Cyber Nations Forums: A Notice from the Red Cross - Cyber Nations Forums

Jump to content


  • (4 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

A Notice from the Red Cross A Statement of Appreciation, Recognition of the Wall

#1 User is offline   ModusOperandi 

  • What's goin' on in that teepee?
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 856
  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • Nation Name:Helena
  • Alliance Name:New Sith Order

Posted 15 May 2009 - 03:23 PM

Posted Image

Posted Image


To the honorable soldiers of the Liberation,


Appreciation,

Red Nations across the continent recognize and embrace the admirable coalition of nations which has emancipated our beloved and rosy sphere.

Nations across the Red Team have begun to display their new taste of freedom by adjusting alliance affiliations which represent fresh seeds of future prosperity.

Quote

Order of the Nuke
Hockey Mania
The Red Dragon Order
Fellowship of the Allied Republics
Steve and Ians Holy Pizza Alliance
The Communist Tetris Alliance
STB 0w3d yu0
Arctic Bearland
Warriors Of The Last Federation
Adamoria
CULT OF DERF
OPEC
Multicolred Protection Organization
The Empire
United Domainers
Redrum LLC
Why Not
Murder Was The Case
The Red Defense
Sudamericana
Drunken Muppets


We recognize that these are but adolescents in comparison to the communities of other spheres; however, Red soil will flourish as the fruits of our labors begin to yield their worth.

Whereas the catalog of our Red continent also reflects the movement of Red Nations to many other much-more established alliances; many of those communities are now willing to accept the affiliation of those members without the necessity of forcing them to change their natural color.

Your sacrifice has enabled the wind of freedom to bring fresh rain; we thank you.

No longer must we sacrifice our identity to obtain membership in either our own, or other, alliances.

Regret,

While the footsteps of freedom are traversing the Red plain, many of us still sympathize with the suffering being experienced by other Red Nations whose homes reside on the Eastern side of the...

(Video)


...we miss our families, our brotherhood and our friends; many of whom are perishing amidst the green glows.

We hope that peace and prosperity is returned to your cities once these unfortunate circumstances reach their conclusions..

To this end, we extend our condolences to the relations of your deceased and look to the day when a construct no longer divides us so that we may collectively ensure the prosperity of our sphere.

With Regards,


ModusOperandi
Director
The Red Cross

#2 User is offline   Heracles the Great 

  • 100% Forum Warning Level
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 1,933
  • Joined: 30-July 08
  • Nation Name:AncientGreece
  • Alliance Name:Coalition of United Nuclear Threats
  • CN:TE Nation Name:MaddHatter
  • CN:TE Alliance Name:Ordo Paradoxia

Posted 15 May 2009 - 03:35 PM

I don't think the NPO ever cared if you were a red nation in an alliance as long as that alliance was not a red-alliance or as long as your alliance was under 50 members...

But maybe I'm wrong

This post has been edited by Heracles the Great: 15 May 2009 - 03:36 PM


#3 User is offline   foxfire99 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 39
  • Joined: 03-June 08
  • Nation Name:Cyrian
  • Alliance Name:Viridian Entente

Posted 15 May 2009 - 03:51 PM

View PostHeracles the Great, on May 15 2009, 04:34 PM, said:

I don't think the NPO ever cared if you were a red nation in an alliance as long as that alliance was not a red-alliance or as long as your alliance was under 50 members...

But maybe I'm wrong


Most alliances would want you to change to their color, though.

#4 User is offline   Mogar 

  • 100% forum warn level.
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Banned - Appeal Denied
  • Posts: 5,187
  • Joined: 03-September 07

Posted 15 May 2009 - 03:52 PM

this is pretty interesting.

#5 User is offline   Vladimir 

  • Vanguard of the Revolution
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,064
  • Joined: 03-September 07
  • Nation Name:Soviestan
  • Alliance Name:New Pacific Order

Posted 15 May 2009 - 03:55 PM

12 of those alliances already existed prior to the war (one for nearly a year). 2 of them don't seem to exist at all. Of the 7 that have come into existence since the war, 4 only have 1 nation and the other 3 only have only 2 nations; of those 3, 1 only has 1 of the 2 nations on red. None of them would have been prevented from forming prior to the war (as the previously noted 12 demonstrate).

Nations on red are not prevented from joining other established alliances, and I don't know of any alliance that prevented only red nations from joining (and if they did you can discuss it with them; it had nothing to do with us or the Moldavi Doctrine).

#6 User is online   Johnny Apocalypse 

  • HUZZAH!
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 757
  • Joined: 27-October 07
  • Nation Name:Anubia
  • Alliance Name:Mushroom Kingdom

Posted 15 May 2009 - 03:57 PM

I love that.

Quote

Seeds of future prosperity

And the first alliance is called "Order of the Nuke"

#7 User is offline   x Tela x 

  • I can haz cute demeanor?
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,880
  • Joined: 03-September 07
  • Nation Name:Gamehenge
  • Alliance Name:Echelon

Posted 15 May 2009 - 04:01 PM

I'm not sure what the point of this is.

I mean really, What is this I don't even

#8 User is offline   Owned-You 

  • Pleased To Meet You, I'm A Man Of Wealth And Taste
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,020
  • Joined: 09-September 07
  • Nation Name:United Owns
  • Alliance Name:Nueva Vida
  • CN:TE Nation Name:Byzantium
  • CN:TE Alliance Name:AZTEC

Posted 15 May 2009 - 04:33 PM

Congrats I guess, although I believe you need to grow more in terms of membership my friend; to gain some legitimacy on Red Team..

#9 User is offline   Hermann Hoth 

  • I'm cuddly, I swear
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,136
  • Joined: 13-November 08
  • Nation Name:Neurrupin
  • Alliance Name:The German Empire

Posted 15 May 2009 - 04:47 PM

This could go interesting places. Consider my attention to be had.

#10 User is offline   ModusOperandi 

  • What's goin' on in that teepee?
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 856
  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • Nation Name:Helena
  • Alliance Name:New Sith Order

Posted 15 May 2009 - 05:48 PM

View PostVladimir, on May 15 2009, 09:55 PM, said:

4 only have 1 nation and the other 3 only have only 2 nations; of those 3, 1 only has 1 of the 2 nations on red...
it had nothing to do with us or the Moldavi Doctrine).


While we appreciate your interest in this matter, please refrain from criticizing those who choose to exercise the freedom which they so recently obtained; a community of Red Alliances will undoubtedly take time to create.. this exercise was merely meant to illustrate that it is happening.

The construction of the Francograd Wall has had an incontrovertible effect on the establishment of independent Red Alliances; this idea is common knowledge and cannot be refuted.

#11 User is offline   ModusOperandi 

  • What's goin' on in that teepee?
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 856
  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • Nation Name:Helena
  • Alliance Name:New Sith Order

Posted 15 May 2009 - 05:52 PM

View PostLady Gaga, on May 15 2009, 10:01 PM, said:

I'm not sure what the point of this is.

I mean really, What is this I don't even


Congratulations on adding nothing of substance to this thread and including a meaningless internet meme; next time, please include a picture of a lulcat so that some semblance of entertainment can be obtained from your typing efforts.

#12 User is offline   Desperado 

  • Ron Hextall Goalie Chop.
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 885
  • Joined: 08-December 07
  • Nation Name:Closure
  • Alliance Name:The Phoenix Federation
  • CN:TE Alliance Name:Trouble

Posted 15 May 2009 - 06:11 PM

hmm, that one is very close to FEAR...

This post has been edited by Desperado: 15 May 2009 - 06:11 PM


#13 User is offline   Fort Pitt 

  • Supreme Deity of Diplomatic Relations
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,244
  • Joined: 17-March 08
  • Nation Name:Fort Pitt
  • Alliance Name:The Dark Templar

Posted 15 May 2009 - 08:08 PM

View PostHeracles the Great, on May 15 2009, 05:34 PM, said:

I don't think the NPO ever cared if you were a red nation in an alliance as long as that alliance was not a red-alliance or as long as your alliance was under 50 members...

But maybe I'm wrong

try 5 members...

#14 User is offline   Tomcat 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 463
  • Joined: 29-December 07
  • Nation Name:new poland
  • Alliance Name:none

Posted 15 May 2009 - 08:08 PM

Good to see Red is slowly but surely beginning to flourish.

#15 User is offline   fireguy15207 

  • TotalFark Councilman
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,700
  • Joined: 03-September 07
  • Nation Name:Nation of Allen
  • Alliance Name:Fark

Posted 16 May 2009 - 01:14 AM

I'm glad to see that Red is starting to flourish under it's new freedom. I hope to see more of this in the future, and good luck in your endevours.

Although, the Moldavi Doctrine has never forbidden red nations from joining alliances, IPA has had several red nations, and NPO never came a-knockin'.

EDIT: nations, not alliances.

This post has been edited by fireguy15207: 16 May 2009 - 01:17 AM


#16 User is offline   Carter 

  • Repeat ban evasion.
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Banned - Appeal Denied
  • Posts: 1,213
  • Joined: 26-January 09
  • Nation Name:Carterland
  • Alliance Name:FIRE

Posted 16 May 2009 - 01:26 AM

Cool story bro. I'm glad red flourishing, I happen to like red a lot.

(OOC: Does Red Cross have an IRC Channel)

#17 User is offline   Johjima 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 101
  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • Nation Name:johjima
  • Alliance Name:Umbrella

Posted 16 May 2009 - 01:29 AM

I am hurt that Conventional Pandemonium did not make the list. :(

#18 User is offline   Pharaoh Bradshaw 

  • Not for ourselves alone were we born
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 139
  • Joined: 08-September 07
  • Nation Name:New Rianthol
  • Alliance Name:Black Order Of Knights

Posted 16 May 2009 - 08:48 AM

Glad to see some freedom on red, however I'm still hoping it'll be a haven from tech raiders...

I know it's a foolish hope, but a hope none the less.

#19 User is offline   ModusOperandi 

  • What's goin' on in that teepee?
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 856
  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • Nation Name:Helena
  • Alliance Name:New Sith Order

Posted 17 May 2009 - 10:26 PM

View PostCarter, on May 16 2009, 07:26 AM, said:

Cool story bro. I'm glad red flourishing, I happen to like red a lot.

(OOC: Does Red Cross have an IRC Channel)


Thanks mate, slowly but surely we'll get there :D Aye, red is the color of blood and love; the best slushies are cherry. :blush:

But we sure do; we are @ RedX on Coldfront.

irc://irc.coldfront.net/RedX

#20 User is offline   x Tela x 

  • I can haz cute demeanor?
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,880
  • Joined: 03-September 07
  • Nation Name:Gamehenge
  • Alliance Name:Echelon

Posted 17 May 2009 - 10:58 PM

View PostModusOperandi, on May 15 2009, 07:47 PM, said:

While we appreciate your interest in this matter, please refrain from criticizing those who choose to exercise the freedom which they so recently obtained; a community of Red Alliances will undoubtedly take time to create.. this exercise was merely meant to illustrate that it is happening.

The construction of the Francograd Wall has had an incontrovertible effect on the establishment of independent Red Alliances; this idea is common knowledge and cannot be refuted.


Nice job of selective quoting.


View PostVladimir, on May 15 2009, 05:55 PM, said:

12 of those alliances already existed prior to the war (one for nearly a year). 2 of them don't seem to exist at all. Of the 7 that have come into existence since the war, 4 only have 1 nation and the other 3 only have only 2 nations; of those 3, 1 only has 1 of the 2 nations on red. None of them would have been prevented from forming prior to the war (as the previously noted 12 demonstrate).

Nations on red are not prevented from joining other established alliances, and I don't know of any alliance that prevented only red nations from joining (and if they did you can discuss it with them; it had nothing to do with us or the Moldavi Doctrine).


I believe the quote here and the truth contained therein sufficiently debunks your claim that:

Quote

Nations across the Red Team have begun to display their new taste of freedom



I wish you luck with your alliance, but you're really going to need more than a handful of alliances that the majority of sanctioned alliances don't even consider actual alliances before your attempts at "liberating" the red sphere accomplish anything.

The entire OP of this thread is just an attempt to gain PR for your fledgling alliance, which while commendable, should be done with factual evidence rather than blurring the actual truths, as Vladimir pointed out.

  • (4 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users