Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Official Vanguard Edict
Cyber Nations Forums > Cyber Nations Gameplay and Roleplay > Open World RP > Alliance Announcements (IC)
Pages: 1, 2, 3
Rafael Nadal
[ooc]posting from phone due to lack of Internet access for the next day or so[/ooc]

SLCB has our full support at this time. We will be protecting them just as we normally do under our treaty. Should SLCB be lumped with SLF in any military response, you can be expecting a fight be brought to your doorstep.

Rafael Nadal
New Frontier
This will end well.
SirWilliam
Obbbbbbbbbbbviously.
chefjoe
This announcement and .25 will get ya a gumball from the wal-mart in my nation wink.gif
scythegfx
Well, This was necessary.

Hail Vanguard and Such.
Aeternalis
DoS's before DoW's again?...
Locke
Heh heh, I'm not quite sure why this needed to be announced (you're MDoAP'ed, I should very much hope you would), but to each their own, I suppose.
Joe Stupid
Vanguard, you truly are my favorite alliance.

o/ Vanguard
The AUT
QUOTE (Aeternalis @ Oct 31 2009, 10:38 PM) *
DoS's before DoW's again?...


Heh, I remember. I think JB attacked GOP for that. laugh.gif

But I don't think anyone's made the mention of attacking SLCB, or I may be mistaken. But I like to see the DoS's being made, it usually signals a war or something very, very dumb.

Either way, I like Rafa and Vanguard.
Brenann
QUOTE (The AUT @ Oct 31 2009, 05:44 PM) *
Heh, I remember. I think JB attacked GOP for that. laugh.gif

But I don't think anyone's made the mention of attacking SLCB, or I may be mistaken. But I like to see the DoS's being made, it usually signals a war or something very, very dumb.

Either way, I like Rafa and Vanguard.

I am going with the later in this case: the "something"
spearo
Thanks you Vanguard o/
Learz
You sure?
You'd better check your sources on SLF before making announcements... you know, to make sure they still exist and stuff.
MCRABT
Congratulations Vanguard for stating the obvious.
Rebel Virginia
A respectable policy, yes, however, I was not aware that there were any plans for anyone to attack any non-SLF nations? Was this the case?
Magnum T. Gundraw
QUOTE (Learz @ Oct 31 2009, 09:54 PM) *
You sure?
You'd better check your sources on SLF before making announcements... you know, to make sure they still exist and stuff.


This announcement was made before the 'disbandment' but thanks for playing, guy who is intimately familiar with situational awareness.
WarriorConcept
QUOTE (Learz @ Oct 31 2009, 05:54 PM) *
You sure?
You'd better check your sources on SLF before making announcements... you know, to make sure they still exist and stuff.


Might want to check your timeline on things like when this was posted before attempting to try and all smart and stuff.
Learz
QUOTE (Magnum T. Gundraw @ Oct 31 2009, 05:56 PM) *
This announcement was made before the 'disbandment' but thanks for playing, guy who is intimately familiar with situational awareness.

Oh. You mean the announcement scared them into disbanding? wink.gif
WarriorConcept
QUOTE (Learz @ Oct 31 2009, 06:02 PM) *
Oh. You mean the announcement scared them into disbanding? wink.gif


Yes an announcement that stated that they'd be getting support if them and SLCB were attacked together would totally scare them into disbanding. brilliant rolleyes.gif
Van Hoo III
QUOTE (Learz @ Oct 31 2009, 03:02 PM) *
Oh. You mean the announcement scared them into disbanding? wink.gif



You sir, are a true asset to your alliance.

Obligatory wub.gif to Vanguard.
Vilien
This is highly irregular. Fine work.
Yankeesfan924
I can only hope this means that something is happening.
Locke
QUOTE (Yankeesfan924 @ Oct 31 2009, 06:16 PM) *
I can only hope this means that something is happening.

Seeing as how SLF no longer exists...unlikely.
Drai
Oh hey, we're in C&G too cool.gif

Edit: Oh hey, SLF is gone.
FreddieMercury
Respectable announcement from our allies in Vanguard. Much bro love. <3
Yankeesfan924
QUOTE (Locke @ Oct 31 2009, 05:18 PM) *
Seeing as how SLF no longer exists...unlikely.


Shhh. They don't know that. ph34r.gif
Nobody Expects
The absence of a treaty cancellation was enough, but thanks for reaffirming your commitment to SLCB, says alot about you guys lol1.gif
Tromp
QUOTE (Nobody Expects @ Oct 31 2009, 11:43 PM) *
The absence of a treaty cancellation was enough, but thanks for reaffirming your commitment to SLCB, says alot about you guys lol1.gif

Thanks for your constructive reply.
I'm sure it'll be appreciated.

Go Vanguard, and all that jazz... tongue.gif
erikz
Rafael I wanna be icky with you all over again smile.gif

DoS are always nice to see. I'm also happy that now SLF stopped existing, there won't be the need to send the vipers to war.

o/
Stumpy Jung Il
QUOTE (Nobody Expects @ Oct 31 2009, 06:43 PM) *
The absence of a treaty cancellation was enough, but thanks for reaffirming your commitment to SLCB, says alot about you guys lol1.gif

We stand by our treaty partners, I know, its truly damning to our reputation.
Some-Guy
QUOTE (erikz @ Oct 31 2009, 11:10 PM) *
Rafael I wanna be icky with you all over again smile.gif

DoS are always nice to see. I'm also happy that now SLF stopped existing, there won't be the need to send the vipers to war.

o/


You know what would make all of planet bob happy?

If your face stopped existing.
erikz
QUOTE (Some-Guy @ Nov 1 2009, 12:20 AM) *
You know what would make all of planet bob happy?

If your face stopped existing.

How harsh. I love my "Boxxy-Awesome" look...
Learz
QUOTE (WarriorConcept @ Oct 31 2009, 06:04 PM) *
Yes an announcement that stated that they'd be getting support if them and SLCB were attacked together would totally scare them into disbanding. brilliant rolleyes.gif

I guess the sarcasm was too subtle.

QUOTE (Van Hoo III @ Oct 31 2009, 06:05 PM) *
You sir, are a true asset to your alliance.

Two in one thread? Sheesh, getting harder and harder to make jokes around here. I'm sorry, I'll go put on my 'CN is srs bsn" hat now.
awesome.gif
Nobody Expects
QUOTE (Stumpy Jung Il @ Oct 31 2009, 11:15 PM) *
We stand by our treaty partners, I know, its truly damning to our reputation.


It is when they are as truly pathetic as SLCB are, we at BAPS as a whole rarely comment on such matters, but this crowd really take the biscuit.
Bob Janova
I'm not really sure why it was necessary to post a thread saying you'd honour your MDP in the case of a hypothetical war ...
Some-Guy
QUOTE (Bob Janova @ Oct 31 2009, 11:29 PM) *
I'm not really sure why it was necessary to post a thread saying you'd honour your MDP in the case of a hypothetical war ...


Your ignorance should hardly be a matter of public debate, Bob dry.gif
SirWilliam
QUOTE (Nobody Expects @ Oct 31 2009, 07:28 PM) *
It is when they are as truly pathetic as SLCB are, we at BAPS as a whole rarely comment on such matters, but this crowd really take the biscuit.

I imagine it matters little to Vanguard what BAPS thinks of its allies. For that matter, BAPS casting a stone of judgment is rather rich if I may say so myself.

QUOTE (Bob Janova @ Oct 31 2009, 07:29 PM) *
I'm not really sure why it was necessary to post a thread saying you'd honour your MDP in the case of a hypothetical war ...

There's nothing really wrong with declaring support for one's allies. Some would consider a public reaffirmation of support rather endearing in fact.
Rafael Nadal
QUOTE (Bob Janova @ Oct 31 2009, 04:29 PM) *
I'm not really sure why it was necessary to post a thread saying you'd honour your MDP in the case of a hypothetical war ...

Because I'm only here through my phone which is inconvenient to speak directly to individuals with online. A public announcement wad the quickest and easieast way to let everybody know where we stood.
Nobody Expects
QUOTE (Rafael Nadal @ Oct 31 2009, 11:50 PM) *
Because I'm only here through my phone which is inconvenient to speak directly to individuals with online. A public announcement wad the quickest and easieast way to let everybody know where we stood.


Em surely the fact that you didn't cancel your treaty....which you didn't......is a pretty effective way of letting people know where you stand? or are Vanguard known to be so fickle when it comes to honouring treaties, that one must issue these edicts whenever a treaty partner comes under scrutiny?
SirWilliam
You try too hard, Nobody Expects.
Some-Guy
QUOTE (Nobody Expects @ Oct 31 2009, 11:53 PM) *
Em surely the fact that you didn't cancel your treaty....which you didn't......is a pretty effective way of letting people know where you stand? or are Vanguard known to be so fickle when it comes to honouring treaties, that one must issue these edicts whenever a treaty partner comes under scrutiny?

You're confusing Vanguard, with TOP.
Unsure
QUOTE (Some-Guy @ Oct 31 2009, 04:58 PM) *
You're confusing Vanguard, with TOP.

Vanguard, TOP, ODN, they're all orange, right?
Rafael Nadal
QUOTE (Nobody Expects @ Oct 31 2009, 04:53 PM) *
Em surely the fact that you didn't cancel your treaty....which you didn't......is a pretty effective way of letting people know where you stand? or are Vanguard known to be so fickle when it comes to honouring treaties, that one must issue these edicts whenever a treaty partner comes under scrutiny?

Do you recall the last time we cancelled any MDP level treaty? Please, inform me of my alliance's reputation which you seem to hinttowards.
Nobody Expects
QUOTE (Rafael Nadal @ Nov 1 2009, 12:01 AM) *
Do you recall the last time we cancelled any MDP level treaty? Please, inform me of my alliance's reputation which you seem to hinttowards.


Indeed sir, my point being if your alliance has such an honourable reputation, why do you feel the need to waste the good people of this forums time pointing out the obvious.............we know you are treatied to SLCB, and until you tell us otherwise, your treaty is set in stone, at least thats the way my alliance works.........maybe your bonds are so fragile you must make edicts to reaffirm commitments.....who knows.
Some-Guy
QUOTE (Unsure @ Nov 1 2009, 12:01 AM) *
Vanguard, TOP, ODN, they're all orange, right?


Round them up and kill them all I say.

It's the only way to be sure.
Rafael Nadal
QUOTE (Nobody Expects @ Oct 31 2009, 05:05 PM) *
Indeed sir, my point being if your alliance has such an honourable reputation, why do you feel the need to waste the good people of this forums time pointing out the obvious.............we know you are treatied to SLCB, and until you tell us otherwise, your treaty is set in stone, at least thats the way my alliance works.........maybe your bonds are so fragile you must make edicts to reaffirm commitments.....who knows.

Considering slf was a decent Portion of slcb, including some gov't members, and seeing as I can't, rather won't take the time and effort to reach everybody involved individually through my pjone's Internet, I felt it prudent and efficient to make this announcement. You're welcome baps.
SirWilliam
QUOTE (Nobody Expects @ Oct 31 2009, 08:05 PM) *
maybe your bonds are so fragile you must make edicts to reaffirm commitments.....who knows.


Maybe, or maybe you clearly have a hard-on for Vanguard and spew crap that doesn't make much sense, has no basis in reality, and ultimately only serves to make you look like a fool.

Speaking as one of Vanguard's closer allies, I can confirm both the above and that their bonds aren't fragile in the least.
Nobody Expects
QUOTE (Rafael Nadal @ Nov 1 2009, 12:13 AM) *
Considering slf was a decent Portion of slcb, including some gov't members, and seeing as I can't, rather won't take the time and effort to reach everybody involved individually through my pjone's Internet, I felt it prudent and efficient to make this announcement. You're welcome baps.


Thanks Rafa, for this thread letting us know you didn't cancel your treaty, almost as efficient as saying nothing, but not quite.
Nobody Expects
QUOTE (SirWilliam @ Nov 1 2009, 12:15 AM) *
Maybe, or maybe you clearly have a hard-on for Vanguard and spew crap that doesn't make much sense, has no basis in reality, and ultimately only serves to make you look like a fool.

Speaking as one of Vanguard's closer allies, I can confirm both the above and that their bonds aren't fragile in the least.


I am not spewing crap my good man, merely stating that a thread notifying people that nothing has changed, is perhaps a waste of time, which indeed it is.....unless there is some underlying need to do so.
Rafael Nadal
QUOTE (Nobody Expects @ Oct 31 2009, 05:17 PM) *
Thanks Rafa, for this thread letting us know you didn't cancel your treaty, almost as efficient as saying nothing, but not quite.

Have all your retorts made your time spent here worthwhile?
Nobody Expects
QUOTE (Rafael Nadal @ Nov 1 2009, 12:20 AM) *
Have all your retorts made your time spent here worthwhile?


Only marginally more so than your posting this pointless thread in the first place.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.