Ch33kY
Oct 22 2009, 05:00 AM
I lose around 500 population and get a decrease in total income of around $3 to $4 when I buy a Barracks. As far as I know this improvement does not effect population happiness, income or citizen count.
Does anyone know the reason for this?
A link to my nation can be found in my signature, though I don't know that my nation has a particularity about it that would influence this.
Auctor
Oct 22 2009, 05:40 AM
probably boosts your soldier's effective strength above 60% and you are losing a point of environment.
Ursarkar E Creed
Oct 22 2009, 06:09 AM
People get weary when they're surrounded by excess amounts of soldiers.
Huang Ti
Oct 22 2009, 12:08 PM
As effective soldier count rises and citizen count falls, only slightly so most people dont notice.
Ch33kY
Oct 23 2009, 04:08 AM
There is no additional soldier count. A Barracks increases solider efficiency. Any other thoughts?
Mirreille
Oct 23 2009, 01:19 PM
Whenever your soldier effiency improves, your population counts goes down slightly. If you are seeing a big difference from that, then probably Auctor is right and you are crossing the 60% threshold number, which costs you an environment point and a more significant amount of population. You lose pop switching from Capitalist to Democracy, so I know the efficiency affects pop count.
Ch33kY
Oct 25 2009, 05:00 AM
Thanks for your reply Mirreille. Now that raises the issue of why should a nation lose population/environment for military efficiency?
Auctor
Oct 25 2009, 06:44 AM
QUOTE (Ch33kY @ Oct 25 2009, 07:00 AM)

Thanks for your reply Mirreille. Now that raises the issue of why should a nation lose population/environment for military efficiency?
gameplay forum is just for how it is, not why it should be...
Sande
Oct 25 2009, 06:59 AM
You should have at least 0.2 soldiers per citizen. The formula doesn't use soldier count but the modified one with efficiency.
Count Rupert
Oct 25 2009, 10:36 AM
QUOTE (Ch33kY @ Oct 25 2009, 07:00 AM)

Thanks for your reply Mirreille. Now that raises the issue of why should a nation lose population/environment for military efficiency?
It's a holdover from the past when everything was based off soldier efficiency and not actual soldier count. Back then, none of the displays in the game even showed what the actual soldier count was since all the formulas used soldier efficiency. Using soldier efficiency however lead to some distortions when applying losses against larger nations leading to some having national drafts situations in the hundreds of thousands. To correct this many of the formulas using soldiers were converted to using actual soldier count over soldier efficiency. The issue in this thread is one that never made the transition from soldier efficiency to actual soldier count.
zzzptm
Oct 26 2009, 05:32 PM
Therefore, dismiss some soldiers and you should be back to normal. The ones you have are now more über, and your citizens are wary of their well-directed truncheons.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.