[lastr0ce]

We all love statistics...

Who has the most tech, most land, most NS, etc etc. Which is deplayed here


As you can see, there is still a lot of white space on the right side, so I thought heck why couldn't we add an "efficiency list"

Nation Created Team Strength Land* Infras. Tech. Cruise Nuclear War Efficiency
1) las trace 9/10/2007 2:00:23 AM 31,551.383 1,491.91 2,389.98 868.40 ....

It's just like in Battlefield 2, where you have the "score per minute", it's really popular.

This post has been edited by las trace: 29 September 2007 - 12:30 PM

[(DAC)Syzygy]

las trace, on Sep 29 2007, 07:07 PM, said:

We all love statistics...

Who has the most tech, most land, most NS, etc etc. Which is deplayed here
As you can see, there is still a lot of white space on the right side, so I thought heck why couldn't we add an "efficiency list"

Nation Created Team Strength Land* Infras. Tech. Cruise Nuclear War Efficiency
1) las trace 9/10/2007 2:00:23 AM 31,551.383 1,491.91 2,389.98 868.40 1669.60

It's just like in Battlefield 2, where you have the "score per minute", it's really popular.

we once had this, and it was removed because in times of 3M+50tech aidbombs efficiency doesnt count for anything. the value isnt comparable to other nations and therefore almost useless.

it would only make sense if the aid-history of a nation would be stored so everyone can see if this nation has received or sent lots of aid. its really no masterpiece to "create" a 2000efficiency nation if you just pump it full with 15M+250tech every 10days.

This post has been edited by (DAC)Syzygy: 29 September 2007 - 11:43 AM

[lastr0ce]

(DAC)Syzygy, on Sep 29 2007, 07:40 PM, said:

we once had this, and it was removed because in times of 3M+50tech aidbombs efficiency doesnt count for anything. the value isnt comparable to other nations and therefore almost useless.

it would only make sense if the aid-history of a nation would be stored so everyone can see if this nation has received or sent lots of aid. its really no masterpiece to "create" a 2000efficiency nation if you just pump it full with 15M+250tech every 10days.

It is a masterpiece if manage to do it without putting money into the game.

But, let's say, people of 50+days get on the list? or something else to outweigh the massive aids when they begin.
Because frankly 99% of those massive bombs nations drop in efficiency below 400 in 50days..

edit: What's wrong with those who have 2000 in the beginning? It's just an addition where you can see how much efficiency a nation has in the extended overall display. One will see that someone with 4500efficiency is just a new nation..

This post has been edited by las trace: 29 September 2007 - 11:52 AM

[(DAC)Syzygy]

las trace, on Sep 29 2007, 07:50 PM, said:

It is a masterpiece if manage to do it without putting money into the game.

But, let's say, people of 50+days get on the list? or something else to outweigh the massive aids when they begin.
Because frankly 99% of those massive bombs nations drop in efficiency below 400 in 50days..

edit: What's wrong with those who have 2000 in the beginning? It's just an addition where you can see how much efficiency a nation has in the extended overall display. One will see that someone with 4500efficiency is just a new nation..

there is nothing wrong with it. it just is not useful when seeing the overall nations stats. these are used to find possible war targets, trade partners, tech dealers... whatever, most ppl dont use them to "show" their "infracount" or "techlevel" (attention whores). its a question of usefulness, and i doubt it is useful have a "ranking list" of efficiency, because as said the efficiency is not comparable.

[lastr0ce]

(DAC)Syzygy, on Sep 29 2007, 08:23 PM, said:

there is nothing wrong with it. it just is not useful when seeing the overall nations stats. these are used to find possible war targets, trade partners, tech dealers... whatever, most ppl dont use them to "show" their "infracount" or "techlevel" (attention whores). its a question of usefulness, and i doubt it is useful have a "ranking list" of efficiency, because as said the efficiency is not comparable.

It's something we can't do nothing about, that's nature of this game (people in the beginning with massive amount of efficiency)

But, outside that, it could be interesting when you're just browsing trough a list, I don't know.