Utter stupidity. This argument that all alliances that simply exist are better than all those who have existed in the past is simplistic and ridiculous. Like enderland has already said, just having nations on an AA says nothing about the quality of an alliance or proves that it is better than alliances that have existed in the past.
Let's push this absurdity, you would argue that Zulu alliance is better than Vox populi, or that the North American Confederacy is a better alliance than RoK. Nothing more needs to be said.
absolutely.
Here's two examples, one that did it right, another that did it wrong.
Vox populi did it right, they disbanded after their main mission (taking NPO out of power) was completed.
Doin it rong: GGA trying to keep the ship afloat for way too long, making themselves the butt of an even bigger joke.