LittleRena Posted July 27, 2010 Report Share Posted July 27, 2010 (edited) [center][img]http://i28.tinypic.com/344ccyg.jpg[/img] As much as it saddens me that it has to come to this, I am cancelling the NAP that TRaPS shared with MOCR, which can be found here: http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=87328 This is mainly due to a lack of communication and the leader not informing us of the future of his alliance, I have not been able to get in touch with him through any of the main channels. This doesn't mean this will cause a dispute between us in future and I hope all former nations of MOCR will remain friends of ours. That is all, thankyou. LittleRena - Grand Princess of TRaPS[/center] Edited July 27, 2010 by LittleRena Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R3nowned Posted July 27, 2010 Report Share Posted July 27, 2010 Lines being erased? Obligatory good luck to both sides Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cotillion Posted July 27, 2010 Report Share Posted July 27, 2010 xfd i didnt know that naps still existed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleRena Posted July 27, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 27, 2010 Well, I sometimes like to sleep on the job. </badjoke> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ernesto Che Guevara Posted July 27, 2010 Report Share Posted July 27, 2010 [quote name='LittleRena' timestamp='1280206199' post='2390883'] Well, I sometimes like to sleep on the job. </badjoke> [/quote] Ha. Ha. I had to think about that one for a bit to get it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mdnss69 Posted July 27, 2010 Report Share Posted July 27, 2010 o/ bad joke also hai LR! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kotic Posted July 27, 2010 Report Share Posted July 27, 2010 Saaaad daaay....who are you guys again? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jens of the desert Posted July 27, 2010 Report Share Posted July 27, 2010 Oh no, not an NAP being cancelled D: Would have been nicer and made more sense if you followed this up with a DoW. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RePePe Posted July 28, 2010 Report Share Posted July 28, 2010 As is evidenced by the deeply important nature of a NAP and the extremely long bond that this treaty has represented over its lengthy month and a half, the title needs to be changed. This is EXTREMELY special, imo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
d3filed Posted July 28, 2010 Report Share Posted July 28, 2010 Interesting turn of events. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fernando12 Posted July 28, 2010 Report Share Posted July 28, 2010 So are you canceling this NAP so you could what? Attack them? Why do they need to communicate with you? Its a NAP. By not really having anything to do with you they are living up to the treaty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omniscient1 Posted July 28, 2010 Report Share Posted July 28, 2010 Sad to see. Good luck to both alliances. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hetman Vladislav Posted July 28, 2010 Report Share Posted July 28, 2010 Thunder is brewing! Uh ... Congrats? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erwin Schrodinger Posted July 28, 2010 Report Share Posted July 28, 2010 I expect a fully escalated war within two weeks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augustus Autumn Posted July 28, 2010 Report Share Posted July 28, 2010 Why was a Non-Agression Pact signed in the first place? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
legion-x Posted July 28, 2010 Report Share Posted July 28, 2010 [quote name='Ferrozoica Hive' timestamp='1280280447' post='2391878'] Why was a Non-Agression Pact signed in the first place? [/quote] i guess its a good way to start a relationship Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augustus Autumn Posted July 28, 2010 Report Share Posted July 28, 2010 [quote name='legion-x' timestamp='1280280694' post='2391894'] i guess its a good way to start a relationship [/quote] Usually I start a relationship by coming to an understanding that I'm not going to violate the other person's borders (or will, depending on the nature of said relationship and assuming that they're consenting, but I digress). I don't feel the need to be contractual about it. Since NAPs tend to get signed to essentially agree that there is some sort of pre-existing tension and that conflict will be avoided. It's not really the best handshake. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleRena Posted July 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 28, 2010 A TOF should have been more appropriate I agree, in hindsight, it would have made more sense. The founder of MOCR was a former govenment member of TRaPS, that's why it was signed, as a sign of friendship and a way to grow a relationship if his alliance took off further. There is no tension to be had. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augustus Autumn Posted July 28, 2010 Report Share Posted July 28, 2010 [quote name='LittleRena' timestamp='1280282936' post='2391949'] A TOF should have been more appropriate I agree, in hindsight, it would have made more sense. The founder of MOCR was a former govenment member of TRaPS, that's why it was signed, as a sign of friendship and a way to grow a relationship if his alliance took off further. There is no tension to be had. [/quote] Gotcha, that makes sense. And I agree with your reassessment, for whatever that's worth. NAPs are junk, nothing more, and pretty useless when it comes right down to it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Locke Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 [quote name='Ferrozoica Hive' timestamp='1280280447' post='2391878'] Why was a Non-Agression Pact signed in the first place? [/quote] Well, at least that's been fixed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karl Peters Posted July 29, 2010 Report Share Posted July 29, 2010 NAP? Are they much use anyways? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Savage Man Posted July 30, 2010 Report Share Posted July 30, 2010 (edited) The only use of NAPs is the hilarity generated when they get violated. Edited July 30, 2010 by Chief Savage Man Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Locke Posted July 30, 2010 Report Share Posted July 30, 2010 [quote name='Chief Savage Man' timestamp='1280449892' post='2394570'] The only use of NAPs is the hilarity generated when they get violated. [/quote] Which is, admitedly, worth getting them signed to see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lennox Posted July 30, 2010 Report Share Posted July 30, 2010 I am a fan of fewer treaties. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.