Cyber Nations Forums: Opinions on Michael Bloomberg? - Cyber Nations Forums

Jump to content


  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Opinions on Michael Bloomberg? Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   Nuke74 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5
  • Joined: 27-October 07
  • Nation Name:Long Island
  • Alliance Name:Genesis

Posted 10 January 2008 - 05:33 PM

I just wanna see how Bloomberg is thought of in a pretty random selection of society.

#2 User is offline   Saniel 

  • A beast of prey on the threshold of pleasure
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,279
  • Joined: 03-September 07
  • Nation Name:Nutopia
  • Alliance Name:Goon Order of Neutral Shoving

Posted 10 January 2008 - 05:35 PM

He was obviously a better mayor than 9ui11iani.

#3 User is offline   Kaiser 

  • Unstoppable
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,251
  • Joined: 27-May 07
  • Nation Name:Kaiser

Posted 10 January 2008 - 05:35 PM

The name sounds familiar but I can't place it. Mind giving some more details?

#4 User is offline   Viking 

  • So then I broke back to base in order to save my NS....
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 709
  • Joined: 10-September 07
  • Nation Name:Odistan
  • Alliance Name:Global Order of Darkness

Posted 10 January 2008 - 05:38 PM

Being from the general area he is involved in, I can definitely say he is indeed a mayor.

#5 User is offline   Galaisa 

  • Banned, for being a fool.
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Banned - Appeal Denied
  • Posts: 1,099
  • Joined: 03-September 07
  • Nation Name:Galaisa

Posted 10 January 2008 - 05:49 PM

He is a hypocrite with his anti-drug stance.

#6 User is offline   Toichus Maximus 

  • Want to see a magic trick? Take this ordinary French fry and...
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,283
  • Joined: 09-September 07
  • Nation Name:Toichmenistan
  • Alliance Name:Alpha Omega

Posted 10 January 2008 - 05:51 PM

View PostKaiser, on Jan 10 2008, 06:35 PM, said:

The name sounds familiar but I can't place it. Mind giving some more details?

Mayor of NYC, multi-billionaire, potential presidential candidate.

#7 User is offline   Leguaris 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,010
  • Joined: 28-September 07
  • Nation Name:Genii
  • Alliance Name:North Atlantic Defense Coalition

Posted 10 January 2008 - 06:16 PM

Bloomberg will not run for President if Obama wins the Democratic nomination.

Calling it right here, right now.

#8 User is offline   Toichus Maximus 

  • Want to see a magic trick? Take this ordinary French fry and...
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,283
  • Joined: 09-September 07
  • Nation Name:Toichmenistan
  • Alliance Name:Alpha Omega

Posted 10 January 2008 - 06:56 PM

View PostLeguaris, on Jan 10 2008, 07:15 PM, said:

Bloomberg will not run for President if Obama wins the Democratic nomination.

Calling it right here, right now.

he's going to announce after super tuesday, which is before we'll discover who wins

#9 User is offline   Leguaris 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,010
  • Joined: 28-September 07
  • Nation Name:Genii
  • Alliance Name:North Atlantic Defense Coalition

Posted 10 January 2008 - 07:10 PM

View PostToichus Maximus, on Jan 10 2008, 07:56 PM, said:

he's going to announce after super tuesday, which is before we'll discover who wins

Foiled!

<Finds the EDIT pen>

Bloomberg will not run for President if Obama wins looks like he's going to win the Democratic nomination after Super Tuesday.

Calling it right here, right now.

#10 User is offline   Elyat 

  • Born to be Wilde
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,817
  • Joined: 27-May 07
  • Nation Name:Greater Doitzel
  • Alliance Name:The Jedi Order

Posted 10 January 2008 - 07:13 PM

A third-party candidate running and winning would be good. Maybe he'll draw some votes from the Democrats and give the Republicans a victory. Then the Democrats can whine for 4 years about how someone else spoiled it for them and stole "their" votes rather than evaluate why people voted for someone other than them.

#11 User is offline   Kaiser 

  • Unstoppable
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,251
  • Joined: 27-May 07
  • Nation Name:Kaiser

Posted 10 January 2008 - 07:26 PM

View PostDoitzel, on Jan 10 2008, 07:13 PM, said:

A third-party candidate running and winning would be good. Maybe he'll draw some votes from the Democrats and give the Republicans a victory. Then the Democrats can whine for 4 years about how someone else spoiled it for them and stole "their" votes rather than evaluate why people voted for someone other than them.

It's the perfect plan!

#12 User is offline   admin 

  • Game Admin/Owner
  • Icon
  • View blog
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 4,265
  • Joined: 27-April 07
  • Nation Name:Senior Staff
  • Alliance Name:CN Staff

Posted 10 January 2008 - 08:20 PM

View PostSaniel, on Jan 10 2008, 05:35 PM, said:

9ui11iani


Nice one! Regarding Bloomberg, I think we've seen out of Ralph Nader, Ross Perot and others that the independent canidate in this country just doesn't have much to stand on, especially in this election. What would he run on that's not already a tag line by the majority of the canidates out there? Besides he's a Democrat, turned Republican, turned independent which is confusing and he's just not a big name for many voters outside of New York. If anyone could have even a chance to pull off the independent vote it would be Clinton or Obama when one of those two doesn't get the nomination.

#13 User is offline   Pyrrhus 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 11
  • Joined: 02-December 07
  • Nation Name:The Hebrews
  • Alliance Name:NATO

Posted 10 January 2008 - 08:28 PM

He's done a pretty good job of running New York city. But what I'm concerned with is how he's delt with the educational system here, which is to say not at all. He's made a number of bureaucratic changes, which haven't helped, and have probably made the situation worse. Not to mention, at a time when class sizes are huge (30+ even in elementary school), he's done nothing in the way of buying more property to build new schools in order to alleviate classroom crowding, which is perfectly well with in his power

#14 User is offline   Czar Garrett 

  • Patron God of Mooses and Aardvarks
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,412
  • Joined: 04-September 07
  • Nation Name:Serine

Posted 11 January 2008 - 08:22 AM

He's run NYC like a business, which is the way things need to be run. I don't think NYC has done better in a while.


However, a poll recently done in the NYC area shows limited support for him in a Presidential race

Quote

Q: Do you think Bloomberg would make a good president?

Yes 52%

No 39%

Q: How likely is it that you would vote for him?

Definitely/probably 34%

Definitely not/probably not 58%

Quinnipiac University Poll fo 1,162 Registered City Voters was conducted Jan. 3-7 Margin of error +/- 2.9 percentage points.



http://www.newsday.c...al/newyork/...0,7178013.story



I wouldn't mind seeing him as President. Socially liberal and fiscally conservative- thats a combination I can get behind.

#15 User is offline   Kevin the Great 

  • The man, the myth, the legend.
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 882
  • Joined: 04-September 07
  • Nation Name:Buckmaster Land

Posted 11 January 2008 - 08:27 AM

Bloomberg is as anti-gun as they come. A Bloomberg run wouldn't even make a ripple in most of the nation.

#16 User is offline   SoxNation 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,396
  • Joined: 01-June 07
  • Nation Name:SoxNation

Posted 11 January 2008 - 08:29 AM

View PostKaiser, on Jan 10 2008, 08:26 PM, said:

It's the perfect plan!



i wonder why people think he'd draw many from the dems


while he used to be a dem, he is now a republican, and that tag will prevent many democrats from voting for him and more republicans would vote for him, i think the effect would be in the reverse.

#17 User is offline   Kevin the Great 

  • The man, the myth, the legend.
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 882
  • Joined: 04-September 07
  • Nation Name:Buckmaster Land

Posted 11 January 2008 - 08:31 AM

He was a RINO, and has left the Republican party.

#18 User is offline   steodonn 

  • BOHSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!&
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,256
  • Joined: 05-June 07
  • Nation Name:Dun Carrig
  • Alliance Name:CSN

Posted 11 January 2008 - 06:01 PM

Never heard of him

#19 User is offline   Loki Ire 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,361
  • Joined: 28-November 07
  • Nation Name:Loki Imperium
  • Alliance Name:Ubercon

Posted 11 January 2008 - 06:07 PM

View PostToichus Maximus, on Jan 10 2008, 07:56 PM, said:

he's going to announce after super tuesday, which is before we'll discover who wins


Hillary's got enough super delegates in her pocket that she'll take the nomination at the last second if it's even close. If she thought her unfavorables looked bad before, just wait until CNN's running headline for a week and a half is: CLINTON STEALS PRIMARY WIN AT LAST SECOND.

Bloomberg won't even be a footnote if he sticks his nose in this mess now. His best bet would be to wait 4 - 8 years.

#20 User is offline   Frank Carbonni 

  • Prince of Porno
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 452
  • Joined: 04-September 07
  • Nation Name:PurpleCapeLand

Posted 13 January 2008 - 05:49 AM

He's a hypocrite and nanny stater.

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users