=WE= Announcement O Hai Thar AE
#1
Posted 22 July 2008 - 02:40 AM
=WE= officially does not recognize this new government and will help the actual AE leadership in any way needed. All you have to do is ask and it will be done.
Master-Debater Emperor of =WE=
Lord Frost IO of =WE=
#9
Posted 22 July 2008 - 06:26 AM
Not directed at anyone inparticular, but may I ask you read my statement I have posted, at least so you can come to a more better conclusion on whether to support the "coup" or not. If any of you would like to speak to me, please message me in game and we can go from there.
Best wishes,
Kingdom of Royalty
#10
Posted 22 July 2008 - 08:15 AM
rishnokof, on Jul 22 2008, 07:54 AM, said:
No, but friendly doesn't equate to good government. It's good for public appearances, but honestly this is AE's decision. I don't think anyone should meddle in their affairs. It's their alliance, let them make the decision.
#11
Posted 22 July 2008 - 08:18 AM
Deepthinker, on Jul 22 2008, 07:15 AM, said:
If this were to happen to one of my allies (say TAB or TCB) I would have done the same exact thing as =WE=.
#14
Posted 22 July 2008 - 08:47 AM
#15
Posted 22 July 2008 - 09:13 AM
mike717, on Jul 22 2008, 10:47 AM, said:
Did YOU just tell someone to mind their own business?
in a way i have to respect your audacity.
Are you saying that because you're assuming I'm being hypocritical?
If so, my retort to your assertion would be this:
I'm defending AE's right to choose their own govt. which is in fact a right we all have in CN, thus it is my business.
#17
Posted 22 July 2008 - 09:46 AM
Deepthinker, on Jul 22 2008, 10:13 AM, said:
If so, my retort to your assertion would be this:
I'm defending AE's right to choose their own govt. which is in fact a right we all have in CN, thus it is my business.
By your reasoning we also all have a right to comment on things brought to the OWF. Thus making it anyone's business who chooses to comment.
Your comment was no more or less relevant than his. In fact, since =WE= has ties to AE i would go so far as to say that it certainly IS their business to consider and state a position on the wholesale government change of an alliance.
#18
Posted 22 July 2008 - 10:04 AM
mike717, on Jul 22 2008, 11:46 AM, said:
Your comment was no more or less relevant than his. In fact, since =WE= has ties to AE i would go so far as to say that it certainly IS their business to consider and state a position on the wholesale government change of an alliance.
If it's their business who is AE's leader then why do they not vote for them as AE's members, following your logic.
#20
Posted 22 July 2008 - 10:33 AM
Deepthinker, on Jul 22 2008, 11:03 AM, said:
Why does =WE= not have a right to recognize the government it formed the basis of its relationship with AE upon.
I fail to see why they don't have that right. Just as AE has the right to say "good for you, we don't care what you think".

Sign In
Register
Help
This topic is locked


Top