JimKongIl
Oct 27 2009, 08:12 PM
To clarify Ordo Paradoxia only permits raids against AAs with 5 members or less. If larger AAs are raided I will message those involved and ask them to peace immediately.
Boogeyman657
Oct 27 2009, 08:19 PM
Please do, before I get him.
HisK Owns You
Oct 27 2009, 08:19 PM
Thanks for this Jim.
Tiberius12
Oct 27 2009, 08:33 PM
OP, ruining Tournament Edition.
Nah just kidding. I know how much pressure there can be at number one, you're doing well Jim, keep it up.
Lysander
Oct 27 2009, 08:36 PM
QUOTE (Tiberius12 @ Oct 27 2009, 07:33 PM)

OP, ruining Tournament Edition.
Nah just kidding. I know how much pressure there can be at number one, you're doing well Jim, keep it up.
OP, i think you have something of RE's
Seriously though, good to have you guys here. It mixes things up from a round that would otherwise have come out predictable...RE with the top spot...AGAIN
HisK Owns You
Oct 27 2009, 08:37 PM
QUOTE (Lysander @ Oct 27 2009, 10:36 PM)

OP, i think you have something of RE's
Seriously though, good to have you guys here. It mixes things up from a round that would otherwise have come out predictable...RE with the top spot...AGAIN

Do you not remember last round?
ClashPoint
Oct 27 2009, 08:38 PM
Good man, that Jim.
Lysander
Oct 27 2009, 08:39 PM
QUOTE (HisK Owns You @ Oct 27 2009, 07:37 PM)

Do you not remember last round?

Uh yeah let me think...RE still had top spot
HisK Owns You
Oct 27 2009, 08:40 PM
QUOTE (Lysander @ Oct 27 2009, 10:39 PM)

Uh yeah let me think...RE still had top spot

Then lost it...
Lysander
Oct 27 2009, 08:42 PM
QUOTE (HisK Owns You @ Oct 27 2009, 07:40 PM)

Then lost it...

no no no. Last I remember we had half your nation strength, but still had more points than you. And it still read RE, 1.
HisK Owns You
Oct 27 2009, 08:43 PM
QUOTE (Lysander @ Oct 27 2009, 10:42 PM)

no no no. Last I remember we had half your nation strength, but still had more points than you. And it still read RE, 1.
TPF won...
Lysander
Oct 27 2009, 08:44 PM
QUOTE (HisK Owns You @ Oct 27 2009, 07:43 PM)

TPF won...

................................you tryin to be funny?
Tiberius12
Oct 27 2009, 08:46 PM
QUOTE (Lysander @ Oct 27 2009, 09:44 PM)


................................you tryin to be funny?
TPF had the most points at the end of the round as I recall, though they only were ahead for the last two days.
HisK Owns You
Oct 27 2009, 08:48 PM
QUOTE (Tiberius12 @ Oct 27 2009, 10:46 PM)

TPF had the most points at the end of the round as I recall, though they only were ahead for the last two days.
A few small alliances joined them. But they still won.
Lysander
Oct 27 2009, 08:51 PM
that must have been the two days I was MIA. *shrugs* we still kicked MHA's, FB's, PU's, and FARK's rears....*plugs ears and runs around screaming* YES WE DID YES WE DID
HisK Owns You
Oct 27 2009, 08:52 PM
QUOTE (Lysander @ Oct 27 2009, 10:51 PM)

that must have been the two days I was MIA. *shrugs* we still kicked MHA's, FB's, PU's, and FARK's rears....*plugs ears and runs around screaming* YES WE DID YES WE DID
LOL keep thinking that! You lost your top spot because of us. We didnt attack you to get first.
Tiberius12
Oct 27 2009, 08:53 PM
QUOTE (HisK Owns You @ Oct 27 2009, 09:48 PM)

A few small alliances joined them. But they still won.
Lol, good precedent to set, mass ghosting/merging as a way to win! If it works I suppose...
Lysander
Oct 27 2009, 09:00 PM
QUOTE (Tiberius12 @ Oct 27 2009, 07:53 PM)

Lol, good precedent to set, mass ghosting/merging as a way to win! If it works I suppose...
would one of those small alliances be...
Trouble?

Oh and...yay OP....or something like that. gotta keep the warn level low
HisK Owns You
Oct 27 2009, 09:02 PM
QUOTE (Tiberius12 @ Oct 27 2009, 10:53 PM)

Lol, good precedent to set, mass ghosting/merging as a way to win! If it works I suppose...
It was not ghosts
DarkEra97
Oct 27 2009, 09:05 PM
Trouble did not exist until this round, I'll have you know.
HisK Owns You
Oct 27 2009, 09:07 PM
QUOTE (DarkEra97 @ Oct 27 2009, 11:05 PM)

Trouble did not exist until this round, I'll have you know.
I think it was a joke... I'll have you know...
Lysander
Oct 27 2009, 09:14 PM
QUOTE (HisK Owns You @ Oct 27 2009, 08:07 PM)

I think it was a joke... I'll have you know...

Beep beep beep, there goes my sarcasm meter.
Yes I was in fact, joking
KingAdam
Oct 27 2009, 09:29 PM
QUOTE (HisK Owns You @ Oct 28 2009, 04:02 AM)

It was not ghosts

I can confirm this.
Lysander
Oct 27 2009, 09:36 PM
QUOTE (KingAdam @ Oct 27 2009, 08:29 PM)

I can confirm this.
myth busted
Strykewolf
Oct 27 2009, 09:56 PM
((chuckles))
What an amusing read.
To the OP: Yeah, we have a similar policy, though ours involves aggressive response in most cases.
kulomascovia
Oct 27 2009, 11:17 PM
Tech raiding rules? Diplomacy? In TE? Jeez, since when has TE become this dull?
HisK Owns You
Oct 27 2009, 11:27 PM
QUOTE (kulomascovia @ Oct 28 2009, 01:17 AM)

Tech raiding rules? Diplomacy? In TE? Jeez, since when has TE become this dull?
Have RE raid a big alliance and dont stop the members... See how long they last this round.
JimKongIl
Oct 27 2009, 11:31 PM
QUOTE (kulomascovia @ Oct 28 2009, 12:17 AM)

Tech raiding rules? Diplomacy? In TE? Jeez, since when has TE become this dull?
If you had at least one attacking casualty then you might have had a better argument.
kulomascovia
Oct 27 2009, 11:33 PM
QUOTE (HisK Owns You @ Oct 27 2009, 10:27 PM)

Have RE raid a big alliance and dont stop the members... See how long they last this round.

I did that last round. I would attack anyone within my range if they are attacking an RE member. Nothing much happened. In fact, I don't think RE has ever issued tech raiding rules until this round and I don't think that had a negative impact on RE. Personally, I don't see the necessity of having tech raiding rules in a war game.
kulomascovia
Oct 27 2009, 11:35 PM
QUOTE (JimKongIl @ Oct 27 2009, 10:31 PM)

If you had at least one attacking casualty then you might have had a better argument.
Don't worry, I'll get some soon; I haven't had much time to build up my nation. As soon as I get some decent trades and a warchest, I'll rack up some casualties. You should have seen my nation at the end of last round!
EDIT: Also, I fail to see how me not having any casualties disproves my argument.
Gabryal
Oct 28 2009, 12:32 AM
QUOTE (Tiberius12 @ Oct 27 2009, 08:53 PM)

Lol, good precedent to set, mass ghosting/merging as a way to win! If it works I suppose...
I think we had a total of six or seven people from RoWN, and maybe 2-3 from OB, 7 out of 10 have remained TPF this round.
Also while I never really trusted you Tiberius ( in a game sense, I wonder what kind of RL encounter we would have ) I do just Jim
JimKongIl
Oct 28 2009, 12:33 AM
QUOTE (kulomascovia @ Oct 28 2009, 12:17 AM)

Tech raiding rules? Diplomacy? In TE? Jeez, since when has TE become this dull?
If you knew how many pms I sent and received over 4 raids today this rule might make more sense to you. Rules can change but right now this is the best (and easiest) policy.
Gabryal
Oct 28 2009, 01:19 AM
QUOTE (JimKongIl @ Oct 28 2009, 12:33 AM)

If you knew how many pms I sent and received over 4 raids today this rule might make more sense to you. Rules can change but right now this is the best (and easiest) policy.
I'd like to say that OP's raiding rules are ALOT stricter than almost every other alliance ( NONE get's a pass )
erikz
Oct 28 2009, 03:30 AM
Ordo Paradoxia also does not you know?
tallah
Oct 28 2009, 05:11 PM
RE had the same policy last round
Also, I love mai warz

anyone who interferes with said wars faces an unstoppable supply of bonzais

(I

MHA, PU, and AoD they gave me one of the top 30 casualty spots last round

)
Lysander
Oct 28 2009, 05:20 PM
QUOTE (kulomascovia @ Oct 27 2009, 10:33 PM)

I did that last round. I would attack anyone within my range if they are attacking an RE member. Nothing much happened. In fact, I don't think RE has ever issued tech raiding rules until this round and I don't think that had a negative impact on RE. Personally, I don't see the necessity of having tech raiding rules in a war game.
....Tech raiding a bigger alliance=bad. What do you think would happen if we raided OP and didn't stop the raiders? Say hello to a war that I doubt many would support us in.
tallah
Oct 28 2009, 05:22 PM
QUOTE (Lysander @ Oct 28 2009, 07:20 PM)

Say hello to a war that I doubt many would support us in.
I would (No clue if my alliance would but you know me on TE

)
JimKongIl
Oct 30 2009, 12:47 AM
QUOTE (tallah @ Oct 28 2009, 06:22 PM)

I would (No clue if my alliance would but you know me on TE

)
Set your gov position and you'll be able to buy more tech.
Drai
Nov 3 2009, 09:41 PM
This rule does not apply to sanctioned alliances
rtellez06
Nov 4 2009, 05:04 PM
QUOTE (HisK Owns You @ Oct 27 2009, 06:52 PM)

LOL keep thinking that! You lost your top spot because of us. We didnt attack you to get first.

Oh get off your high horse. If MHA and RE went 1 vs 1 RE would have won. But it didn't work out like that. You guys again went close to 3 vs 1
elborrador
Nov 4 2009, 09:27 PM
QUOTE (rtellez06 @ Nov 4 2009, 06:04 PM)

Oh get off your high horse. If MHA and RE went 1 vs 1 RE would have won. But it didn't work out like that. You guys again went close to 3 vs 1
LOL both of those alliances are pathetic excuses for alliances. Neither had an efficient war machine. The only efficient war machines i've seen in this game is 1. Murder Inc in early rounds 2. LE (tip: they were a splinter from MI to hide our true strength originally, these guys are hella active and know what they're doing... and 3. hopefully OP. i've never seen an alliance that has such an allstar cast and has the activity to back it up as OP has.
Dom Zak
Nov 12 2009, 05:56 PM
I have never seen this rule enforced. I see OP nations raiding allainces with 30 members. This is unacceptable. Keep your nations under control!
Believland
Nov 12 2009, 07:23 PM
How about you make us?
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.