[Curristan]

A letter was sent to Top Gear:



To: The Stig, Leader of Top Gear


We invite you to discuss matters that involve both our countries. The meeting can take place at the Presidential Palace in the Curristan Capital Jakirata. We feel this meeting is necessary due to the current political climate in the world today. Please respond



President Lisa Black
Curristan Minister for Foreign Affairs, Mark Richards

[TheStig]

The Stig immediately boarded the plane headed for the capital.

Upon arrival he stepped out of his vehicle and shook hands the President.

"Good evening, m'lady."

[Curristan]

"Good morning President Stig. Welcome to Curristan." She led The Stig to a large room where they sat down at an oak table. "First item we will discuss is the treaty that we have. Is there any additions to it you wish to have?"

[TheStig]

"For a long time now, our nations have been great friends. In fact, you might say that we have never been closer.

As such, I believe that as neighbours we should upgrade our treaty to an MADP, to ensure the security and protection for both our nations forever."

[Curristan]

TheStig, on Oct 4 2009, 01:17 PM, said:

"For a long time now, our nations have been great friends. In fact, you might say that we have never been closer.

As such, I believe that as neighbours we should upgrade our treaty to an MADP, to ensure the security and protection for both our nations forever."

"I agree. Do you have any terms in mind that you want to add to the treaty? I am open to any suggestions."

[TheStig]

Curristan, on Oct 4 2009, 06:36 PM, said:

"I agree. Do you have any terms in mind that you want to add to the treaty? I am open to any suggestions."

Perhaps the following:

"In the event that either nation's government becomes incapable of ruling their nation effectively, the land will automatically transfer to the jurisdiction of the other signatory for temporary occupation lasting thirty days. During which time, if the signatory's government is still incapable of keeping the country running, it will assimilate into the rule of the occupant."

Thoughts?

[Shadowsage]

OOC: As a note, that directly challenges my Orwellian Doctrine, which means that if you try that I'm automatically at war with you.

Just letting you know.

[TheStig]

Shadowsage, on Oct 4 2009, 06:44 PM, said:

OOC: As a note, that directly challenges my Orwellian Doctrine, which means that if you try that I'm automatically at war with you.

Just letting you know.

OOC: Which doctrine is this? Link?

[Shadowsage]

OOC: http://forums.cybern...showtopic=69907

[TheStig]

Quote

-Should anarchy appear in any of the protected areas the Holy Imperium is obliged to interfere and restore order.

OOC: In that case, consider that article the relief of your 'obligation' to any such action on either of our nations. You're welcome.

[Shadowsage]

OOC: Yeah, no. If you try taking the land out from under my doctrine, I'm obligated to kick the piss out of you.

[TheStig]

Shadowsage, on Oct 4 2009, 06:53 PM, said:

OOC: Yeah, no. If you try taking the land out from under my doctrine, I'm obligated to kick the piss out of you.

OOC: It isn't your land, it is ours, and we shall do what we damn well like with it, thank you very much.

Consider this a little 'doctrine' of our own. If you have a problem with it, feel free to declare war or whatever ridiculous idea you have of enforcing this ridiculous doctrine of yours.

[Shadowsage]

OOC: I come in here trying to warn you what will happen if this clause ever comes into effect, and you start trying to threaten me. Hmm. Yes. That makes sense.

Regardless, you have been warned.

[TheStig]

Shadowsage, on Oct 4 2009, 06:58 PM, said:

OOC: I come in here trying to warn you what will happen if this clause ever comes into effect, and you start trying to threaten me. Hmm. Yes. That makes sense.

Regardless, you have been warned.

OOC: I can assure you, if we sign the document, the clause would be put into effect. I am intrigued to know what you are going to do about that, good sir.

[Shadowsage]

OOC: Simple. If it ever gets used, I call it a violation of my doctrine and invade.

[TheStig]

Shadowsage, on Oct 4 2009, 07:03 PM, said:

OOC: Simple. If it ever gets used, I call it a violation of my doctrine and invade.

OOC: You wouldn't invade.

[Shadowsage]

OOC: Ha. Haha.

Your right. That's not the right term, 'steamroll' is probably more correct.

[TheStig]

Shadowsage, on Oct 4 2009, 07:06 PM, said:

OOC: Ha. Haha.

Your right. That's not the right term, 'steamroll' is probably more correct.

OOC: You act tough, but deep down you're such a softy. But in all seriousness, I know for a fact even you wouldn't be as silly as to declare a war with such a ridiculous CB. Anyway, this is a private dicsussion, so I bid you good day.

IC:

"Does that sounds reasonable? Addition of the clause I proposed earlier and the mutual attack clause? In which case, I hereby sign the amendments."

[Shadowsage]

OOC: See, the difference between our thinkings is that you call it silly, but I call it my In-Character obligations and stance. We'll see what happens.

[TheStig]

Shadowsage, on Oct 4 2009, 07:09 PM, said:

OOC: See, the difference between our thinkings is that you call it silly, but I call it my In-Character obligations and stance. We'll see what happens.

OOC: Obligations? I think you mean your 'subtle' attempt to land grab any nations that may go inactive before anyone else. Blatant power-hungriness, nothing else.