• Announcements

    • Sentinel

      Cyber Nations Forum Rules   07/03/2016

        Cyber Nations Forum Rules  
      In the process of registering on this forum, all players--including you--agreed to accept these terms and conditions and the terms and conditions of Invision Power Board. In doing so you essentially signed an electronic contract pledging to have read the rules and TOS and agreeing to follow the rules and TOS as written. It is your continued responsibility to read, follow, and keep up-to-date with the CN rules.
      The following are basic guidelines for use of the Cyber Nations community forum. Anyone caught disobeying these guidelines will be issued a warning. The forum staff works on a five warn limit policy unless the situation calls for more appropriate action ranging from a verbal warning to a double warn and suspension to an immediate ban, etc.   Just because something is not listed specifically here as illegal does not mean it's allowed. All players are expected to use common sense and are personally responsible for reading the pinned threads found in the Moderation forum. Questions regarding appropriateness or other concerns can be sent via PM to an appropriate moderator.   A permanent ban on the forums results in a game ban, and vice versa. Please note that the in-game warn system works on a "three strikes you're out" policy and that in-game actions (including warnings and deletions) may not be appealed. For more information regarding in-game rules please read the Cyber Nations Game Rules.   1.) First Warning
      2.) Second Warning
      3.) Third Warning (48 hour suspension at the forum)
      4.) Fourth Warning (120 hour suspension at the forum)
      5.) Permanent Ban   Game Bans and Forum Bans
      If you receive a 100% warn level on the forums, you will be subject to removal from the forums AND have your nation deleted and banned from the game at moderator(s) discretion.   If you are banned in the game, then you will be banned from the forums.   Process of Appeals
      Players may not appeal any in-game actions. This includes cheat flags, canceled trades, content removals, warn level increases, nation deletion, and bans from the game.   Players may appeal individual forum warnings. You may only appeal a warning if you can show with evidence that it was unwarranted or unduly harsh. If a reasonable amount of time has passed (no less than one month and preferably longer) in which you have demonstrated reformed behavior than you may request a warning level reduction. Wasting staff time with inappropriately filed reports and/or unfounded appeals will result in a warn level raise. Repeat incidences will result in a ban from the forum.   Bans are permanent. Banned players may appeal to the Senior Staff if they believe grounds exist (very, very rare) in which they state their case with evidence and why explain why they believe they deserve to be allowed back into Cyber Nations. This process is not quick and the investigation into cases may last three minutes or three weeks or more depending on the individual situation.   The only place where discussion of moderator action is acceptable is in the appropriate Moderation forum. Posting commentary on or disagreement with moderator action elsewhere will result in a warn level raise.   Posting
      All posts must be in English. Common phrases in other languages will be allowed so long as they are translated upon request. Foreign languages are permitted in signatures and avatars, however.   Certain areas of the forum require you to have a nation in either standard CN or CN:TE. If you have...   A SE and a TE nation: You get one forum account. Your forum account name must match your SE nation or ruler name. You are allowed to post in either SE or TE areas of the forum. You must have your CN:TE nation name listed in your profile to post in the CN:TE section of the forum.
      Just an SE nation: You get one forum account. Your forum account name must match your SE nation or ruler name. You are not allowed to post in any TE areas of the forum.
      Just a TE nation: You get one forum account. Your forum account name must match your TE nation name or ruler name. Your must have your CN:TE nation name listed correctly in your profile. You are not allowed to post in any of the SE areas. You are allowed to post in the water cooler, question center and the moderation forums. Other than that, all your posts need to stay in the TE area.   Flame/Flamebait/Trolling
      Flaming is expressing anger or lobbing insults at a person/player rather than a character, post, idea, etc. Flamebait are posts that are made with the aim of targeting/harassing/provoking another user into rule-breaking. Trolling is submitting posts with the aim of targeting/harassing/provoking a specific group into rule-breaking. Forum users should not be participating in any of these, and doing so will result in a warning.   Topic Hijacking
      Hijacking is forcing the current thread discussion off of the original topic and usually results in spam or flame from either side. Forum users found hijacking threads will be given a warning.   Repeat Topics
      One topic is enough. Repeat topics will be locked, removed, and the author given a warning. Users found creating repeat topics after others were locked by staff will receive a warn raise.   Joke Topics
      Topics created as a joke are prohibited. Joke topics will be locked and the author warned. This includes topics in which the author is making an announcement “for” another in-game alliance. Humorous threads are permitted; it is up to the discretion of the moderation staff to determine what is merely satire and what is actually a joke topic.   Spam
      Spam is defined as creating posts or topics containing only contentless material of any kind. Users found spamming will receive a warning. Examples include (but are in no way limited to) posts containing nothing but smilies, "+1", "QFT", "this" any other one/few-word contentless combination, joke threads, or posts containing quotes and anything that counts as spam by itself. Adding words to a post with the express intent of avoiding a spam warn will result in a warning. These posts and other similar contributions have no substance and hence are considered spam. Posts of "Ave", "Hail" or any other one word congratulatory type are acceptable as one word posts. Emoticon type posts such as "o/" without accompanying text is still not allowed. Posts containing only images are considered spam, unless the image is being used in the Alliance Politics sub-forum and then the actual text of the image be placed into spoiler tags.   Posting in All Caps
      Posting large amounts of text in capital letters is not permitted. Use discretion when using your caps lock key.   No Discussion Forums
      There are forums that are not for discussion and are used strictly for game and forum staff to address certain issues, bugs, etc. The following forums are not open to discussion: Report Game Abuse, Report Forum Abuse, and Warn/Ban Appeals. Only moderators and the original poster may post in a thread, period, with absolutely no exceptions. Users found disobeying this guideline will receive an automatic warning for each offense.   Moderation Forums
      All Moderation forums also maintain pinned threads clearly marked as required reading before posting. Failure to read and follow required reading and procedure in a Moderation forum will result in a warning. Examples include posting requests in the wrong forum, failure to include all required information in posts, etc. The standard of conduct and enforcement of rules in Moderation forums is strictly enforced and the repercussions for disregarding rules or disrespecting staff are harsh. Read the pinned threads before posting and you will be fine.   Namecalling
      Excessive or unqualified namecalling is not allowed in IC forums; namecalling should also never make up the bulk of a post. Namecalling is prohibited entirely in all OOC forums.   Filtered Words
      Any attempts to evade the word filter will result in a warning. The terms we have filtered are filtered for a reason and no excuse for evasion will be accepted. Filter evasion includes censoring or deliberately misspelling part of a filtered word.   If you link to a website, image, video, etc., containing profanity, please post a disclaimer before the link. The moderation staff may still remove links if the content is deemed too obscene.   Harassment
      Forum users should not be stalking/harassing others on the forums. Anyone found stalking players from topic to topic, etc., will be subject to a warning.   Gravedigging
      Gravedigging is not allowed anywhere on the forums. Gravedigging is "bumping" old topics which haven't been active for quite some time (four to seven days is standard depending on the nature of the thread and how many pages back it had been pushed before bump). Your warn level will be raised if you are caught doing this.   The Suggestion Box and Black Market forums are partial exceptions to this rule. Suggestions/ideas in that forum may be posted in regardless of age PROVIDING that the reviving post contains constructive, on-topic input to the original topic or discussion. Black Market threads may be bumped by the author if there is new information about the offered exchange (i.e open aid slots). In the Player Created Alliances forum it will not be considered gravedigging to bump a topic up to a year old, so long as the alliance in question still exists and it is not a duplicate thread.   Signatures
      Those who fail to read and abide by these rules will have their signatures removed and receive a warning.   You may have only one image per signature which may not exceed the maximum size of 450 pixels wide by 150 pixels tall. You may have no more than 8 lines of text and text size cannot exceed size 4. Each quote-tag, image and empty line count as a line.   Inappropriate Images and Other Disallowed Images
      Images that are sexual in nature or have sexual overtones are prohibited. It is up to the discretion of the moderation staff to determine what constitutes sexual overtones. Depictions of kissing are permissible provided there are no sexual implications. Images depicting female nipples are prohibited outright.   Making “ASCII art” is prohibited regardless of the image depicted.   Using photos or likenesses of another Cyber Nations player is also prohibited.   Drug References
      Images and posts promoting illegal drug use are prohibited. References to drugs are acceptable only if the moderation staff deems that it is not promoting the use thereof.   Obscene Content and/or "Account Suicide"
      Anyone caught posting vulgar material (including but in no way limited to pornography, "gross," "tubgirl," "lemonparty," photos depicting RL illegal acts such as violence towards humans or animals, child pornography, death photos, and any other obscene or offensive material in either text form or picture form) will have their account(s) permanently banned, and their ISP contacted along with any other applicable internet and RL authorities.   OOC Threats / Revealing Personal Information
      An OOC threat of any nature will equate to an automatic ban from the game and forums. Likewise, the publishing of personal information of any other player without their explicit permission is grounds for warning and/or a ban from the game depending on the severity of the offense.   Death Threats / Death Wishes
      A death threat or a death wish of any nature (including but not limited to telling another player to commit suicide) will result in at very least a 40% warn level increase and 2 day suspension from the forums, with harsher punishments, including a complete ban from the forums and game, up to the discretion of the moderation staff.   Quoting Rulebreaking Posts
      Do not quote any post with obscene content or any other content that has to be removed by the moderation staff. Doing so makes it more difficult for the moderation staff to find and remove all such content and will result in a warn level increase. Putting rulebreaking posts of any kind in your signature is prohibited.   Forum Names
      With the exception of moderator accounts, all forum accounts must match up exactly with the ruler name or nation name of your in-game country. Those found not matching up will be warned and banned immediately. Forum account names may not be profane or offensive.   Multiple Forum Accounts
      With the exception of moderators, if you are caught with multiple forum accounts, the multiple account(s) will be banned, warn level raised, and your identity will be announced by a moderator to the CN community so rule-abiding players can take IC action against you. Multiple forum account offenders will receive a varying percentage warn level raise and/or a permanent ban on a case-by-case basis.   Posting For Other Players
      Posting for banned or suspended players is prohibited, as is posting for any person without a nation. This includes making warn and ban appeals on their behalf.   Imitation &. Impersonation
      Imitation in terms of this forum is mimicking the posting, avatar, or signature styles of another user in an attempt to be satirical or generally humorous. Impersonation in terms of this forum is copying the posting, avatar, or signature styles of another user in order to present the illusion that the person is in fact that user. Imitation is fine and can be quite funny. Impersonation is disruptive and is warnable. Please pay attention to the subtle difference between these two concepts.   A player may not impersonate another player by emulating the characteristics of someone else's past or present account in an attempt to harass, stalk, or flamebait. Creating a new forum account in an attempt to impersonate a standing account will result in deletion and banning without notice.   Any attempt at imitation and/or impersonation of moderators and game staff is strictly prohibited and will be met with harsh repercussions.   Avatars
      Size for avatars is limited by the forum mechanics, therefore there is no size issue for a user to worry about. Avatars must be in good taste, and any avatar containing a picture that is too violent, disgusting, sexually explicit, insulting to another player or staff member, etc. will be removed. Avatars that are potentially seizure inducing will not be permitted. Players may not "borrow" the avatars of any moderator past or present without permission.   Swastikas and Nazi Imagery
      The swastika may not be used in signatures or avatars. Pictures of swastika's are acceptable for use in the In Character (IC) sections of the roleplay forums, so long as its context is In Character, and not Out Of Character. Pictures of Hitler, mentioning of the Holocaust, etc... have no place in the roleplay forums, since these people and events existed in real life, and have no bearing or place in the Cyberverse. Other Nazi or SS imagery is forbidden in all forums.   Moderation Staff
      The revealing of the private identities of any Cyber Nations staffers past or present is strictly prohibited, and thus no speculation/accusation of identity is allowed. Doing so is grounds for moderator action against your account appropriate to the offense, including a full forum/game ban.   Claims of moderator bias should be directed to the highest level of authority--the Head Game & Forum Mod/Admin, Keelah. Claims of moderator bias without supporting evidence is grounds for a warning.   Blatant disrespect of the moderator staff is strictly prohibited. This includes but is not limited to spoofing moderator accounts in any way, sig/avatar references, baiting, flaming, rude demands, mocking, attitude, and unsubstantiated claims of bias. They are volunteers hired to enforce the rules. If you have a problem with the way a moderator is enforcing the rules or the rules themselves please contact Keelah.   Attempting to use the moderation staff as a weapon by abusing the report system in an attempt to get another player warned or banned is strictly prohibited.   Do not ask about becoming or campaign to become a moderator. The moderators are drawn from CN membership but moderation positions are by invitation only. Asking to become one will substantially decrease your chances of ever being asked.   Aiding Rule Violators
      Any user found to know of a serious rule violation without reporting it to a game moderator (eg. knowledge of a user with multiple nations) will be given a warning or, in more serious cases, have their nation deleted.   Aiding Banned Players
      Any user found to be harboring, aiding or otherwise knowingly helping a banned user will be deleted. This includes knowing of their existence within the game without reporting it to the game-moderation staff.   Questionable Actions and Content
      The forum rules are not designed to cover every scenario. Any action that is seen to be counter-productive or harmful to the forum community may be met with moderator action against your account. The Cyber Nations Moderation Staff reserves the right to take action against your account without warning for any reason at any time.   Private Transactions
      Nation selling and other private transactions via such auction sites like eBay is against the Cyber Nations terms and conditions. While our moderators cannot control what people do outside of the game you are not allowed to promote such private exchanges on our forums without expressed permission from admin only. Anyone found to be engaging in such activity without permission will be banned from the game.   Advertising
      Advertising other browser games and forums is prohibited. Soliciting donations towards commercial causes is also prohibited. If you wish to ask for donations towards a charitable cause, please contact a moderator before doing so.   Extorting Donations
      Donations are excluded from any kind of IC payment. Anyone found extorting others for OOC payments will be warned in-game and/or banned.   Third Party Software
      Third party software is not allowed to be advertised on these forums by any means (post, signature, PM, etc). These programs can easily be used to put malware on the user's computer, and as such can cause huge security issues. Anybody who is caught spreading links to these will at the very least have their warning level increased.   Other Forum Terms & Rules   Please take a moment to review these rules detailed below. If you agree with them and wish to proceed with the registration, simply click the "Register" button below. To cancel this registration, simply hit the 'back' button on your browser.   Please remember that we are not responsible for any messages posted. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. USE THE WEB SITE AT YOUR OWN RISK. We will not be liable for any damages for any reason. THIS WEB SITE IS PROVIDED TO YOU "AS IS," WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.   The messages express the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of this bulletin board. Any user who feels that a posted message is objectionable is encouraged to contact us immediately by email. We have the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.   You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this bulletin board to post any material which is knowingly false and/or defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise violative of any law.   You agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or by this bulletin board.
Immortan Junka

Libertarian Party of Cybernations Consent Decree

201 posts in this topic

4 minutes ago, Alonso Quixano said:

 

No, but there have been more than just this latest person, whom left ISX, and has said bad things about it. When there are more ex-members speaking out against ISX, than current, non-gov, members speaking up for it. It sure does say something. 

 

You may wish to ignore that there has always been more detractors than defenders of the Imperium, especially from those who have left. I have never talked to someone who has left the Imperium who had a positive experience in it. 

 

Also. The "big boy" forums are not representative of every nation speaking out against the Imperium. As well as, this ex-member speaking out on the forums, I have a hard time believing that he barely interacted with his previous AA, when he is out on the main forums interacting with the world. Unless he is an anomaly, which is doubtful, he probably interacted fairly consistently with his previous AA, and you're just down playing it. 

 

The Imperium is not for everyone. It is a harsh, disciplined, authoritarian military alliance shaped by eight wars in the last two years. This isn't a rainbows and butterflies alliance so not sure what the point of yout rambling is.

Edited by Immortan Junka

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Immortan Junka said:

Galerion, Tk0Rahl and Sigrun are all sponsored candidates and coordinate regardless of who actually wins each month.

If Sigrun is out, then the real LPC loses all Senate influence and it's just SNX holding influence. SNX never agreed as an alliance to become a full LPC members and respect their policies either. 

 

Seems you're trying to pull a fast one to wrestle all Senate influence from the LPC. You're making it harder rather than easier for Sigrun to hold a seat when you don't priorize Sigrun's seat before claiming extras for SNX.

 

Seems clear it's just SNX holding influence on Brown you care about and this stunt where you pretend to be LPC is so they give up their Senate power without a fight.

Edited by Sephiroth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Immortan Junka said:

 

The Imperium is not for everyone. It is a harsh, disciplined, authoritarian military alliance. This isn't a rainbows and butterflies alliance so not sure what the point of yout rambling is.

 

Point one is that there are more public detractors of the Imperium than public defenders of current members. You understood the point I was making, because you defended your alliance as authoritarian. Which is contradictory to the title of this announcement. 

 

Point two is that I'm happy that you finally stopped the sham of you saying you are even remotely close to Libertarian. Remember when you tried to tell me producerism was a libertarian ideal? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it wasn't for CA supporting the Imperium, many more would vote Sigrun. However now Sigrun has allowed himself to become reliant on SNX to hold a seat and Junka would rather maximize SNX seats instead.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Alonso Quixano said:

 

Point one is that there are more public detractors of the Imperium than public defenders of current members. You understood the point I was making, because you defended your alliance as authoritarian. Which is contradictory to the title of this announcement. 

 

Point two is that I'm happy that you finally stopped the sham of you saying you are even remotely close to Libertarian. Remember when you tried to tell me producerism was a libertarian ideal? 

 

What are you talking about?

 

First, we have so many detractors because we have made so many enemies. We are not some inactive AA that sits on the sidelines, we are actively implementing our vision for the world, and those who have tried to destroy us resent it.

 

Second, we are both authoritarian and libertarian because we are a voluntaryist alliance... membership is voluntary and comraderie built by those who have fought together to defend the Imperium and our Revolution.

 

We will still be standing, regardless of how many people complain about us or outright attack us, as several "detractors" in this thread have. I look forward to years more tears flowing because of our continued existence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You still haven't denied you're trying to take Sigrun's seat, you only claimed it doesn't matter if Sigrun has one anyways.

 

Even now if CA & aNiMaLz asked me help save them from SNX's treachery, I would pull whatever strings I need to in order to ensure Sigrun doesn't lose this election. However if Sigrun loses this election, that really will be the end of the LPC.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Immortan Junka said:

 

What are you talking about?

 

First, we have so many detractors because we have made so many enemies. We are not some inactive AA that sits on the sidelines, we are actively implementing our vision for the world, and those who have tried to destroy us resent it.

 

Second, we are both authoritarian and libertarian because we are a voluntaryist alliance... membership is voluntary and comraderie built by those who have fought together to defend the Imperium and our Revolution.

 

We will still be standing, regardless of how many people complain about us or outright attack us, as several "detractors" in this thread have. I look forward to years more tears flowing because of our continued existence.

 

 

Can you not read? There are more former members detracting on ISX, than current non-gov members defending it. Stop with the propaganda. Just read. There are more former members. Nations that were once apart of ISX, that left, and are detracting from ISX. Hopefully you're still with me. There are less current non-gov members than former members defending ISX. Which means the current members of ISX are not defending ISX. Did you make it this far? Hopefully you can understand what I have posted now. 

 

Go get a dictionary, read both definitions of governing style, and come back to me, and tell me that they are the same.

 

Again. Calm down on the propaganda, we're not your silly, dumb members here. We can see through your rhetoric, and propaganda. You can't even comprehend a normal rhetorical statement without trying to propaganda your way out of it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Alonso Quixano said:

 

 

Can you not read? There are more former members detracting on ISX, than current non-gov members defending it. Stop with the propaganda. Just read. There are more former members. Nations that were once apart of ISX, that left, and are detracting from ISX. Hopefully you're still with me. There are less current non-gov members than former members defending ISX. Which means the current members of ISX are not defending ISX. Did you make it this far? Hopefully you can understand what I have posted now. 

 

Go get a dictionary, read both definitions of governing style, and come back to me, and tell me that they are the same.

 

Again. Calm down on the propaganda, we're not your silly, dumb members here. We can see through your rhetoric, and propaganda. You can't even comprehend a normal rhetorical statement without trying to propaganda your way out of it. 

 

Nice, so the one or two people who left are more important than the 60+ "silly, dumb members" who remain. You really aren't getting any points for your rhetoric either Alonso.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Immortan Junka said:

 

Nice, so the one or two people who left are more important than the 60+ "silly, dumb members" who remain. You really aren't getting any points for your rhetoric either Alonso.

What was that alliance called again, where most of the former SNX joined after you became leader and aligned them with Doom Sphere?

 

It was more than one or two people who left, also you dealt with those who didn't agree with you rather harshly using your Doom allies. There is a reason most former SNX members don't like you. After you did a full shift in their foreign policy by becoming a tech farm for their enemies, you later helped roll them alongside other Doom alliances to try making an example of them. Rewriting history to one or two people leaving when the entire alliance fractured after you took over is a bit much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Immortan Junka said:

 

Nice, so the one or two people who left are more important than the 60+ "silly, dumb members" who remain. You really aren't getting any points for your rhetoric either Alonso.

 

Where did I say that? You are grasping at straws, and the english language. I made a comment about how there were more former in public, decrying ISX, than current non-gov members defending ISX. So, if you would actually try to refute my statement, instead of trying to use rhetoric, or propaganda. Please do so. 

 

Instead you are trying to put words in my mouth that I did not say. 

 

I'm also still waiting how in the world you believe that Libertarian, and Authoritarian can be even remotely considered to be the same leadership style. Because unless you can throw some feeble excuse together about them being so, you just clearly stated that you are not about the values of Libertarianism. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, Alonso Quixano said:

You may wish to ignore that there has always been more detractors than defenders of the Imperium, especially from those who have left. I have never talked to someone who has left the Imperium who had a positive experience in it.

 

It might surprise you to learn that those who leave any alliance are more likely to have had issues with it than those who stay. Particularly an alliance like SnX with its intentionally dense and intimidating signup. It's just kind of the way those things generally work. The people that like it the way it is stick around and the people that don't like it as it is leave, ideally to find an alliance more to their taste and move on, rather than feeling the need to post about how bad their previous alliance was constantly.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This discussion is over, I don't need to explain anything to either of you two. Go get a room.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Sephiroth said:

What was that alliance called again, where most of the former SNX joined after you became leader and aligned them with Doom Sphere?

 

It was more than one or two people who left, also you dealt with those who didn't agree with you rather harshly using your Doom allies. There is a reason most former SNX members don't like you. After you did a full shift in their foreign policy by becoming a tech farm for their enemies, you later helped roll them alongside other Doom alliances to try making an example of them. Rewriting history to one or two people leaving when the entire alliance fractured after you took over is a bit much.

The splinter had MasterChief77 as their leader, so it had to be put down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Sigrun Vapneir said:

 

It might surprise you to learn that those who leave any alliance are more likely to have had issues with it than those who stay. Particularly an alliance like SnX with its intentionally dense and intimidating signup. It's just kind of the way those things generally work. The people that like it the way it is stick around and the people that don't like it as it is leave, ideally to find an alliance more to their taste and move on, rather than feeling the need to post about how bad their previous alliance was constantly.

 

 

That's part of my point. That there are more former members saying ISX, in turn Junka, is not that great. Junka has said he is the alliance, which if you follow that logic. There are more members decrying Junka, than defending him. 

 

I've found more people ;eave because they are not happy with the current FA, or for more activity, which shouldn't be the case for ISX. I'm glad you like them, and want to defend them. There are just more former members detracting than current members defending. 

 

It's just a fact. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Immortan Junka said:

This discussion is over, I don't need to explain anything to either of you two. Go get a room.

 

Awe, little Junka had to take his toys home? No. You are correct that you don't need to explain anything to anyone. Yet don't make public statements saying that two things that are in definition opposed to each other, to conflate them as the same. It's telling that when someone can actually confront you with facts, and true statements, you go hide. 

 

You are apart of a bloc with Libertarian in it's title, yet you think Authoritarianism is the same as Libertarianism. 

 

So, please, go. Go take your toys, and leave the conversation because someone is pointing out your hypocrisies. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Franz Ferdinand said:

The splinter had MasterChief77 as their leader, so it had to be put down.

 

That doesn't negate the facts that more people than just two left the alliance because of Junka, and have decried it over the time Junka has lead. When you remove propaganda from rhetoric, you can clearly see that ISX has had many more former members decry that alliance, than current members every defend it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Franz Ferdinand said:

The splinter had MasterChief77 as their leader, so it had to be put down.

 

We had a valid Casus Belli since July for the reasons listed in the DoW and simply waited for an appropriate time:

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Immortan Junka said:

This discussion is over, I don't need to explain anything to either of you two. Go get a room.

The part on nobody from the LPC needing a seat apart from SNX, since you can then take away all power the LPC has over how the Senate is used?

 

I'm surprised the founding LPC members are still going along with your scheme. The LPC used to depend on support from nations scattered across the Brown Team, but ever since the Imperium claimed LPC membership suddenly voting LPC hasn't been so popular. You're killing the LPC right in front of them, yet somehow convincing them its for the best.

 

Although before this election ends, there is always that chance they will suddenly come to their senses and everything you've been working towards these last few months fall apart & you're revealed for what you are and always have been to the LPC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Immortan Junka said:

 

We had a valid Casus Belli since July for the reasons listed in the DoW and simply waited for an appropriate time:

 

 

Of which Doom Kingdom assisted due to Masterchief77's past actions while in the North Star Federation. That was the main reason why Doom Kingdom came in and quashed that splinter. If he wasn't the leader, the situation would likely have been different. It didn't help that he sat in Peace Mode for the entirety of it, and GATO had to hash out a deal to bail him out of the conflict to "retire" on their alliance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Sigrun Vapneir said:

You can discuss it all you want but you're talking out your caboose and then asserting your prior access to a non-public thread as backup for it, which is bull. If it really were there you'd be misusing information that you had access to in confidence, but it's doubly bull because that's not actually what happened in the thread!

 

So don't spout bull if you don't want to be called on it.

 

What information have I misused? I've provided no information, I made an opinion.

 

Going off you post it seems you store all information for later use, that says more about you than me who just reads it.

 

1 hour ago, Immortan Junka said:

One ex-member who barely interacted with his fellows is not representative of more than himself.

 

Hard to interact when no one really posts on the forums, hence one of the reasons for leaving: no community.

 

56 minutes ago, Alonso Quixano said:

I have a hard time believing that he barely interacted with his previous AA, when he is out on the main forums interacting with the world. Unless he is an anomaly, which is doubtful, he probably interacted fairly consistently with his previous AA, and you're just down playing it. 

 

There is more conversation in a morgue than at SNX.

Edited by Jay Kay

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You were never masked above Confidential access level, which is entry level, and never volunteered to do anything. 

 

It's ok, you weren't really our type anyway.

Edited by Immortan Junka

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Immortan Junka said:

You were never masked above Confidential access level, which is entry level, and never volunteered to do anything.

 

I thought you took your toys, and went home? Or are you going to only respond to others who have not directly confronted you on your wrong definitions of government styles? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Franz Ferdinand said:

Of which Doom Kingdom assisted due to Masterchief77's past actions while in the North Star Federation. That was the main reason why Doom Kingdom came in and quashed that splinter. If he wasn't the leader, the situation would likely have been different. It didn't help that he sat in Peace Mode for the entirety of it, and GATO had to hash out a deal to bail him out of the conflict to "retire" on their alliance.

 

I have no idea what micro drama NSF and Masterchief777 had to do with it, and I dont remember talking to you much about it being our primary points of contact were Lord Hershey and White Chocolate.

 

Maybe you are right, but I have no idea what that's about, since DK's actual leadership never told me that.

 

The official reason DK presented was it was in support of the Imperium, which it was.

 

SNX: 22 wars declared

Doom Kingdom: 11 wars

Doom Squad: 8 wars

Edited by Immortan Junka

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Immortan Junka said:

You were never masked above Confidential access level, which is entry level, and never volunteered to do anything. 

 

It's ok, you weren't really our type anyway.

 

Oh so only active in the government, seems I was mislead in my recruitment message, shame on you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Jay Kay said:

 

Oh so only active in the government, seems I was mislead in my recruitment message, shame on you.

 

What did you expect, sitting around singing kumbaya? Most of our people are active but quiet, following orders and doing management work when they can. There's chatting in the public lounge but most of us who fought wars arent here to chit chat.

 

Maybe you should have joined MI6 a couple years ago, it would have been a better fit.

Edited by Immortan Junka

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now