XxSnipezxX
Jan 29 2009, 09:08 PM
Declaration of Support
The time has come… now that GDI has split and been corrupted on one side. The Brotherhood of Nod recognizes The Keepers of The Covenant as a sovereign alliance and thus supports them in any action they may take, weather it be defensive, or offensive The Brotherhood of Nod supports them Financially and militarily.
PEACE THROUGH POWER!
Kane Has Spoken!
Sultan Axermis
Jan 29 2009, 09:12 PM
What is this I don't even...
Republic of Lenahan
Jan 29 2009, 09:13 PM
QUOTE (XxSnipezxX @ Jan 29 2009, 10:08 PM)

Declaration of Support
...supports them in any action they may take, weather it be defensive, or offensive The Brotherhood of Nod supports them Financially and militarily.
Thank you, we appreciate it.
Vyper
Jan 29 2009, 09:14 PM
Hail the great Kane!
Vasuda
Jan 29 2009, 09:15 PM
QUOTE (Sultan Axermis @ Jan 29 2009, 10:12 PM)

What is this I don't even...
And here I thought you guys were doing it wrong...
There are no words for this. Except, maybe..."Laugh out loud."
Josh the Great
Jan 29 2009, 09:15 PM
Interesting.
Lines being drawn etc etc
XxSnipezxX
Jan 29 2009, 09:16 PM
QUOTE
And here I thought you guys were doing it wrong...
There are no words for this. Except, maybe..."Laugh out loud."
whats wrong with supporting your friends?
AllenKalashnikov
Jan 29 2009, 09:16 PM
QUOTE (Vasuda @ Jan 29 2009, 10:15 PM)

And here I thought you guys were doing it wrong...
There are no words for this. Except, maybe..."Laugh out loud."
Why did you pick Bathazr as your pic?
nutkase
Jan 29 2009, 09:16 PM
Didnt Nod and GDI just sign a treaty not to long ago?
Vasuda
Jan 29 2009, 09:17 PM
QUOTE (AllenKalashnikov @ Jan 29 2009, 10:16 PM)

Why did you pick Bathazr as your pic?
Baltar, and because he's awesome. Why did you pick a rotorcraft?
XxSnipezxX
Jan 29 2009, 09:17 PM
a NAP
AllenKalashnikov
Jan 29 2009, 09:17 PM
Yes we did it was a NAP.
Carter
Jan 29 2009, 09:17 PM
Sounds terrrrrrrrrific.
AllenKalashnikov
Jan 29 2009, 09:18 PM
QUOTE (Vasuda @ Jan 29 2009, 10:17 PM)

Baltar, and because he's awesome. Why did you pick a rotorcraft?
B/c you already took Baltar.
Tom Litler
Jan 29 2009, 09:29 PM
I have had good dealings with NOD in the past but I can't say that I'm particularly proud of you acknowledging the Republic of Lenahan's poorly composed attempt at further defaming GDI and Ryan.
Princess Aurora Soup
Jan 29 2009, 09:32 PM
So you have a NAP with GDI, but will support the Keepers of the Covenant militarily in whatever they do?
XxSnipezxX
Jan 29 2009, 09:34 PM
yes i feel our ties are more strong to KOTC compared to GDI
EDIT: KOTC does not want war with GDI it was a peacful separation
nutkase
Jan 29 2009, 09:38 PM
well to me does not look very "peaceful" by calling them a corrupt alliance
Might wanna cancel that NAP
Pacifism
Jan 29 2009, 09:39 PM
Normally, someone breaking away from another alliance is fine. But you seem to be all Vox Populi-like and trying to start a vendetta against GDI, which sort of defames what KoTC is trying to do. You're more like hurting them with this DoS.
Tom Litler
Jan 29 2009, 09:40 PM
QUOTE (Pacifism @ Jan 30 2009, 03:39 AM)

Normally, someone breaking away from another alliance is fine. But you seem to be all Vox Populi-like and trying to start a vendetta against GDI, which sort of defames what KoTC is trying to do. You're more like hurting them with this DoS.
This is true and if you refuse to agree with me because you have something against me, as many do, listen to this man.
XxSnipezxX
Jan 29 2009, 09:48 PM
no we have nothing against GDI, but in the C&C franchise they are mortal enemies, and this announcement was IC (me pretending to be Kane) meaning that it was for RP

lol
hizzy
Jan 29 2009, 09:50 PM
QUOTE (XxSnipezxX @ Jan 30 2009, 07:34 AM)

yes i feel our ties are more strong to KOTC compared to GDI
EDIT: KOTC does not want war with GDI it was a peacful separation
You have stronger ties to an alliance that was JUST created than to the alliance you signed an NAP with some time ago?
Or is your word and signature about as useful as an olive pit?
Kevin McDonald
Jan 29 2009, 09:52 PM
QUOTE (XxSnipezxX @ Jan 29 2009, 10:48 PM)

no we have nothing against GDI, but in the C&C franchise they are mortal enemies, and this announcement was IC (me pretending to be Kane) meaning that it was for RP

lol
But this isn't C&C...
This entire thing from CoMA to GDI to Nod to everything is, quite simply put, astounding.
XxSnipezxX
Jan 29 2009, 09:54 PM
no our NAP is mostly just to keep the peace, and i have been in contact with lenahan and all the members of KOTC for awhile, and also RyanGDI and i go back along time, he destroyed 3 of my alliances. for no good reason :/ never really got any press except the UNSC war, and that was somewhat justified. :/
EDIT: Hizzy love your Sig, Go Dom!!! WOOO!!
New Frontier
Jan 29 2009, 09:55 PM
Lines being drawn in crayon by children.
Lokiee
Jan 29 2009, 09:56 PM
QUOTE
You have stronger ties to an alliance that was JUST created than to the alliance you signed an NAP with some time ago?
Or is your word and signature about as useful as an olive pit?
hey dont diss olive pits there yummy
Incitatus
Jan 29 2009, 10:14 PM
1. This is not a NAP (in regards to a comment by sniperz) an NAP is a Non-Aggression Pact. I fail to see any treaty in this thread.
Either way, small alliance drama is always fun, so thus I say: Have fun and good luck.
Princess Aurora Soup
Jan 29 2009, 10:18 PM
QUOTE (Incitatus @ Jan 29 2009, 11:14 PM)

1. This is not a NAP (in regards to a comment by sniperz) an NAP is a Non-Aggression Pact. I fail to see any treaty in this thread.
Either way, small alliance drama is always fun, so thus I say: Have fun and good luck.
The NAP being referred to is one between NOD and GDI, signed a week ago or something like that.
Mechanus
Jan 30 2009, 08:19 AM
For some reason I sense a RyanGDI Jr. in Snipez. Am I the only one that gets that sort of feeling?
Oh, and this DoS is lulworthy at best. Nice passive aggressiveness in the OP.
Kevin McDonald
Jan 30 2009, 08:54 AM
QUOTE (Mechanus @ Jan 30 2009, 09:19 AM)

For some reason I sense a RyanGDI Jr. in Snipez. Am I the only one that gets that sort of feeling?
No. That's exactly what I was saying to someone last night. It's getting hard to tell these micro leaders apart.
Schattenmann
Jan 30 2009, 09:32 AM
QUOTE (Pacifism @ Jan 29 2009, 10:39 PM)

Normally, someone breaking away from another alliance is fine. But you seem to be all Vox Populi-like and trying to start a vendetta against GDI, which sort of defames what KoTC is trying to do. You're more like hurting them with this DoS.
Hey! Heeeeyyyyyy. We'll tell everyone our own opinions on this, thank you very much.
ChairmanHal
Jan 30 2009, 10:33 AM
I want to do this while reading this thread:

But instead I find myself doing this:
It's like a slow motion train wreck of GDI.
Vasuda
Jan 30 2009, 10:36 AM
I'm gonna have to disagree with Hal on this one. The whole CoMA drama and all the little alliance drama that it spawned was pretty funny for a while, but now it's just getting repetitive. Can't we get someone to roll these guys? Practice targets for OPP or Ragnablock, perhaps?
Also Hal, bring back the Riker avatar please. He is a superhero.
Alaric the Great
Jan 30 2009, 10:36 AM
QUOTE (Kevin McDonald @ Jan 29 2009, 09:52 PM)

But this isn't C&C...
This entire thing from CoMA to GDI to Nod to everything is, quite simply put, astounding.
QUOTE (Kevin McDonald @ Jan 30 2009, 08:54 AM)

No. That's exactly what I was saying to someone last night. It's getting hard to tell these micro leaders apart.
This man speaks the truth. Will the hilarity between all you guys ever end? Apparently not. But, it is providing some good entertainment!
Srsly, the majority of the little former CoMA alliances might want to just find your niche in joining an established alliance, spend some time on IRC and in their forums talking to ppl who've been around a while. When you have learned how politics and such on Planet Bob works, then strike out on your own, armed with all this newfound knowledge. For realz. Just trying to save you from yourselves.
Tungsten
Jan 30 2009, 10:41 AM
QUOTE (hizzy @ Jan 29 2009, 10:50 PM)

You have stronger ties to an alliance that was JUST created than to the alliance you signed an NAP with some time ago?
Or is your word and signature about as useful as an olive pit?
Their NAP has a 10 minute cancellation clause, which makes it a little less useful than an olive pit.
AllenKalashnikov
Jan 30 2009, 11:14 AM
QUOTE (hizzy @ Jan 29 2009, 10:50 PM)

You have stronger ties to an alliance that was JUST created than to the alliance you signed an NAP with some time ago?
Or is your word and signature about as useful as an olive pit?
Well concider this..
1. RyanGDI has constently made threats to roll us since the day this alliance was created. So yes we have stronger ties to what
WAS the better part of GDI.
2.The NAP we have with GDI was a way to try and repair the damages between GDI and Nod.
3. The 10 minute clause is to make sure that GDI could not drag us down into the "mud".
hizzy
Jan 30 2009, 11:23 AM
QUOTE (AllenKalashnikov @ Jan 30 2009, 09:14 PM)

Well concider this..
1. RyanGDI has constently made threats to roll us since the day this alliance was created. So yes we have stronger ties to what WAS the better part of GDI.
2.The NAP we have with GDI was a way to try and repair the damages between GDI and Nod.
3. The 10 minute clause is to make sure that GDI could not drag us down into the "mud".
1. Then you shouldn't have signed an NAP.
2. I'm sure this DoS will also help very much, eh?
3. How does one drag you down into the "mud" with an NAP? Although, if by "drag you down" you mean force you to sign a binding agreement and then force you to publicly break the agreement by offering complete and indiscriminate support against them, then ya I guess you got dragged down into the "mud" pretty hard.
AllenKalashnikov
Jan 30 2009, 11:33 AM
QUOTE (hizzy @ Jan 30 2009, 12:23 PM)

1. Then you shouldn't have signed an NAP.
2. I'm sure this DoS will also help very much, eh?
3. How does one drag you down into the "mud" with an NAP? Although, if by "drag you down" you mean force you to sign a binding agreement and then force you to publicly break the agreement by offering complete and indiscriminate support against them, then ya I guess you got dragged down into the "mud" pretty hard.
1. We signed it as way to try to have relations.
2.This DoS is to help many friends that we have made.
3. People have a tendency to use treaty partners names to scare other people. So if I find out that is the case I will only worry for 10 minutes.
ChairmanHal
Jan 30 2009, 11:53 AM
QUOTE (Vasuda @ Jan 30 2009, 11:36 AM)

I'm gonna have to disagree with Hal on this one. The whole CoMA drama and all the little alliance drama that it spawned was pretty funny for a while, but now it's just getting repetitive. Can't we get someone to roll these guys? Practice targets for OPP or Ragnablock, perhaps?
Also Hal, bring back the Riker avatar please. He is a superhero.
This brings up the question of whether or not GDI is actually worth the expenditure of ammunition.
Ok, it is my understanding that GDI has a MADP treaty with SPA. That would tend to make any such operation more "complex". Of course if that treaty is null and void, the way would appear to clear for such an operation. I can't speak for TPF as to whether they would carry out such an attack but as a rule Ragnablok doesn't play vigilante.
For you I will bring it back for a limited engagement once our Marvel Comics Week celebration has ended. Just remember though that Eastwood rules all.
hizzy
Jan 30 2009, 11:54 AM
QUOTE (AllenKalashnikov @ Jan 30 2009, 09:33 PM)

1. We signed it as way to try to have relations.
2.This DoS is to help many friends that we have made.
3. People have a tendency to use treaty partners names to scare other people. So if I find out that is the case I will only worry for 10 minutes.
1. Then you (Nod) should not have said what you did in the DoS. (I hope you see the roundabout of dumb that you just drove into).
2. Again, wording.
3. What are they going to threaten with? "If you don't do as I say, Nod will not declare war on us!" Seriously, if any moron is fooled by that he deserves to be threatened and extorted.
I know the concept of not gathering against an NAP partner is not of this world, but try to get it. It's all in the fundamentals, people!
Lokiee
Jan 30 2009, 11:57 AM
that would be funny but then we would have less fun on CN
Kevin McDonald
Jan 30 2009, 11:59 AM
QUOTE (ChairmanHal @ Jan 30 2009, 12:53 PM)

Ok, it is my understanding that GDI has a MADP treaty with SPA.
I think SPA cancelled it.
Lokiee
Jan 30 2009, 12:01 PM
Im pretty sure they did
AllenKalashnikov
Jan 30 2009, 12:16 PM
They did cancel it
Alfred von Tirpitz
Jan 30 2009, 12:31 PM
QUOTE (AllenKalashnikov @ Jan 30 2009, 11:03 PM)

1. We signed it as way to try to have relations.
2.This DoS is to help many friends that we have made.
3. People have a tendency to use treaty partners names to scare other people. So if I find out that is the case I will only worry for 10 minutes.
Number 3 there dont float man. How in the name of mike is GDI or anyone going to scare anything with an IQ with a NAP? NAP means non agression between signatories, thats all. Its like, you dont hit me and i wont hit you. For a third party thats about as scary as a flake of dandruff.
hizzy
Jan 30 2009, 02:39 PM
QUOTE (Alfred von Tirpitz @ Jan 30 2009, 10:31 PM)

Number 3 there dont float man. How in the name of mike is GDI or anyone going to scare anything with an IQ with a NAP? NAP means non agression between signatories, thats all. Its like, you dont hit me and i wont hit you. For a third party thats about as scary as a flake of dandruff.
I don't know man... you ever get a flake of dandruff in your eye? Heaven forbid you wear contacts and one gets between the lens and your eye, GOD HELP YOU THEN!
SodaPolPop
Jan 30 2009, 02:53 PM
Apparently this is causing extreme mental strain on the remaining members of GDI.
As the nation of kwazulu natal from GDI has now sent aaa0016 of ODN into anarchy in an attempt at self-destruction?
http://www.cybernations.net/search_wars.as...yallexact=exact
kobiashiy
Jan 30 2009, 03:11 PM
Wow I didn't know this was posted

The NAP we had was more towards Ryan himself, we where fine with everyone else and still are. We have nothing against Ryan and don't plan on doing anything except for, hoping the best for both alliances. Also they came to us for support, and we do give them our support.
kobiashiy
Jan 30 2009, 03:12 PM
QUOTE (SodaPolPop @ Jan 30 2009, 03:53 PM)

Apparently this is causing extreme mental strain on the remaining members of GDI.
As the nation of kwazulu natal from GDI has now sent aaa0016 of ODN into anarchy in an attempt at self-destruction?
http://www.cybernations.net/search_wars.as...yallexact=exactNow thats funny
Emperor Marx
Jan 30 2009, 03:17 PM
QUOTE (New Frontier @ Jan 29 2009, 10:55 PM)

Lines being drawn in crayon by children.
Everyone laughs now, but it's the
children micro alliances that have all the fun.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.