But, to be fair, SLCB carefully and painstakingly looked into the matter. I know they must have done so carefully and painstakingly because of how much time it took them to figure out what was going on. Now, someone might very well suggest that more than 24 hours to establish that a member had gone rogue borders on dithering. Someone might very well suggest that. But I would never say such a thing.
But, finally, it was established that Kurtopotamia had not acted with the support of the SLCB government or their allies. It was a pretty straightforward matter of a member who had gone rogue. Easy. We've all been there. Member goes rogue; member is reprimanded and ordered to stand down; member either does so or is ejected from the alliance to be dealt with as the victim's alliance sees fit; and, of course, member is expected to pay reps. These are pretty established procedures between alliances when a member has gone rogue. Easy, like I said. Right?
Well, apparently not. Apparently SLCB has taken it upon themselves to decide that their member – whom they concede was in the wrong by going rogue – does not owe any reps at all:
QUOTE
<Matt-Shovel[SLCB]> Well, sorry, but we aren't paying reps.
QUOTE
<ogodai> Well, we aren't going to pay - with regards to that, my apologies.
<Waltar|Invicta> We've come to a reps number too.
<ogodai> Hooray
<Waltar|Invicta> Yep. As Imentioned to Matt, we're looking for 3m for each nation at Invicta that he attacked.
<Waltar|Invicta> Figure that's fair.
<ogodai> It certainly SOUNDS fair
<ogodai> Well, very sorry.
<Waltar|Invicta> We've come to a reps number too.
<ogodai> Hooray
<Waltar|Invicta> Yep. As Imentioned to Matt, we're looking for 3m for each nation at Invicta that he attacked.
<Waltar|Invicta> Figure that's fair.
<ogodai> It certainly SOUNDS fair
<ogodai> Well, very sorry.
So, SLCB admits that their member went rogue, and that the reps requested (a paltry $3M for each of the two victims) are fair, but they refuse to pay it. And they continue to harbor the rogue.
Hmm.
You know, someone might very well suggest that such a scenario would be an excellent way to goad an alliance into starting a war. Yes, indeed. Someone might very well suggest that. But of course I would never say such a thing.
Certainly not us.
