Fluoroalien

[quote name='Dogs of War' timestamp='1293378628' post='2554385'] I think you are missing my point. Fark and International have about 1/2 of their nations at 30k or less. The majority of them do not have nukes and I assume they wont have SDI's. Once we reach their level and start engaging them with nukes. How long will they have the will to fight once they( the 30K and lower nations) realize that they dont have anything to counter us? That is when the lower tier starts to crumble. You will see nations that refuse to engage, complaining on their alliance forums that they need help or money, and start surrendering individually. Once the moral starts to fade, and alliances start having to put out the fires internally. That is when the peace talks really start. [/quote] You're completely unfamiliar with Fark's history, aren't you?

[quote name='ALFERALFER' timestamp='1293132080' post='2551814'] I moved from Farkistan to TF to TF![/quote] Yeah, that's pretty much all we need to know about you. Coward.

/o hali Good luck and godspeed to our allies, may we drive the enemy before us.

[quote name='The Atomik Kangaroo' timestamp='1291244326' post='2527535'] ...aaand with Mr. Wobbles gone, the fun was just sapped out of this announcement. [/quote] Silly Fark, fun is for other places, this is a SRS BSNS game

[quote name='Ivan Moldavi' timestamp='1283961736' post='2446620'] Congratulations. Even though I think many of the alliances involved are just tag-a-longs that can't do anything without someone larger holding their hand this is still quite an accomplishment. [/quote] It's sad that you don't appear to understand the concept of friendship, but it certainly goes a long way to explaining the way that that Pacifica treated its allies while you were in charge.

Truly this treaty is a thing of beauty. /o hali

My ears are bleeding. /o hali

Say, does anybody have a map I could borrow?

[quote name='Branimir' date='24 February 2010 - 07:10 PM' timestamp='1267038850' post='2201821'] Already explained in my previous post. But you do not read. NSO considers it to be humiliating for them, thus, forcing them to do it is forcing them to make an act of humiliation by their standards. If, as you said, you do not seek their humiliation and the term in your eyes is anyway just playful fun and nothing crucial, then dropping it isn't a problem, is it?[/quote] I find it quite interesting that you're accusing somebody else of not reading properly, given that you're still calling for us to drop the beer review clause for NSO. Allow me to point out something that you obviously missed: [quote name='Jim Bob the Glorious' date='24 February 2010 - 05:42 PM' timestamp='1267033536' post='2201654'] Going forward, NSO will not be getting 'White Peace' from Fark. They have been given many chances to get out at terms they found acceptable only to back away without notice. Like everyone else that Fark fights today, if they want peace it will come through surrender. [/quote] You can rest assured, we will not be seeking a beer review from NSO to end this conflict.

A good fight was had by all, now let us go to the pub and reminisce fondly of our lost infra

Happy Birthday guys, may you have every success in the future /honoured and surprised to see his name on that list

[img]http://i47.tinypic.com/xpoagz.jpg[/img] Q&D

[img]http://my.jetscreenshot.com/1634/m_20100205-outm-60kb.jpg[/img]

Well, you're certainly not fighters

Cthulhu Claus says congratulations to all, and have a non-euclidian Farkmas That is not dead, which can eternal Fark