So this is how it is
#1
Posted 12 January 2009 - 07:41 PM
As it turns out, there was an open war slot on this nation this morning, and I adjusted my capabilities to be able to fight the good fight. Permission was, of course, requested, but silence was the only answer.
Now I am threatened with ZI myself, from the Alliance prosecuting the nation as a rouge. Personal destruction is not an issue; it was assumed from the founding of my nation.
Honor. Honor is what? Alliance Honor, National Honor, Personal Honor. What does it mean in the context of Planet Bob?
So far as I can tell from my conversation with the (assumed) Military leader of this alliance, Alliance Honor means that if we are bigger than you, then Power dictates what Honor is, not actions or truths.
I don't ask for anything but an explanation.
#5
Posted 12 January 2009 - 09:35 PM
It would seem to me that a "military operation" would not leave open slots, and if they did, it could be viewed as Game On.
Regardless, you haven't addressed the question.
#6
Posted 12 January 2009 - 09:44 PM
Ammon, on Jan 12 2009, 10:40 PM, said:
If a nation is wearing an AA, especially one from an alliance as large as the Viridian Entente, you should get that alliances permission before attacking. If you don't, you should not be surprised if you get in trouble for attacking their AA and their targets.
Quote
You would be mistaken. ZI executions are often invitation only.
This post has been edited by Tritonia: 12 January 2009 - 09:44 PM
#7
Posted 12 January 2009 - 09:50 PM
Ammon, on Jan 12 2009, 10:40 PM, said:
It would seem to me that a "military operation" would not leave open slots, and if they did, it could be viewed as Game On.
Regardless, you haven't addressed the question.
People leave slots open for staggers and such. As far as I know it is common knowledge you not jump on someone elses target. It is a matter military planning for the alliance running the op and if nothing else its just common courtesy for anyone else who wants jump in to ask first.
#9
Posted 12 January 2009 - 10:41 PM
This is not a might makes right issue. As The Big Bad said, it's a common courtesy issue. You made a faux pa, deal with it. Don't come wailing about truth and honor as if it is some sort of trump card that makes you immune to the consequences of your actions. Many more people have suffered and died for truth and honor than for lies and cruelty.
#11
Posted 12 January 2009 - 11:16 PM
Ammon, on Jan 12 2009, 10:49 PM, said:
Let's Roll, Mutha F'ers.
I would say it is you who are throwing those terms around and not anyone else. Truth is, you screwed up. you won't even really admit it, otherwise you would not be here posting as you have been. Honor, you took a slot that was not yours to take. in the OP, you stated you requested permission, but did not wait for an answer. Instead you took a slot, and instead of discussing this with VE, you came to the forums.
While, i did not think you should be ZIed before for making your mistake; your continued failure to man up to it, makes me feel differently. I would suggest instead of stating no one knows what truth and honor means, or that VE is acting the way of "might makes right", you should be asking for forgiveness for your mistake and leaving this subject to private channels instead of public.
trust me, take my advice and you may well escape ZI.
#12
Posted 13 January 2009 - 01:12 AM
Ammon, on Jan 13 2009, 04:49 AM, said:
Let's Roll, Mutha F'ers.
As your rolling I advise you dont accept that pending aid in your slot, or you will drag the alliance sending it to you into strife as well.
have fun
#13
Posted 13 January 2009 - 07:30 AM
My unsolicited advice -- Visit the VE in their public IRC channel and ask to speak with a member of government. Apologize for stepping on their toes and ask for their suggestion about how to solve the situation you are in.
#14
Posted 13 January 2009 - 07:35 AM
Ammon, on Jan 12 2009, 10:55 PM, said:
acta est fabula plaudite
That is precisely it. Welcome to the survivalist world of the New Pacific Order and its brutish toadies.
International and interalliance standards are the shackles of slavery, they say. All are free to do as they please -- except when it interferes with them doing as they please, whereupon they will sentence you to permanent destruction. All is slanted against justice and skewed in favour of large alliances. And so will it all remain until sufficient numbers express their dissent.
Good luck. Lots of people who have tiffs with Ephriam.
#15
Posted 13 January 2009 - 07:56 AM
Doitzel, on Jan 13 2009, 01:41 PM, said:
International and interalliance standards are the shackles of slavery, they say. All are free to do as they please -- except when it interferes with them doing as they please, whereupon they will sentence you to permanent destruction. All is slanted against justice and skewed in favour of large alliances. And so will it all remain until sufficient numbers express their dissent.
Good luck. Lots of people who have tiffs with Ephriam.
Uhh... I don't see how this is a case of might makes right at all. Sounds more like you just enjoy saying that you hate Pacifica at every turn.
#16
Posted 13 January 2009 - 09:07 AM
Alliances like to control their punishment because it is easier to maximise damage done to the target with a well coordinated, internal strike force.
In your case, your initial 'offence' was relatively minor, but your continued aggressive posting is likely to land you in a lot more trouble than you really should be. Viridia was somewhat misleading in the fact that it explicitly expelled Ephriam and yet still 'protects' him from aggression by others. This is a common practice but it is understandable not to know that, and take the war slot. Upon being informed of this by Viridian military command, you should simply have apologised for not knowing and assured them that you would assist them as much as possible now the mistake had been made.
Your action is a breach of protocol and an honourable alliance would not do it deliberately, and that is the case whether the alliance in question is large (like Viridia) or small. Now you know
Also, you declared war on a nation wearing the Viridian Entente AA. Even if you are 99% sure the nation is not a real member, you should always get clearance from an alliance's government to attack a nation wearing its AA.
#17
Posted 13 January 2009 - 10:58 AM
I PM'ed one of the attackers with my request at 6:00PM on Sunday, and declared war at 6:00 AM on Monday. That is 12 hours with a reset in the middle. Plenty of time for a nation at war to respond.
Secondly, when contacted, I visited the General on the VE IRC. The general did not want to discuss anything. He issued his edict and left the room.
#18
Posted 13 January 2009 - 11:31 AM
Ammon, on Jan 12 2009, 09:55 PM, said:
acta est fabula plaudite
So says someone attacking someone for no reason other than that he can.
Can't say I have a whole lot of sympathy for you considering you engage in exactly what you appear to be opposed to.
#19
Posted 13 January 2009 - 12:15 PM
Ammon, on Jan 13 2009, 11:03 AM, said:
I PM'ed one of the attackers with my request at 6:00PM on Sunday, and declared war at 6:00 AM on Monday. That is 12 hours with a reset in the middle. Plenty of time for a nation at war to respond.
Secondly, when contacted, I visited the General on the VE IRC. The general did not want to discuss anything. He issued his edict and left the room.
lawlz. no it is not. Since the nation was already at war, they had most likely already quad attacked. This means they do not have to be on at update to attack anymore. they can hit whenever need be. i would have told you to wiat 24 hours because some people have something called a life and may not be able to make it on but once a day or so.

Sign In
Register
Help
This topic is locked


Top
MultiQuote