QUOTE (Madame Unicorn @ Sep 1 2009, 08:10 PM)

<snip>Because all the OOC comments that you seem to want to make ALL THE TIME have ruined it.
You're ruining CNRP with your petty and inane comments when they aren't needed AT ALL.
So what if Sargun wanted to invade? So what if it was wrong. STOP GOING ON ABOUT IT. What Sargun does IC is his business, and also the business of the other person he's engaging with. Why do we need to have 50 million comments on how you disagree and how %^ this is OOC.
Seriously. We all need to have a decent look at how we're roleplaying and how we're treating each other. Derailing threads with your OOC flaming and tantrum throwing wont get you anywhere and it certainly wont make anyone else respect you.
CNRP, I believe, is a priviledge given to us by the mods. We NEED to start getting ourselves into line before they take the RP ability away from us. We NEED to give new players a chance. We NEED to be a bit more decent towards one another.
*sigh* I dont care if you dont like this rant. It's about time someone grew some and actually spoke up about the issues at hand.
I will try to be brief and to the point with my responses to this thread - I have a lot of IC damage control to do on behalf of the Red Sands.
I've been in CNRP for about a month or two, and quite frankly, the experience was amazing... being a 19 year old Uni first year, I've tried a lot of online stuff to pass the RARE blocks of empty time inbetween school, work, friends and girlfriend. CNRP was something that I felt was perfect for me, something that was immersive and engaging, while simultaneously being something I could work on, and put down for indefinite periods of time if need be. I loved looking over threads and narrative posts I've made, and seeing the reactions others had, good or bad.
If anyone would not want to "ruin" CNRP, it would be me. Now, why have I given this seemingly inane monologue? Well, its because I've noticed some glaring flaws within my newest and most prized obsession. I've taken this quote from Generalissimo, for two reasons, one, because it is completely and utterly 100% true, and two, Gen is an established CNRPer, and would nullify some responses to this point that I predict would take the form of "stfu you're a newb/noob (depending on the level of maturity of the respondent) thats trying to ruin what we've built".
QUOTE (Generalissimo @ Sep 2 2009, 10:23 AM)

I can see why you want a CNRP alternative, it’s often not a very friendly community; moreover CNRP is an insider’s game and suffers from horrible elitism.
Please, do not take this at a stab at ALL established CNRPers, please, because believe it or not, I too wish to become one of you.
I agree with the OP, with all her/his points actually, CNRP is a priviledge given to us by the mods. But what do you mean by us? I believe its a priviledge given to EACH AND EVERYONE of the thousands of CN players. Now, thankfully, not all of them wish to RP, but when a new person does want to, we should at least give them a chance.
The CNRP board is a board like every other board out there. All the stigmas a new member has when joining up and posting a thread for the first time are present within the CNRP. I remember being horrified when I saw LVN and Firestorm post their comments on my DoE/Factbook. I just wanted to start off and already I have people who, at that time and wrongly, I believed were against me.
QUOTE (Sargun @ Sep 1 2009, 07:53 PM)

OOC: No, the issue is that you guys are crossing the OOC/IC line, Executive. OOC, he's new and it sucks. IC, he's an established nation and he is in the way of an objective. More importantly, AmpaSand is not a new RPer. Just because his account is new doesn't mean he is..
Now, I am not defending those, like Zoot Zoot, who flamed Sargun. I hate those that flame and preemptively strike against others on boards. Whether its a post like Zoot's or threads like Ubers on the Nords (which I actually tried to defuse before the other CNRPers came online and started a flame fest) its wrong, and If I see it is wrong, I will point it out. I will put an OOC comment only if it is credible and not a flame regardless. The reason I am mentionning Zoot and Sarg's posts is because he' requested the original rebellion thread to be free of more OOC.
In regards to blurring the OOC/IC line. Not once have I EVER RP'd for OOC reasons. Spacingoutman can vouch for me completely and utterly. I have never flamed and will never do so. Sure OOC and IC viewpoints can be parallel, because honestly, its bound to be. As long as the person at the computer is typing what the IC person in the government says, there will be some correlation. To expect otherwise is absurd. It was only when things got worse did i drop the IC, because in all honesty, sure Sarg may be right and Ampa might have been the top dog in RP somewhere else, but if you looked at what he DID RP, come on... he was definitely a new RPer and everyone knows this, his Rage quitting should be the final nail in the coffin.
I will repeat myself. SURE Sargun was totally in his right to completely steamroll Tyran and Carthage. But OOC'ly, did you HAVE to??? I understand that you previously RPed in Africa, but come on... couldn't you have just waited till Amp quitted on his own? You had New Zealand or whatever before. Instead, you caused him to rage quit, which is essentially booting him from the game. Whether he was going to do it on his own or not is irrelevent anymore. You booted him out, and this gives me the message that only the strong IG'ly can RP safely on this board. Or those who have lots of friends in CNRP.
Not to jab at Sarah, but Sargun, honestly, if Sarah was RPing in Carthage, would you roll her? I HIGHLY HIGHLY doubt it. What if V the King, the most powerful nation IG'ly in CNRP was in Tyran, would you roll him? Hell no. But why not, they are established nations in the way of your objective?QUOTE (SpacingOutMan @ Aug 24 2009, 01:52 PM)

[In regards to planned wars] I'm sorry but no. This is a freaking roleplay in international politics. You don't get to decide if/when your nation gets declared on. Now should you at least have the courtesy of backing off if the RPer doesn't want to war? Sure.
QUOTE (DeSchaine @ Aug 24 2009, 01:03 PM)

I voted yes because if you dont have planned wars, then anyone who wanted a particular piece of land could jump the tiny, under developed nation that owned it and drive them right out without consent. I was never keen on the whole "If you dont recognize the war, its an auto win for the other guy."
In order to assuage MUs comments that my OOC in the thread is ruining CNRP, I will use this whole issue to make an attempt to improve CNRP IMVVVVVHO.
There should be a rule on Nation strength. Keep the spontaneous wars. KEEP THEM COMPLETELY AND UTTERLY! Just, make it so an immensely stronger nation IG'ly cannot pre-emptively take hostile actions up to and including war against a nation that IG'ly is a fly to them without the fly's consent. This does not rule out defensive actions. CN itself has this rule, why can't CNRP?
QUOTE (Drakedeath @ Aug 25 2009, 12:33 AM)

Voted no. It just lets people do what they want and then not recognize a war when it comes time to fight.
Nation A attacks Nation B. Nation B is smaller, but thinks it'd be fun and recognizes the war
Nation A wins and annexes 75% of B.
Nation A declares war on Nation C. Nation C thinks the same way as B and recognizes
Nation A wins and expands.
Nations D, E, F, and G decide they're tired of it and want to attack Nation A
Nation A refuses to recognize the war.
This is just a way for the bullies to kill the fun-loving weaker nations while saving their $@! from the big guys. I'm fine if the war is unplanned, but the two sides meet and say "So do we agree not to use nukes, bio weapons, etc.", but this idea is a big $%&@ NO.
So far I have not seen this scenario play out AT ALL.
Right now, Nation A who is most likely HUGE attacks Nation B. Nation B does not wish to lose his foothold in CNRP and declines. Nation A complains that B is being a poor sport and initiates the, "if you don't recognize my war i win" which is the stupidest rule I have ever seen to be frank. In order to be a poor sport, there SHOULD BE SPORT IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!!!!!!!!!! If 10000000 out of 10000000 times you lose, thats not a sport, its non-sense. This is the CNRP we have now... especially with the whole, I have it IG'ly therefore i have it RP'ly. This means the oldest CNers will by default be the toughest sons of in CNRP, which contributes to the, correct-me-if-I-am-freaking-wrong, Elitist attitude in here.
QUOTE (Elrich von Richt @ Sep 1 2009, 09:26 PM)

OOC: The next generation of idiocy.
I do not know where you're going with this. Care to explain?
Grow some? They be swangin'...