Jump to content

Waterana

Members
  • Posts

    251
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Waterana

  1. My nation is a tech farm too. Get your strongest guy out of peace mode, build him up a bit, and I'll be happy to nuke him into obivion take a hit for my alliance too.
  2. Yay, the dirty vikings are back. Great news :) Better go stock up on air freshener again :P
  3. Am very pleased to see this. o/ to both Orders
  4. An announcement that is sad but exciting at the same time. All the best you dirty vikings
  5. You couldn't have chosen a better new home to go to. All the best.
  6. [quote name='masterbake' timestamp='1322342882' post='2852866'] [img]http://i625.photobucket.com/albums/tt336/grubaker/GrubnTyga1.jpg[/img] [/quote] That is one scrawny looking Tiger. Seems STA need lots of cake and chocolate, stat. On a serious note, love that pic. Out of the whole thread it was the only one to make me crack up laughing.
  7. Hang on, the new leader was decided with a contest of drinking and debauchery....and Jesper lost? How? Anyway, <3 CJ forever. Congrats and all the best Tronix. You have some huge, and rather smelly, shoes to fill.
  8. The aid TOP is sending MK isn't being used for flowers and kittens. They might not be fighting us directly, but are certainly aiding and abetting the war effort against us.
  9. [quote name='Banksy' timestamp='1300443728' post='2668956'] 3 rounds of war = total destruction of Pacifica. Doomhouse: We're [i]that[/i] good. [/quote] You know as well as I do our nations will be swarmed by much bigger enemies and smashed. Yes, they would deal out their own fair share of damage to their attackers on the way down, but the end result isn't in question. It isn't really an issue anyway, so I'm going to stop arguing with you about it. I really can't see our govt agreeing to this, if they haven't already said no (I honestly don't know if they have or not).
  10. If you don't want the total destruction of Pacifica, you won't insist on destroying the last of our alliance strength by trying to force us to feed our own people to you on a silver platter.
  11. [quote name='Banksy' timestamp='1300442376' post='2668943'] "i'm here for the community" > wont let upper tier nations fight three rounds of war in case they lose NS. [/quote] I said "my" community, which those nations are a part of. So yes, I do want them protected from DH's unwarranted aggression. They don't need to be destroyed in war to show their commitment to the alliance and their comrades. There are other ways they can do that, primarily after hostilities stop. The decision whether they fight or not isn't mine however as you've implied as I'm not NPO govt. Why is the total destruction of Pacifica so important to you lot? Do we really scare you that much?
  12. [quote name='Banksy' timestamp='1300432107' post='2668878'] lol. your biggest nation has a $10b warchest. you're literally protecting people who are fully capable of defending themselves. the funny thing is, we have the funding capacity for an extended war, whereas you do not due to them hiding in PM. so any 'threat' of a two year long war is empty, and even if you could fund it, gOONs would love the opportunity. we're offering an exit, and you're 'protecting' nations who can look after themselves. hilarious. [/quote] Do you really think we're that stupid? We've know from the start our upper tier are heavily out numbered and out gunned. They'll get smashed, which of course is the entire idea of this 'term'. You don't seem to understand I don't care how well you can fund yourselves or keep the war going. I'm not here for my nation, I'm here for my community. Fund yourselves higher than Rockefeller and pound it all you want for long as you want. It matters nothing to me. I wasn't issuing any threats. We've been told bring our peace nations out or the war continues. How long that happens is up to you. It's your war and in your control after all.
  13. [quote name='Banksy' timestamp='1300429499' post='2668837'] no, we're using the fact that 75% of your NS is in PM vs our current 18% (most of which has been in war recently). Most of your NS in PM has stayed there throughout the war. [/quote] Again, that is our business not yours. Who fights the war and who doesn't in the NPO is up to our leadership to decide, not our enemies. We didn't hand our banks over for a bashing in karma, and I very much doubt we're going to hand our upper tier over now. Get used to it. If you lot playing kick the can with my nation for the next 6 months/year/two years/forever, protects our big nations, then kick away. I don't care and I'm one of those 'small nations burning'. We get it that you want our entire alliance smashed, and having all that strength protected in peace is driving you nuts, tough. We didn't start this mess, your side did. We've done nothing to deserve utter devastation except in the deluded minds of your leaders.
  14. [quote name='Masterof9puppets' timestamp='1300346650' post='2667453'] CSM's point is that the war is real for NPO. They are actively losing nation strength and what-not. However, the reason that Doomhouse wishes for NPO's peacemode warriors to step out of their protective cages, is because they have not yet experienced this war. The war is, say, less real for them. Comprende? [/quote] Whether some of our members experience the war or not is our business, not yours. We didn't want this war in the first place.It was forced on us because MK and friends were 'scared', or some rot about Polar, or we didn't kiss the derrieres of alliances that hate us after karma, whichever one is being used this week or just choose your favorite. They are interchangeable. You lot got to decide when and why to start this war, but you don't get to decide how we fight it.
  15. [quote name='Ardus' timestamp='1300345287' post='2667400'] You are incorrect. Both the Federation and Nordreich attended and agreed to the offer in the formal meeting with your leaders. [/quote] Then why isn't that mentioned in the OP? The omission is rather glaring and makes me doubt what you say.
  16. What peace? FAN and Nor aren't mentioned in this so it doesn't apply to them. After you and your buddies have finished beating down our top tier for 4 weeks those two, and whoever they bring in to assist, will be free to keep killing for however long they see fit. I will be beyond disappointed if our govt even considers taking your 'offer'.
  17. Interesting. Washing dirty laundry in public is a good thing when it dishes out such juicy gossip. Tell me though, I always thought MK ran the cyber world, now you're telling me it's GOD? What happened?
  18. [b]Have you ever been in an alliance you have previously been at war with?[/b] Yes, moved from Legion to NPO not long after GW3 [b]Is one of your current treaty partners (ODP+) an alliance you (as a nation, not an alliance) have previously been at war with?[/b] No, not that I remember anyway. Unless you count Legion's time under our Viceroy as 'war'. [b]Have you ever switched sides of the treaty web?[/b] Move from Legion took me from the Aegis side (or what was left of it post GW3) to the Initiative side of the web.
  19. Yet another one sided Supercomplaints curbstomp. Why aren't I surprised.
  20. All the best LS, you'll be missed o/ Congrats Red o/ Millionario and Brehon, enjoy your retirement and thank you o/
  21. Freedom feels so good. Time to put the hippy weed away. o/ Pacifica
×
×
  • Create New...