Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Alliance member kick suggestion


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 commanderragnar

commanderragnar

    Also known as RagnarBuliwyf

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 303 posts
  • Nation Name:Valenwood
  • Alliance Name:Pacifica
  • CN:TE Nation Name:Valenwood
  • CN:TE Alliance Name:Roman Empire

Posted 17 November 2012 - 11:26 AM

I've noticed ghosting busting is good for getting rid of people on your AA, but why not have a kick method? say only the founder IE who ever started the alliance first has the power to kick people. He can if he wishes pass the power on to someone else (the next leader) maybe? Anyway this could help with ghosting instead of attacking people and for people just sitting on your who you don't want to.

Thoughts?

Edited by commanderragnar, 17 November 2012 - 11:26 AM.


#2 Aeros

Aeros

    Can't see the sword, but you'll feel it

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,898 posts
  • Nation Name:Empire of Chyrellos
  • Alliance Name:Valhalla
  • CN:TE Nation Name:Syracuse
  • CN:TE Alliance Name:Roman Empire

Posted 17 November 2012 - 01:08 PM

I dunno, my experience from other games tells me that while a useful tool, its also a source of abuse. For instance, who gets to control it? You could have an off-game election that chooses a new leader for the alliance, but the existing leader (who controls the magic button) may not take kindly to losing, and nuke the entire AA.

#3 commanderragnar

commanderragnar

    Also known as RagnarBuliwyf

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 303 posts
  • Nation Name:Valenwood
  • Alliance Name:Pacifica
  • CN:TE Nation Name:Valenwood
  • CN:TE Alliance Name:Roman Empire

Posted 17 November 2012 - 01:49 PM

That's true but it is very useful to have. Also I can't think of a counter argument.

#4 Winner12345

Winner12345

    No Matching Nation

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 800 posts
  • Nation Name:Winner12345
  • Alliance Name:Social Democratic Union
  • CN:TE Nation Name:Winner12345
  • CN:TE Alliance Name:International Armed Forces Group

Posted 17 November 2012 - 02:34 PM

That's true but it is very useful to have. Also I can't think of a counter argument.

I would have to oppose this. When i played the Game that cammot be named, you had this. You had a founder and a WA Delegate. I was the VP of a Region of 100 or so and the Founder`s Nation got "Hacked" (Later recanted that statement, turns out it wasn`t hacked) and every nation got banned from the region, the region disappeared as well. It was a bad day for the Region. We reassembled, but only about 10 of them came back.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users