I have checked to see first if it is OK to bump old recruiting threads before posting this, and it seems that it is OK. I wanted to tag this explanation here rather than create a new thread on what NONE's purpose is so potential recruits and outsiders can understand where we are coming from.A newer member of NONE asked this question and I wanted to offer my answer here so others can see.
QUOTE
...But no one has answered my question about NONE's relationship with non-aligned who are NOT in NONE. Do we try to do things on their behalf or not? Does anyone here care if they get fired on because other people are lazy and can't or will not bother to tell the difference?
Forget about the alliances out there for a moment. What about this group? Do we do or see ourselves doing anything for the non-aligned not a part of NONE other than leave them alone?
I originally founded NONE in Standard with all of us indistinguishable from the non-aligned. The purpose was to create an element of uncertainty amongst tech-raiders.
The wimps who hide behind alliances while victimizing the non-aligned basically look at those who do not wish to play the alliance system to have to pay for their independence by being subject to continual attack. They hope to use perpetual violence to either motivate the non-aligned to join their alliances or serve as tech-cows/punching bags. Those who fight back are subject to be gang-attacked "Tech-raid, accept peace or ZI."
Those who were non-aligned in Standard in the first year can tell you that it was not always this way; most spent the better part of that year with hardly any action. In those days, non-aligned were largely left alone so long as they didn't start fights.
============================
Anyway, we quickly found that when we fought alongside each other as indistinguishable from other non-aligned, we would be gang-attacked by alliances that didn't even have treaties with the original aggressor alliance. We were at one point facing 5 alliances each of which was much larger than our group and suffered multiple first-strike nukes. They demanded apologies, "reparations," extortion, POW status, etc.
That was because the other alliances were outraged that non-aligned would be banding together for self-defense.
They used force to either subjugate us or wipe us out with the object of making sure that those who tech-raided the non-aligned could do so with assurance that it was safe to do so because their victims would be operating once more in complete isolation.
We never surrendered and IMO, this is why I was designated EZI [an OOC ZI that follows the user even after his/her nation is deleted and a new persona is created] in Standard and anyone found associating with me were hounded from the game. Excepting for an ignominious few who actually joined the enemy during a war of extermination against us, nearly all of us either left the game for good or went underground in Standard.
We have experimented with being open in TE and so far are doing OK.
============================
I would prefer that we did not have to capitalize our AA as NONE and distinguish ourselves from the other non-aligned. That would allow us to be more of an agent of deterrent, but for the reasons I explained above, that simply is not possible even in TE.
As we have seen from discussions in OWF, the tech-raiding alliances simply cannot abide living with non-aligned who defend each other. Even two non-aligned who do so will typically be subject to being driven from the game. Non-aligned who defend each other are viewed by this sort of bully as being guilty of entrapment for appearing to be all alone with our juicy tech and thus view tech-raiders who find themselves facing coordinated resistance as victims.
============================
Given this, we capitalize our AA as NONE so those who wish to avoid us can do so and so we can be "allowed" to survive. Also we still hope to provide some kind of haven for non-aligned who are willing to participate and abide by our singular rule of reserving our military for defense.
I am not looking for agreement here, but hope at least our position can be understood as sincere, consistent and well-thought-out.