Il Terra Di Agea Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 If I may start a new argument, our good friend comrade nikonov has just used tanks that, according to his IG nation don't exist. Is this allowed? And he has nowhere near enough tech for some of his planes. Namely, his stealth bombers and his F-15E Eagle. In my opinion, he can use them if he put them in the Nation information database, but considering it has no slot for tanks, he has to have them IG to use them. And he can't use stealth jets, he needs stealth jet fighter/ bombers in game to have them here. I usually used the planes I had IG, except for my own crazy stuff. But look at me talking, I have no stake in the matter, I'm no longer in CNRP, I guess I should just crawl back into my cave, eat a few raw fish, and caress a small golden ring Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Markus Wilding Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 You never specified they were F-15B. You first stated they were F-15E's then changed them to B when people started complaining. It is logical, but you won't get 300 out of 750. I'm at 3k and I have no problem maintaining my 81 tanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
comrade nikonov Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 I make $700,000. I think its easily done if i wanted to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raritan Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 Then do it if it's so easily done. Then, there would be nobody complaining that you didn't have thme IG and no one would dispute them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Markus Wilding Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 I make $700,000. I think its easily done if i wanted to. But, for the sake of honest RPing, why don't you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manetheren Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 If I may start a new argument, our good friend comrade nikonov has just used tanks that, according to his IG nation don't exist. Is this allowed? And he has nowhere near enough tech for some of his planes. Namely, his stealth bombers and his F-15E Eagle. Tanks are okay to use even if you don't have them in game. Now what use tanks are on his islands is another story, but thats for working around IC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael McBride Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 I say I have tanks even though my nation doesn't have them IG. I also say I have the max amount of soldiers. It is expensive for nations to maintain tanks and soldiers all the time, and most will tell you to not keep any tanks on hand. I see no problem as long as he has no more than 8% of his total max soldiers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeVentNoir Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 Up to 500 tech, you have the planes you have IG. Also, if you don't have tanks IG, you don't have them in RP. Go buy some if you want. Provide some proof about how many tanks you can buy and then we might accept them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 Tanks and soldiers are fine - air force and navy on the other hand, you have to buy. Same with nukes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael McBride Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 Up to 500 tech, you have the planes you have IG. Also, if you don't have tanks IG, you don't have them in RP. Go buy some if you want. Provide some proof about how many tanks you can buy and then we might accept them. Seriously? You're going to make someone provide screenshots of what they can buy IG to have them here? That's retarded. No one is going to keep 8,000 tanks on their payroll just for CNRP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeVentNoir Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 Seriously? You're going to make someone provide screenshots of what they can buy IG to have them here? That's retarded. No one is going to keep 8,000 tanks on their payroll just for CNRP. As IW I did. And there is the military tool, under tools and stats.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manetheren Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 (edited) Congratulations, good for you. No really, thats great. Just because you did it doesn't make it the standard though. People don't need to keep max soldiers/tanks/CM's to have them in RP. We all know what we can have in game with that. Edited December 20, 2008 by Emperor Mudd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Il Terra Di Agea Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 I've got to agree with vent, back a few days ago in the day, I kept my army up, and bought tanks and stuff just to have them in CNRP. If you all want to play by stats, you should follow your stats, not set double standards. My four cents... (I have more, because I can) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael McBride Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 I've got to agree with vent, back a few days ago in the day, I kept my army up, and bought tanks and stuff just to have them in CNRP. If you all want to play by stats, you should follow your stats, not set double standards.My four cents... (I have more, because I can) Playing by your IG stats and playing by what you currently have in your nation are not one in the same. My IG stats say that I have thousands upon thousands of tanks, because I have that many people. My nation currently shows no tanks. And yet no one says anything when I brought tanks in to wipe you out. My IG stats allow me to have a certain number of tanks. Simply because they are not there, doesn't mean I cannot have them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEDCJT Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 Playing by your IG stats and playing by what you currently have in your nation are not one in the same. My IG stats say that I have thousands upon thousands of tanks, because I have that many people. My nation currently shows no tanks. And yet no one says anything when I brought tanks in to wipe you out. My IG stats allow me to have a certain number of tanks. Simply because they are not there, doesn't mean I cannot have them. I agree. I have no tanks in-game, and still I RPed them in the invasion of Agea and as such... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XRCatD Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 I think we should soon add "Soldiers", "Tanks", "Navy", "Aircraft", and "Nuclear Weapons" to the stats database... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voodoo Nova Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 I think we should soon add "Soldiers", "Tanks", "Navy", "Aircraft", and "Nuclear Weapons" to the stats database... I don't think we should since those numbers could change instantly and a lot quicker than Tech/Infra/Land. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeVentNoir Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 I think we should soon add "Soldiers", "Tanks", "Navy", "Aircraft", and "Nuclear Weapons" to the stats database... No thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stefano Palmieri Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 I think that the Tech/Infra/Land Database should be, IG Tech/RP Tech/Infra/Land Database because if you tech share using your RP tech can be much higherhan your IG tech Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeVentNoir Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 I think that the Tech/Infra/Land Database should be, IG Tech/RP Tech/Infra/Land Database because if you tech share using your RP tech can be much higherhan your IG tech I though it was your IG tech land etc? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stefano Palmieri Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 I just thought that it would make RPing easier so that way it would make tracking everyones RPing Easier. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XRCatD Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 (edited) I don't think we should since those numbers could change instantly and a lot quicker than Tech/Infra/Land. That's the point of adding it to the stats base. The stats base was meant to stablize RP stats so nations don't change very fast, and changes would take time. Edited December 20, 2008 by XRCatD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 The stats database is for in-game: if you ever leave and come back, your "RP tech" wouldn't carry over anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XRCatD Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 (edited) That's correct. However, a sudden change in a stat will occur slowly since updates occur over time. Edited December 20, 2008 by XRCatD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Markus Wilding Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 I agree with XR here. We should add those because if we don't, then people could say they have about 9 thousand soldiers. The only way we could check that is to find the said RPer's nation, and if that nation is different IG than RP, then the whole cause is lost, imo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.