Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Clarification of Ordo Paradoxia Raiding Rules
Cyber Nations Forums > Cyber Nations Gameplay and Roleplay > Cyber Nations Tournament Edition > Tournament Edition Open World Forum
JimKongIl
To clarify Ordo Paradoxia only permits raids against AAs with 5 members or less. If larger AAs are raided I will message those involved and ask them to peace immediately.
Boogeyman657
Please do, before I get him.
HisK Owns You
Thanks for this Jim. smile.gif
Tiberius12
OP, ruining Tournament Edition.




















Nah just kidding. I know how much pressure there can be at number one, you're doing well Jim, keep it up.
Lysander
QUOTE (Tiberius12 @ Oct 27 2009, 07:33 PM) *
OP, ruining Tournament Edition.




















Nah just kidding. I know how much pressure there can be at number one, you're doing well Jim, keep it up.

OP, i think you have something of RE's tongue.gif
Seriously though, good to have you guys here. It mixes things up from a round that would otherwise have come out predictable...RE with the top spot...AGAIN biggrin.gif
HisK Owns You
QUOTE (Lysander @ Oct 27 2009, 10:36 PM) *
OP, i think you have something of RE's tongue.gif
Seriously though, good to have you guys here. It mixes things up from a round that would otherwise have come out predictable...RE with the top spot...AGAIN biggrin.gif


Do you not remember last round? wink.gif
ClashPoint
Good man, that Jim.
Lysander
QUOTE (HisK Owns You @ Oct 27 2009, 07:37 PM) *
Do you not remember last round? wink.gif

Uh yeah let me think...RE still had top spot tongue.gif
HisK Owns You
QUOTE (Lysander @ Oct 27 2009, 10:39 PM) *
Uh yeah let me think...RE still had top spot tongue.gif


Then lost it... rolleyes.gif
Lysander
QUOTE (HisK Owns You @ Oct 27 2009, 07:40 PM) *
Then lost it... rolleyes.gif

no no no. Last I remember we had half your nation strength, but still had more points than you. And it still read RE, 1.
HisK Owns You
QUOTE (Lysander @ Oct 27 2009, 10:42 PM) *
no no no. Last I remember we had half your nation strength, but still had more points than you. And it still read RE, 1.


TPF won...
Lysander
QUOTE (HisK Owns You @ Oct 27 2009, 07:43 PM) *
TPF won...

mellow.gif ................................you tryin to be funny?
Tiberius12
QUOTE (Lysander @ Oct 27 2009, 09:44 PM) *
mellow.gif ................................you tryin to be funny?

TPF had the most points at the end of the round as I recall, though they only were ahead for the last two days.
HisK Owns You
QUOTE (Tiberius12 @ Oct 27 2009, 10:46 PM) *
TPF had the most points at the end of the round as I recall, though they only were ahead for the last two days.


A few small alliances joined them. But they still won.
Lysander
that must have been the two days I was MIA. *shrugs* we still kicked MHA's, FB's, PU's, and FARK's rears....*plugs ears and runs around screaming* YES WE DID YES WE DID
HisK Owns You
QUOTE (Lysander @ Oct 27 2009, 10:51 PM) *
that must have been the two days I was MIA. *shrugs* we still kicked MHA's, FB's, PU's, and FARK's rears....*plugs ears and runs around screaming* YES WE DID YES WE DID


LOL keep thinking that! You lost your top spot because of us. We didnt attack you to get first. happy.gif
Tiberius12
QUOTE (HisK Owns You @ Oct 27 2009, 09:48 PM) *
A few small alliances joined them. But they still won.

Lol, good precedent to set, mass ghosting/merging as a way to win! If it works I suppose...
Lysander
QUOTE (Tiberius12 @ Oct 27 2009, 07:53 PM) *
Lol, good precedent to set, mass ghosting/merging as a way to win! If it works I suppose...

would one of those small alliances be...
Trouble?
rolleyes.gif

Oh and...yay OP....or something like that. gotta keep the warn level low
HisK Owns You
QUOTE (Tiberius12 @ Oct 27 2009, 10:53 PM) *
Lol, good precedent to set, mass ghosting/merging as a way to win! If it works I suppose...


It was not ghosts tongue.gif
DarkEra97
Trouble did not exist until this round, I'll have you know.
HisK Owns You
QUOTE (DarkEra97 @ Oct 27 2009, 11:05 PM) *
Trouble did not exist until this round, I'll have you know.


I think it was a joke... I'll have you know... wink.gif
Lysander
QUOTE (HisK Owns You @ Oct 27 2009, 08:07 PM) *
I think it was a joke... I'll have you know... wink.gif

Beep beep beep, there goes my sarcasm meter.

Yes I was in fact, joking
KingAdam
QUOTE (HisK Owns You @ Oct 28 2009, 04:02 AM) *
It was not ghosts tongue.gif


I can confirm this.
Lysander
QUOTE (KingAdam @ Oct 27 2009, 08:29 PM) *
I can confirm this.

myth busted
Strykewolf
((chuckles))

What an amusing read.



To the OP: Yeah, we have a similar policy, though ours involves aggressive response in most cases. blush.gif wink.gif
kulomascovia
Tech raiding rules? Diplomacy? In TE? Jeez, since when has TE become this dull?
HisK Owns You
QUOTE (kulomascovia @ Oct 28 2009, 01:17 AM) *
Tech raiding rules? Diplomacy? In TE? Jeez, since when has TE become this dull?


Have RE raid a big alliance and dont stop the members... See how long they last this round. awesome.gif
JimKongIl
QUOTE (kulomascovia @ Oct 28 2009, 12:17 AM) *
Tech raiding rules? Diplomacy? In TE? Jeez, since when has TE become this dull?




If you had at least one attacking casualty then you might have had a better argument.
kulomascovia
QUOTE (HisK Owns You @ Oct 27 2009, 10:27 PM) *
Have RE raid a big alliance and dont stop the members... See how long they last this round. awesome.gif


I did that last round. I would attack anyone within my range if they are attacking an RE member. Nothing much happened. In fact, I don't think RE has ever issued tech raiding rules until this round and I don't think that had a negative impact on RE. Personally, I don't see the necessity of having tech raiding rules in a war game.
kulomascovia
QUOTE (JimKongIl @ Oct 27 2009, 10:31 PM) *
If you had at least one attacking casualty then you might have had a better argument.


Don't worry, I'll get some soon; I haven't had much time to build up my nation. As soon as I get some decent trades and a warchest, I'll rack up some casualties. You should have seen my nation at the end of last round!

EDIT: Also, I fail to see how me not having any casualties disproves my argument.
Gabryal
QUOTE (Tiberius12 @ Oct 27 2009, 08:53 PM) *
Lol, good precedent to set, mass ghosting/merging as a way to win! If it works I suppose...


I think we had a total of six or seven people from RoWN, and maybe 2-3 from OB, 7 out of 10 have remained TPF this round.

Also while I never really trusted you Tiberius ( in a game sense, I wonder what kind of RL encounter we would have ) I do just Jim
JimKongIl
QUOTE (kulomascovia @ Oct 28 2009, 12:17 AM) *
Tech raiding rules? Diplomacy? In TE? Jeez, since when has TE become this dull?



If you knew how many pms I sent and received over 4 raids today this rule might make more sense to you. Rules can change but right now this is the best (and easiest) policy.
Gabryal
QUOTE (JimKongIl @ Oct 28 2009, 12:33 AM) *
If you knew how many pms I sent and received over 4 raids today this rule might make more sense to you. Rules can change but right now this is the best (and easiest) policy.


I'd like to say that OP's raiding rules are ALOT stricter than almost every other alliance ( NONE get's a pass )
erikz
Ordo Paradoxia also does not you know?
tallah
RE had the same policy last round ph34r.gif
Also, I love mai warz wub.gif anyone who interferes with said wars faces an unstoppable supply of bonzais tongue.gif lol1.gif rolleyes.gif (I wub.gif MHA, PU, and AoD they gave me one of the top 30 casualty spots last round biggrin.gif )
Lysander
QUOTE (kulomascovia @ Oct 27 2009, 10:33 PM) *
I did that last round. I would attack anyone within my range if they are attacking an RE member. Nothing much happened. In fact, I don't think RE has ever issued tech raiding rules until this round and I don't think that had a negative impact on RE. Personally, I don't see the necessity of having tech raiding rules in a war game.

....Tech raiding a bigger alliance=bad. What do you think would happen if we raided OP and didn't stop the raiders? Say hello to a war that I doubt many would support us in.
tallah
QUOTE (Lysander @ Oct 28 2009, 07:20 PM) *
Say hello to a war that I doubt many would support us in.

I would (No clue if my alliance would but you know me on TE wub.gif )
JimKongIl
QUOTE (tallah @ Oct 28 2009, 06:22 PM) *
I would (No clue if my alliance would but you know me on TE wub.gif )


Set your gov position and you'll be able to buy more tech.
Drai
This rule does not apply to sanctioned alliances
rtellez06
QUOTE (HisK Owns You @ Oct 27 2009, 06:52 PM) *
LOL keep thinking that! You lost your top spot because of us. We didnt attack you to get first. happy.gif


Oh get off your high horse. If MHA and RE went 1 vs 1 RE would have won. But it didn't work out like that. You guys again went close to 3 vs 1
elborrador
QUOTE (rtellez06 @ Nov 4 2009, 06:04 PM) *
Oh get off your high horse. If MHA and RE went 1 vs 1 RE would have won. But it didn't work out like that. You guys again went close to 3 vs 1

LOL both of those alliances are pathetic excuses for alliances. Neither had an efficient war machine. The only efficient war machines i've seen in this game is 1. Murder Inc in early rounds 2. LE (tip: they were a splinter from MI to hide our true strength originally, these guys are hella active and know what they're doing... and 3. hopefully OP. i've never seen an alliance that has such an allstar cast and has the activity to back it up as OP has.
Dom Zak
I have never seen this rule enforced. I see OP nations raiding allainces with 30 members. This is unacceptable. Keep your nations under control!
Believland
How about you make us?
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.