has been attacked? Why isn't my nation in anarchy? Why are all my soldiers still on their parade grounds and not in the battle field? I guess I'll go tell them to march to war then, happy hunting.
  8. Glad this is done, was a bit curious as to what the name would be, as I was absent from the last 2-3 days of negotiations. I can see whoever chose the name chose a good one. o/ NAC o/ DB4D
  9. Recent rogue attacks against the nations of my alliance have all ended tragically for those responsible.

  10. Good to see this is finally official, NEW treaties between a few old friends, eh?
  11. Honor or Honour, doesn't quite matter as it all sounds the same - I personally use both, depending on the people I'm speaking/typing with. But back to the topic at Hand: I am proud to have signed the treaty and announcement that you have feasted your eyes upon.
  12. I've finally been released out of solitary confinement for that action... Aryan and his strict rules... But, I'm here to say o/ DRAGON o7 DB4D
  13. [quote name='kriekfreak' timestamp='1294407123' post='2567231'] Penkala is not a rogue. [b]Also, actions taken into the past deserve a sanction in the presence?[/b] I don't believe it should. If you or VA wanted to have Penkala pay for his crimes you should've declared on him in the past and dealt with him in the past. VE wouldn't have accepted him if he was on some kind of ZI list I take it. So letting Penkala go is really your won damn fault and not that of Penkala nor VE. Sanctioning him now, now he is a legit VE member, constitutes as an act of war. VA should be lucky VE didn't roll them right away. [/quote] Then drop this thing about what a VA senator did... It was done in THE PAST... There's no arguing that... [quote name='potato' timestamp='1294419175' post='2567365'] It's rogue. Rogue, rogue, rogue, rogue, rogue. If you're going to try a oh so witty quip about middle school, at least try to be irreproachable. [/quote] Thanks, I typed that at 6AM and posted it at 7am, and had been a bit lazy to correct that. [quote name='Penkala' timestamp='1294413344' post='2567298'] I am not a rogue. This is a factual statement and cannot possibly be disputed. I am a member of the Viridian Entente. Yeah that's not quite how this works. Your senator went rogue. [b]There are consequences to going rogue.[/b] Sucks. [/quote] Once a rogue, always a rogue, at least in the eyes of those you attacked... Particularly if you attack Rogue them multiple times, even after whining and promising to not attack again. I know those who have not been rogued won't agree... But once someone does it to them, I can almost guarantee they will change their tone real quick... Anyways, Penkala... Who said I was saying 'Rogue' in a strictly CN fashion? And you can not say that its a factual statement that can not be disputed about this, because opinions do not apply to this rule. I just made a speech today about hypocrites, and how I absolutely hate their guts... You really are going to try and play the 'rogue's have consequences'? That is very balssey and foolish to do... I suggest you think with your MIND a bit more, please.
  14. [quote name='Penkala' timestamp='1294378096' post='2566858'] Worst argument ever. [/quote] Worst refute ever: For multiple reasons. 1. Lack of Content 2. Lack of supporting Details I'll give a D for effort though. Go back to middle school and learn how to make an argument please. [quote name='Azaghul' timestamp='1294388493' post='2567102'] He's still a legitimate member of VE, regardless of what you think about him, and therefore under their protection. [/quote] Penkala is a rouge, you say that he is a member of VE and under their protection... Thusly, you just admitted to VE harboring rouges? I'd be careful, they will probably threaten to DoW you now for spilling their beans. Technically... you all say that VA and allies should pay for what a VA senator did... Yet you of course all disregard the actions Penkala has committed in the past. We might as well start saying 'VE should pay for what Penkala did.' But of course, either argument is false and really should be replaced with a better argument.
×
×
  • Create New...