Arwen
Aug 21 2009, 07:14 PM
I think CNTE will be more of a challenge if a 75%/200% rule was implemented. The 50%/200% is a bit unfair especially when a nation 2x your size attacks you. The other rule makes the odds a bit more even and will help with war practice in preperation for war in regular CN.
Please fix it!
Thanxkbai
-- edit --
Changed it from 75%/133% to 75%/200%, because 200% gives you more target options yet the 75% keeps battles fair where someone twice your size cannot attack you. It gives you a chance to fight back.
Ackbarican_Idol
Aug 21 2009, 09:08 PM
I 100% agree. The difference in NS is magnified at the lower levels, and implementing the 75%/133% rule would make warring a little for fair.
Emperor Stranger
Aug 22 2009, 08:25 AM
Let's do it.
De Caelo Missus
Aug 23 2009, 01:46 AM
Then the nations who donate and generally avoid war will be out of range of the nations who want to attack them. Unless of course you still get the +250/-250 in the rankings thing, then I'd be all for it. Maybe +100/-100 would be better on TE.
Janitor
Aug 23 2009, 01:03 PM
We're playing a war game and you want to limit the the possible wars? C'mon now... so a guy twice your size attacks you - 3 of your guys his size or better attack him. He loses - problem solved.
Get your Alliance involved.
JimKongIl
Aug 23 2009, 03:14 PM
I strongly disagree. We need more wars in TE not less.
Janitor
Aug 23 2009, 03:19 PM
^^^^ what he said, he just was more succinct than I was
Arwen
Aug 23 2009, 09:13 PM
It would make CNTE more of a challenge if you could only attack nations closer to your National Strength range. It will also reflect the same rule applied to regular CN [75%/133%]. CNTE could future be used as a training grounds to prepare nations for war in regular CN, because the same rule applies.
The current rule makes CNTE a clobber fest when you have nations 2x your size attacking you.
lonewolfe2015
Aug 23 2009, 09:33 PM
I say we make it 75%/200%
We should be allowed to war anyone stronger than us we want, but curb stomping people sucks.
JimKongIl
Aug 23 2009, 10:45 PM
QUOTE (Arwen @ Aug 23 2009, 10:13 PM)

The current rule makes CNTE a clobber fest when you have nations 2x your size attacking you.
I thought that was the point of TE. I actually think that just like the old SE rules nations above 7500 should be able to attack anyone higher than them even if they are greater than 200% of their Nation Strength.
In TE no one should feel secure.
Arwen
Aug 24 2009, 04:50 AM
QUOTE (lonewolfe2015 @ Aug 23 2009, 10:33 PM)

I say we make it 75%/200%
We should be allowed to war anyone stronger than us we want, but curb stomping people sucks.
I could live with that. That is a good idea!
Ackbarican_Idol
Aug 24 2009, 07:50 AM
QUOTE (lonewolfe2015 @ Aug 23 2009, 11:33 PM)

I say we make it 75%/200%
We should be allowed to war anyone stronger than us we want, but curb stomping people sucks.
Encourages people to fight their weight class and above, I like it.
ZKee1
Aug 27 2009, 05:36 AM
I agree with 75%/200%; having 3 nations twice as big attacking you is not fun.
Arrnea
Aug 27 2009, 06:25 AM
QUOTE (lonewolfe2015 @ Aug 24 2009, 11:33 AM)

I say we make it 75%/200%
We should be allowed to war anyone stronger than us we want, but curb stomping people sucks.
I agree with this. 75%/200% sounds like a good idea, or perhaps even 75%/250%.
Arwen
Aug 28 2009, 06:40 AM
Added a poll to this topic.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.