Cyber Nations Forums: old hated alliances in TE? - Cyber Nations Forums

Jump to content


  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

old hated alliances in TE?

#1 User is offline   maxfiles 

  • BANNED - APPEAL DENIED
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 378
  • Joined: 06-September 07
  • Nation Name:Private

Posted 05 August 2008 - 10:51 PM

so would any of the following alliances come back?

/b/, goons, \m/, lue, and any other hated alliance I am missing come back in CN:TE?


would they dare?

This post has been edited by maxfiles: 05 August 2008 - 10:51 PM


#2 User is offline   LeVentNoir 

  • LeVentNoir, Duke of Wellington and Lord of Glorious Aotearoa
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 5,373
  • Joined: 05-September 07
  • Nation Name:Imperial Wellington
  • Alliance Name:Mostly Harmless Alliance

Posted 05 August 2008 - 11:32 PM

No there is another game that they are ruining. They managed to get themselves declared on before beta ended.

This post has been edited by Vivi: 06 August 2008 - 01:17 AM
Reason for edit: No need to link.


#3 User is offline   Tron Paul 

  • I'm kind of a big deal
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,439
  • Joined: 14-October 07
  • Nation Name:iTexas
  • Alliance Name:Bel Air

Posted 05 August 2008 - 11:38 PM

View Postmaxfiles, on Aug 5 2008, 09:51 PM, said:

so would any of the following alliances come back?

/b/, goons, \m/, lue, and any other hated alliance I am missing come back in CN:TE?


would they dare?


My alliance is an offshoot of a game that is full of them, so I don't see why not. I'd love for GOONs, \m/, LUE, /b/, and all the cool dudes to come over.

This post has been edited by Cowboy Cornholio: 05 August 2008 - 11:39 PM


#4 User is offline   Joffrey17 

  • I RULE THE SKIES
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 340
  • Joined: 09-September 07
  • Nation Name:The Old Republic
  • Alliance Name:TSO
  • CN:TE Nation Name:Generation Kill

Posted 05 August 2008 - 11:52 PM

Hell yea!
I loved the GOONS


they were like

THE BEST in CN :)


No offense NPO but I like them Better than you

#5 User is offline   rabonnobar 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,048
  • Joined: 03-September 07
  • Nation Name:Calabria
  • Alliance Name:Veritas Aequitas

Posted 06 August 2008 - 12:19 AM

LUE would be cool, the others: bleh, hope not.

#6 User is online   BamaBuc 

  • We Weren't Born to Follow
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,240
  • Joined: 03-September 07
  • Nation Name:United Dixie
  • Alliance Name:The Order Of Light

Posted 06 August 2008 - 07:26 AM

Depends who joined them. And /b/... just no.

-Bama

#7 User is offline   Lord Cyvole 

  • [x_x]
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 327
  • Joined: 03-September 07
  • Nation Name:T.R.P.
  • Alliance Name:The Sasori Initiative

Posted 06 August 2008 - 01:02 PM

\m/ :awesome:

#8 User is offline   KingSrqt 

  • bored
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,168
  • Joined: 02-July 07
  • Nation Name:New Ireland
  • Alliance Name:The Jedi Order

Posted 06 August 2008 - 01:22 PM

TE is a different game with different politics, I see no reason why these alliances would not be allowed to come back in TE.

This post has been edited by KingSrqt: 06 August 2008 - 01:22 PM


#9 User is offline   JayOvfEnnay 

  • 100% warning level
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Banned - Appeal Denied
  • Posts: 960
  • Joined: 26-June 08
  • Nation Name:Ampanian Tsumeric
  • Alliance Name:OMGENMAY
  • CN:TE Nation Name:Unjust Path
  • CN:TE Alliance Name:o.o

Posted 06 August 2008 - 01:51 PM

I think the only ones that would be successful recruiting others that are not already part of the groups would end up being \m/, [m], LUE, and maybe GOONS, but I don't particularly think anyone else really wants to join /b/, NAAC, Illuminati, Nordreich, NEO, or LoFN and etcetera other than /b/, NAAC, Illuminati, Nordreich, NEO, or LoFN lol. But yeah, I don't see why they wouldn't be able to come back.

#10 User is offline   LordJohnson 

  • DE Member
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,488
  • Joined: 06-April 08
  • Nation Name:Candytopia
  • Alliance Name:Soldier

Posted 06 August 2008 - 02:00 PM

View PostKingSrqt, on Aug 6 2008, 03:22 PM, said:

TE is a different game with different politics, I see no reason why these alliances would not be allowed to come back in TE.


I agree, CN:TE is a different game then the regular CN. I don't see any problem with these alliances being in CN:TE. Really to me CN:TE is just a little practice for wars because that is all you do. I don't think Politics should even be entered in CN:TE.

This post has been edited by State of Cameron: 06 August 2008 - 02:00 PM


#11 User is offline   JayOvfEnnay 

  • 100% warning level
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Banned - Appeal Denied
  • Posts: 960
  • Joined: 26-June 08
  • Nation Name:Ampanian Tsumeric
  • Alliance Name:OMGENMAY
  • CN:TE Nation Name:Unjust Path
  • CN:TE Alliance Name:o.o

Posted 06 August 2008 - 02:31 PM

View PostState of Cameron, on Aug 6 2008, 08:59 PM, said:

I agree, CN:TE is a different game then the regular CN. I don't see any problem with these alliances being in CN:TE. Really to me CN:TE is just a little practice for wars because that is all you do. I don't think Politics should even be entered in CN:TE.

Agreed. I almost shrieked when the first treaties were made because I know that somehow that'll evolve into some one sided thing AGAIN =.= And though it may be easier to overthrow unbalanced power in CN:TE, I still just don't want to have the need to do so.

#12 User is offline   Nintenderek 

  • That guy with the silly avatar
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,124
  • Joined: 03-September 07
  • Nation Name:Derekica
  • Alliance Name:I wear a coat and it is brown
  • CN:TE Nation Name:Derekica
  • CN:TE Alliance Name:Looking for one.

Posted 06 August 2008 - 02:40 PM

Any of them but /b/. If /b/ comes back, I'll stop playing CN:TE, but all the others are cool, \m/ in particular.

This post has been edited by Nintenderek: 06 August 2008 - 02:41 PM


#13 User is offline   Ksehersonos 

  • Proud Mujahid of the Vox Insurgency
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 201
  • Joined: 01-August 08
  • Nation Name:Ksehersonos
  • Alliance Name:Vox Populi

Posted 06 August 2008 - 02:52 PM

ICSN :ph34r:

#14 User is offline   Hyperion321 

  • Former Ephor of Defense
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Validating
  • Posts: 2,329
  • Joined: 13-September 07
  • Nation Name:The Sabathian Empire
  • Alliance Name:Sparta

Posted 06 August 2008 - 03:09 PM

The New Polifican Order :ph34r:

#15 User is offline   Josh the Great 

  • Banned - No matching nation
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 1,128
  • Joined: 29-June 07
  • Nation Name:Dell Land
  • Alliance Name:New Polar Order

Posted 06 August 2008 - 03:39 PM

I'm personally for a little politics. Not to the scale of CN. But I do like huge epic wars, but if it goes one sided like it is now, I think I might cry.

#16 User is offline   JayOvfEnnay 

  • 100% warning level
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Banned - Appeal Denied
  • Posts: 960
  • Joined: 26-June 08
  • Nation Name:Ampanian Tsumeric
  • Alliance Name:OMGENMAY
  • CN:TE Nation Name:Unjust Path
  • CN:TE Alliance Name:o.o

Posted 06 August 2008 - 04:06 PM

View PostKsehersonos, on Aug 6 2008, 08:52 PM, said:

ICSN :ph34r:

I always thought that the fall of ICSN was a little hypocritical, but atleast they were very realistic. o.o

Also I don't really see who could hold or bar any alliances from joining anyway, since unlike now, alliances such as NPO, IRON, NpO, and etcetera won't be nearly as large as they are now, nor will any other alliances because it'll continually reset, so if any one nation of the barred parties because larger than any of the opposing parties then the barred party will have a chance again.

#17 User is offline   yetanothername 

  • !false > /dev/null 2>&1 &
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 446
  • Joined: 27-October 07
  • Nation Name:Pridelands

Posted 06 August 2008 - 05:48 PM

I always thought that \m/ would be a good fit for CN:TE.

I'd like to see them back.

#18 User is offline   Josh the Great 

  • Banned - No matching nation
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 1,128
  • Joined: 29-June 07
  • Nation Name:Dell Land
  • Alliance Name:New Polar Order

Posted 06 August 2008 - 06:53 PM

View Postyetanothername, on Aug 6 2008, 07:48 PM, said:

I always thought that \m/ would be a good fit for CN:TE.

I'd like to see them back.

I can garuntee you it is coming. and You will love it I mean :P

This post has been edited by Josh the Great: 06 August 2008 - 07:00 PM


#19 User is offline   Nintenderek 

  • That guy with the silly avatar
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,124
  • Joined: 03-September 07
  • Nation Name:Derekica
  • Alliance Name:I wear a coat and it is brown
  • CN:TE Nation Name:Derekica
  • CN:TE Alliance Name:Looking for one.

Posted 06 August 2008 - 07:49 PM

View PostJosh the Great, on Aug 6 2008, 04:53 PM, said:

I can garuntee you it is coming. and You will love it I mean :P



I quote this man for the truth!

#20 User is offline   HordeOfDoom 

  • No in-game nation or ruler match.
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 3,802
  • Joined: 27-May 07
  • Nation Name:N/A

Posted 06 August 2008 - 07:59 PM

I don't think most of you understand how CN:TE plays out. If an alliance wants to come back, they do, there's hardly anything threatening to stop them from doing so. Oh no, I'm going to be ZIed in a game that resets every month? THE HORROR!!!!

CN:TE = stuff blowing up. constantly.

\m/ >_< \m/

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users