Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: FFA!!! tournament edition
Cyber Nations Forums > Cyber Nations Gameplay and Roleplay > Cyber Nations Tournament Edition > Tournament Edition Suggestions
wild wild west
i would just like to see how a free for all would go. HIDE alliance affiliations


but for sure a FFA you would see more action ,more competition for #1 it would be more fair an balanced .

people couldn't just sit inn a large alliance of 300 and free build while other in a 20 man alliance they have to pay more bills cause they got to buy a military or get attacked by a large alliance . or u cant attack a nation because of the politics , i just think one FFA would rock!! may the best raider win smile.gif
Emperor Stranger
QUOTE (wild wild west @ Nov 5 2009, 02:29 PM) *
i would just like to see how a free for all would go. remove alliance affiliations


but for sure a FFA you would see more action ,more competition for #1 it would be more fair an balanced .

people couldn't just sit inn a large alliance of 300 and free build while other in a 20 man alliance they have to pay more bills cause they got to buy a military or get attacked by a large alliance . or u cant attack a nation because of the politics , i just think one FFA would rock!! may the best raider win smile.gif


An alliance affiliation is just to make things easier on everyone. There will never be just a "free for all"--people will still group together, even without a formal "AA". (This has been discussed many times before.)
wild wild west
their needs to be something different done, that's why i most likely even play the next round, biggest alliance win's whoopee doo, why bother lol

how about adding a instant message icon *shows who's online who's not* *with the option to hide* accept or deny friends request* *ignore*

[Alliance Statistics] [Alliance Rankings] [Alliance Map] [Search Wars] [Search Exposed Spy Operations] [ Friends]

so u you could be part of a alliance *or friends* butt everyone cant see your friends list ..
anyone get what im saying?

hide the alliance affiliation, you could even add a spy option * spy friends list*
wild wild west
thats the chance you have to take hitting a nation, you don't know who he is connected to.. unless of course u have spies making spies more valuable keeping that a secret

it would bring allot more war strategy to the game , then just oh im connected to this alliance you cant attack me in bio. , no u wanna keep that a secret let em attack u have 5 6 or maybe 100 nations ready for a nice raid on the raider wink.gif
Emperor Stranger
QUOTE (wild wild west @ Nov 5 2009, 04:53 PM) *
their needs to be something different done, that's why i most likely even play the next round, biggest alliance win's whoopee doo, why bother lol

how about adding a instant message icon *shows who's online who's not* *with the option to hide* accept or deny friends request* *ignore*

[Alliance Statistics] [Alliance Rankings] [Alliance Map] [Search Wars] [Search Exposed Spy Operations] [ Friends]

so u you could be part of a alliance *or friends* butt everyone cant see your friends list ..
anyone get what im saying?

hide the alliance affiliation, you could even add a spy option * spy friends list*


Actually, no. If I am not mistaken, the nation who won last round was in a rather tiny alliance. But no, it seems like a horrible waste of time. If you want to have such fun with people, join NONE.

QUOTE (wild wild west @ Nov 5 2009, 05:00 PM) *
thats the chance you have to take hitting a nation, you don't know who he is connected to.. unless of course u have spy's making spy's more valuable keeping that a secret

it would bring allot more war strategy to the game , then just oh im connected to this alliance you cant attack me in bio. , no u wanna keep that a secret let em attack u have 5 6 or maybe 100 nations ready for a nice raid on the raider wink.gif


It's "spies"; and we already have an alliance called NONE dedicated to ending raiding on nations without an AA. And there is already strategy. We get our strategy from being able to see how large or small alliances are. What's the point of remodeling the whole AA system and adding completely new spy operations which work just like the current AA system.
wild wild west
QUOTE (Emperor Stranger @ Nov 5 2009, 03:56 PM) *
Actually, no. If I am not mistaken, the nation who won last round was in a rather tiny alliance. But no, it seems like a horrible waste of time. If you want to have such fun with people, join NONE.



It's "spies"; and we already have an alliance called NONE dedicated to ending raiding on nations without an AA. And there is already strategy. We get our strategy from being able to see how large or small alliances are. What's the point of remodeling the whole AA system and adding completely new spy operations which work just like the current AA system.

because this is Tournament Edition > suggestions
its to much like SE , there is no strategy in seeing how big or small your enemy is , not knowing and finding out is more strategy.
Emperor Stranger
QUOTE (wild wild west @ Nov 5 2009, 09:00 PM) *
because this is Tournament Edition > suggestions
its to much like SE , there is no strategy in seeing how big or small your enemy is , not knowing and finding out is more strategy.


Suicide is not strategy. Strategy is being able to see a list of their nations and forming a hit list, so to speak. That's a lot better strategy than just randomly attacking another alliance and possibly committing suicide or genocide.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.