Cyber Nations Forums: The Treaty of Two Worlds - Cyber Nations Forums

Jump to content


  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

The Treaty of Two Worlds Oh my!

#1 User is offline   Ezequiel 

  • The Pirate of CN
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 995
  • Joined: 29-August 08
  • Nation Name:Espana
  • Alliance Name:Octava Orden

Posted 25 May 2009 - 10:06 PM

After many talks, these nations have agreed to this treaty that we present to you...

Quote

The Treaty of Two Worlds

Posted Image

Preamble
The Treaty of Two Worlds is in place to keep peace in the continents of the of this world.

Article 1.
The under signed signatories agree to non-aggression against the others and will not be agressive against the other(s).

Article 2.
The signatories agree to not spy against one another.

Article 3.
Should a signatory come under attack it is not in this treaty that you are to assist an signatory.

Article 4.
Any nation who would like to join may contact the bloc to gain admission after approval.

Article 5.
If any signatory wishes to cancel this treaty, they may do so with a 48 hour notice to all signatories.


/s/ for The New Taiwanese Empire,

Nebu II, Emperor of The New Taiwanese Empire
Ja'Hina, Secretary of State of the New Taiwanese Empire



/s/ for Dragonisia,

Maelstrom Vortex, The Chairman of Dragonisia


/s/ for Wästerdyskreich,

His Excellency Emperor of Wästerdyskreich, Fleet Admiral Doctor Alexander I, OBE, PHD, COD,ASAP, Lord of All the Beasts of the Earth and Fishes of the Sea, Conqueror of the Italian Lands in General and Godwanaland in Particular, Also Hello


/s/ for Greater Nordland,

Reichskaiserin Magnhild Michelsdottar Martens von Nordland, Reichskanzler Scholar Visari of the Greater Nordlandic Reich


/s/ for Greater German Reich,

ReichKanzer of the Greater Nordland Reich, Scolar Visari


/s/ for Drakoria,

Jason R. Drake, President and the First Drakorian Senate


/s/ for Gebiv,

Empress Gebiv I
Princess Gebiv IV


/s/ for the Imperial Alliance,

Stephen Othran Ph.D: Stephen Othran
General Administrator of the Imperial Alliance


#2 User is offline   Maelstrom Vortex 

  • NPO Dragon of War
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,849
  • Joined: 16-June 08
  • Nation Name:Dragonisia
  • Alliance Name:NPO
  • CN:TE Nation Name:Dragonisia
  • CN:TE Alliance Name:Trouble

Posted 25 May 2009 - 10:07 PM

Affirming my signature.

#3 User is offline   Gebiv 

  • BoA ^_^
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,066
  • Joined: 20-February 08
  • Nation Name:Gebiv
  • Alliance Name:Nueva Vida

Posted 25 May 2009 - 10:07 PM

"Peace is always a good thing. This treaty pleases us."

#4 User is offline   Drakedeath 

  • IAA's Cataphract
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,244
  • Joined: 02-September 08
  • Nation Name:Drakoria
  • Alliance Name:Imperial Assault Alliance

Posted 25 May 2009 - 10:08 PM

We confirm our signature, and hope for a long and prosperous relationship.

#5 User is offline   Kaiser Martens 

  • The Lightbringer
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,216
  • Joined: 04-September 07
  • Nation Name:Deutschland

Posted 25 May 2009 - 10:13 PM

"It is nice to see such peaceful initiatives and even better to be a part of it."

#6 User is offline   Sumeragi 

  • Akatsukami
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Banned - Appeal Denied
  • Posts: 7,244
  • Joined: 26-May 08
  • Nation Name:Kyokujitsu Teikoku

Posted 25 May 2009 - 10:16 PM

Yamato wishes to join this NAP.

#7 User is offline   Emperor Mudd 

  • Tiocfaidh Ar La
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,456
  • Joined: 10-September 07
  • Nation Name:Tahoe
  • Alliance Name:Nordreich Polar Order

Posted 25 May 2009 - 10:24 PM

Quote

Should a signatory come under attack it is not in this treaty that you are to assist an signatory.


This is a rediculously roundabout way of saying "this is not a treaty of mutual defense" which would have been apparent had there not even been an article pertaining to mutual defense in the treaty in the first place.

- Ministry of Education and Speaking Words Good and Stuff

#8 User is offline   iamthey 

  • Mr. Kurtz
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,826
  • Joined: 04-September 07
  • Nation Name:Swiss Empire
  • Alliance Name:Argent

Posted 25 May 2009 - 10:30 PM

Confirming my signature.

#9 User is offline   Ezequiel 

  • The Pirate of CN
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 995
  • Joined: 29-August 08
  • Nation Name:Espana
  • Alliance Name:Octava Orden

Posted 25 May 2009 - 10:33 PM

View PostSumeragi, on May 26 2009, 12:46 AM, said:

Yamato wishes to join this NAP.


OOC: Send me your signature, Taiwan will approve you to join the bloc. B)

#10 User is offline   Madame Unicorn 

  • Your afternoon wake-up call.
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 431
  • Joined: 16-February 09
  • Nation Name:Annihilation
  • Alliance Name:The Family
  • CN:TE Nation Name:Terra Australis

Posted 25 May 2009 - 10:38 PM

Annihilation would like to join this Treaty :)

OOC: To save time:
[For Annihilation,
Madame Unicorn
Supreme Leader of Annihilation]

This post has been edited by Madame Unicorn: 25 May 2009 - 10:39 PM


#11 User is offline   LeVentNoir 

  • LeVentNoir, Duke of Wellington and Lord of Glorious Aotearoa
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 5,373
  • Joined: 05-September 07
  • Nation Name:Imperial Wellington
  • Alliance Name:Mostly Harmless Alliance

Posted 25 May 2009 - 10:40 PM

Why do two signatures appear from nation which merged into the GNR? Should one be removed or are they still separate nations?

#12 User is offline   Madame Unicorn 

  • Your afternoon wake-up call.
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 431
  • Joined: 16-February 09
  • Nation Name:Annihilation
  • Alliance Name:The Family
  • CN:TE Nation Name:Terra Australis

Posted 25 May 2009 - 10:43 PM

One would assume that since GNR is only a merger, they are seperate nations.

#13 User is offline   LeVentNoir 

  • LeVentNoir, Duke of Wellington and Lord of Glorious Aotearoa
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 5,373
  • Joined: 05-September 07
  • Nation Name:Imperial Wellington
  • Alliance Name:Mostly Harmless Alliance

Posted 25 May 2009 - 10:47 PM

View PostMadame Unicorn, on May 26 2009, 04:43 PM, said:

One would assume that since GNR is only a merger, they are seperate nations.

That sounds completely backwards. The point of a merger is that they cease to be separate nations.

#14 User is offline   king of cochin 

  • Honor is Our Family Treasure
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,407
  • Joined: 11-December 07
  • Nation Name:Cochin
  • Alliance Name:Orange Defense Network
  • CN:TE Nation Name:Cochin
  • CN:TE Alliance Name:Orange Juice

Posted 25 May 2009 - 10:55 PM

The Kingdom of Cochin wishes to join this NAP. This is our signature,

Sd,
His Highness Rama Varma,
The King of Cochin.


#15 User is offline   Sumeragi 

  • Akatsukami
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Banned - Appeal Denied
  • Posts: 7,244
  • Joined: 26-May 08
  • Nation Name:Kyokujitsu Teikoku

Posted 25 May 2009 - 11:00 PM

View PostEzequiel, on May 26 2009, 01:33 PM, said:

OOC: Send me your signature, Taiwan will approve you to join the bloc. B)

For Yamato

Ishima Ryu, Prime Minister

#16 User is online   Californian 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,353
  • Joined: 28-November 08
  • Nation Name:Tysland
  • Alliance Name:Ragnarok

Posted 25 May 2009 - 11:04 PM

We would also like to sign this NAP treaty.

/s/ Federal Republic of Grøenlandia,

Forseti Ty Eyvindsson
Forsætisráðherra Ísólfur Ármannsson

This post has been edited by Californian: 25 May 2009 - 11:06 PM


#17 User is offline   Ezequiel 

  • The Pirate of CN
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 995
  • Joined: 29-August 08
  • Nation Name:Espana
  • Alliance Name:Octava Orden

Posted 25 May 2009 - 11:31 PM

View PostLeVentNoir, on May 26 2009, 01:10 AM, said:

Why do two signatures appear from nation which merged into the GNR? Should one be removed or are they still separate nations?


The reason we have member states of GNR on our treaty listed under their nations is so that everyone knows that it was not all of GNR who have signed the treaty, only the member states listed.


*Private to the members of the bloc*

Taiwan approves of The Kingdom of Cochin and Annihilation, We would like to ask the other members of the bloc if we shall accept Yamato and The Federal Republic of Grøenlandia into the bloc. You have 48 hours to reply, if you do not vote, you will be counted as absent

To re-cap, please cast your votes for:

Annihilation
The Kingdom of Cochin
Yamato
The Federal Republic of Grøenlandia

Thank you.

This post has been edited by Ezequiel: 25 May 2009 - 11:52 PM


#18 User is offline   Lynneth 

  • AI Chairman of the GDR | ಠ_ಠ
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,477
  • Joined: 17-June 08
  • Nation Name:Saboria
  • Alliance Name:Mostly Harmless Alliance

Posted 26 May 2009 - 02:16 AM

"And for a moment I thought someone laid claim to Mars."
-Merkel

#19 User is offline   Sir Keshav IV 

  • Part of the Clown Cabinet. O/ Emperor Watchman.
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,158
  • Joined: 20-March 08
  • Nation Name:Articuno Islands
  • Alliance Name:Mushroom Kingdom

Posted 26 May 2009 - 02:22 AM

"We are intrigued by this treaty but will keep quiet as the old saying goes - If you nothing nice to say, don't say anything at all."

#20 User is offline   Stefano Palmieri 

  • Rawr
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,279
  • Joined: 16-October 08
  • Nation Name:SanMarino
  • Alliance Name:LOUD
  • CN:TE Nation Name:Polska
  • CN:TE Alliance Name:RnR

Posted 26 May 2009 - 02:26 AM

"Well, If Taiwan thinks its good, It must have some amount of Merit."

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users