Alright, all this Halloween stuff has made me reminisce about the time Blue had penguins and polar bears wrestling around. I know GR still does da bear but when is somebody from the arctic going to finally remake NAAC?!?!? Think of the fun!

resurrecting dead alliances almost never ends well

Oh Admin forbid.

Remember when someone tried remaking CIS? While NAAC was slightly cooler anyway, it is still the same concept.

Or you know that and are trolling. >_<

No.

The NAAC retroactively merged with Polar, why do you think Grub is now Emperor. That was a condition of the merger.

I believe the only reborn alliance that has worked out is VE

Zombie alliances are never good. They may wear the same face, but they'll end up eating your brains.

As one of the few Aegis alliances I still respect in hind sight I request you let a dead hero rest in peace.

I thought GR was the NAAC in disguise...

only if this tme im the head of state like back in the good old days

shhhh...

Don't say our secrets.

Didnt we do this with: IAA, GOONS, VE, and a few others who slip my mind

Null vote because I'd be too embarrassed to say I voted for any of those options.

As a former member of an alliance whose resurrection is frequently suggested, I can say that is a really bad idea.

Poll and/or OP distinctly lacks ICP, thus I cannot vote properly at this time

CIS and Nordreich are the only others I can truly think of who reformed under the same banner.

This is an old conversation. The answer is still the same

Dead alliances stay dead or fail miserably.

I love this war of respect.

What disguise?

I'm not gonna lie, I do miss NAAC. But I don't think I'd want to see them return.

It's been too long. The former members are too diversely spread among other alliances. It would disrupt the alliance of current members, tarnish the memory of the NAAC, and has too much baggage to move foward.

In short, let the NAAC rest in peace.

I beg to differ

Like Drai said, I null-voted as I'd be too embarrassed to say which I voted for, however, I can tell you Modus that it has been discussed several times on and off the CN forums, and the answer is pretty much the same.

There are some who consider actually doing it, a ton who miss it, and a majority that do not wish to see it return and tarnish the good name that it originally held.

I don't know about NAAC since it was before my time. However I would like to see TDSM8 come back.

I see where you guys are coming from and, after thinking about it, you're right; it had its place in time and the fact that FAN still maintains so much respect for them really says a lot.

One word: Nordreich.

As for NAAC, they absorbed Polar.

It's too soon to say whether Nordreich 2 has worked out.

Nordreich 2 is working out great.

This is very unlikely.

Why do you have to hurt me so?

WHY STUMPY WHY?

I agree with Janova: it's too early to say.

Nordreich II has been very quiet since it returned. The cynics believe it is only a matter of time before they do something and get into strife.

NAAC is dead.

Let it stay dead.

On a long enough time chart, the probability of any alliance getting into strife approaches 1.

As I once remarked elsewhere with respect to Bob's opinion of Nordreich, he can suck it. I have not had occasion to alter that point of view.

NoR2.0 will be fine. The post-reformation Kaisers have all been brilliant choices.

This is especially true if their name is Arctic Paulson.

Nordreich 2 won't live up to Nordreich 1 until it snuffs a few alliances from existence, or at least tries.

Oh, come on, everyone's thinking it.

Or Browncoats. A little early so far, but an alliance can't die if at least 2 people refuse to leave, and I think we've got that commitment... >_>

I doubt very much that that will happen.

And I agree. Zombie alliances are terrible.