Jump to content

i hate cyber nations

Banned
  • Posts

    140
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About i hate cyber nations

  • Birthday 12/07/1983

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://mash-alliance.org
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Location
    ca
  • Gender
    Male

Previous Fields

  • Nation Name
    i hate cyber nations
  • Alliance Name
    M*A*S*H/ The 4077th (TE)
  • Resource 1
    Lumber
  • Resource 2
    Oil

i hate cyber nations's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  1. I do not think we have a treaty with purple stating we all head to war together. I understand why people are angry we did not side with purple in this war, but there are many other spheres in this situation. Aqua with Nato, Orange with IRON. While we had treaties with both sides in this war, we knew our alliance had to help defeat NPO due to our past history with them. bottom line, we will gladly leave purple after the war is over if the purple alliances insist. Hopefully driving people off spheres for having different ideas becomes a thing of the past after this war. But so far it doesn't sound like it will be.
  2. what a lame post good to see you action action -boomerisgod
  3. We are not currently members of Poseidon, nor have we ever been.
  4. I personally think it's the 2nd one. And judging by some of the responses in this thread, I can tell it is also garnering them some sympathy (and probably easier terms).
  5. I remember those two nations (their top 2) leaving Legion right before GWIII. They always run off right before a war. I really don't understand why somebody would want them in their alliance (except to make your stats look nicer)
  6. our top 20 was definitely not stronger than TPF's before the war. We had 1 nation above 6k, and the rest around 3-5k. TPF had at least 4 nations in the top 10, and many more above 6k.
  7. that's probably because you have a bunch of small nations and it'd be pointless to give them targets and better to let them grow. I think it's inherently unfair when an alliance double in size first strikes another. There's no getting around the unfair label in that scenario. Maybe if we'd struck first things would be different. It doesn't mean we can't have fun though and despite your larger size we have only lost about 2k more ns than TPF
  8. no, there is no spy. Honestly, some guy said TPF is probably attacking us. We already suspected it, and only believed it after seeing the early declaration against two of our nuclear nations. Raiders don't usually attack nations with nukes. I'm not sure what an alliance could do with only an hour of preparation, but that's still better than not knowing at all.
  9. that may be true, but being able to strike first is a huge advantage. Especially when the alliance coordinating the first strike is double in size. we shall see
  10. Only part of that I don't agree with is the "very close to our NS" part Your ns is about double ours, but that is because we have 70 less members than you. But you'll be surprised how much damage we cause. Good luck !
  11. The 4077th and The Phoenix Federation. Earlier before update we received word that TPF would be conducting an update strike on our alliance. Soon after an early declaration occurred 1 hour before the update against two of our largest nations. This is apparently all due to a war we engaged against Hammer Time which has been declared over for more than two days now. Hence, the TPF leadership have begun attacks against our alliance. We do not mind a 1v1 since we believe that is what TE is all about. They may be twice our size but we will fight to the last bit of infra. And besides, there are only 3 weeks left in the round good luck
  12. CDT and 4077th nations started sending out peace offers over a day ago. So if you are still under attack by anybody from those two alliances let me know and I'll message them. As we told Fish Land, it was nothing personal and was only a challenge for the #1 nation. As far as nuking your #2 guy, we're sorry about that and our member has been warned not to nuke again without authorization.
  13. Is it not possible to add punctuation to war reasons in-game? I'm seeing so many "were bos" and "wer bos"
  14. We found this message from you pretty amusing. thanks for the laugh fish land
×
×
  • Create New...