Jump to content

HeinousOne

Banned
  • Posts

    3,107
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Previous Fields

  • Nation Name
    Children of the Corn
  • Alliance Name
    STA
  • Resource 1
    Fish
  • Resource 2
    Water
  • CN:TE Nation Name
    Heinocracy
  • CN:TE Alliance Name
    Frostbite

HeinousOne's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  1. I don't have much more to say then simply "What a show". You have most definately left your mark on this world for all time Grub. I am not going to bother with the still to come debates on whether it was for good or bad. I don't really care which it is.
  2. [quote name='MaGneT' date='05 February 2010 - 06:20 AM' timestamp='1265350847' post='2160907'] Quite close. First part is correct, but we activated our MA clause with PC, after that I believe you're perfect. Half the reason we did this is because of how hilarious it is, methinks. [/quote] I thought it was pretty funny. Never seen an announcement like that. I kept hearing a certain voice in my head each time I saw yet another announcement after the one I just read and that voice said "And then...." [quote name='MaGneT' date='05 February 2010 - 06:34 AM' timestamp='1265351640' post='2160965'] Please prove that we don't hold a treaty with them. Treaties do not need to be written on the OWF, nor do they need to be written at all to carry the same meaning. We do not conform to your standards. [/quote] Damn, you are winning me over here MaGneT.
  3. [quote name='mhawk' date='03 February 2010 - 10:22 PM' timestamp='1265235754' post='2157251'] What I'm getting at is if you guys were committed to defending in the event TOP and IRON did this, it sure would have helped to have mentioned it hours before the attack so someone could have stopped it. :/ [/quote] Aww you would have stopped the show for little ole us? I feel the love mhawk but I am having a hard time believing it. Still though, we all saw the quote of her saying just hit Athens and not Mushroom. Mushroom was attacked....I think she made it pretty clear myself.
  4. [quote name='Chickenzilla' date='03 February 2010 - 06:04 PM' timestamp='1265220276' post='2156813'] I don't recall Stickmen being used at all against STA. [/quote] No, in order to use it against us we probably would have had to have been told about it first off. [quote name='mhawk' date='03 February 2010 - 10:11 PM' timestamp='1265235081' post='2157225'] I guess my one question here is if you were intent on doing this, why didn't you state as such when you knew about the attack. Perhaps it would have been useful to the people that were preparing to defend you and your polar allies if you said, "if x is attacked, we will defend them." Instead of "we know about the plan, but we're just going to pretend we didn't." ? [/quote] We all saw what Pez shared. She said we didn't care if Athens is attacked (apology was given) but dont attack our ally MK. That is your problem you have a problem understanding something that simple. I know you don't need everything spelled out letter by letter for you Mhawk.
  5. You know, I hope one of these days you guys and girls in GGA are able to show up and earn some respect in a war. It gets tiring watching everyone fall into the mob mentality more and more. It shows true in every GGA thread as folks think it is time to be cool and see if they can toss the most snide remark your way. Maybe I just like underdogs but they make it very hard for me personally to dislike you guys. Good luck GGA.
  6. [quote name='Ivan Moldavi' date='03 February 2010 - 02:25 PM' timestamp='1265207117' post='2156463'] His opinion is his own. It is not indicative of the NSO. [/quote] Fair enough, I shouldn't have taken such liberty with my words. I do have a great respect for NSO's actions towards us.
  7. [quote name='Methrage' date='03 February 2010 - 02:14 PM' timestamp='1265206452' post='2156439'] MK seemed to when they were complaining about NpO helping us on our front with GOD. Its a shame you guys would let MK elawyer you onto the other side while we're still fighting CSN, although I realize you guys are doing what you think right. [/quote] As I said, we don't believe in sides. No one E-lawyered anyone into anything. As far as I know a request was made per a treaty agreement that our leaders signed and our leaders make every effort possible to live up to their words of the past when they can. In this instance we can and we seem to be doing such. People will try to add on to that reality with their own little tidbits but personally, it isn't appreciated coming from those who not long ago came running to our aid without a treaty obligation. You make it seem like some of you might have expected us to have to owe you our servitude over our treaty obligations due to that very unselfish act of NSO. We are simply following a treaty obligation, it has nothing to do with right and wrong. That is my take on it anyway.
  8. [quote name='King DrunkWino' date='03 February 2010 - 06:00 AM' timestamp='1265176852' post='2155606'] STA, you folks have such a good rep that you can end up changing sides in a war and have everyone give you props for it. [/quote] We don't believe in sides. [quote name='Alterego' date='03 February 2010 - 06:25 AM' timestamp='1265178353' post='2155762'] Congratulations STA. You weighed up everything and went with the massively superior side (56m V 118m) in this war to fight against the people who had your back only a a week or so ago for the side you were fighting against. This will never be forgotten and regularly brought up in the future. I cant see it as anything other that picking the larger side, which is sad because I never expected an alliance like STA to do something like that. [/quote] Yeah, this was awesome. Unfortunately I came along too late and this has already been properly torn up. [quote name='cookavich' date='03 February 2010 - 07:19 AM' timestamp='1265181581' post='2155976'] Stay safe, boys. We have your back no matter what... and I do mean no matter what. [/quote] And we have yours, no matter what. Edit: I almost forgot, I wanted to offer a hail to TOP for the respectful and understanding words that I have seen come from you guys here. It is good to see that such power is wielded by respectful and understanding folk.
  9. [quote name='mpol777' date='03 February 2010 - 05:32 AM' timestamp='1265175178' post='2155161'] I believe this DoW does not fit under the common standards of the community of Planet Bob and this is why I like it. [/quote] Not making a statement about any of the stated alliances but I must agree. Keep on expressing your Sovereign Right to do as you see fit PC.
  10. [quote name='fallin' date='03 February 2010 - 04:33 AM' timestamp='1265171632' post='2154581'] Declaring war on the Gramlins without a similar declaration on MHA would be akin to having a ham sandwich without eating the ham. Its missing the entire point of the exercise. [/quote] It is OG. You are the largest alliance in the world. You do realize how this taunting makes you look? You may think of yourselves and Gramlins as a single unit but you still maintain two alliances so in all actuality you are not. OG declaring war on Gre is still living up to their treaty considering what they are bringing to the table. Why doesn't MHA just go ahead and declare on them if you and Gre are so close? You are the one that has to represent that relationship, not OG.
  11. [quote name='Lord Brendan' date='03 February 2010 - 02:54 AM' timestamp='1265165674' post='2154385'] In addition to supporting you, TOP declared war on C&G for reasons entirely unrelated to Polar or \m/ - namely their desire to "eliminate a threat". C&G is more of a threat to TOP now than ever before (since TOP has shown their cards), and obviously TOP with this mentality is a huge threat to C&G. Both sides therefore have an extremely good reason to continue the war - self preservation. [/quote] Yeah, I got to admit that your reasoning is sound and logical. Does such make it a different war then? I know we are used to single wars with periods of peace in between but that does not mean it has to always be that way. Are these now two back to back Wars due to reasoning for the current war being exactly as you state? The fight isn't even over the Polar and \m/ conflict anymore. It is about a much bigger face off. The current conflict is of much greater magnitude and importance to the world as a whole.
  12. [quote name='Shodemofi' date='03 February 2010 - 01:03 AM' timestamp='1265159000' post='2154223'] I've got to echo this. It sucks having allies on both sides and all, but this is definitely the most exciting CN's been in a long, long time. [/quote] I think that which "sucks" has actually given this period some of it's excitement. We are seeing a Treaty Web possibly thicker then ever and we are seeing exactly what that leads to and what it will continue to lead to in the future. Most of the wars of the past were all overplanned conflicts that went right as planned. This Period of War is different and continues to throw people for a loop. Whether they respond to it negatively or positively it has brought about a very large response and to think, we have only just begun.
  13. [quote name='astronaut jones' date='03 February 2010 - 01:12 AM' timestamp='1265159532' post='2154234'] uhh.. I never said what you quoted me as saying. [/quote] I already claimed that which he quoted. I am not sure why he quoted it to you rather then to me. [quote name='AlmightyGrub' date='03 February 2010 - 01:16 AM' timestamp='1265159804' post='2154241'] I wonder if Polar would ever allow GOD to dictate its own foreign policy. The allies of my ally are NOT my ally, they are his. This whole nonsense is exactly that. Hoo is completely within his rights to cancel the treaty, it makes me sad, but I am not allowing you, \m/ or any other member of SF to dictate what I can and can not do. I no longer have a treaty with your bloc, so be it. If I no longer have links to all the other !@#$%* blocs that consider their treaties with each other superior to all others, then that is fine too. No bloc will ever dictate the way we do things, unless it is our own and we are not interested in forming another one. Your pack mentality politics is what allowed previous situations to exist and what will allow them to continue. [/quote] Now these are words I can get behind. I am not big on Crusades but if anything is worth it in my opinion then protecting the Sovereign Rights of alliances from the growing mob mentality is one of those important enough issues.
  14. [quote name='Schattenmann' date='03 February 2010 - 01:08 AM' timestamp='1265159288' post='2154228'] All treaties that contain compulsive clauses hand over the Sovereign Rights (lol, we're capitalizing it now?) of the signatories. [/quote] For clarity, that was my quote not AJ's and yes I am capitalizing it. It is important to me. Thank you for pointing out what you just pointed out. Guess we can put it on the list.
  15. [quote name='Tautology' date='03 February 2010 - 12:19 AM' timestamp='1265156360' post='2154167'] You are wrong. Alfred von Tirpitz resigned from Ragnarok government on January 16th. Emperor Grub made his declaration on \m/ on January 21st. I'm glad Alfred's back in RoK. [/quote] I do not mind being wrong about such.
×
×
  • Create New...