Cyber Nations Forums: Harry Connick Jnr Is not Amused - Cyber Nations Forums

Jump to content


  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Harry Connick Jnr Is not Amused Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   Stefano Palmieri 

  • Rawr
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,275
  • Joined: 16-October 08
  • Nation Name:SanMarino
  • Alliance Name:LOUD
  • CN:TE Nation Name:Polska
  • CN:TE Alliance Name:RnR

Posted 08 October 2009 - 06:55 AM

Hey Hey Its Saturday Reunion Jackson 5
Herald Sun Reference
On Wednesday night Hey Hey its Saturday (yes on Wednesday but its a reunion) was on , and A group of Doctors from Sydney(most of whom were immigrants) did a parody of the Jackson 5. Evidently Harry Connick Jnr was not amused. I personally dont see the problem, well I see why It is a problem I just dont think there should be one, and 80% of the country agrees that they have no problem with it. I know it would have gone badly in America if Harry is anything to go by, but Australia =/= America. He should lighten up or realise people have different views to the Americans.

My 2 Cents.

#2 User is offline   Nythera 

  • I must confess, I'm not impressed
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,518
  • Joined: 16-July 09
  • Nation Name:Tratten
  • Alliance Name:United under Scorn (US)
  • CN:TE Nation Name:Silent Earth
  • CN:TE Alliance Name:Mostly Harmful Alliance

Posted 08 October 2009 - 06:58 AM

View PostMarquis Chris 1, on Oct 8 2009, 07:00 AM, said:

Hey Hey Its Saturday Reunion Jackson 5
Herald Sun Reference
On Wednesday night Hey Hey its Saturday (yes on Wednesday but its a reunion) was on , and A group of Doctors from Sydney(most of whom were immigrants) did a parody of the Jackson 5. Evidently Harry Connick Jnr was not amused. I personally dont see the problem, well I see why It is a problem I just dont think there should be one, and 80% of the country agrees that they have no problem with it. I know it would have gone badly in America if Harry is anything to go by, but Australia =/= America. He should lighten up or realise people have different views to the Americans.

My 2 Cents.

Took the word right outta my mouth.

#3 User is offline   Lamuella 

  • Flipper! Noooo! Put down that rifle!
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 14,482
  • Joined: 29-June 07
  • Nation Name:Amead
  • Alliance Name:Goon Order of Oppression, Negligence, and Sadism

Posted 08 October 2009 - 10:44 AM

in this day and age, there really isn't a call for blackface. I'm on Harry Connick Jr's side here.

#4 User is offline   Thorgrum 

  • Peanut Gallery Member
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 946
  • Joined: 03-July 08
  • Nation Name:Realm of Asgard
  • Alliance Name:The Ninjas

Posted 08 October 2009 - 11:09 AM

I can go either way, it was entertainment with a bit of levity. If he was offended thats his right, if people dont like him I hope they would simply change the channel. He made it a bigger deal then it needed to be.

#5 User is offline   Tyler DurdenCC 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 608
  • Joined: 09-June 09
  • Nation Name:Fight Club
  • Alliance Name:Olympus

Posted 08 October 2009 - 12:00 PM

I'm more offended by how un-funny and non-entertaining it was.

#6 User is offline   Comrade Craig 

  • General Secretary, The Int'l
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 659
  • Joined: 05-September 07
  • Nation Name:Free Left Coast
  • Alliance Name:The International

Posted 08 October 2009 - 01:43 PM

View PostMarquis Chris 1, on Oct 8 2009, 06:00 AM, said:

Hey Hey Its Saturday Reunion Jackson 5
Herald Sun Reference
On Wednesday night Hey Hey its Saturday (yes on Wednesday but its a reunion) was on , and A group of Doctors from Sydney(most of whom were immigrants) did a parody of the Jackson 5. Evidently Harry Connick Jnr was not amused. I personally dont see the problem, well I see why It is a problem I just dont think there should be one, and 80% of the country agrees that they have no problem with it. I know it would have gone badly in America if Harry is anything to go by, but Australia =/= America. He should lighten up or realise people have different views to the Americans.

My 2 Cents.


I support Harry on this particular issue. Australia has had some high-profile racial issues lately, and viewed through that context, it's difficult to view this as anything but another symptom of the racism that seems to find mainstream acceptance in that country.

Also, I don't think this has anything to do with a conflict between American and Australian values. Someone performed a vulgar act, and Harry Connick Jr. called them on it. That's all. Using blackface to mock black Americans is a profoundly offensive act with a well-known history. You can't feign cultural ignorance on this one.

-Craig

#7 User is online   Mack Truck 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,944
  • Joined: 09-September 07
  • Nation Name:Stevastan
  • Alliance Name:Shroomville

Posted 08 October 2009 - 07:24 PM

View PostComrade Craig, on Oct 9 2009, 05:48 AM, said:

I support Harry on this particular issue. Australia has had some high-profile racial issues lately, and viewed through that context, it's difficult to view this as anything but another symptom of the racism that seems to find mainstream acceptance in that country.


Hardly mainstream. Just because events/actions take place doesn't mean most people like or accept them.

That aside I do think there's a cultural difference in this respect between the US and here, and it's a good thing. I would rather it wasn't an issue at all rather than the over the top political correctness on the subject over there, although unfortunately that attitude is growing here.

Quote

Also, I don't think this has anything to do with a conflict between American and Australian values. Someone performed a vulgar act, and Harry Connick Jr. called them on it. That's all. Using blackface to mock black Americans is a profoundly offensive act with a well-known history. You can't feign cultural ignorance on this one.

-Craig


Except it doesn't have a history here. It comes from American theatre and Vaudeville, doesn't it? Black face I mean.

#8 User is offline   Comrade Craig 

  • General Secretary, The Int'l
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 659
  • Joined: 05-September 07
  • Nation Name:Free Left Coast
  • Alliance Name:The International

Posted 09 October 2009 - 11:25 AM

View PostMack Truck, on Oct 8 2009, 06:29 PM, said:

Except it doesn't have a history here. It comes from American theatre and Vaudeville, doesn't it? Black face I mean.


So your argument is that if something did not occur in Australia, then Australians shouldn't be aware? That's a weak argument. The racial oppression and dehumanization of an entire race of people is in the United States is not exactly a secret. Six million Jews weren't slaughtered in Los Angeles, but I know better than to put on a fake nose, draw serial number on my arm, then dance around like a clown. Common sense should prevail.

I do not doubt that the performers in question were naive. I'm sure they didn't mean any offense. There's something extra offensive in that ignorance. The fact that someone could paint themselves up to represent an exaggerated black man, then perform a routine that clearly mocked their identity as black humans -- all without understanding how profoundly disrespectful it was -- is the most offensive part.

And even worse, it wasn't even funny!

-Craig

#9 User is offline   Flatlander 

  • "He said ... go back inside."
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 637
  • Joined: 14-July 09
  • Nation Name:Flatlanderia
  • Alliance Name:Leverage

Posted 09 October 2009 - 12:35 PM

View PostMarquis Chris 1, on Oct 8 2009, 06:00 AM, said:

well I see why It is a problem I just dont think there should be one, and 80% of the country agrees that they have no problem with it.

Not sure how scientific that is, the only Australians I know don't understand what the hell the producers were thinking either.

#10 User is offline   Arrnea 

  • Stormbringer
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,453
  • Joined: 09-September 07
  • Nation Name:The Barony of Arrnea
  • Alliance Name:SOS Brigade
  • CN:TE Nation Name:North High School
  • CN:TE Alliance Name:SOS Brigade

Posted 09 October 2009 - 12:46 PM

View PostFlatlander, on Oct 10 2009, 02:40 AM, said:

Not sure how scientific that is, the only Australians I know don't understand what the hell the producers were thinking either.

What an Australian thinks about this will largely depend on what channel they like better; Channel 9, on which Hey Hey aired, or Channel 10, which has come out swinging on several of their shows, taking shots at Hey Hey and Channel 9 in general whenever they can.

Of course, when 10 does something worth picking up on, 9 bashes them for it.

It's all channel politics.

In my opinion, it was a well-meaning but ultimately poorly-recieved joke. I don't think they honestly meant anything racist by it.
People need to buck up and learn to have a sense of humor. Political correctness sucks.

This post has been edited by Arrnea: 09 October 2009 - 12:47 PM


#11 User is offline   Nythera 

  • I must confess, I'm not impressed
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,518
  • Joined: 16-July 09
  • Nation Name:Tratten
  • Alliance Name:United under Scorn (US)
  • CN:TE Nation Name:Silent Earth
  • CN:TE Alliance Name:Mostly Harmful Alliance

Posted 09 October 2009 - 12:52 PM

Don't blame the Australians. A weird load of crap is going on in the world right now, but that doesn't mean I or some other Australian agree with it.

This post has been edited by Nythera: 09 October 2009 - 06:57 PM


#12 User is offline   Arcadian Empire 

  • The Legion's Resident Pikachu
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,878
  • Joined: 22-September 07
  • Nation Name:Arcadian Empire
  • Alliance Name:The Legion

Posted 09 October 2009 - 06:07 PM

I came out to get a drink, and my first thought was, "Hey, I like this song!"

Then the guy came out with powder on his face... I think that took it too far. Although I find the fault is with Channel 9, their producers shouldn't have allowed that through.

Interesting to note that on Hey Hey twenty years ago, they had a similar skit put on - but with the lead singer with the blackface.

#13 User is offline   Stefano Palmieri 

  • Rawr
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,275
  • Joined: 16-October 08
  • Nation Name:SanMarino
  • Alliance Name:LOUD
  • CN:TE Nation Name:Polska
  • CN:TE Alliance Name:RnR

Posted 09 October 2009 - 08:47 PM

View PostArcadian Empire, on Oct 10 2009, 11:13 AM, said:

Interesting to note that on Hey Hey twenty years ago, they had a similar skit put on - but with the lead singer with the blackface.


yeah 20 years ago the same people did the exact same skit and won. They were medicalninterns at the time and are now all full doctors. The reason they were on in the first place is because they did it before

This post has been edited by Marquis Chris 1: 09 October 2009 - 08:49 PM


#14 User is online   Mack Truck 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,944
  • Joined: 09-September 07
  • Nation Name:Stevastan
  • Alliance Name:Shroomville

Posted 09 October 2009 - 09:54 PM

View PostComrade Craig, on Oct 10 2009, 03:31 AM, said:

So your argument is that if something did not occur in Australia, then Australians shouldn't be aware? That's a weak argument. The racial oppression and dehumanization of an entire race of people is in the United States is not exactly a secret. Six million Jews weren't slaughtered in Los Angeles, but I know better than to put on a fake nose, draw serial number on my arm, then dance around like a clown. Common sense should prevail.

I do not doubt that the performers in question were naive. I'm sure they didn't mean any offense. There's something extra offensive in that ignorance. The fact that someone could paint themselves up to represent an exaggerated black man, then perform a routine that clearly mocked their identity as black humans -- all without understanding how profoundly disrespectful it was -- is the most offensive part.


How did they make fun of black people? They just danced around like a boy-band, which the Jackson Five (practically) was. If they had actually based their routine around <insert-negative-thing-about-black-people> then it would be really offensive. The Jackson Five were black and did have afros, and imitating that shouldn't be seen as racist.

Quote

And even worse, it wasn't even funny!

-Craig


Aye. Although it's a bit funny that in their performance 20 years ago their Michael didn't have a white face.

#15 User is offline   Renolds 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,275
  • Joined: 05-September 07
  • Nation Name:Derbyshire
  • Alliance Name:Vanguard

Posted 10 October 2009 - 02:23 AM

View PostComrade Craig, on Oct 9 2009, 06:31 PM, said:

So your argument is that if something did not occur in Australia, then Australians shouldn't be aware? That's a weak argument. The racial oppression and dehumanization of an entire race of people is in the United States is not exactly a secret. Six million Jews weren't slaughtered in Los Angeles, but I know better than to put on a fake nose, draw serial number on my arm, then dance around like a clown. Common sense should prevail.

I do not doubt that the performers in question were naive. I'm sure they didn't mean any offense. There's something extra offensive in that ignorance. The fact that someone could paint themselves up to represent an exaggerated black man, then perform a routine that clearly mocked their identity as black humans -- all without understanding how profoundly disrespectful it was -- is the most offensive part.

And even worse, it wasn't even funny!

-Craig

im sorry i missed the part where they stripped to loincloths put on chains and then danced around like the Jackson 5. If they had done that then you would have a point.

Tell me, when Michael Chappelle wears white make up on his face is that racist?

#16 User is offline   Bordiga 

  • Demagogue
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 878
  • Joined: 08-February 09
  • Nation Name:Ergatocracy
  • Alliance Name:The Sandwich Confederation

Posted 11 October 2009 - 07:45 AM

It's flat out racism. You know when Bill O'Reilly comes out in support of the sketch that it is racist, to be frank.

Craig is right, as usual. Australia is an incredibly racist country which deserves to be publicly embarrassed more for it. When the government of both Howard and then Rudd can send an army of white cops into Aboriginal communities to enforce alcohol and pornography bans on them, seizing half of their welfare cheques in order to force them to line up in aboriginal only queues for food, while at the same time denying Aboriginal communities access to government funding in order to blackmail them into handing over their land to mining companies, you know you live in a country afflicted with inveterate racism.

And let's not forget the hysteria the media and government creates over an imagined refugee crisis. 1600 refugees in a year? What a threat to (racist white) society. And anti-muslim racism!

I wouldn't mind knowing from Craig or other non-Australian residents what sort of racism Australia is portrayed to possess? I would find that interesting. What sort of events have appeared in the international press and media?

#17 User is offline   Ursarkar E Creed 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 475
  • Joined: 12-May 08
  • Nation Name:.

Posted 11 October 2009 - 08:21 AM

Not sure if this has been said already, but didn't he right after this show (or a few days later/earlier) do a skit where he impersonated a black preacher?

That's what we like to call double standards and being hypocritical.

Also, you call Australia a racist country, take a step back and look at yours, buddy.

This post has been edited by Ursarkar E Creed: 11 October 2009 - 08:22 AM


#18 User is offline   Bordiga 

  • Demagogue
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 878
  • Joined: 08-February 09
  • Nation Name:Ergatocracy
  • Alliance Name:The Sandwich Confederation

Posted 11 October 2009 - 08:23 AM

View PostUrsarkar E Creed, on Oct 12 2009, 12:26 AM, said:

Not sure if this has been said already, but didn't he right after this show (or a few days later/earlier) do a skit where he impersonated a black preacher?

That's what we like to call double standards and being hypocritical.

Also, you call Australia a racist country, take a step back and look at yours, buddy.


What country do I reside in, patriotic Australian?

#19 User is offline   Ursarkar E Creed 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 475
  • Joined: 12-May 08
  • Nation Name:.

Posted 11 October 2009 - 08:26 AM

Australia of course. :rolleyes:

Also, you take things far too seriously. I've seen American skit shows where all Australians are shown as beer drinking, jean wearing country hicks who live with Kangaroos, and the dingo ate my baby line. Do we find this offensive? No.

Lighten up.

This post has been edited by Ursarkar E Creed: 11 October 2009 - 08:29 AM


#20 User is offline   Bordiga 

  • Demagogue
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 878
  • Joined: 08-February 09
  • Nation Name:Ergatocracy
  • Alliance Name:The Sandwich Confederation

Posted 11 October 2009 - 08:36 AM

Hahaahaha. Racism is serious. The Northern Territory Intervention is serious. Interning refugees in concentration camps is serious. When I see an example of racism occurring yet again in Australia I'm not going to refrain from highlighting it simply because some right winger feels offended and thinks he can brow beat me with apolitical aspersions about me being "too serious."

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users