Cody Seb
Nov 2 2009, 07:46 PM
Major Hendrik Christiaan sent a message to the ruler of the Kuwaiti Emirate concerning a meeting in Pretoria.
CODE
To Whom It May Concern,
Due to political shifts in the past few weeks and imminent threats to world and regional peace, as well as aiming to increase continental cooperation, I would like to invite you to a meeting in the capital city of South Africa, Pretoria, at your first convenience. Thank you for your time.
Major Hendrik Christiaan
Californian
Nov 2 2009, 08:00 PM
QUOTE
TO: Major Hendrik Christiaan
FR: KUWAITI EMIRATE MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS
MS: RE: INVITATION
I shall set off at once.
Nasser Mohammed Al-Ahmed Al-Sabah
Cody Seb
Nov 2 2009, 09:10 PM
OOC: Hope you don't mind if I cut to the chase.
IC:
Once Al-Sabah's plane had touched down, he was politely taken to the conference room inside the government building in Pretoria. The building was as one would expect in South Africa. It was African Colonial for sure, as was the interior, decorated as such. The heads of antelope and native shields and spears adorned the walls next to portraits of British and Union political leaders.
Once inside the conference room, Al-Sabah's needs were made to be met and after the Major politely greeted him, he began.
"Let me say it's an honor to meet you, Excellency. Now if I may get to business? The situation in southern Africa has been...tense of late. With the emergence of two states that were immediately hostile towards each other, the region has never been the same. As you may or may not know, the Republic of South Africa removed itself from the Treaty of Buckingham. Now, we hold an NAP with the Confederacy of Mozambique, but they are acting provocatively towards us and as always are constantly reminding the Greeks that they must come to their aid upon their beckon call. At the same time, they are working overtime to establish an alliance with Britain. This could be bad news for all of us, my friend. The Republic of Mozambique is our ally, however, but we do not want to use them or drag them in to needless conflict, though I feel that they could be a potential target.
Let me be clear in that it is my aim to avoid military conflict with the Confederacy of Mozambique and any other state for that matter. However, that is not entirely up to me, ja? Considering you have a large base and cultural tie to Africa, perhaps we could form an alliance for African security. I cannot tell you how much I love this continent, and how much I wish to safeguard it, and my people."
Californian
Nov 2 2009, 09:35 PM
QUOTE (Cody Seb @ Nov 2 2009, 07:10 PM)
"Let me say it's an honor to meet you, Excellency. Now if I may get to business? The situation in southern Africa has been...tense of late. With the emergence of two states that were immediately hostile towards each other, the region has never been the same. As you may or may not know, the Republic of South Africa removed itself from the Treaty of Buckingham. Now, we hold an NAP with the Confederacy of Mozambique, but they are acting provocatively towards us and as always are constantly reminding the Greeks that they must come to their aid upon their beckon call. At the same time, they are working overtime to establish an alliance with Britain. This could be bad news for all of us, my friend. The Republic of Mozambique is our ally, however, but we do not want to use them or drag them in to needless conflict, though I feel that they could be a potential target.
Let me be clear in that it is my aim to avoid military conflict with the Confederacy of Mozambique and any other state for that matter. However, that is not entirely up to me, ja? Considering you have a large base and cultural tie to Africa, perhaps we could form an alliance for African security. I cannot tell you how much I love this continent, and how much I wish to safeguard it, and my people."
Al-Sabah chuckled when he heard Mr. Christiaan talk about the Buckingham Treaty, "That treaty has long been dead, a remembrance of Britain's willingness to manipulate others for its personal gain, I would say."
"I hear your argument and I agree with most points, but due to our position the Kuwaiti Emirate looks at politics globally, not just in the southern African sphere. I share your concern for Britain, they would be more than willing to invade another country if they could gain some more of that precious land they so desire. As for your concerns about Greece, they are nothing more than a puppet of Britain. If you have listened to any of our policies, you would know we would never allow a foreign nation to interfere in Africa. The threats of Greece helping the Confederacy... moot. We would simply deny them access across our land and waters, and considering we also own Madagascar there is no way Greece could reach the Confederacy.
We will continue to look at the Confederacy/Republic situation closely and intervene should tensions escalate if needed. You are right about our cultural ties to Africa. Nations accuse us of being Asian, Middle Eastern, what have you, but in truth we are a nation of Islamic brothers committed to ensuring the prosperity of our people, our lands, and our allies wherever that is. We have almost entirely rid Africa of foreigners and we intend to keep it that way. I am interested to hear more of this alliance you have proposed."
Cody Seb
Nov 2 2009, 09:49 PM
''The alliance would hopefully be on paper, but hopefully it would transcend that. We want to keep this continent safe, as we feel that unless we do, we can't help keep the world safe. We sum to create a bond that grows and adapts to our nations' relationships with eachother and with the globe. Perhaps a mutual defense pact with economic clauses, or anything else you wish to add? That, and perhaps it could be opened up to other nations. We have no invitees as it stands, but if the emirate were to wish it, it could be done.''
Californian
Nov 2 2009, 10:02 PM
"This is acceptable. We will sign a MDP with you to promote African stability."
Cody Seb
Nov 2 2009, 10:27 PM
OOC: I'm on a blackberry so ill post the mdp later, just so I can keep the meeting going.
IC:
''Very good, very good. There's another item here, Zaire and Angola. We feel that peace may be fostered in the area if the regions were not directly or solely within our control. We were wondering if any deals could be arranged, either a transfer or joint administration?''
Californian
Nov 3 2009, 05:51 PM
Here is a version of the treaty:
QUOTE
African Union
I. Preamble
The undersigned nations- South Africa and the Kuwaiti Emirate – are sovereign independent entities who sign this pact to ensure peace, justice, well-being, and security for the mutual betterment of the respective signatories.
II. Non-Aggression
The aforementioned nations agree to a pact of non-aggression, and will not interfere or step into the soil of any other member nation that does not specifically ask for said interference. Nor will any signatory illegally spy, destabilize, or in any other way attempt to bring harm to another signatory.
III. Mutual Defense
The aforementioned nations agree to a pact of mutual defense and pledge to defend any member of this treaty that is being attacked by a foreign aggressor. If a nation is waging a defensive war, the signatories promise to provide military, intelligence, and civilian aid to ensure the survival of the threatened nation.
a. Member nations are not required to assist in any aggressive war started by another. Though their help is suggested in a just war, it is by no means required through this document.
IV. Economical Advancement
The nations in this treaty agree to support trade amongst each other, and free-trade agreements between the signatories are highly suggested. In addition, member nations agree to help support less advanced signatories through favorable contracts and deals.
V. Membership
Nations may apply to join this treaty. There are no requirements, however geographical position in the Africa or close proximity to other member nations is suggested. Applicant nations may be accepted with a majority vote.
If signatories feel a nation in the treaty no longer has the best interests of others in mind and does not live up to the ideals presented in the preamble, the signatories may expel the unfavorable nation with a supermajority (2/3) vote.
VI. Amendments
Any part of this treaty can be amended with a supermajority vote besides Article II.
VII. Termination
No nation shall be forced to stay in this treaty against their will. Thus, any nation may leave this pact so long as they give a five day notice before withdrawal. The nation may apply to rejoin at any time.
VIII. Signatures
This treaty was ratified on the date of November 3, in the year of our Lord 2009. The undersigned agree to uphold this treaty to the best of their ability.
Signed for the Kuwaiti Emirate,
Emir Sabah Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Saba
Prime Minister Nasser Mohammed Al-Ahmed Al-Sabah
As for Zaire and Angola, we would prefer not to have sole or joint administration. We currently are attempting to modernize many other neighbors and for us to help when it is not required is not a practical use of resources.
In addition, Britain has recently reclaimed African land. This goes against both of our beliefs, and I fear this may lead to war. Do we have your support to vanquish these foes?
Cody Seb
Nov 3 2009, 06:24 PM
Signed for the Republic of South Africa,
Staatspresident Major Hendrik Christiaan
As for Britain, South Africa is committed to a policy of no first strikes. However, if exploitation of the people begins again, South Africa will highly pressure Britain. However, once they harm an ally, we will throw our full might against them.
Recently though, our problems with the Confederacy have been dissolved. We are working with them to create a South African co-prosperity sphere, but perhaps, with your consent, they two mozambiques be admitted to the African Union?
Californian
Nov 3 2009, 06:42 PM
"We are sending in troops to secure Greater Northern Africa and Germany occupied Africa. As this point in time we do expect resistance from the British, though we pray they may see the errors of their way and leave this continent.
We have no problem letting the Republic in, although we have concerns about the Confederacy. From the little we have interacted with them, they seem to be British sympathizers and we have serious doubts about their willingness to ensure a unified Africa."
Cody Seb
Nov 3 2009, 06:46 PM
Fair enough. We will be prepared to respond and will follow the situation closely. If something happens up there, we will be ready.
Californian
Nov 4 2009, 06:30 PM
Since we are both here, should we invite the Republic and Confederacy to this meeting to discuss their possible membership into the AU?
Cody Seb
Nov 4 2009, 07:30 PM
QUOTE (Californian @ Nov 4 2009, 06:30 PM)
Since we are both here, should we invite the Republic and Confederacy to this meeting to discuss their possible membership into the AU?
Yes, I will invite them myself. We shall adjourn until they arrive.
maicke
Nov 4 2009, 07:39 PM
Ethan Malcolm, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, arrives at the meeting.
"Hello. I am here to discuss the possibility of the Republic of Mozambique joining the African Union. The Republic highly supports this decision, and would like to join with both of your nations consent."
thenb
Nov 4 2009, 08:24 PM
Joseph Richardson, Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs arrives at the conference.
"Hello there, the minister is sick so I will be filling in for him. So we are to discuss a new African Union?"
Californian
Nov 4 2009, 08:32 PM
"South Africa and us have already formed the African Union. I am glad to see you are interested in joining. Would you be willing to help defend this continent from foreign all imperialism and help fellow African nations accomplish this? Also, we have not discussed much with either of you before so I would like to clarify any questions or disputes you may have with us, your large northern nerighbors."
thenb
Nov 4 2009, 08:35 PM
"Yes, we would be very interested in having a united Africa and improving our great continent. We would like a few small concerns addressed first though."
Californian
Nov 4 2009, 08:42 PM
"Please continue..."
maicke
Nov 4 2009, 08:45 PM
"The Republic only has two major concerns. With a war with Britain likely, signing this makes us a target of nuclear warfare. While we can defend against conventional warfare, we have no defenses against nuclear weapons. A second concern is raised with the inclusion of the Confederacy. However, I do not think that it would be too much of a problem. Though the decision would have to be voted on in the senate. As I believe I stated earlier (OOC: In another thread), it is nothing against the Confederacy, it's only that we recently fought a war.
We do not have many other concerns, for we already have a MDP with South Africa. We are completely willing and ready to defend Africa against foreign powers."
thenb
Nov 4 2009, 08:50 PM
"The Republic makes a good point, and we would not like to see death and destruction on the continent. With your permission, we will have the president E-sign the treaty."
OOC: its been almost a year in RP since the war, so relations might be improving by now...
maicke
Nov 4 2009, 08:55 PM
QUOTE (thenb @ Nov 4 2009, 08:50 PM)
"The Republic makes a good point, and we would not like to see death and destruction on the continent. With your permission, we will have the president E-sign the treaty."
OOC: its been almost a year in RP since the war, so relations might be improving by now...
OOC: Holy crap, really?
Dang, time flies fast here. 15 in-game days a day really makes things quick.
EDIT: IC: I have one more question. What would become of the regions of Uganda, Rwanda, and Burundi?
Californian
Nov 4 2009, 08:59 PM
Nassar sipped some water before continuing, "The Republic raises some valid points.
Britain indeed possesses nuclear weapons and they definitely seem crazy enough to use them. We do not want our allies decimated and would do everything in our power to prevent that. We can build fallout shelters and help distribute gas masks and iodine pills amongst your populations if you require. We can also play around with the possibility of a missile defense system for your nations that would have a high probability of shooting a ICBM down. Another factor to your advantage, you are at an inconvenient location for the British and they would much rather turn us into a parking lot, sadly.
As for your continued strained relations, I cannot help but say I am dissapointed to see African nations continuing to bicker like this. I know your past is unpleasant, but we must move on and ensure stability and prosperity in this new dawn.
We are willing to allow you both into the African Union if you sign the document. As an additional sign of good faith, we are willing to cede the majority of Madagascar to your nation. You are geographically closer and could better rule it, methinks.
South Africa would also get a small portion and we would retain the southern and northern tips, mainly for defense and military purposes."
thenb
Nov 4 2009, 09:04 PM
"Recently and much to our joy, relations between us have been steadily improving. As for the Rwanda/Uganda/Brundi, we recommend that we set them aside as African Union protectorates, so that native governments may form. We also beleive your idea on Madagascar is most excellent."
maicke
Nov 4 2009, 09:14 PM
"Yes, relations have certainly been improving. (OOC: Lol, I thought that it had only been like five months, I see now it has been a long time XD)
We do have a suggestion for the treaty, however. I am sure that we all have noticed many foreign nations claiming that the Kuwaiti Emirate has no right to maintain African land. I suggest that there be a line in the treaty that reads something along the lines of "All signatories of this treaty are hereby defined as 'African'." I know that this would only help the Emirate, but it may also help avoid future conflict with countries who are severely against 'imperialism'. I also know that it may make the Emirate seem not to be Middle-Eastern/Asian. It is completely up to the other signatories if such a line is added."
thenb
Nov 4 2009, 09:16 PM
"The Confederacy would agree to that."
Californian
Nov 4 2009, 09:20 PM
"We have added 'African' to Article VIII. However we would like to note that regardless of what any treaty or naysayer may say, we firmly believe we are African, Middle Eastern, and Asian. We thank you for the suggestion though. In addition, Rwada, Uganda, and Burundi should be protected by the African Union.
When you have signed and ratified the AU treaty the Madagascar land will be officially handed over."
QUOTE
African Union
I. Preamble
The undersigned nations- South Africa and the Kuwaiti Emirate – are sovereign independent entities who sign this pact to ensure peace, justice, well-being, and security for the mutual betterment of the respective signatories.
II. Non-Aggression
The aforementioned nations agree to a pact of non-aggression, and will not interfere or step into the soil of any other member nation that does not specifically ask for said interference. Nor will any signatory illegally spy, destabilize, or in any other way attempt to bring harm to another signatory.
III. Mutual Defense
The aforementioned nations agree to a pact of mutual defense and pledge to defend any member of this treaty that is being attacked by a foreign aggressor. If a nation is waging a defensive war, the signatories promise to provide military, intelligence, and civilian aid to ensure the survival of the threatened nation.
a. Member nations are not required to assist in any aggressive war started by another. Though their help is suggested in a just war, it is by no means required through this document.
IV. Economical Advancement
The nations in this treaty agree to support trade amongst each other, and free-trade agreements between the signatories are highly suggested. In addition, member nations agree to help support less advanced signatories through favorable contracts and deals.
V. Membership
Nations may apply to join this treaty. There are no requirements, however geographical position in the Africa or close proximity to other member nations is suggested. Applicant nations may be accepted with a majority vote.
If signatories feel a nation in the treaty no longer has the best interests of others in mind and does not live up to the ideals presented in the preamble, the signatories may expel the unfavorable nation with a supermajority (2/3) vote.
VI. Amendments
Any part of this treaty can be amended with a supermajority vote besides Article II.
VII. Termination
No nation shall be forced to stay in this treaty against their will. Thus, any nation may leave this pact so long as they give a five day notice before withdrawal. The nation may apply to rejoin at any time.
VIII. Signatures
This treaty was ratified on the date of November 3, in the year of our Lord 2009. The undersigned African nations agree to uphold this treaty to the best of their ability.
Signed for the Kuwaiti Emirate,
Emir Sabah Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Saba
Prime Minister Nasser Mohammed Al-Ahmed Al-Sabah
Signed for the Republic of South Africa,
Staatspresident Major Hendrik Christiaan
maicke
Nov 4 2009, 09:24 PM
"Thank you. The treaty is expected to be ratified by senate shortly. For now, the President provides his signature."
Signed,
Jobuk Wade
President of the Republic of MozambiqueOOC: It will be ratified no matter what, by the way, so you can just say that I'm part of the treaty.
thenb
Nov 4 2009, 09:30 PM
Signed,
President Lashir Rakshana
The Mozambique Confederacy
Cody Seb
Nov 5 2009, 01:38 PM
"South Africa currently has the capacity for creating missile defenses and would help out in their construction as we begin installing them here. I would like to add however that we would consider making Zaire and perhaps even Angola into African Union Joint Administration Zones as Burundi, Uganda, and Rwanda are."
thenb
Nov 5 2009, 02:25 PM
"That would be most agreeable."
Californian
Nov 6 2009, 05:14 PM
"We of course would help protect them and ensure their independence."
Cody Seb
Nov 6 2009, 05:20 PM
"After further deliberation with my colleagues, we have come to the conclusion that we are willing to put Zaire up for joint administration by the AU. However, we would like exclusive rights to conscript from Zaire, as conscripts and volunteers from Zaire account for a very large chunk of our forces."
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.