Garion Posted November 26, 2014 Report Share Posted November 26, 2014 Roll Wasso. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ovidsidios Posted November 26, 2014 Report Share Posted November 26, 2014 We’re invoking the optional aggression clause of our treaty with the Fellowship of the Wolves. Choosing our treaty to oA off of? I think I just found one more reason to love you guys. Sorry for the late response. It took me forever to find that particular face. The lights of heaven will glow with our shared victories. o/AB o/FTW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wasso Posted November 27, 2014 Report Share Posted November 27, 2014 Roll Wasso. Wise man , wise words :facepalm: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baltus Posted November 27, 2014 Report Share Posted November 27, 2014 This announcement has too much Sarkin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wasso Posted November 27, 2014 Report Share Posted November 27, 2014 This announcement has too much Sarkin. Your comment is so Sarkin . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drake Spoke Posted November 27, 2014 Report Share Posted November 27, 2014 Where's Nitro? :'( I hate it when I'm late to the party I'll just have to make up for it ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smurthwaite Posted November 27, 2014 Report Share Posted November 27, 2014 10:1 odds, I would not call that a good fight. If nothing else, Polar should have more targets to nuke. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister black Posted November 27, 2014 Report Share Posted November 27, 2014 Lol. Wow polaris defends allies then everyone attacks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schad Posted November 27, 2014 Report Share Posted November 27, 2014 Lol. Wow polaris defends allies then everyone attacks. That is a mostly adequate description of how chained warfare works, sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auctor Posted November 27, 2014 Report Share Posted November 27, 2014 That is a mostly adequate description of how chained warfare works, sure.It's too bad we don't have a master negotiator to resolve these problems before they escalate out of control like this... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlmightyGrub Posted November 27, 2014 Report Share Posted November 27, 2014 It almost feels like it was planned this way :O Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schad Posted November 27, 2014 Report Share Posted November 27, 2014 It almost feels like it was planned this way :o I cannot help but get the impression that you believe that there was or is a shadowy cabal of alliance leaders on our side, meeting more or less in secret, colluding on who goes where and when, shuffling alliances like so many pieces on a game board. What an imagination you have, my dear fellow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ovidsidios Posted November 27, 2014 Report Share Posted November 27, 2014 (edited) What an imagination you have, my dear fellow. Nay, it's heresy. Edited November 27, 2014 by Ovidsidios Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Zigur Posted November 27, 2014 Report Share Posted November 27, 2014 I cannot help but get the impression that you believe that there was or is a shadowy cabal of alliance leaders on our side, meeting more or less in secret, colluding on who goes where and when, shuffling alliances like so many pieces on a game board. What an imagination you have, my dear fellow. God King not cabal. Cabal would imply a level of collective leadership and vision which is lacking on your side. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schad Posted November 27, 2014 Report Share Posted November 27, 2014 God Kings don't do conference calls. Instead, we meet to divine his will from the clues to yesterday's New York Times crossword. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarkin Posted November 27, 2014 Author Report Share Posted November 27, 2014 God King not cabal. Cabal would imply a level of collective leadership and vision which is lacking on your side. You're right. Everything in this coalition has pretty much been my idea. Ask around, you'll see that God King Sarkin rules the Lulzist forces with an iron fist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auctor Posted November 27, 2014 Report Share Posted November 27, 2014 You're right. Everything in this coalition has pretty much been my idea. Ask around, you'll see that God King Sarkin rules the Lulzist forces with an iron fist.this is why we can't have nice things. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ovidsidios Posted November 27, 2014 Report Share Posted November 27, 2014 this is why we can't have nice things. or is it why we can? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saxasm Posted November 27, 2014 Report Share Posted November 27, 2014 or is it why we can? I'm pretty certain none of us have any nice things. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jutopia la Posted November 27, 2014 Report Share Posted November 27, 2014 I'm pretty certain none of us have any nice things. EMP nukes with battle support, dude. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canik Posted November 27, 2014 Report Share Posted November 27, 2014 (edited) whoops wrong thread, carry on o/ Edited November 27, 2014 by Big Ego Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.