Atlas Shruged: The video game
#4
Posted 30 October 2007 - 01:25 PM
Opethian, on Oct 30 2007, 03:16 PM, said:
This really for the Boiler Room if it's about a game?
Anywho, this reminds me of how I described Rapture to my cousin, "Somebody has been reading too much Ayn Rand." I can't believe I was right.
#6
Posted 30 October 2007 - 01:34 PM
Opethian, on Oct 30 2007, 03:32 PM, said:
I have to say, appreciate the first part of his commentary about "the sweat of a mans brow", even if his ultimate attempt to reach his goal failed utterly.
Hehe...utterly failed is an understatement. You think there will be a sequel or prequel to Bioshock to better explain the morass of a story it was? It got good really quick...but then got really convoluted even quicker.
#7
Posted 30 October 2007 - 01:38 PM
Kenadian_2006, on Oct 30 2007, 07:34 PM, said:
I haven't played the game, but from all the description I had read and clips I had seen it seemed very Randish. As soon as that opening commentary started (before the reviewer chimed in about it) I was convinced.
#12
Posted 01 November 2007 - 04:54 PM
Opethian, on Oct 30 2007, 12:16 PM, said:
I thought the same while playing through the game. All the banners that say "Altruism is the root of all wickedness" and what not. See how a Randian society ended? Civilization degenerated and drug addicts started killing each other.
#13
Posted 01 November 2007 - 05:13 PM
mastab, on Nov 1 2007, 03:54 PM, said:
This is essentially what the creators were going for, the creation of an objectivist dystopia which shows just how badly this kind of society would fall apart.
Also, Yahtzee's review was far superior to that one.
#15
Posted 01 November 2007 - 07:04 PM
mastab, on Nov 1 2007, 06:54 PM, said:
its a video game
it does not reflect reality
#16
Posted 01 November 2007 - 07:40 PM
mastab, on Nov 1 2007, 10:54 PM, said:
Any society based solely and unwaveringly on an ideology is doomed to fail. I may lean to Libertarian philosophy, but I'd no sooner go to that extreme than I would any other.
But, yes, a man is entitled to the sweat of his brow; it does not belong to the poor or to the government or to anyone else.
#17
Posted 01 November 2007 - 09:04 PM
mastab, on Nov 1 2007, 03:54 PM, said:
In my opinion, it had nothing to do with the free market, but rather the fact that people didn't know what they were injecting into themselves. I give the game a 12/10.
#18
Posted 01 November 2007 - 09:14 PM
Vietnamese Guy, on Nov 1 2007, 06:04 PM, said:
it does not reflect reality
A joke, my dear Vietnamese Guy, a joke!
Opethian, on Nov 1 2007, 06:40 PM, said:
But, yes, a man is entitled to the sweat of his brow; it does not belong to the poor or to the government or to anyone else.
Yes, it does belong to him, but when one man starts using the metaphorical sweat on his brow to take the metaphorical sweat on another man's brow, the first man goes too far.
This post has been edited by mastab: 01 November 2007 - 09:16 PM
#19
Posted 01 November 2007 - 10:05 PM
blizzardman1219, on Nov 1 2007, 10:04 PM, said:
But the lack of a nanny state allowed the companies the freedom to pursue their enlightened self interest.
Anyway, this is one more reason I do not see myself buying this game (the other being the ignorant copy protection).
#20
Posted 01 November 2007 - 10:07 PM
mastab, on Nov 2 2007, 03:14 AM, said:
I'd suggest the man whose sweat is being taken solve his own problem, rather than create a bureaucratic mess that attempts to create a false equality.
People, quite simply, are not inherently equal.

Sign In
Register
Help



Top