Cyber Nations Forums: NEW NATION strength calculations - Cyber Nations Forums

Jump to content


  • (20 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

NEW NATION strength calculations i love it.. Rate Topic: ***** 1 Votes

#1 User is offline   sayton 

  • Banned In-Game
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 364
  • Joined: 08-September 07
  • Nation Name:Sayton
  • Alliance Name:MCXA

Posted 15 April 2008 - 09:22 AM

I just wanted to say thank you admin for doing an excellent job well done...

Exactly wht i was thinking... very well done.. :-D

#2 User is offline   Viluin 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 871
  • Joined: 04-September 07
  • Nation Name:Viluin
  • Alliance Name:Dark Fist

Posted 15 April 2008 - 09:27 AM

Nations with 20 nukes now get 4k NS from them.. It's going to make it considerably harder for smaller nations to get into the top 5%, especially because a large standing military doesn't have a large impact anymore. These 2 changes combined were a bit much imo, just the second was needed.

This post has been edited by Viluin: 15 April 2008 - 09:28 AM


#3 User is offline   Weiss von Toten 

  • User-requested ban.
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 3,186
  • Joined: 29-February 08
  • Nation Name:Weimar Republic
  • Alliance Name:The Eternal Reich

Posted 15 April 2008 - 09:27 AM

What exactly was changed? All I know is that I went down in NS :(

#4 User is offline   sayton 

  • Banned In-Game
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 364
  • Joined: 08-September 07
  • Nation Name:Sayton
  • Alliance Name:MCXA

Posted 15 April 2008 - 09:31 AM

i stayed the exact same NS pretty much.. considering i had no military.. lol..

hold on.. ill get the info

Land Purchased * 1.5 + Tanks Deployed * .015 + Tanks Defending * .020 + Cruise Missiles * 10 + ((Nuclear Purchased^2)*10) + Technology Purchased * 5 + Infrastructure Purchased * 3 + Actual Military * .02 + Aircraft Rating Totals * 5

The previous nation strength calculation before 4/15/2008 was:

Land Purchased * 1.5 + Tanks Deployed * .75 + Tanks Defending * 1 + Cruise Missiles * 1.5 + Nuclear Purchased * 50 + Technology Purchased * 5 + Infrastructure Purchased * 3 + Actual Military * .10 + Aircraft Rating Totals * 5

#5 User is offline   sayton 

  • Banned In-Game
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 364
  • Joined: 08-September 07
  • Nation Name:Sayton
  • Alliance Name:MCXA

Posted 15 April 2008 - 09:34 AM

View PostViluin, on Apr 15 2008, 11:46 AM, said:

Nations with 20 nukes now get 4k NS from them.. It's going to make it considerably harder for smaller nations to get into the top 5%, especially because a large standing military doesn't have a large impact anymore. These 2 changes combined were a bit much imo, just the second was needed.


the first part i guess didnt really effect me just because ive had my nukes for the pased 1.5 years.. lol.. i just never noticed the strengths from nukes to begin with.. :(

as for the military.. that was PERFECT move.. i loved it.. lol :-D

now. .form 10,000 Tanks instead of 10,000NS you get.. 200 NS which is perfect :-D

#6 User is offline   The fox 

  • Look deeply into my eyes
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 129
  • Joined: 05-February 08
  • Nation Name:Leningrad
  • Alliance Name:Aurora Borealis
  • CN:TE Nation Name:Micengrad
  • CN:TE Alliance Name:Rodentia Dominatus

Posted 15 April 2008 - 09:40 AM

I can't quite agree with everyone saying this is something good. Once I get rid of my military I will be back in the range I was in when I was about 10-20 days old. Rather an big annoyance if I can say so.

#7 User is offline   admin 

  • Game Admin/Owner
  • Icon
  • View blog
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 4,257
  • Joined: 27-April 07
  • Nation Name:Senior Staff
  • Alliance Name:CN Staff

Posted 15 April 2008 - 09:41 AM

View PostViluin, on Apr 15 2008, 10:46 AM, said:

Nations with 20 nukes now get 4k NS from them.. It's going to make it considerably harder for smaller nations to get into the top 5%, especially because a large standing military doesn't have a large impact anymore. These 2 changes combined were a bit much imo, just the second was needed.


The new calculation allows nations to grow into the top 5% instead of having to militarize into it. Also, don't forget the Manhattan Project wonder.

#8 User is offline   Terra Extraneus 

  • Banned - No matching nation
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 925
  • Joined: 27-September 07
  • Nation Name:Terra Extraneus
  • Alliance Name:The Order Of Light

Posted 15 April 2008 - 09:41 AM

I went up in strength since I had not a lot of military.

Edit: Good thing I was able to militarize before this happened. :awesome:

This post has been edited by Ivan The Infidel: 15 April 2008 - 09:42 AM


#9 User is offline   sayton 

  • Banned In-Game
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 364
  • Joined: 08-September 07
  • Nation Name:Sayton
  • Alliance Name:MCXA

Posted 15 April 2008 - 09:45 AM

I think with the change in tank calculations for NS.. more nations will be decommissioning because almost always nations kept them for the NS boost and it was worth the upkeep.. and now.. the upkeep is definitely not worth the 200 NS from them, thats why its pointless to keep. It will keep the cyber world more into true NS rather then military :-D

and yes.. i grew up 200NS myself, and shot up about 9 spots :-D i only had 40,000 soldiers and no tanks as opposed to like peoples 140,000 soldiers and 14000 Tanks.. ;-D MUAHAHA

#10 User is offline   Terra Extraneus 

  • Banned - No matching nation
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 925
  • Joined: 27-September 07
  • Nation Name:Terra Extraneus
  • Alliance Name:The Order Of Light

Posted 15 April 2008 - 09:46 AM

View Postsayton, on Apr 15 2008, 09:03 AM, said:

I think with the change in tank calculations for NS.. more nations will be decommissioning because almost always nations kept them for the NS boost and it was worth the upkeep.. and now.. the upkeep is definitely not worth the 200 NS from them, thats why its pointless to keep. It will keep the cyber world more into true NS rather then military :-D

and yes.. i grew up 200NS myself, and shot up about 9 spots :-D i only had 40,000 soldiers and no tanks as opposed to like peoples 140,000 soldiers and 14000 Tanks.. ;-D MUAHAHA


I think i went up a whole percent. :jihad:

#11 User is offline   jonnygozy 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 178
  • Joined: 01-October 07
  • Nation Name:The Shady Milkmen
  • Alliance Name:United Commonwealth of Nations

Posted 15 April 2008 - 09:51 AM

I dropped 4k NS from my soldiers, but gained 3k from my 20 nukes, so it didn't hurt me too much. I also have no tanks.

This post has been edited by jonnygozy: 15 April 2008 - 10:21 AM


#12 User is offline   hornguard 

  • VE Drum Corps Nut
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 266
  • Joined: 04-September 07
  • Nation Name:Legend
  • Alliance Name:Viridian Entente

Posted 15 April 2008 - 09:51 AM

I didn't change much since I don't keep tanks on hand. I'm still not sure how this will play out, though.

#13 User is offline   sayton 

  • Banned In-Game
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 364
  • Joined: 08-September 07
  • Nation Name:Sayton
  • Alliance Name:MCXA

Posted 15 April 2008 - 09:51 AM

Haha... yea thats alot.. i dont think i dont think i can grow from 0.0% :-D lol... soo yea...

#14 User is offline   Jack Grist 

  • I want mah' scalps!!
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 551
  • Joined: 22-October 07
  • Nation Name:Jackosia
  • Alliance Name:Nebula-X

Posted 15 April 2008 - 09:54 AM

Nuclear Weapons now seem impossible to reach for nations my size. It seems everytime i get stronger, i dont get the bomb becuase my NS keeps going down becuase of changes.

#15 User is offline   Weiss von Toten 

  • User-requested ban.
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 3,186
  • Joined: 29-February 08
  • Nation Name:Weimar Republic
  • Alliance Name:The Eternal Reich

Posted 15 April 2008 - 09:54 AM

From the looks of it the CM value is a little high. Maybe it's just me.

#16 User is offline   DougZ37 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 124
  • Joined: 09-September 07
  • Nation Name:GoGoGadgetNation

Posted 15 April 2008 - 09:58 AM

I think this is a MUCH better indicator of the true strength of a nation. For example - my nation was at about the top 3.5% for infrastructure (7500) and top 4.5% for technology (1500) with 20 nukes but under the old system I was at about 6% because I was demilitarized, whereas I would be at around 2% when militarized. now i'm at a more reasonable demonstration of my true strength, rather than being muscled down because someone decided to build a ton of tanks. That also means that only the 5% of truly large nations can get nukes, where as before if you were in the top 10% you could militarize up vastly expanding the ranks of nuclear nations, further diluting the importance of nukes...

I approve

#17 User is offline   Trinite 

  • Lover of Sparta
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,331
  • Joined: 08-September 07
  • Nation Name:Distopia

Posted 15 April 2008 - 10:10 AM

I like the decreased emphasis on military, but the tank decrease was a bit extreme.

Quote

Tanks Deployed * .015 + Tanks Defending * .020 ... Actual Military * .02


I think that's a little ridiculous given the relative power of tanks. At any rate I think it's better. Simply buying your military doesn't make you a stronger nation, and this reflects that :).

#18 User is offline   (DAC)Syzygy 

  • Elder Dark Archon
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,198
  • Joined: 03-September 07
  • Nation Name:New Syzygia
  • Alliance Name:True Grämlins

Posted 15 April 2008 - 10:31 AM

very nice change. 4k NS for 20nukes is not too much of a boost, if you consider that non-nuclear nations earn around 1M more clear profit per day when using the same setup as a nuclear armed nation, so they can outgrow that difference by just investing more cash into their nation over time.

finally the NS inflation via soldiers/tanks is gone.

#19 User is offline   Boondock 

  • He loved Big Brother
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,097
  • Joined: 03-September 07
  • Nation Name:The Boondock
  • Alliance Name:The Härmlins

Posted 15 April 2008 - 10:38 AM

I lost 7k NS due to this change. But it doesn't matter. This stops the days of having to declare on nations before you buy mil, etc.

#20 User is offline   Litha Riddle 

  • Baby maker
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 309
  • Joined: 31-May 07
  • Nation Name:Enigmathena
  • Alliance Name:New Pacific Order

Posted 15 April 2008 - 10:41 AM

View PostJack Grist, on Apr 15 2008, 05:12 PM, said:

Nuclear Weapons now seem impossible to reach for nations my size. It seems everytime i get stronger, i dont get the bomb becuase my NS keeps going down becuase of changes.


Same here, and it's just my personal opinion but I have to say, I think this is the worst update ever. You might as well scrap the war memorial since you have effectively made soldiers worthless.

  • (20 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users