mhawk Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 (edited) So I'll go ahead and introduce a quick situation overview for everyone. A small group of 8 nations known as Zombie Defense Plan was going about their business and was tech raided by our allies NEW. Apparently there was some outrage, people wanted reps, NEW was going to keep it a 1 on 1, until some guy goes in and starts trying to start a fight or what was perceived as a fight with a NEW general member. Keep in mind NEW is not an english speaking alliance and the member took quite an offense and attacked. Okay so now we have a few NEW nations on a ZDP nation, now ZDP nations attack the nations that attacked in response, NEW nations hit the guys that counter attacked, some guys from other alliances join ZDP and attack more NEW nations, later another nation joins ZDP and attacks NEW nations not involved with the raids. I'll make this clear since there will soon be a smear campaign launched. 1) NEW wants to make peace and stop this cycle, all of NEW's allies want this same end. I'm of the opinion since ZDP wants reps, they probably shouldn't have attacked nations not involved with the raid... call it an eye for an eye. Just white peace NEW like they have requested? 2) If IAA wants to start a war against our MADP friends at NEW supporting ZDP without a treaty, we stand ready as allies to make war. We however greatly wish to prevent that particular outcome as I feel there is a great amount of ego and language barrier hindering each side. [01:35] <Chimaera[iAA]> So, how can I say this best?[01:35] <Chimaera[iAA]> Oh, screw it, let's take the direct route, shall we? [01:35] <~Yevgeni> I'm all for it. [01:35] <Chimaera[iAA]> NEW must declare peace with the Zombie Defense Plan. Now. 01:44] <Chimaera[iAA]> So anything you say here tonight is a logical casus belli for any future war against NEW? 2:14] <~Yevgeni> Here is our official position: we demand a complete white peace. Today. Not tomorrow, not "we couldn't reach our guy". We've put up with your lies once already. This is the second and last chance. And we want reparations for Brother-Kane. [02:15] <TAN[NEW]> A white peace, is sure will be granted... any time.. [02:15] <Chimaera[iAA]> Now. [02:15] <Chimaera[iAA]> Not any time. [02:15] <Chimaera[iAA]> Now. [02:16] <Chimaera[iAA]> Message every member of NEW at war with a member of ZDP and instruct them to send peace immediately. mhawk, The Phoenix Federation Edited December 16, 2009 by mhawk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enrage Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 good luck Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soccerbum Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 This is going to end well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Diorno Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 I for one, hope this spirals out of control. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supercoolyellow Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 Way to stand by your allies TPf. IAA, I'd back down if I were you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Maximus Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 Way to roll the hard six. Best of luck to NEW. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archon Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 Get 'cha popcorn ready - I've always been a fan of call-outs. Also, this can go into my notebook in my "arguments against tech raiding" folder. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Greenberg Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 This could get interesting, or it could be nothing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infidel Israeli Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 please? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wickedj Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 I for one, hope this spirals out of control. ohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohplease Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JWConner Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 Good call mhawk! o/TPF and our friends in NEW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PX6DEVASTATER Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 who is ZDP and when did we in the IAA support them? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ty345 Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 Obligatory "rollin' teh hard six." prays for war Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earogema Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 I for one, hope this spirals out of control. Said it better than I ever could. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taget Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 (edited) The dragon asked the octopus, "Why so many legs?" He replied, "I don't breath fire." "But you're not supposed to breath fire in the water. So why so many legs?" "I never decided to have these legs. They are just what I was given." The dragon replied, "That cannot be so. You grew them so you could attack me." The Octopus was perplexed. How could I attack you when I am in the water and you are in the air. And how are we talking to each other anyway? o/ IAA o/ NEW o/ TPF Edited December 16, 2009 by Taget Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pezstar Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 I'm of the opinion since ZDP wants reps, they probably shouldn't have attacked nations not involved with the raid. Read: I don't think ZDP had the right to defend themselves against their attackers, and since they did so, no reps for them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supa_Troop3r Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 Interesting I suppose. *Looks at IAA war slots* Very interesting indeed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandwich Controversy Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 Everybody involved is a wild and crazy guy. I hope this turns out as hilarious as possible! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Panda Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 (edited) I for one, hope this spirals out of control. This man is the hero of our time. Edited December 16, 2009 by Lord Panda Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirWilliam Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 Why anyone other than ZDP would be considering war against those raiding ZDP, if anyone is in fact even considering it, is beyond me. Yes, alliances have sovereignty and may do as they wish, with or without treaty-based obligations, but it'd be unwarranted and reckless nonetheless, especially in this situation (at least based on what I've seen and heard). Also, this can go into my notebook in my "arguments against tech raiding" folder. In my opinion it's not always tech-raiding that's the problem; just as frequently it's the unreasonable, inconsistent reactions to the raiding that is problematic, and quite worrisome at that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Death II Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 Its clear IAA just wants some lulz. Lets hope this goes to full out war for fun! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2burnt2eat Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 Read: I don't think ZDP had the right to defend themselves against their attackers, and since they did so, no reps for them. I'm of the opinion since ZDP wants reps, they probably shouldn't have attacked nations not involved with the raid. ^This quote was the best you could come up with? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mortale Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 I heard something else. We'll see what's true and what is not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goldie Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 Get 'cha popcorn ready - I've always been a fan of call-outs. Also, this can go into my notebook in my "arguments against tech raiding" folder. Agreed 100%, headaches are averted by just banning the practice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROMMELHSQ Posted December 16, 2009 Report Share Posted December 16, 2009 Read: I don't think ZDP had the right to defend themselves against their attackers, and since they did so, no reps for them. pretty much this. Good luck ZDP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.